Surgery After Primary Dexamethasone Treatment for Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma-A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to quantify the need for additional surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) primarily treated with dexamethasone and to identify patient characteristics associated with additional surgery. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 283 patients with CSDH, primarily treated with dexamethasone, in 3 hospitals from 2008 to 2018. Primary outcome was the need for additional surgery. The association between baseline characteristics and additional surgery was analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: In total, 283 patients with CSDH were included: 146 patients (51.6%) received 1 dexamethasone course (DXM group), 30 patients (10.6%) received 2 dexamethasone courses (DXM-DXM group), and 107 patients (37.8%) received additional surgery (DXM-SURG group). Patients who underwent surgery more often had a Markwalder Grading Scale of 2 (as compared with 1, aOR 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-4.65), used statins (aOR 2.09; 95% CI 1.01-4.33), had a larger midline shift (aOR 1.10 per mm; 95% CI 1.01-1.21) and had larger hematoma thickness (aOR 1.16 per mm; 95% CI 1.09-1.23), had a bilateral hematoma (aOR 1.85; 95% CI 0.90-3.79), and had a separated hematoma (as compared with homogeneous, aOR 1.77; 95% CI 0.72-4.38). Antithrombotics (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.95) and trabecular hematoma (as compared with homogeneous, aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.77) were associated with a lower likelihood of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of patients with CSDH primarily treated with dexamethasone received additional surgery. These patients were more severely affected amongst others with larger hematomas.

Prevalence and calcification of intracranial arterial stenotic lesions as assessed with multidetector computed tomography angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in patients with recent ischemic stroke is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. More insight into the pathophysiology of ICAS could help identify patients at high risk requiring more aggressive secondary prevention. We evaluated the prevalence, distribution, calcification, and the risk factors predisposing ICAS in a European stroke population. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke (n=786) were evaluated for the presence and distribution of ICAS (≥30% luminal narrowing) by CT angiography. ICAS were categorized as symptomatic or asymptomatic, and the presence of calcification was assessed. The association of traditional cerebrovascular risk factors and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate with ICAS was analyzed. RESULTS: In 178 of 786 patients (23%), 288 ICAS were observed. Most stenoses (n=194/288; 67%) were located in the posterior circulation arteries. In 59 of 786 patients (8%), ICAS were considered symptomatic. ICAS in the basilar artery and arteries beyond the circle of Willis were mainly noncalcified. In addition to age, gender, and several traditional cerebrovascular risk factors, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was independently associated with the presence of ICAS (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36) and with the presence of noncalcified ICAS in particular (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: ICAS was observed in a noteworthy number of European stroke patients. Particularly, the majority of ICAS was observed in the posterior circulation, possibly conferring worse prognosis. ICAS in distal arteries were mainly noncalcified. Association of noncalcified ICAS and erythrocyte sedimentation rate may indicate a prominent role for inflammatory factors in intracranial atherosclerotic disease.