A plain language summary of the safety of relugolix combination therapy and improvement in symptoms in women with uterine fibroids from the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of research studies (known as clinical trials) called LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2. The LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies looked at how well a medication called relugolix combination therapy worked to reduce heavy bleeding at the time of menstruation compared with placebo. The studies also looked at what side effects were reported in women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers looked at 388 adult women in the LIBERTY 1 study and 382 adult women in the LIBERTY 2 study. All women had heavy menstrual bleeding with uterine fibroids before the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies. The women were given one of three treatments during the studies: relugolix combination therapy or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix combination therapy (relugolix alone for the first 12 weeks, then relugolix combination therapy for the last 12 weeks of the studies). More women taking relugolix combination therapy in the LIBERTY 1 study (73%) and LIBERTY 2 study (71%) had menstrual blood loss of less than one-third of a cup (80 mL) and had reduction of at least 50% less blood loss during their last menstrual period after 24 weeks of taking the medicine compared with placebo (LIBERTY 1: 19% and LIBERTY 2: 15%). The women taking relugolix combination therapy also had less pain than those taking placebo. Side effects were similar across treatment groups. Headaches and hot flushes were the most common side effects. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: More women with uterine fibroids taking relugolix combination therapy for 24 weeks were likely to have fewer uterine fibroid symptoms than women receiving placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (LIBERTY 1); NCT03103087 (LIBERTY 2).

Long-term Relugolix Combination Therapy for Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas.

OBJECTIVE: In the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 placebo-controlled trials, once-daily relugolix combination therapy reduced menstrual blood loss volume and pain in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas and was well tolerated, with preservation of bone mineral density (BMD) through 24 weeks. Here we report the long-term efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy treatment for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: Women with uterine leiomyoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding who completed any treatment arm in either the LIBERTY 1 or LIBERTY 2 trial were eligible to enroll in a 28-week long-term extension study. All participants received once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, estradiol 1 mg, norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg) in the extension study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of women who achieved or maintained a menstrual blood loss volume of less than 80 mL and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from LIBERTY study baseline to the last 35 days of treatment (defined as responders ). Analyses were conducted for all three randomized treatment groups from pivotal studies. RESULTS: Overall, 477 women enrolled, 476 were treated, and 363 (76.1%) completed 52 weeks. Among patients treated with relugolix combination therapy through 52 weeks (n=163), sustained improvement in heavy menstrual bleeding was observed in 87.7% (responders). The least squares mean menstrual blood loss volume reduction was 89.9%, with 70.6% of patients achieving amenorrhea. At week 52, 59.0% of patients with anemia at baseline had improvements in hemoglobin concentration of greater than 2 g/dL. Distress due to uterine leiomyoma-associated symptoms measured by the BPD (Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort) scale score was reduced by 51.3 points. Sustained reductions in uterine and uterine leiomyoma volume were observed. Bone mineral density was preserved through week 52. CONCLUSION: Improvements in heavy menstrual bleeding and anemia and reduction of uterine leiomyoma-associated symptom burden were sustained through up to 52 weeks of treatment with relugolix combination therapy in women with uterine leiomyomas. No new safety concerns were identified, and BMD was maintained. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03049735; NCT03103087; NCT03412890. FUNDING SOURCE: Myovant Sciences GmbH.

Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Treatment with the combination of relugolix (an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-receptor antagonist), estradiol, and norethindrone acetate, administered once daily, may have efficacy in women with uterine fibroids and heavy bleeding while avoiding hypoestrogenic effects. METHODS: We conducted two replicate international, double-blind, 24-week, phase 3 trials involving women with fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily placebo, relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix, 1 mg of estradiol, and 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate), or delayed relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix monotherapy, followed by relugolix combination therapy, each for 12 weeks). The primary efficacy end point in each trial was the percentage of participants with a response (volume of menstrual blood loss <80 ml and a ≥50% reduction in volume from baseline) in the relugolix combination therapy group, as compared with the placebo group. Key secondary end points were amenorrhea, volume of menstrual blood loss, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, pain, fibroid volume, and uterine volume. Safety and bone mineral density were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 388 women in trial L1 and 382 in trial L2 underwent randomization. A total of 73% of the participants in the relugolix combination therapy group in trial L1 and 71% of those in trial L2 had a response (primary end point), as compared with 19% and 15%, respectively, of those in the placebo groups (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Both relugolix combination therapy groups had significant improvements, as compared with the placebo groups, in six of seven key secondary end points, including measures of menstrual blood loss (including amenorrhea), pain, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, and uterine volume, but not fibroid volume. The incidence of adverse events was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo. Bone mineral density was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo but decreased with relugolix monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in menstrual bleeding, as compared with placebo, and preserved bone mineral density in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; LIBERTY 1 [L1] and LIBERTY 2 [L2] ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03049735 and NCT03103087, respectively.).

