Need for risk-adapted therapy for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: A large multicenter analysis of germ cell tumors' patients from French TMRG network.

BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors are rare tumors, affecting young women with a generally favorable prognosis. The French reference network for Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) aims to improve their management. The purpose of this study is to report clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes, to explore prognostic parameters and to help in considering adjuvant strategy for stage I patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with MOGCT registered among 13 of the largest centers of the TMRG network were analyzed. We report clinicopathological features, estimated 5-year event-free survival (5y-EFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) of MOGCT patients. RESULTS: We collected data from 147 patients including 101 (68.7%) FIGO stage I patients. Histology identifies 40 dysgerminomas, 52 immature teratomas, 32 yolk sac tumors, 2 choriocarcinomas and 21 mixed tumors. Surgery was performed in 140 (95.2%) patients and 106 (72.1%) received first line chemotherapy. Twenty-two stage I patients did not receive chemotherapy. Relapse occurred in 24 patients: 13 were exclusively treated with upfront surgery and 11 received surgery and chemotherapy. 5y-EFS was 82% and 5y-OS was 92.4%. Stage I patients who underwent surgery alone had an estimated 5y-EFS of 54.6% and patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy 94.4% (P < .001). However, no impact on estimated 5y-OS was observed: 96.3% versus 97.8% respectively (P = .62). FIGO stage, complete primary surgery and post-operative alpha fetoprotein level significantly correlated with survival. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival in stage I patients. Active surveillance can be proposed for selected patients with a complete surgical staging.

Should We Abandon Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare disease that accounts for 5% of all ovarian cancers and requires surgical complete debulking. To date, the prognostic value of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy remains unclear in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of LGSOC was registered in the Tumeurs Malignes Rares Gynécologiques national network, between January 2000 and July 2017, at 25 centers. All LGSOC were confirmed after pathological review and operated by primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT-IDS). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included, 86.1% were stage III/IV, and 74.6% underwent lymph node dissection (LND). According to the Completeness of Cancer Resection (CCR) score, 83.7% had complete resection. Median OS was 130 months, and median PFS was 41 months. Pelvic and paraaortic LND had no significant impact on OS (p = 0.78) or DFS (p = 0.93), and this was confirmed in subgroups (advanced stages FIGO III/IV, CCR score 0/1 or 2/3, and timing of surgery PDS or NACT-IDS). Histological positive paraaortic lymph nodes had a significant negative impact on PFS in the whole population (HR 2.21, 1.18-4.39, p = 0.02) and in the CC0/CC1 population (HR, 2.28, 1.13-4.59, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic pelvic and paraaortic LND in patients with LGSOC improved neither overall nor PFS. A prospective trial would be necessary to validate these results but would be difficult to conduct due to the rarity of this disease.

The French national network dedicated to rare gynecological cancers diagnosis and management could improve the quality of surgery in daily practice of granulosa cell tumors. A TMRG and GINECO group Study.

OBJECTIVE: The French national rare gynecological tumor network has been established to improve the quality of care through offering expertise in double reading histological diagnosis, reviewing cases and guiding management of these tumors through specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards and online clinical guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.com). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the development and implementation of this network by assessing the conformity of medical practice with the guidelines concerning the granulosa cell tumors (GCTs). METHODS: This is a French nationwide study, including 463 patients (out of the 639 identified patients) with a definitive diagnosis of GCT between 2011 and 2016. Surgical practices were analyzed for conformity with the current guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.org). Medical records, surgical and pathological reports were systematically analyzed. Total conformity was defined by a conservative (unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) or radical surgery (hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) including surgical staging (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies and peritoneal cytology) according to the FIGO stage. Partial conformity referred to a conservative or radical surgery without surgical staging and non-conformity was defined as a non-optimal surgery as recommended by the guidelines. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 49 years old (range 10-89). The median size of tumor was 94 mm (range 5-400). Radical surgery was performed in 240 patients (52%); while a fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 98 cases (21%). A surgical staging was performed in 76 cases (16%) and an evaluation of the endometrium in 289 cases (62%). Surgery was fully compliant with the guidelines in 65 patients (14%), partially compliant in 213 patients (46%), non-compliant in 137 patients (30%) and not assessable in 48 cases (10%). A statistically significant difference for compliance was observed in restaging surgery (p < 0,001), radical surgery (p = 0,017) and the period (before or after) of the implementation of the network (p < 0,001). Survival analyses did not allow us to demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival nor in PFS although there was a trend in favor of optimal surgery compared to incomplete/non optimal surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgical management's conformity to the guidelines increases over time from 2011 to 2016. According to this study, the implementation of a national network dedicated to rare gynecologic tumors seems to significantly improve the surgical management of the patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumors.

