Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Curr Oncol ; 23(4): e332-9, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536182

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening clinical breast examination (cbe) is controversial; the use of cbe is declining not only as a screening tool, but also as a diagnostic tool. In the present study, we aimed to assess the value of cbe in breast cancer detection in a tertiary care centre for breast diseases. METHODS: This retrospective study of all breast cancers diagnosed between July 1999 and December 2010 at our centre categorized cases according to the mean of detection (cbe, mammography, or both). A cbe was considered "abnormal" in the presence of a mass, nipple discharge, skin or nipple retraction, edema, erythema, peau d'orange, or ulcers. RESULTS: During the study period, a complete dataset was available for 6333 treated primary breast cancers. Cancer types were ductal carcinoma in situ (15.3%), invasive ductal carcinoma (75.7%), invasive lobular carcinoma (9.0%), or others (2.2%). Of the 6333 cancers, 36.5% (n = 2312) were detected by mammography alone, 54.8% (n = 3470) by mammography and cbe, and 8.7% (n = 551) by physician-performed cbe alone (or 5.3% if considering ultrasonography). Invasive tumours diagnosed by cbe alone were more often triple-negative, her2-positive, node-positive, and larger than those diagnosed by mammography alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of cancers would have been missed if cbe had not been performed. Compared with cancers detected by mammography alone, those detected by cbe had more aggressive features. Clinical breast examination is a very low-cost test that could improve the detection of breast cancer and could prompt breast ultrasonography in the case of a negative mammogram.

3.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 45(3): 307-14, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25977141

RESUMO

AIM: To show the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided puncture in the treatment of lactational breast abscess and identify its risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study at the CHU of Lyon-Sud from December 2007 to December 2013, including patients with lactational breast abscess confirmed on ultrasound and treated with antibiotics and analgesics. Realisation of ultrasound-guided needle under local anesthesia by the radiologist and washing the cavity with physiological serum. RESULTS: Forty patients had lactational abscesses at an average of 10 weeks post-partum. Thirty-four patients were treated by needle aspiration, of which 2 had first surgical drainage. The average size of the abscess was 41.2mm. The success rate of needle aspiration was 91.2%. No cases of recurrence were observed, however, there were 5 fistulisations. In all, 91.2% were treated on an outpatient basis. In 87.8% of cases, breastfeeding was continued on the healthy side and in 48.5% of cases on the affected side. The major risk factor for abscess was mastitis in 91.1% of cases. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance of needle aspiration should be gold standard for the treatment of lactational breast abscesses to continue breastfeeding including the affected side.


Assuntos
Abscesso/etiologia , Abscesso/cirurgia , Doenças Mamárias/etiologia , Doenças Mamárias/cirurgia , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso/microbiologia , Abscesso/patologia , Adulto , Biópsia por Agulha , Mama/microbiologia , Mama/patologia , Doenças Mamárias/microbiologia , Doenças Mamárias/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactação/fisiologia , Mastite/etiologia , Mastite/microbiologia , Mastite/patologia , Mastite/cirurgia , Transtornos Puerperais/etiologia , Transtornos Puerperais/patologia , Transtornos Puerperais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA