Surgical treatment of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus-meta-analysis of the published literature.

BACKGROUND: To examine published data and assess evidence relating to safety and efficacy of surgical management of symptomatic pineal cysts without hydrocephalus (nhSPC), we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched Pubmed and SCOPUS for all reports with the query 'Pineal Cyst' AND 'Surgery' as of March 2021, without constraints on study design, publication year or status (PROSPERO_CRD:42,021,242,517). Assessment of 1537 hits identified 26 reports that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: All 26 input studies were either case reports or single-centre retrospective cohorts. The majority of outcome data were derived from routine physician-recorded notes. A total of 294 patients with surgically managed nhSPC were identified. Demographics: Mean age was 29 (range: 4-63) with 77% females. Mean cyst size was 15 mm (5-35). Supracerebellar-infratentorial approach was adopted in 90% of cases, occipital-transtentorial in 9%, and was not reported in 1%. Most patients were managed by cyst resection (96%), and the remainder by fenestration. Mean post-operative follow-up was 35 months (0-228). PRESENTATION: Headache was the commonest symptom (87%), followed by visual (54%), nausea/vomit (34%) and vertigo/dizziness (31%). Other symptoms included focal neurology (25%), sleep disturbance (17%), cognitive impairment (16%), loss of consciousness (11%), gait disturbance (11%), fatigue (10%), 'psychiatric' (2%) and seizures (1%). Mean number of symptoms reported at presentation was 3 (0-9). OUTCOMES: Improvement rate was 93% (to minimise reporting bias only consecutive cases from cohort studies were considered, N = 280) and was independent of presentation. Predictors of better outcomes were large cyst size (OR = 5.76; 95% CI: 1.74-19.02) and resection over fenestration (OR = 12.64; 3.07-52.01). Age predicted worse outcomes (OR = 0.95; 0.91-0.99). Overall complication rate was 17% and this was independent of any patient characteristics. Complications with long-term consequences occurred in 10 cases (3.6%): visual disturbance (3), chronic incisional pain (2), sensory disturbance (1), fatigue (1), cervicalgia (1), cerebellar stroke (1) and mortality due to myocardial infarction (1). CONCLUSIONS: Although the results support the role of surgery in the management of nhSPCs, they have to be interpreted with a great deal of caution as the current evidence is limited, consisting only of case reports and retrospective surgical series. Inherent to such studies are inhomogeneity and incompleteness of data, selection bias and bias related to assessment of outcome carried out by the treating surgeon in the majority of cases. Prospective studies with patient-reported and objective outcome assessment are needed to provide higher level of evidence.

The column procedure preserves elbow stability on biomechanical testing.

PURPOSE: The effect of open release of a post-traumatic elbow contracture on the stability of the joint has not been so far studied in vivo. Resection of elbow joint capsule, the key element of surgery, was reported to have no effect on the stability of cadaveric elbows. The joint capsule is yet known to participate in maintaining elbow stability as one of secondary stabilizers. METHODS: We assessed elbow joint laxity in 39 patients who underwent an open contracture release via the 'column procedure' described by B. Morrey and P. Mansat within the preceeding three to nine months. The measurements were taken with an apparatus designed particularly for this experiment according to the predetermined protocol. A preliminary part of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference between laxity of two elbow joints in healthy volunteers. Laxity of the operated elbows could be then compared with the contralateral joints. RESULTS: Mean absolute difference of laxity between healthy and operated elbows was 1.55° (0.1°-4.1°, SD = 1.1) being significantly lower than 2°, p = 0.0056. The difference of the joint laxity between the operated and healthy elbows did not differ statistically significantly by more than 0.6° from the difference of the laxity of two healthy elbows and, therefore, is not clinically noticeable. CONCLUSIONS: Our experiment confirmed that the 'column procedure' is a safe procedure which does not compromise the stability of the elbow joint.

Surgical treatment of pineal cysts in non-hydrocephalic and neurologically intact patients: selection of surgical candidates and clinical outcome.

PURPOSE: Management of patients presenting for various nonspecific complaints without clear neurological abnormalities and with normal ventricular size remains highly controversial. We intended to share our rationale for surgical treatment of patients who show symptoms of transient increase of intracranial pressure owing to the presence of the cyst. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed 28 cases of patients who presented without Parinaud syndrome nor ventricular enlargement and underwent pineal cyst removal in our centre between 2007 and 2015. We analyzed patients' age, sex, symptoms, preoperative cyst size, perioperative course, treatment outcome and neurologic status at discharge and at follow-up visits 4 and 12 months afterwards. RESULTS: Main complaints included paroxysmal headaches, nausea, vomiting, visual disturbances, syncope and transient depression of consciousness. Mean age of patients was 31 years (17-55); there were 24 females and 4 males. Mean cyst diameter was 17 mm (10-26). Decision about surgical treament was based on signs of transient increases of intracranial pressure. All patients underwent complete cyst excision via midline suboccipital craniotomy and infratentorial supracerebellar route. Short-lasting perioperative neurological signs (notably upgaze palsy) were noted in 22 cases and uniformly resolved within the observation period of 12 months. CONCLUSION: Abnormal neurological findings and ventricular enlargement are not indispensable to justify surgical treatment of pineal cysts. Judicious selection of surgical candidates based predominantly on clinical grounds can lead to excellent operative results.

