Necrotizing external otitis: diagnostic clues in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: The assessment of necrotizing external otitis requires a high index of suspicion by the attending physician. The purpose of the study is to determine the accuracy of parameters available at the Emergency Department for the diagnosis of this pathology. METHODS: Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. Patients consulting at the Emergency Department for longstanding ear swelling, severe otalgia, and failure to respond to topical treatment were included. Otoscopy, physical examination, CT appearance, and analytical results were tested for the diagnosis of necrotizing external otitis, using nuclear imaging as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and ROC curves were calculated. RESULTS: 24 patients were included; 13 cases were necrotizing external otitis, and 11 cases were other external ear pathologies. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels were significantly associated with necrotizing external otitis (AUC 0.92 p < 0.001, and 0.8 p < 0.001). Positive likelihood ratios were 10.15 for values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate over 26 mm/h, and 8.25 for C-reactive protein levels over 10 mg/L. Negative likelihood ratios were 0.08 and 0.28, respectively. These results were significant. The rest of clinical and radiological parameters were less accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are useful parameters in the evaluation of a case of longstanding otitis with clinical suspicion of necrotizing external otitis. If any of them is elevated, the probability of suffering this condition is significantly increased. If they are within normal ranges, an alternative diagnosis should be sought.

Effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline and quality of life in younger and older adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss.

PURPOSE: (a) To measure the change in cognition, the improvement of speech perception, and the subjective benefit in people under and over 60 years following cochlear implantation. (b) To assess the relationship between cognition, demographic, audiometric, and subjective outcomes in both age groups. METHODS: 28 cochlear implant (CI) users were assigned to the < 60y group and 35 to the ≥ 60y group. Cognition was measured using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H); subjective benefit was measured using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ); the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI); the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19); Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Prior to surgery: the RBANS-H total score positively correlated with the domains "Advanced sound", "Self-esteem", and "Social functioning" of NCIQ, and negatively with HADS scores. 12 months post-implantation: the RBANS-H total score increased in the < 60y (p = 0.038) and in the ≥ 60y group (p < 0.001); speech perception and subjective outcomes also improved; RBANS-H total score positively correlated with "Self-esteem" domain in NCIQ. Age and the RBANS-H total score correlated negatively in the ≥ 60y group (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: After implantation, both age groups demonstrated improved cognition, speech perception and quality of life. Their depression scores decreased. Age was inversely associated with cognition.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracochlear Test Electrode for Acoustic Nerve Monitoring in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants (CIs) are a well-known hearing restoration option for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) in cases of neurofibromatosis type-2 and, more recently, for patients with sporadic VS. One of the main limitations when performing CI during VS surgery is the capability to preserve the acoustic nerve (AN) anatomically and functionally. Significant efforts have been directed toward developing an intraoperative testing method for monitoring the AN function to determine if, after tumor removal, it is suitable for conducting stimuli delivered by a CI. However, all these methods have significant limitations, and none of them have documented diagnostic efficacy. To overcome these limitations and to obtain reliable information before CI insertion, a minimally invasive intracochlear test electrode (TE) has been recently developed. This TE has demonstrated to be suitable to test the integrity of the AN before CI in patients without any residual hearing by recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). The present study constitutes the next phase of this research, which was to determine the usefulness of EABR obtained intraoperatively with the intracochlear TE after the resection of a VS and to calculate its diagnostic accuracy to assess the functionality of the AN for CI. DESIGN: This was a prospective, multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy. It was conducted in three tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and 2018. This study was designed following the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement guidelines. The STARD statement are guidelines to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the EABR evoked with the intracochlear TE after tumor removal was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Patients eligible for the study were consecutive adults undergoing surgery for VS with simultaneous CI. The test under evaluation (index test) was the EABR obtained with the intracochlear TE after resection of the tumor. The reference test (gold standard) was the presence of auditory perception with the CI, defined as the presence of sound detection on an audiogram at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz of no greater than 50 dB. In all the cases, auditory perception was verified by the presence of a positive EABR evoked with the CI. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included during the study period; seven patients were excluded from the diagnostic efficacy analysis due to inconclusive EABR results or absence of the gold standard to compare (they did not finally receive the CI). Thus, the outcome of the gold standard was assessed in 14 cases: 9 cases had positive EABR, all of them obtained auditory perception with the CI, and 5 cases had negative EABR, only one case had auditory perception with the CI, which constitutes the only false negative of this study. Accuracy of the TE was 93% (95% confidence interval, 66 to 100%), sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval, 71 to 100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), and negative predictive value 80% (95% confidence interval, 45 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: EABR elicited with the intracochlear TE had a diagnostic accuracy of 93% for predicting auditory perception with CIs after VS removal. These results suggest that the intracochlear TE can be used intraoperatively after tumor removal to test the integrity of the AN as a useful tool to complement the surgeon's perception for decision-making regarding implantation.

