Development of an individualized scoring system to predict mid-term survival after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a prophylactic surgery focused in preventing stroke in the mid-long term. The purpose of this study was to analyze mid-term mortality in patients undergoing CEA, identify predictors of 3-year mortality and design a score to estimate individual risk of mortality in this population. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study including consecutive patients undergoing CEA between 1997-2010. Demographic data and comorbidities, postoperative results and patient follow-up data were registered and evaluated. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to analyze survival. After multivariable COX regression analysis, a score based on the calculated Hazards Ratios (HR) was designed. The sum of all points performed the individual score for each patient for estimating 3-years mortality. Population was stratified into four groups according to percentiles of score obtained: Group A (-7 to 4 points), Group B (5-8 points), Group C (9-10 points), Group D (score greater than 11 points). RESULTS: A total of 453 patients with a mean follow-up of 53.4 months were included in the study. Overall 3-year survival was 88.4%. On the univariate analysis the variables associated with significant increasing in 3-year mortality were: female gender (OR 2.32), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.28), COPD (OR 2.98), ischemic heart disease (OR 2.29), critical carotid stenosis >90% (OR 2.16) and antiplatelet therapy as a protective factor (OR 0,23). Factors associated with mortality in multivariate analysis were age (HR 1.14 P=0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.62, P=0.031), COPD (HR 1.88 P=0.022), ischemic heart disease (HR 1.59 P=0.05), critical stenosis >90% (HR 1.70 P=0.015) and antiplatelet therapy as a protective factor (HR 0.23 P=0.027). The scoring system includes the following items: female gender (+2 points), age (50-69 years +7 points, 70-79 years +12 points, >80 years +15 points), diabetes (+4 points), COPD (+5 points), ischemic heart disease (+4 points), carotid stenosis> 90% (+4 points). Antiplatelet (-7 points). The score range from -7 to 26 points. The 3-year mortality range was 5.6% (group A) versus 25.5% (group D). The incidence of stroke at 3-year folllow-up was not correlated with the score (99%, 100%, 97% and 94.5%, respectively groups A-D, P=0.11) CONCLUSIONS: The score developed based on the risk factors of mortality allows individualized risk prediction of 3-year mortality in patients with carotid stenosis. This represents a useful and practical tool for decision-making in the indication of the CEA, allowing surgeons to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from medical treatment due to their limited life expectancy, mainly in asymptomatic patients.

Applicability of Zenith p-branch Standard Fenestrated Endograft in Our Series.

BACKGROUND: In the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with short or absent infrarenal neck, the delay in the availability of fenestrated device and its high cost, have led to the manufacture of standardized models. Another option is the endografts with stents in parallel; however, regulated criteria for their use and long-term studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to assessed whether the AAA treated with fenestrated device or stents in parallel in our department, complied with the characteristics for the placement of the new endograft p-branch(®). Furthermore, the differences between the p-branch and the implanted prosthesis were analyzed. METHODS: Single-center and descriptive study of 41 aneurysms treated consecutively from 2008 to 2015. The anatomic characteristics analyzed were: relative distances between the visceral arteries, time position, diameter in the sealing area and number of fenestrations, and its compatibility with the p-branch. RESULTS: The anatomic compatibility rate with the p-branch options was 73.2% (30 cases). Of the 11 incompatible cases, 6 were due to misalignment of the visceral branches, 2 due to the aortic neck diameter being greater, another because the femoral access was inappropriate, and 2 more due to the fenestration configuration. Of the 30 cases in which compatibility existed, in 12 (40%) the configuration used coincided with the p-branch. In 13 cases, the number of fenestrations was higher than those actually used, with 23 fenestrations carried out and 39 hypothetical fenestrations with the new endograft. In the 5 remaining cases, a fenestration for the celiac trunk was necessary to achieve an adequate seal. CONCLUSIONS: The p-branch could meet the needs of three-quarters of the aortic anatomies of our series, with favorable expectations on cost and waiting time. However, in most cases either a higher number of fenestrations are needed for visceral arteries or the proximal seal was shorter than would be ideal.