Surgical management of congenital radial head dislocation: a case report.

Congenital radial head dislocation is a rare condition which is, however, the most common of all congenital pathologies of the elbow joint. This paper is a case report on a patient presenting with moderate pain and discomfort in one of his elbow joints, both of which were found to be affected by this condition. He was treated by surgery which consisted of resection of the proximal radius and partial anterior capsulectomy of the elbow joint. This treatment led to a significant improvement in pain and elbow function compared to the preoperative status.

Biomechanical assessment of varus-valgus range of motion of normal elbow joint using prototype measuring device.

INTRODUCTION: Elbow joint stability is provided by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, joint surface alignment, and the joint capsule. The contribution of the joint capsule is relatively minor and varies with the position of the joint. The normal range of forearm abduction and adduction in the elbow joint is estimated to be between 5 and 10°. The aim of the paper was to determine precisely the physiological range of elbow joint motion in the frontal plane (laxity), which, apart from the knowledge gained, will provide a means to assess the effect of the surgical treatment of elbow joint contractures by comparing the stability of operated and healthy joints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The measurements were carried out using UB-01, a prototype device produced by ANT Polska, in a group of 52 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The mean valgus and varus deviation of the elbow joint was 11.2° (6.4° 16.1°) and 6.6° (3° 10.7°), respectively. The mean degree of elbow joint laxity was 17.8° (10.6° 26.5°). The difference in laxity between two opposite elbow joints in the same person was, on average, 1.2° (0.1° 3.8°). In healthy persons, the amplitude of deviation for both elbows is significantly smaller than 2°. CONCLUSIONS: 1. There are major differences in elbow joint laxity between individuals. 2. Nevertheless, laxity values of two elbow joints in the same individual are very similar. This observation allows for the healthy elbow to be treated as a reference while assessing the affected joint's stability in a patient following conventional surgery for elbow joint contracture.

Arthroscopic assessment of intraarticular distal radius fractures--results of minimally invasive fixation.

BACKGROUND: For many years, wrist arthroscopy has been used to diagnose and treat soft tissue lesions and to restore anatomic articular surface alignment in intraarticular fractures. However, there are no publications providing clear and precise indications for wrist arthroscopy in distal radius fractures. The aim of the study was to analyse factors influencing the outcomes of intraarticular distal radius fracture treatment with K-wire fixation under arthroscopic guidance in AO B1 and C1 type fractures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A group of 26 patients (27 wrists) following an arthroscopic procedure (ARTR group) was the prospective component and 27 patients (27 wrists) following a non-arthroscopic procedure (OP group) constituted the retrospective part of the trial. Both groups consisted only of patients with B1 and C1 type fractures (10 and 17, respectively) according to the AO classification. RESULTS: In the ARTR group, there was a marked (statistically significant) difference between radiologically and arthroscopically assessed displacement. This underestimation of displacement was higher in B1 than C1 type fractures (statistically significant difference). Numerous associated injuries were identified, such as carpal bone cartilage injuries (85.19%), TFCC injury (59.26%) and SL ligament injuries (40.74%). Loose bodies were detected in 66.7% of the patients. In B1 type fractures, the most common ligamentous injury was a SL ligament lesion (50%), while in C1 fractures it was a TFCC lesion (70.59%). Comparing both groups (ARTR and OP), better clinical outcomes were observed in the ARTR group (though not statistically significant), with the most marked differences noted with regard to B1 type fractures. CONCLUSIONS: In B1 and C1 type intraarticular distal radius fractures, displacement visible during arthroscopy was greater than that seen on primary radiological assessment. In B1 type fractures, the difference between radiological and arthroscopic evaluation of displacement was more marked than in C1 fractures. It means that B1 type fractures can be highly "misleading", because their radiological pattern suggested little displacement, while actual displacement was more pronounced. On the basis of our results, it might be concluded that wrist arthroscopy could become a standard, routine procedure in B1 type fractures. In C1 type fractures, the method of treatment would depend on the surgeon's preferences.