Facial paralysis: Clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology. / Parálisis facial: guía de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de ORL.

Bell's palsy is the most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve weakness or paralysis. However, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. Other common causes include treatment of vestibular schwannoma, head and neck tumours, iatrogenic injuries, Herpes zoster, or trauma. The approach to each of these conditions varies widely. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with guidance on the treatment and monitoring of patients with different causes of facial paralysis. We intend to draft a practical guideline, focusing on operationalised recommendations deemed to be useful in the daily management of patients. This guideline was promoted by the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and developed by a group of physicians with an interest in facial nerve disorders, including at least one physician from each Autonomous Community. In a question and answer format, it includes 56 relevant topics related to the facial nerve.

Validation of the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL) for Spanish-Speaking Patients.

Objective To perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL) to the Spanish language. Study Design Prospective study. Setting Tertiary neurotologic referral center. Subjects and Methods PANQOL was translated and translated back, and a pretest trial was performed. The study included 27 individuals diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma. Inclusion criteria were adults with untreated vestibular schwannoma, diagnosed in the past 12 months. Feasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects were assessed for the present study. Results The mean overall score of the PANQOL was 69.21 (0-100 scale, lowest to highest quality of life). Cronbach's α was 0.87. Intraclass correlation coefficient was performed for each item, with an overall score of 0.92. The κ coefficient scores were between moderate and almost perfect in more than 92% of patients. Anxiety and energy domains of the PANQOL were correlated with both physical and mental components of the SF-12. Hearing, balance, and pain domains were correlated with the SF-12 physical component. Facial and general domains were not significantly correlated with any component of the SF-12. Furthermore, the overall score of the PANQOL was correlated with the physical component of the SF-12. Conclusion Feasibility, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity outcomes in the current study support the validity of the Spanish version of the PANQOL.

Long-term results of the transattical approach: an alternative technique for cochlear implantation.

Cochlear implantation through the standard posterior tympanotomy approach may sometimes be challenging. In cases with complicated anatomy or malformations, an alternative surgical technique may be chosen. The transattical approach is a simple technique based on a mastoidectomy and a transmeatal cochleostomy. The electrode is driven to the middle ear through the attic. This way it overcomes some of the standard technique's drawbacks. Our aim is to assess the value of this alternative approach in cochlear implant surgery. We conducted a comparative retrospective study; we included 74 patients operated by transattical approach and 59 patients operated with the standard technique. Auditory performance and complications at long term follow-up were compared. The consequences of the different trajectory of the electrode in the transattical approach were also studied. No significant differences were found between both groups regarding complication rates and cochlear implant performance. The electrode's integrity was not significantly affected by its different position and angles, when compared to the standard approach. We conclude that transattical approach is a safe technique for cochlear implantation. It may be considered as an alternative to the posterior tympanotomy approach for those cases where this cannot be performed.

Cochlear implantation outcomes in advanced otosclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies support the use of cochlear implants (CI) in far-advanced otosclerosis (FAO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared our results of CI in patients with FAO and unknown origin hearing loss (UOHL) and our incidence of facial electrical stimulation and difficult insertion of the electrode bundle up to 3 to 5 years from surgery. RESULTS: We found 17 patients with CI in FAO and UOHL. FAO patients achieved better results on the pure tone average (PTA) and recognition of monosyllables by GEE test (p=0.022; p=0.006), and particularly at 1 year on the PTA (p=0.002), at 6 months and a year in monosyllables (p=0.002; p=0.001), and at 6 months in disyllables (p=0.004). There were no differences toward complications. CONCLUSION: In our experience, placement of CI in FAO has proven successful, with results comparable to other similar cohorts, and with low complications.