Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(2): 848-856, 2021 04 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244945

RESUMO

Background/aim: Healthy wound healing is very important for patient comfort. Diabetes is one of the factors that negatively affect wound healing. Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) are antiinflammatory and antimicrobial agents and may have positive effects on wound healing. Materials and methods: In this study, 72 male Wistar albino rats were used. Rats; control, CAPE, ABS, diabetes + control, diabetes + ABS and diabetes + CAPE groups were divided into 6 groups. A healthy 36 rats created diabetes using streptozotocin (STZ). A gingival wound was created using a 4-mm punch biopsy in the gingival tissue under the lower anterior incisors of the rats. Results: The comparison between the nondiabetic groups had a statistically significant positive effect compared to the control group of CAPE and ABS (P ˂ 0.05). In the comparison between ABS and diabetes + ABS groups and in the comparison between CAPE and diabetes + CAPE groups, a decrease in vascularization in diabetes + CAPE groups was observed and it was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.005). Conclusion: ABS and CAPE have been found to have positive effects on gingival wound healing in the nondiabetic group. We think that this situation is caused by its antiinflammatory and antimicrobial properties.


Assuntos
Ácidos Cafeicos/farmacologia , Mucosa Bucal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Bucal/lesões , Álcool Feniletílico/análogos & derivados , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Diabetes Mellitus , Masculino , Álcool Feniletílico/farmacologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(5): 1444-1447, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31299740

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Mandibular body fractures are considered to be one of the most affected fracture sites in the maxillofacial region. Although the rates of fracture in this region are high, biomechanical evaluations related to this region are rare. The purpose of this investigation was to reveal the effects of different treatment methods onmandibular body fractures. METHOD: Twenty-five synthetic polyurethane hemi-mandibles were used in this study. The hemi-mandibles, which simulated simple unfavorable mandibular body fractures, were divided into 5 groups (n = 5/group) according to the treatment method. The bone segments were fixed using different osteosynthesis methods and 2.0 mm miniplate/screw systems. The groups consisted of locking or conventional systems, 5 or 11 mm long screws and 4 or 6 holes. The hemi-mandibles were loaded vertically with compressive strength until they reached 120 N. RESULTS: The results were analyzed using Tamhane's T2 post hoc test, and the significance level was 0.05. Group 1 had the lowest mechanical resistance of all groups and group 5 had the highest. No significant differences were observed in group 2 or 3. CONCLUSION: The locking system miniplate group showed better fixation stability than the conventional systems for the same screw length, and the number of holes and screw length seemed to be effective for stabilization.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Mandibulares/cirurgia , Placas Ósseas , Parafusos Ósseos , Força Compressiva , Humanos
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 28(7): e632-e634, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28806384

RESUMO

A 40-year-old female patient was admitted to the authors' oral and maxillofacial clinic for removal of her lower left second molar under local anesthesia. The patient's medical history revealed that she had cardiac arhythmia and hypertension. Inferior alveolar nerve block was achieved using 2 mL of sefacaine (%3 mepivacaine HCL, without epinephrine). The patient complained of loss of vision in her left eye. All procedures were stopped immediately. Within 2 minutes the patient reported diplopia. All of the symptoms disappeared about 5 minutes after initial observation. Follow-up after 1 day revealed no complications. The procedure was then performed uneventfully.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Cegueira/etiologia , Diplopia/etiologia , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Nervo Mandibular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Extração Dentária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA