Assessment of the pelvic pain experienced by infertile women is of prime importance for diagnosing endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence regarding the significance of painful symptoms among women suffering from infertility. DESIGN: An observational retrospective cross-sectional study SETTINGS: University hospital-based research center PATIENTS: Infertile patients aged between 18-42 years surgically explored for benign gynecological conditions between 01-2004 and 12-2020. INTERVENTION(S): For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview conducted by the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. Preoperative assessment the pain symptoms was recorded. Pain intensity was assessed with a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). The pain was considered to be severe when the VAS score was ≥ 7. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surgery was performed in 839 infertile women. 451 women had severe pelvic pain. Infertile patients with severe pain significantly more often had endometriosis (67.4% versus 30.7% respectively; p<0.001) than infertile women without severe pelvic pain, and especially deep infiltrating lesions (43.2% versus 8.5% respectively; p<0.001). Moreover, these women more often had intestinal endometriosis lesions (28.4% versus 1.8%; p<0.001). After multivariable regression analysis, the presence of endometriosis, irrespective of the phenotype (superficial lesions (OR1.84[1.19-2.86] and/or ovarian endometrioma OR 2.79[1.70-4.59] and/or deep infiltrating endometriosis OR 4.49[2.69-7.51]), and the presence of at least one intestine endometriosis lesion (OR6.49[2.69-7.51] were significantly associated with severe pelvic pain. CONCLUSION: Severe pelvic pain is significantly associated with endometriosis and especially deep infiltrating lesions in a population of infertile women. These results demonstrate the importance of thorough questioning regarding pelvic pain symptoms during the initial management of infertile patients.

An integrated multi-tissue approach for endometriosis candidate biomarkers: a systematic review.

Biomarker identification could help in deciphering endometriosis pathophysiology in addition to their use in the development of non invasive diagnostic and prognostic approaches, that are essential to greatly improve patient care. Despite extensive efforts, no single potential biomarker or combination has been clinically validated for endometriosis.Many studies have investigated endometriosis-associated biological markers in specific tissues, but an integrative approach across tissues is lacking. The aim of this review is to propose a comprehensive overview of identified biomarkers based on tissue or biological compartment, while taking into account endometriosis phenotypes (superficial, ovarian or deep, or rASRM stages), menstrual cycle phases, treatments and symptoms.We searched PubMed and Embase databases for articles matching the following criteria: 'endometriosis' present in the title and the associated term 'biomarkers' found as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms or in all fields. We restricted to publications in English and on human populations. Relevant articles published between 01 January 2005 (when endometriosis phenotypes start to be described in papers) and 01 September 2022 were critically analysed and discussed.Four hundred forty seven articles on endometriosis biomarkers that included a control group without endometriosis and provided specific information on endometriosis phenotypes are included in this review. Presence of information or adjustment controlling for menstrual cycle phase, symptoms and treatments is highlighted, and the results are further summarized by biological compartment. The 9 biological compartments studied for endometriosis biomarker research are in order of frequency: peripheral blood, eutopic endometrium, peritoneal fluid, ovaries, urine, menstrual blood, saliva, feces and cervical mucus. Adjustments of results on disease phenotypes, cycle phases, treatments and symptoms are present in 70%, 29%, 3% and 6% of selected articles, respectively. A total of 1107 biomarkers were identified in these biological compartments. Of these, 74 were found in several biological compartments by at least two independent research teams and only 4 (TNF-a, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and miR-451) are detected in at least 3 tissues with cohorts of 30 women or more.Integrative analysis is a crucial step to highlight potential pitfalls behind the lack of success in the search for clinically relevant endometriosis biomarkers, and to illuminate the physiopathology of this disease.

IVF/ICSI Outcomes After a Freeze-All Strategy: an Observational Cohort Study.

In order to inform patients undergoing ART regarding their chances for motherhood, it seems useful to describe "freeze all" outcomes according to the different potential indications. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of a "freeze-all approach" on the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) according to the indication. It is a cohort study including women who had undergone ovarian stimulation (OS) using an antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering between 09.2016 and 09.2018 followed by a freeze-all cycle of blastocyst embryos. The ART outcomes were compared between the two main indications of the freeze-all strategy which were in our cohort: risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and endometriosis. The ART outcomes were also described for the others indications (inadequate endometrium and/or premature progesterone elevation at trigger day, two or more previous ART failures, and autoimmune disease and/or a high risk of thromboembolic disease (AI and/or TE risk)). In total, 658 women were included. The cLBR in the total population was 37.7% (248/658). The cLBR was significantly higher in the "OHSS risk" group (133/281, 47.3%) than in the "endometriosis" group (69/190, 36.3%) (p = 0.017). No significant differences were noted regarding perinatal outcomes, except a significantly higher risk of placenta praevia (PP) observed in the "endometriosis" group (10.1%) (p = 0.002). The "freeze-all approach" yielded good results in terms of the cLBR and especially in case of OHSS risk. These data should be taken into account when informing patients about the ART strategy and their chances of motherhood.

Fertility preservation for patients affected by endometriosis should ideally be carried out before surgery.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What prognostic factors relate to a high oocyte yield in fertility preservation for women affected by endometriosis? DESIGN: Observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary care university hospital between April 2015 and January 2019. Women who had undergone fertility preservation with ovarian stimulation for oocytes and embryo vitrification for endometriosis were included. Prognostic factors associated with the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 146 women who had undergone 258 ovarian stimulation cycles were included; 82 (56.2%) had undergone more than one ovarian stimulation cycle; 72.6% had at least one endometrioma lesion; and 36.3% had previously undergone surgery for endometriosis. After adjustment by multiple linear regression, the factors that significantly reduced the number of oocytes retrieved were previous history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis (coefficient -1.08; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.15; P = 0.024); women's age (-0.21; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.01; P = 0.039); and total dose of gonadotrophin used (-0.01; 95% CI -0.01 to -0.00; P = 0.047). Anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and gravidity positively correlated with an increase in the number of oocytes retrieved (1.65; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.17; P < 0.001 and 3.30; 95% CI 0.91 to 5.68; P = 0.007, respectively) after the first ovarian stimulation cycle. CONCLUSION: A history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis was associated with significantly lower oocyte yields. Fertility preservation should be integrated into endometriosis management. Fertility preservation should ideally be made available to the patient before surgery.

Adenomyosis is associated with specific proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) serum metabolic profiles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the adenomyosis phenotype affects the proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR)-based serum metabolic profile of patients. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: University hospital-based research center. PATIENTS: Seventy-seven patients who underwent laparoscopy for a benign gynecologic condition. INTERVENTIONS: Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and collection of a venous peripheral blood sample were performed during the preoperative workup. The women were allocated to the adenomyosis group (n = 32), or the control group (n = 45). The adenomyosis group was further subdivided into two groups: diffuse adenomyosis of the inner myometrium (n = 14) and focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium (n = 18). Other adenomyosis phenotypes were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Metabolomic profiling based on 1H-NMR spectroscopy in combination with statistical approaches. RESULTS: The serum metabolic profiles of the patients with adenomyosis indicated lower concentrations of 3-hydroxybutyrate, glutamate, and serine compared with controls. Conversely, the concentrations of proline, choline, citrate, 2-hydroxybutyrate, and creatinine were higher in the adenomyosis group. The focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium and the diffuse adenomyosis phenotypes also each exhibited a specific metabolic profile. CONCLUSION: Serum metabolic changes were detected in women with features of adenomyosis compared with their disease-free counterparts, and a number of specific metabolic pathways appear to be engaged according to the adenomyosis phenotype. The metabolites with altered levels are particularly involved in immune activation as well as cell proliferation and cell migration. Nevertheless, this study did find evidence of a correlation between metabolite levels and symptoms thought to be related to adenomyosis. Further studies are required to determine the clinical significance of these differences in metabolic profiles.

Endometriosis phenotypes are associated with specific serum metabolic profiles determined by proton-nuclear magnetic resonance.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the correlation between serum metabolic profile and endometriosis phenotype? DESIGN: A pilot study nestled in a prospective cohort study at a university hospital, including 46 patients with painful endometriosis who underwent surgery and 21 controls who did not have macroscopic endometriotic lesions. Endometriosis was strictly classified into two groups of 23 patients each: endometrioma (OMA) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Serum samples were collected before surgery for metabolomic profiling based on proton-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with statistical approaches. Comparative identification of the metabolites in the serum from endometriosis patients and from controls was carried out, including an analysis according to endometriosis phenotype. RESULTS: The serum metabolic profiles of the endometriosis patients revealed significantly lower concentrations of several amino acids compared with the controls, whereas the concentrations of free fatty acids and ketone bodies were significantly higher. The OMA and the DIE phenotypes each had a specific metabolic profile, with higher concentrations of two ketone bodies in the OMA group, and higher concentrations of free fatty acids and lipids in the DIE group. CONCLUSION: Proton-nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of serum samples were found to have ample potential for identifying metabolic changes associated with endometriosis phenotypes. This information may improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Impact of Supraphysiological Estradiol Serum Levels on Birth Weight in Singletons Born After Fresh Embryo Transfer.

In assisted reproductive technology, high estradiol (E2) levels at trigger may increase the risk of low birth weight (LBW). Our objective was to investigate the impact of supra-physiological E2 levels at trigger, on the rate of LBW in singleton pregnancies following fresh embryo transfers (ET), in a center that typically employs the 'freeze-all' strategy in case of high E2 levels, to prevent ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome risk. A cohort study was conducted in a university hospital between November 2012 and January 2017. The main inclusion criterion was having a live birth (LB) singleton (≥ 24 weeks of gestation) after a fresh-ET. Four groups were defined according to the E2 level at trigger, as quartiles of the entire patient population. The main measured outcome was the rate of LBW. 497 fresh-ET led to LB. Mean E2 level was 1608.4 ± 945.5 pg/ml. The groups were allocated as follows: 124LB in the Group E2 < 25 percentile(p) (1106.5 pg/ml), 124LB in the Group E2 [25p-50p] (1106.5-1439 pg/ml), 124LB in the Group E2[50p-75p] (1440-1915 pg/ml), and 125LB in the Group E2 > 75p (>1915 pg/ml). There was no significant difference in the rate of LBW (Group E2 < 25p, n = 8/124, (6.5%); Group E2[25p-50p], n = 15/124, (12.1%); Group E2 [50p-75p], n = 13/124, (10.4%); and Group E2 > 75p, n = 10/12, (8.1%); (p = 0.43)). After multivariate analysis, E2 level at trigger was not significantly correlated to the rate of LBW. In our cohort, E2 level on the day of hCG trigger was not associated with increased odds of LBW after fresh embryo transfers.

The Ovarian Response After Follicular Versus Luteal Phase Stimulation with a Double Stimulation Strategy.

The double-ovarian stimulation strategy has been proposed to optimize the number of oocytes retrieved within the shortest possible timeframe. The objective of this study is to explore the effectiveness of luteal phase (LP) ovarian stimulation as compared to the previous follicular phase (FP) stimulation in a double stimulation strategy. We conducted an observational cohort study of women scheduled for a double stimulation protocol between March 2014 and June 2017, who had completed the FP controlled ovarian stimulation (COS 1) and started the LP stimulation (COS 2) in the same cycle. Women received equivalent daily doses of gonadotropins in combination with GnRH-antagonist protocol for both the COS 1 and the COS 2 performed during the same cycle. Ovulation was triggered using GnRH-agonist in the two stimulations. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. A total of 77 patients were included in the analysis. The number of oocytes retrieved after COS 1 was significantly higher than after the COS 2 (5.25 ± 3.38 for COS 1 versus 3.83 ± 3.14 for COS 2; p = 0.001). The duration of the stimulation was significantly shorter, the total dose of injected gonadotropins was significantly lower, and the estradiol level on the trigger day was significantly higher with COS 1 as compared to COS 2. Stimulation during the LP in a double-successive stimulation strategy results in a lower ovarian response as compared to the FP equivalent daily dose stimulation.

Tobacco consumption is associated with slow-growing day-6 blastocysts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if there are any obvious clinical factors associated with delayed blastulation at day 6 (D6) compared with day 5 (D5). DESIGN: Monocentric observational cohort study from November 2012 to December 2018. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 941 women with an entire cohort of exclusively D5 blastocysts compared with 162 patients with a cohort of exclusively D6 blastocysts. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical characteristics and data related to the ovarian stimulation protocols. RESULTS: After univariate analysis, a significantly higher proportion of women who were active smokers was found in the D6 group compared with the D5 group (n = 22/162 [13.6%] vs. n = 82/941 [8.7%]). In addition, the women in the D6 group had a higher rank number of assisted reproductive technology (ART; total no. of ART cycles performed: 2.1 ± 1.4 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1) and a lower antral follicle count (AFC; 18.7 ± 11.3 vs. 22.2 ± 12.8). Moreover, fertilization with the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection was used more frequently in the D6 group compared with the D5 group. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders highlighted several independent predictors for reaching blastocyst stage at D6 rather than D5: being an active smoker, previous ART cycles, and a lower AFC. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining an exclusively D6 blastocyst cohort is independently associated with women who are active smokers, previous ART cycles, and a lower AFC. These findings provide evidence, to be confirmed by further studies, that women who are active smokers could greatly benefit from smoking cessation before undergoing ART.

Endometriosis and ART: A prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation.