Networking for ovarian rare tumors: a significant breakthrough improving disease management.

BACKGROUND: Rare ovarian tumors represent >20% of all ovarian cancers. Given the rarity of these tumors, natural history, prognostic factors are not clearly identified. The extreme variability of patients (age, histological subtypes, stage) induces multiple and complex therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Since 2011, a national network with a dedicated system for referral, up to 22 regional and three national reference centers (RC) has been supported by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The network aims to prospectively monitor the management of rare ovarian tumors and provide an equal access to medical expertise and innovative treatments to all French patients through a dedicated website, www.ovaire-rare.org. RESULTS: Over a 5-year activity, 4612 patients have been included. Patients' inclusions increased from 553 in 2011 to 1202 in 2015. Expert pathology review and patients' files discussion in dedicated multidisciplinary tumor boards increased from 166 cases in 2011 (25%) to 538 (45%) in 2015. Pathology review consistently modified the medical strategy in 5-9% every year. The rate of patients' files discussed in RC similarly increased from 294 (53%) to 789 (66%). An increasing number (357 in 5 years) of gynecologic (non-ovarian) rare tumors were also registered by physicians seeking for pathological or medical advice from expert tumor boards. CONCLUSION: Such a nation-wide organization for rare gynecological tumors has invaluable benefits, not only for patients, but also for epidemiological, clinical and biological research.

Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is a surgical strategy in breast cancer when breast-conserving surgery is not an option. There is a lack of evidence showing an advantage of mastectomy plus IBR over mastectomy alone on health-related quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A large prospective multicentre survey, STIC-RMI (support of innovative and expensive techniques - immediate breast reconstruction), was undertaken to study the changes in QoL in patients treated by mastectomy with or without IBR. Patients were recruited between 2007 and 2009. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 instruments were used to assess QoL before operation, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. A propensity score was used to compare QoL between mastectomy alone and mastectomy plus IBR, with limited bias. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were included from 22 French academic hospitals, of whom 407 (68·4 per cent) underwent IBR. One-year data were available for 71·1 per cent of patients. Factors associated with IBR were age, histological tumour type, palpable nodes and an attempt at breast-conserving surgery. At inclusion, QoL was significantly better in the IBR group (P < 0·001) and there was no significant change in either group during 1 year compared with baseline. Results for the QLQ-BR23 functional dimension varied according to propensity score quartiles; IBR had no influence in the lowest quartile. In the upper quartiles, QoL increased slightly over the year among patients who had IBR, whereas it decreased among those who had mastectomy alone (P = 0·037). Satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome strongly influenced QoL, especially in upper quartiles (P < 0·001). However, an unsatisfactory outcome after IBR was still considered a better condition than simple mastectomy. CONCLUSION: The QoL benefit provided by IBR depends on patients' life status at inclusion; young active women with an in situ tumour are more likely to preserve their QoL after IBR.