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol transdermal delivery system: Phase 3 clinical trial results.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contraceptive efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a contraceptive transdermal delivery system, (TDS; TWIRLAⓇ) containing levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE). STUDY DESIGN: This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, 1-year (13 cycle), phase 3 study enrolled sexually active women ≥18 years old at risk for pregnancy irrespective of body mass index (BMI). Women used patches in 28-day cycles (3 consecutive administrations of 7-day patches followed by 7 days off-treatment/patch-free week). We assessed contraceptive efficacy by the Pearl Index (PI) in women 18 to 35 years, excluding cycles without intercourse or when other contraceptive methods were used. RESULTS: The study enrolled 2032 demographically diverse women in the US, of which 35.3% had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. In the primary efficacy analysis, the PI (95% confidence interval) was 5.8 (4.5-7.2) pregnancies per 100 woman-years. PIs trended higher as BMI increased; the PI was 4.3 (2.9-5.8) in women with BMI <30 kg/m2 and 8.6 (5.8-11.5) in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Hormone-related treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea (4.1%) and headache (3.6%); 11% of women discontinued due to adverse events. Four women (all with BMIs ≥30 kg/m2) reported thromboembolic events considered related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The low-dose LNG/EE TDS was effective in preventing pregnancy in a population of women representative of US demographics. Efficacy was reduced in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The TDS safety and tolerability profile was consistent with other similar dose combined hormonal contraceptives. Results of this phase 3 study supported the US Food and Drug Administration approval of TWIRLAⓇ for prevention of pregnancy in women with BMI <30 kg/m2. IMPLICATIONS: TDS (120 µg/day levonorgestrel and 30 µg/day ethinyl estradiol) is an effective, low-dose transdermal contraceptive patch with favorable tolerability profile approved for prevention of pregnancy in women with BMI <30 kg/m2. TDS has reduced effectiveness in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m2.

Elagolix for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women with Uterine Fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are hormone-responsive neoplasms that are associated with heavy menstrual bleeding. Elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist resulting in rapid, reversible suppression of ovarian sex hormones, may reduce fibroid-associated bleeding. METHODS: We conducted two identical, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-month phase 3 trials (Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and 2 [UF-1 and UF-2]) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elagolix at a dose of 300 mg twice daily with hormonal "add-back" therapy (to replace reduced levels of endogenous hormones; in this case, estradiol, 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate, 0.5 mg, once daily) in women with fibroid-associated bleeding. An elagolix-alone group was included to assess the impact of add-back therapy on the hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix. The primary end point was menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml during the final month of treatment and at least a 50% reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to the final month; missing data were imputed with the use of multiple imputation. RESULTS: A total of 412 women in UF-1 and 378 women in UF-2 underwent randomization, received elagolix or placebo, and were included in the analyses. Criteria for the primary end point were met in 68.5% of 206 women in UF-1 and in 76.5% of 189 women in UF-2 who received elagolix plus add-back therapy, as compared with 8.7% of 102 women and 10% of 94 women, respectively, who received placebo (P<0.001 for both trials). Among the women who received elagolix alone, the primary end point was met in 84.1% of 104 women in UF-1 and in 77% of 95 women in UF-2. Hot flushes (in both trials) and metrorrhagia (in UF-1) occurred significantly more commonly with elagolix plus add-back therapy than with placebo. Hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix, especially decreases in bone mineral density, were attenuated with add-back therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix with add-back therapy was effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by AbbVie; Elaris UF-1 and Elaris UF-2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02654054 and NCT02691494.).

Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom.

BACKGROUND: Only one female condom [FC1 Female Condom (FC1)] is currently marketed, but it is poorly utilized, perhaps due to difficulty with insertion, discomfort and suboptimal functional performance during intercourse. The Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) Woman's Condom (WC) was developed in an effort to overcome these obstacles. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized crossover study to evaluate the functional performance, safety and acceptability of the FC1 and WC. Seventy-five couples were assigned to one of two condom use sequences (WC/FC1 or FC1/WC) at three centers. Four condoms of the first type were used by couples in four acts of intercourse at home over a 2-4-week period. After a follow-up visit, these procedures were repeated with the second assigned condom type. In a substudy of participants (n=25), a colposcopy was performed prior and subsequent to the first condom use of each of the two condom types. Condom performance was evaluated by calculating measures of function from questionnaires completed by the couple after each condom use. Safety was evaluated by reported urogenital symptoms with a given condom during or immediately following condom use and colposcopic signs of genital irritation in the substudy. Acceptability of each given condom type was measured by questionnaire. RESULTS: Total condom failure (slippage, breakage, etc., divided by the number of female condoms opened) was 31% for the WC and 42% for the FC1. Total clinical failure (slippage, breakage, etc., divided by the number of female condoms used) was 17% for the WC and 24% for the FC1. The proportion of condom failures was 10.9 percentage points less, and the proportion of clinical failure 6.7 percentage points less, when couples used the WC compared to the FC1 [90% CI: -18.5 to -3.3 and -12.6 to -0.8, respectively). Fewer women reported symptoms of urogenital irritation when using the WC vs. the FC1 either overall or when analyzing each use of the condom [woman as unit: -20 percentage points (90% CI: -30.5 to -9.3); condom use as unit: -12.3 percentage points (90% CI: -18.0 to -6.7)]. A similar result was seen for signs of urogenital irritation [woman as unit: -20 percentage points (90% CI: -42.7 to 4.8)]. Among participants with a preference, WC was preferred over the FC1 by twice as many males and by 2.6 times as many females. CONCLUSIONS: While both female condoms were safe and acceptable in short-term use, the PATH Woman's Condom leads to less failure, was associated with fewer adverse events, and was more acceptable than the FC1 Female Condom.