Endograft-assisted coil embolization of a celiac trunk aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Celiac trunk aneurysms are rare but potential life-threatening lesions. Endovascular techniques are more often used for their treatment because of low rates of morbidity and mortality. CASE REPORT: We describe a modification of stent-assisted coil embolization technique more commonly used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysm, to exclude a 50-mm diameter celiac trunk aneurysm. The patient was a 67-year-old man who had a previous exclusion of a symptomatic aortic aneurysm, with occlusion of the inferior mesenteric and both hypogastric arteries. Anatomic features of the celiac trunk aneurysm and its branches do not allow treatment with a straight endograft or maintain direct flow to the hepatic artery. We then performed an endograft-assisted coil embolization of the aneurysm, with a straight flow line to the splenic artery. CONCLUSION: Endograft-assisted coil embolization is a feasible and safe technique to allow selective embolization of the sac and the presence of direct flow to the splenic artery and indirect flow to the hepatic artery.

[Natural history of moderate-degree carotid stenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease]. / Historia natural de la estenosis carotídea de grado moderado en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To understand the evolution of moderate asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the factors that influence its progression and the related morbimortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 133 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis between 50-69% in one or both carotids between 2002 and 2009. Included patients were subjected to screening for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), aneurysmal disease or carotid bruit. The monitoring was carried out using an annual duplex scan. The rate of progression, the variables related to this, the appearance of neurological events, and global and cardiovascular mortality were evaluated. Descriptive studies, univariate analysis (chi-squared test and Student's t-test), multivariate analysis (logistic regression), and survival curves (Log-Rank test) were carried out. RESULTS: With an average time of monitoring: 30.8 ± 1.7 months, stenosis progression was observed in 33% of the patients, with an average progression time of 31.3 ± 2.7 months. Greater progression was observed in the subgroup of patients with PAD and ischemic heart disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.84, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.14-7.03). In the multivariate analysis only the PAD was identified as a risk factor for progression (P=.043). The group of patients with progression showed greater rates of neurological events: 15 vs. 1.6% (P=.01), greater global mortality: 15 vs. 3% (P=.04), and greater cardiovascular mortality: 12.1 vs. 1.5% (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis between 50-69% is common in patients subjected to screening, especially in those with a history of ischaemic heart disease and/or PAD. This progression is associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular complications. For this reason, we recommend clinical and echographic follow-up of these patients.

Endovascular repair of an iliac arteriovenous fistula secondary to perforation from a common iliac aneurysm in a patient with Ehler-Danlos syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Type IV Ehler-Danlos syndrome (EDS) patients are prone to life-threatening vascular complications. Surgical management of those complications is challenging owing to vessel wall fragility, which may result in hemorrhagic events and high mortality rates. Here we report a case of left common iliac aneurysm perforation of the ipsilateral iliac vein repaired using endovascular technique in a patient with EDS. METHOD AND RESULTS: A 54-year-old patient presented with heart failure symptoms that evolved over 1 week in association with left leg edema and steal syndrome due to a perforation of the left iliac vein caused by a left common iliac aneurysm. A thrombosed right common iliac aneurysm and several other visceral and peripheral aneurysms were discovered on computed tomographic scan at admission. An aortouniiliac stent graft was used to seal the fistula. After 18 months of follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that endovascular therapy is useful to manage vascular complications in patients with EDS.

Primary aortoduodenal fistula in a patient with pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Primary aortoenteric fistula is a rare and extremely serious condition. In most cases, it is caused by an abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting with symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnosis is difficult owing to its rarity and the fact that diagnostic tests are not definitive in many cases. Surgery is performed urgently in most cases and is associated with high mortality. We report a case of a 65-year-old man presenting with symptoms of abdominal pain and massive rectal hemorrhage. Computed tomography revealed a pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and suspected aortoenteric fistula. The patient underwent an emergency surgery, confirming the suspected diagnosis. The surgery performed was the traditionally recommended extra-anatomical bypass with aortic ligation and repair of the intestinal defect. We describe the clinical condition and provide an up-to-date overview of diagnosis and treatment by reviewing the literature. We believe the therapeutic decision should be personalized by assessing the anatomy of the aneurysm, the patient's clinical status, the degree of local contamination, and the surgeon's experience with each of the techniques.

Popliteal artery aneurysm in patient with Klippel--Trénaunay--Weber syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The association of Klippel-Trénaunay-Weber syndrome (KTWS) with artery aneurysms is very rare. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 61-year-old man, diagnosed with left lower limb KTWS, presented with a venous ulcer and a popliteal aneurysm measuring 3.5 cm in diameter in the same limb. Endovascular treatment with covered stent was applied with good morphological and clinical results. CONCLUSION: We report a singular case of the association of a popliteal aneurysm with KTWS and its endovascular treatment. This treatment enabled exclusion of the popliteal artery aneurysm with safety and effectiveness and reduced the number of arteriovenous fistulas.

Endovascular treatment of a ruptured iliac aneurysm previously excluded.

We report a case of an isolated ruptured iliac artery aneurysm that had previously been treated, 25 months before, with iliac endovascular exclusion. Urgent computed tomographic (CT) scan showed the retroperitoneal hematoma and a type IA endoleak. On an emergency basis, at the operating room, an aortouni-iliac graft and femorofemoral crossover bypass were performed, successfully. This is a very rare but serious complication and requires careful indication and close follow-up with CT. In isolated common iliac artery aneurysms, the common iliac artery and distal aorta may tend to enlarge with failure of the endograft proximal attachment site and migration, thus leading to a late aneurysm rupture. A safe length and width, especially of the proximal sealing zone, should be accurately defined and closely followed up, or otherwise complete exclusion of the aortoiliac arteries should be considered.

[Value of the Doppler-ultrasonography for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis]. / Valor de la ecografía Doppler en el diagnóstico de la arteritis de la temporal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of color Doppler-ultrasonography (CDU) compared with biopsy for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis (TA). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Twenty-three patients with suspected TA on the basis of clinical criteria were evaluated with CDU prior to temporal artery biopsy. The presence of a hypoechoic halo, suggesting edema of the inflamed vessel, and inflammatory stenoses were registered. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and eficiency or global test value (GTV) were evaluated. RESULTS: All patients completed a bilateral CDU examination of temporal arteries, and in 72% of patients the biopsy was negative for TA. When the presence of an halo in CDU examination was regarded as determinant for disease, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and GTV compared with TA histologic confirmation were 80%, 92%, 80%, 92% and 88%, respectively. When the criteria used was presence of the halo sign with or without inflammatory stenosis, the values were 100%, 77%, 62.5%, 100% and 83% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high sensitivity and NPV, we consider CDU as a good screening test for the diagnosis of TA.

[Effect of renal revascularization techniques on renal function and blood pressure control]. / Efecto de las técnicas de revascularización renal en la función del riñón y en el control de la presión arterial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of renal revascularization on renal function and blood pressure control. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of primary renal revascularization procedures performed during a 6-year period. Parameters of renal function and blood pressure control were assessed before and after the procedure. RESULTS: Forty consecutive renal artery revascularizations were performed in 36 patients (12 aorto-renal bypasses and 28 percutaneous transluminal angioplasties, 4 bilateral). At the first month, the renal function improved in 50% cases, but at the mean follow-up it improved only in 26%. At the first month, blood pressure control improved in 50% patients, but at the mean follow-up, it only improved in 28%. CONCLUSIONS: Renal revascularization does not offer a medium-term benefit in most patients.