Outcomes of plastic closure in gastroschisis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is a congenital abdominal wall defect in which the intestines develop outside the abdomen and are exposed to amniotic fluid. When the defect is small, lymphatic, venous, and intestinal obstruction may occur and contribute to the formation of intestinal edema, atresia, ischemia, and a thick inflammatory peel. Treatment requires early coverage of abdominal contents either by primary closure or by the placement of temporary Silastic silo followed by abdominal wall closure. Currently, both traditional suture closure and the sutureless plastic closure are being employed to repair the gastroschisis defect. The goal of the current study is to evaluate plastic closure. We predict no difference will be found in clinical outcomes between plastic closure and traditional suture closure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 80 patients treated between 2000 and 2009 was performed. Plastic closure was used in 52 (65%) and traditional suture closure in 28 (35%) babies. The surgical procedure was determined by surgeon preference. Of the 31(39%) babies who required silos, 15 (19%) were treated with plastic closure and 16 (20%) underwent traditional closure. We collected the following demographic data and clinical progression data. Using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC), we conducted linear regression, logistic regression, and time to event models to compare the following outcomes: days on ventilator, days to start enteral feeds, days to reach goal enteral feeds, days on total parenteral nutrition, hospital charges, duration of stay, mortality, and complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 11.4 months. Patients spent an average of 6 days on the ventilator. There were 2 mortalities. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that no differences were found between the 2 closures with most of the outcomes; however, when compared with traditional suture closure, those babies treated with plastic closure spent 4 days fewer days on the ventilator (P < .01). Those babies who underwent suture closure were more likely to have an infection or sepsis (odds ratio, 5.15; P < .001). When the entire cohort was considered, no significant difference was found between plastic and suture closure in time to start feeds, time to reach goal feeds, time on parenteral nutrition, hospital charges, duration of stay, or complications. Ventral hernias were noted in 46 (58%) patients, 32 (62%) after plastic closure and 14 (50%) after suture closure (P = .32). Hernia repair was required in 16 (20%) patients, 11 (21%) after plastic closure, and 5 (18%) after traditional repair (P = .32). In the silo cohort, children treated with plastic closure required 7.5(P < .01) fewer days to start enteral feeds than those treated with suture closure. CONCLUSION: Plastic closure of abdominal wall defects in gastroschisis is effective both as a primary procedure and after silo placement. A multivariate analysis shows plastic closure to be associated with fewer days of mechanical ventilation and less likelihood of developing infection or sepsis.

Fetal extraperitoneal rectal perforation: a rare neonatal emergency.

PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal bowel perforation may occur in utero as a result of a variety of abnormalities and typically results in sterile meconium ascites, pseudocysts, and/or calcification in the fetus. On the other hand, extraperitoneal bowel perforation in intrauterine life is extremely rare. The object of this report is to present our experience of prenatal extraperitoneal rectal perforation, defining the clinical presentation, management, and progress. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine babies who were identified from 2 centers in the Republic of South Africa with fetal extraperitoneal rectal perforation are presented. The details of these babies were obtained retrospectively from the case notes. RESULTS: All patients presented at or shortly after birth with air and meconium tracking below the pelvic floor manifesting as either an expanding, meconium-stained aerocele or with perirectal spreading sepsis. Where abdominal signs were present, laparotomy confirmed the extension of the meconium perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Management was by diverting colostomy, drainage of the perineal collection, and supportive therapy. A posterior approach to the rectum and excision of a fibrotic section of the lower rectal wall was performed in one case. One case developed rectal stenosis that was treated by dilatation before colostomy closure. In all the other cases, digital examination performed before colostomy closure ruled out significant narrowing. There was no mortality, and the site of the rectal perforation healed in all cases to leave good anorectal function after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal extraperitoneal perforation is extremely rare, but the clinical features are easily recognizable, and when appropriate therapy is instituted, the outcome is likely to be good with normal anorectal function to be expected in the long-term. The exact cause of the condition is unknown.

Formalin treatment of refractory hemorrhagic cystitis.

Severe hemorrhagic cystitis can be a devastating complication of chemotherapy. Intravesical formalin may obviate the need for radical surgery in the face of failure of other conservative measures. Open instillation is favored in order to reduce the risk of complications.

Appendico-cutaneous fistula in cystic fibrosis.

Appendico-cutaneous fistulae are rare. We describe a 12-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis (CF) and a chronically draining sinus in the right iliac fossa, found to be a primary appendico-cutaneous fistula. Misdiagnosis of right iliac fossa pain in patients with CF and the preponderance of complicated disease frequently lead to manifestations of appendicitis rarely seen in usual clinical practice.