BACKGROUND: Many women whose fertility may have been impaired by endometriosis require assisted reproductive technology (ART) in order to become pregnant. However, the influence of ovarian endometriosis (OMA) on ovarian responsiveness to hyperstimulation has not been clearly established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of a poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation and ART outcomes in women with OMA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a large observational controlled matched cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital between 01/10/2012 and 31/12/2015. After matching by age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, 201 infertile women afflicted with OMA (the OMA group) and 402 disease-free women (the control group) undergoing an ART procedure were included in the study. The main outcomes that we measured were a POR to hyperstimulation (i.e., ≤ 3 oocytes retrieved, or cancelled cycles), the clinical pregnancy rate, and the live birth rate. All of the women with endometriosis underwent a pre-ART work-up, in order to obtain an accurate diagnosis and staging of their disease. An OMA diagnosis was based on published imaging criteria (obtained by transvaginal sonography or magnetic resonance imaging) or on histological analysis for patients with a prior history of endometriosis surgery. The statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: The incidence of a POR to hyperstimulation was significantly higher for the OMA group than for the control group [62/201 (30.8%) versus 90/402 (22.3%), respectively; p = 0.02]. However, no significant differences were found between the OMA and the control group in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate [53/151 (35%) versus 134/324 (41.3%), respectively; p = 0.23] and the live birth rate [39/151 (25.8%) versus 99/324 (30.5%), respectively; p = 0.33]. By multivariate analysis, a prior history of surgery for OMA was found to be an independent factor associated with a POR to stimulation [OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1-4.0], unlike OMA without a prior history of surgery [OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9-2.2]. CONCLUSION: The presence of OMA during ART treatment increased the risk of a POR to hyperstimulation, although the live birth rate was not affected. Furthermore, having OMA and having previously undergone surgery for OMA was identified as an independent risk factor for a POR.

Fertility preservation in women with cancer: a national study about French oncologists awareness, experience, and feelings.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate patient management and quality of information given by French oncologists to cancer women concerning fertility issues and possibilities of fertility preservation. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 1161 physicians in all major cancer centers throughout France between May 2012 and January 2013. RESULTS: A total of 102 responses were received and analyzed. Only 46% of all physicians surveyed reported discussing infertility risks with patients of reproductive age and 22% referred them to a fertility center before beginning treatments. Only 14% of practitioners considered themselves knowledgeable in FP techniques and ovarian transposition was the most frequently mentioned technique in consultation. CONCLUSION: This study is at the best of our knowledge the first nationwide survey to assess the state of the art in oncofertility management. It highlights inadequate management of fertility preservation for female patients in France. Physicians reported lacking knowledge and tools that would allow them to provide patients with appropriate information. A better collaboration between cancer and fertility centers needs to be organized in France as already organized in other countries.

Prolonged estrogen (E2) treatment prior to frozen-blastocyst transfer decreases the live birth rate.

STUDY QUESTION: How does the duration of estrogen (E2) treatment prior to frozen-blastocyst transfers affect the live birth rate (LBR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Prolonged E2 exposure as part of artificial endometrial preparation (AEP) significantly decreases the LBR after autologous frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: One effective method for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer is AEP, a sequential regimen with E2 and progesterone, which aims to mimic the endocrine exposure of the endometrium in a normal cycle. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of E2 administration prior to transfer remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care university hospital between 01/07/2012 and 31/12/2015. The main inclusion criteria was having a single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer with an AEP using exogenous E2. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 1377 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers were assigned to four groups according to the duration of the E2 administration prior to the embryo transfers. These comprised a '≤21 days' group (n = 330), a '22-28 days' group (n = 665), a '29-35 days' group (n = 289) and a '36-48 days' group (n = 93). The '≤21 days' group' was taken as the reference group. The main measured outcome was the LBR following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis was conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: LBR significantly decreased when the E2 exposure prior to the frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer exceeded 28 days: OR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.46-0.95]; P = 0.026 and OR = 0.49 [0.27-0.89]; P = 0.018, respectively, for the '29 to 35 days' group and for the '36 to 48 days' group compared to the reference group. Early pregnancy loss rates significantly increased when the E2 exposure lasted more than 35 days prior to the frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (OR = 2.37 [1.12-5.05]; P = 0.025 vs. the reference group). After multivariate logistic regression, E2 exposure lasting more than 28 days prior to the frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer was associated with a decrease in the LBR, for the '29-35 days' group (OR = 0.65; [0.45-0.95]; P = 0.044) as for the '36-48 days' group (OR = 0.49; [0.26-0.92]; P = 0.035), vs. the reference group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: One limitation is linked to the observational design of this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In order to give patients the best chance to obtain a live birth after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer, the length of E2 exposure prior to the frozen-blastocyst transfer should not exceed 28 days. This study provides new insight in regard to endometrial preparation using AEP prior to frozen-blastocyst transfer. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding and no competing interest.