Survival effect of laparoscopic para-aortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares two methods of evaluating para-aortic node involvement in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in order to define external radiotherapy treatment fields: laparoscopic surgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy or PET-CT imaging. POPULATION: We selected 187 patients with LACC who had been treated by chemoradiation therapy in two comprehensive cancer centres from January 2001 to December 2013. A total of 98 underwent para-aortic evaluation by PET-CT (Centre 1) and 89 received surgical laparoscopic excision (Centre 2). METHODS: All patients with LACC were retrospectively collected in each centre. OS and DFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier's method and survival curves were compared using log-rank test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were the comparison of patients' disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two centres. RESULTS: Patients had a significantly better disease-free survival in cohort 1 than in cohort 2, at 2 years [80.9% (71.7-87.5) versus 57.1% (46.1-67.3)] and at 5 years [70.5% (58.8-79.9) versus 49.2% (38.2-60.4)] (P = 0.009). These results are confirmed by multivariate analysis model [hazard ratio (HR) 1.93; 95% CI 1.03-3.61; P = 0.04]. The overall survival was also better in cohort 1, both at 2 and 5 years [93.5% (86.5-97.0) versus 78.5% (68.5-86.0) and 85.1% (73.2-92.2) versus 63.8% (51.9-74.2), respectively; P = 0.006]. The multivariate analysis model found concordant results with an increased relative risk of death for patients treated in cohort 2 (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.09-5.99; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort analysis, para-aortic surgical staging in LACC is more deleterious for patients than is radiological staging in terms of OS and DFS. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Para-aortic surgical staging in LACC is more deleterious for patients than clinical staging.

Results of a multicenter phase I dose-finding trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and complete cytoreductive surgery and followed by maintenance bevacizumab in initially unresectable ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may improve the outcome of patients with initially unresectable ovarian cancer who are eligible for complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The main objective of this multicenter phase-I study was to identify the recommended dose of cisplatin for HIPEC at CCRS after neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP). METHODS: Patients were treated with 6cycles of CP followed by CCRS and HIPEC using cisplatin heated for one hour at 42°C+/-1°C. Four cisplatin dose-levels were evaluated: 50, 60, 70, 80mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as a grade≥IIIb adverse event (Dindo classification). The Continual Reassessment Method was used for this dose-finding study, with a target percentage of DLT set at 20%. Twenty-two cycles (15mg/kg/cycle) of maintenance bevacizumab therapy were planned after surgery. RESULTS: Between June-2011 and September-2012, 30 patients were recruited. No DLT occurred at the first three dose-levels (4, 4 and 5 patients at 50, 60 and 70mg/m(2) respectively). At dose-level 4 (80mg/m(2), 17 patients), four DLTs occurred: renal failure (n=2), peritonitis (n=1) and hemorrhage (n=1). Eight weeks after surgery, creatinine clearance was reduced to <30mL/min in 3 patients, all treated at 80mg/m(2), and between 30 and 60mL/min in 6 patients (2, 1, 1 and 2 at the four dose-levels respectively). Twenty patients started maintenance bevacizumab, and 7 received the 22 courses initially planned. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observed DLTs and prolonged impairment of renal function, we recommend a dose of 70mg/m(2) of cisplatin for HIPEC.

Surgical Complexity Impact on Survival After Complete Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The direct relationship between surgical radicality to compensate biologic behavior and improvement of patient outcome at the time of primary or interval cytoreduction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of disease extension and surgical complexity on survival after complete macroscopic resection for stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records from seven referral centers in France were reviewed to identify all patients who had complete cytoreductive surgery for stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer. All patients had at least six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel combination therapy. RESULTS: From the 374 consecutive patients with complete cytoreduction who were included in this study, stage, grade, upper abdominal disease, surgical complexity, and carcinomatosis extent were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS) at univariate analysis. Stage IV and the need for ultra-radical procedures were significantly associated with lower overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, radical surgery, including more than two visceral resections, was significantly associated with decreased DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who need complex surgical procedures involving two or more visceral resections in order to achieve successful complete cytoreduction have worse outcome than patients with less extensive procedures. The negative impact of surgical complexity was not significant in patients who underwent upfront procedures. Tumor volume and extension were associated with decreased DFS in patients undergoing a primary surgical approach. This adds to the evidence that, even though complete cytoreduction is currently the objective of surgery, tumor load remains an independent poor prognostic factor and probably reflects a more aggressive behavior.

