Capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease: diagnostic yield and safety.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is increasingly used in patients with suspected or known Crohn's disease (CD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic yield of CE and the distribution of small-bowel (SB) lesions in symptomatic patients with known CD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of CE procedures performed in patients with CD between 2001 and 2005 in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-four patients with an established diagnosis of CD and symptoms suggestive of active disease. INTERVENTIONS: Swallowing the capsule. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic yield of CE and distribution of SB lesions in patients with CD. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six CE procedures were performed on 134 CD patients. Fifty-two (39%) of 134 patients had CE findings diagnostic of active CD (> 3 ulcerations), and 17 (13%) had findings suggestive of active CD (< or = 3 ulcerations). Fifty-seven (42%) patients had normal findings, and 6% had normal but incomplete studies. The distribution of SB lesions was 32% in the duodenum, 53% in the jejunum, 67% in the proximal ileum, and 85% in the distal ileum. CE was comparable to ileoscopy in detecting ileal ulcerations (55% vs 48%), but superior to SB follow-through in detecting CD lesions in the SB (incremental yield of 32%; 95% CI, 9%-54%; P = .0017). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study from a single center. CONCLUSIONS: CE identified SB lesions in approximately half of symptomatic CD patients. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether positive CE findings may affect disease outcomes.

Agreement between central venous and arterial blood gas measurements in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Venous blood gas (VBG) analysis is a safer procedure than arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and may be an alternative for determining acid-base status. The objective of this study was to examine the agreement between ABG and central VBG samples for all commonly used parameters in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) population. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a single-center, prospective trial to assess the agreement between arterial and central VBG measurements in a medical ICU. Adult patients who were admitted to the ICU and required both a central venous line and an arterial line were enrolled. When an ABG was performed, a central venous sample was obtained to examine the agreement among the pH, Pco(2), and bicarbonate. Data comparing central and peripheral VBG values were also obtained. RESULTS: The mean arterial minus venous difference for pH, Pco(2), and bicarbonate was 0.027, -3.8, and -0.80, respectively. Bland-Altman plots for agreement of pH, Pco(2), and bicarbonate showed 95% limits of agreement of -0.028 to 0.081, -12.3 to 4.8, and -4.0 to 2.4, respectively. Regression equations were derived to predict arterial values from venous values as follows: Arterial pH = -0.307 + 1.05 x venous pH, arterial Pco(2) = 0.805 + 0.936 x venous Pco(2), and arterial bicarbonate = 0.513 + 0.945 x venous bicarbonate. The mean central minus peripheral differences for pH, Pco(2), and bicarbonate were not clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral or central venous pH, Pco(2), and bicarbonate can replace their arterial equivalents in many clinical contexts encountered in the ICU.