Physicians' views and practices concerning menopausal hormone therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine physicians' views and practices concerning estrogen+progestogen therapy (EPT). DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of physicians in the United States (US) in 2003. A total of 1614 (53.8%) surveys were returned (633 obstetricians and gynecologists (Ob/Gyns), 571 family practitioners, and 410 internists). RESULTS: Only a minority of the physicians (16%) would offer EPT to menopausal women in the absence of menopausal symptoms (26% Ob/Gyn, 11% family practitioners, 6% internists, p<0.0001). However, many physicians (62%) believed that EPT could be offered "short term" to menopausal women with menopausal symptoms assuming no contraindications (82% Ob/Gyn, 54% family practitioners, 42% internists; p<0.0001). Irrespective of specialty, the strongest contraindications to EPT use reported by these physicians were personal history of breast cancer (93%), thrombosis (92%), cerebrovascular disease (84%), ischemic heart disease (74%), uterine cancer (73%), as well as women's subjective "concern" about breast cancer (57%). Procedures reported as always required by physicians for continuing women on EPT were breast examination (97%), mammogram (96%), blood pressure measurement (94%), and pelvic examination (91%). CONCLUSIONS: Internists and family practitioners address more contraindications to EPT use than Ob-Gyns. Although many physicians appear to be accepting of short-term use of EPT for menopausal indications in the absence of contraindications, the majority would not prescribe it for prophylactic purposes.

Quantitative DNA perturbations of p53 in endometriosis: analysis of American and Icelandic cases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate quantitative aberrations involving p53 copy numbers in eutopic endometrial and endometriotic tissue from two populations. DESIGN: Comparative analysis of normal and diseased tissue. SETTING: Tissue specimens collected in Iceland and USA. PATIENT(S): Subjects with moderate/severe endometriosis (Iceland, n = 26; USA, n = 45). Paraffin-embedded tissue from 19 matched Icelandic cases and seven unaffected controls. American cases were fresh surgical tissue from 17 matched cases and 28 unaffected controls. DNA isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with TaqMan assay were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The frequency of p53 loss and/or gain based on quantitative differences for copy numbers of p53 located on chromosome (17p) and GAPDH on a control locus (chromosome 12p). RESULT(S): Among American cases, significant p53 gain (n = 13) or loss (n = 4) was observed in 17 of 21 cases. In Icelandic cases this was not seen to the same degree. Mean normalized p53 values were 3.46 and 1.16 copies per reaction, respectively. Significant differences were observed between normalized p53 in the control blood and affected tissue for the American and Icelandic cases compared to standard GAPDH control but not in normal Icelandic and American endometrium. CONCLUSION(S): The results continue to support a role for nonrandom somatic p53 locus alterations in the pathogenesis of late or severe-stage endometriosis. Differences between Icelandic and American subjects have implications for generalization of genome-wide approaches.

Cycle control, tolerability, and satisfaction among women switching from 30-35 microg ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptives to the triphasic norgestimate/25 microg ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptive Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO.

OBJECTIVE: To determine cycle control, tolerability, and satisfaction among women (aged 18-45) switching from oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 30-35 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) to Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO (norgestimate 180/215/250 microg/EE 25 microg) and Loestrin Fe 1/20 (norethindrone acetate 1 mg/EE 20 microg). DESIGN: A subset of patients from a study comparing Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO (N = 864) with Loestrin Fe 1/20 (N = 565) was analyzed. The subset was defined as those who had taken a 30-35 microg EE-containing OC within 60 days of study start. The total number of cycles of exposure for the subset was 6,054 for Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO and 3,814 for Loestrin Fe 1/20. Additional analyses evaluated switchovers from Ortho Tri-Cyclen to Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO (N = 111). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cycle control was assessed by daily diary cards reporting the frequency, severity, and duration of bleeding/spotting. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) were considered to reflect tolerability. Satisfaction was evaluated by questionnaire. RESULTS: The proportion of cycles in which subjects experienced breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting was significantly lower with Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO than Loestrin Fe 1/20. Discontinuations due to AEs and serious AEs were comparable for Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO (3.4% and 0.6%, respectively) and Loestrin Fe 1/20 (3.2% and 0.7%, respectively). More women on Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO versus Loestrin Fe 1/20 were very or somewhat satisfied at Cycle 6 (86% vs. 81.1%; P < 0.05) and last visit (81.6% vs. 78.1%; P < 0.05). At Cycle 6, 89.3% of Ortho Tri-Cyclen to Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO switchovers were very or somewhat satisfied, and 72.6% desired to continue taking Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO after study conclusion. Conclusions-Switchovers from OCs containing 30-35 microg EE to Ortho Tri-Cyclen LO had excellent cycle control and tolerability, and were satisfied.