[Anatomoclinical study of ovarian cancers in patients with history of hysterectomy for benign pathology]. / Étude anatomoclinique des cancers de l'ovaire chez les patientes aux antécédents d'hystérectomie pour pathologie bénigne.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the various anatomoclinical characteristics of ovarian cancer in patients with a history of hysterectomy for benign disease. METHODS: This is a comparative, retrospective, monocentric and descriptive study, carried out at the Centre of Jean-Perrin in patients with ovarian cancer between 2005 and 2014 and with a history of hysterectomy for benign disease. Each patient was paired with a non-hysterectomy patient with ovarian cancer. The two populations were matched 1 to 5, based on their age at diagnosis and their FIGO stage. RESULTS: During the period of the study, 249 patients were operated for de novo ovarian neoplasia, 43 patients had a history of hysterectomy (group 1) and 206 remaining patients represented the control group (group 2). There was no difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between the two subpopulations of patients (P=0.59 and P=0.38). On CT-scan assessment, the lymph node involvement risk was greater than 2.6 in the group of patients with hysterectomy (P=0.00038). Peritoneal Cancer Index scores of the two subgroups of populations were comparable, there were an average of 13.65 for group 1 versus 12.31 for group 2 (P=0.28). The rate of rectosigmoid resection was higher in group 1: 48.6% versus 32.9% in group 2 without any significant difference (P=0.07). Hundred and thirty-three patients undergone lumbar aortic lymphadenectomy, with node involvement found in 83% of patients in the hysterectomy group and 51% of patients in the control group (P=0.0053). CONCLUSION: Indication of lumbar aortic lymphadenectomy should be taken in better consideration in patients with history of inter-adnexial hysterectomy. These data must be thoroughly assessed with a prospective multicenter comparative study.

[Salvage concomitant chemoradiation therapy for non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer after chemotherapy failure]. / Chimioradiothérapie concomitante des cancers du sein inflammatoire, non métastatiques, non répondeurs à une chimiothérapie première.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical possibility following concomitant chemoradiotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer, after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from ten patients with inflammatory breast cancer treated between 1996 and 2010 by concomitant chemoradiotherapy after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. All patients had an invasive carcinoma. All patients received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including anthracyclin, six patients received taxan and one received trastuzumab. Radiotherapy was delivered to the breast and regional lymph nodes in all patients at a dose of 50Gy; a boost of 20Gy was delivered to one patient. Concomitant chemotherapy was based on weekly cisplatin for six patients, on cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil the first and last weeks of radiotherapy for four patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 44 months. Mastectomy was performed in nine patients. Two- and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 70 % and 60 %. Median local recurrence delay was 5 months; six patients died (all from cancer), seven developped metastasis. Grade 1 and 2 epithelite was respectively observed in six and two patients, grade 2 renal toxicity in three patients, grade 2 neutropenia in one patient. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer after unsucessful neoadjuvant chemotherapy may control the disease in some patients and lead to mastectomy. These results have to be confirmed through a multicentric study with more patients.

Professional risks when carrying out cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A French multicentric survey.

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, many surgical teams have developed programs to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis with extensive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, there are no specific recommendations for HIPEC procedures concerning environmental contamination risk management, personal protective equipment (PPE), or occupational health supervision. METHODS: A survey of the institutional practices among all French teams currently performing HIPEC procedures was carried out via the French network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE). RESULTS: Thirty three surgical teams responded, 14 (42.4%) which reported more than 10 years of HIPEC experience. Some practices were widespread, such as using HIPEC machine approved by the European Community (100%), individualized or centralized smoke evacuation (81.8%), "open" abdominal coverage during perfusion (75.8%), and maintaining the same surgeon throughout the procedure (69.7%). Others were more heterogeneous, including laminar flow air circulation (54.5%) and the provision of safety protocols in the event of perfusate spills (51.5%). The use of specialized personal protective equipment is ubiquitous (93.9%) but widely variable between programs. CONCLUSION: Protocols regarding cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC and the associated professional risks in France lack standardization and should be established.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women in France. It is all too often diagnosed at an advanced stage with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but remains confined to the peritoneal cavity throughout much of its natural history. Because of cellular selection pressure over time, most tumor recurrences eventually develop resistance to systemic platinum. Options for salvage therapy include alternative systemic chemotherapies and further cytoreductive surgery (CRS), but the prognosis remains poor. Over the past two decades, a new therapeutic approach to PC has been developed that combines CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment strategy has already been shown to be effective in non-gynecologic carcinomatosis in numerous reports. There is a strong rationale for the use of HIPEC for PC of ovarian origin. On the one hand, three prospective randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (without hyperthermia) in selected patients compared to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, retrospective studies and case-control studies of HIPEC have reported encouraging survival data, especially when used to treat chemoresistant recurrence. However, HIPEC has specific morbidity and mortality; this calls for very careful selection of eligible patients by a multidisciplinary team in specialized centers. HIPEC needs to be evaluated by means of randomized trials for ovarian cancer at different developmental stages: as first line therapy, as consolidation, and for chemoresistant recurrence. Several European phase III studies are currently ongoing.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite a high response rate to front-line therapy, prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) remains poor. Approaches that combine Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been developed recently. The purpose of this study was to assess early and long-term survival in patients treated with this strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort multicentric study from French centres was performed. All consecutive patients with advanced and recurrent EOC treated with CRS and HIPEC were included. RESULTS: The study included 566 patients from 13 centres who underwent 607 procedures between 1991 and 2010. There were 92 patients with advanced EOC (first-line treatment), and 474 patients with recurrent EOC. A complete cytoreductive surgery was performed in 74.9% of patients. Mortality and grades 3 to 4 morbidity rates were 0.8% and 31.3%, respectively. The median overall survivals were 35.4 months and 45.7 months for advanced and recurrent EOC, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with chemosensitive and with chemoresistant recurrence. Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) that evaluated disease extent was the strongest independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in all groups. CONCLUSION: For advanced and recurrent EOC, curative therapeutic approach combining optimal CRS and HIPEC should be considered as it may achieve long-term survival in patients with a severe prognosis disease, even in patients with chemoresistant disease. PCI should be used for patient's selection.

[Pelvic exenteration: current state and perspectives]. / Exentération pelvienne : actualités et perspectives.

Criteria for patient selection prior to undergo pelvic exenteration have strongly diminished due to improvement in local control of locally advanced tumors treated with chemo-radiotherapy. Preoperative study with current image techniques improves the definition of tumor extension to better adapt surgical resection. New haemostatic devices have lead to a reduction in peroperative blood loss. Latero-pelvic extension requires a specific surgical approach with latero-endopelvic résection including vascular and nervous structures and/or intraoperative radiotherapy techniques. Laparoscopic approach is an alternative for selected patients presenting with central tumor. Reconstruction phase is crucial: the pelvic filling diminishes postoperative complications. Continent urinary diversions are the best option for young motivated patients. Pelvic reconstruction, especially by myocutaneous flaps should be systematically proposed to improve body image and cover the pelvis dead space. The development of pelvic isolated perfusion technique will probably emerge as an alternative to pelvic exenteration, or as a neoadjuvant treatment to improve oncological outcomes.

Systematic (complete) para-aortic lymphadenectomy: description of a novel surgical classification with technical and anatomical considerations.

The clinical indications for a complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of gynaecological malignancies remain controversial. The debate on complete para-aortic node dissection is hindered by the absence of an identifiable and accepted definition for the procedure of systematic (complete) para-aortic node dissection. In this paper we propose a classification of para-aortic lymphadenectomy. We have identified and imaged the most common and rare para-aortic vascular anomalies that we have encountered. An understanding of the anatomical anomalies in this area also provides a useful reference for the surgical technique that is adopted in order to ensure the completeness of excision.

Prognostic value of initial tumor parameters after metastatic relapse.

Classical prognostic factors of breast cancer are correlated to disease-free survival and overall survival (OS); their precise role is less known on metastatic disease. A total of 511 breast cancer patients without initial metastasis were treated. OS was divided in time to distant recurrence and metastatic survival (MS). Age, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade, hormone receptor, axillary node involvement, and Nottingham prognostic index predicted MS in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis retained age, SBR grade, and axillary lymph node involvement as significant independent prognostic factors. Interactions are still present between initial parameters and MS. The clinician has to take into account for treatment choice.