RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiligamentous knee injuries with a posterolateral corner injury represent a devastating insult to the knee. PURPOSE: To evaluate multiligamentous knee reconstruction rehabilitation programs and recommend a rehabilitation program based on a review of published outcomes studies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, and Embase database search was conducted using the terms "posterolateral corner" and "rehabilitation." All articles obtained were examined to confirm their rehabilitation programs for multiligamentous knee injuries. These injuries included a posterolateral corner injury plus an isolated anterior or posterior cruciate ligament injury or a combined cruciate injury. RESULTS: Ten publications representing 245 patients with multiligamentous knee reconstruction were analyzed. Rehabilitation protocols were divided by weightbearing (WB) status: in 2 studies, patients were non-WB until postoperative 4 weeks (delayed WB; n = 61); 5 studies permitted progressive WB until postoperative 6 weeks (progressive WB; n = 123); and 3 studies allowed WB immediately after surgery (immediate WB; n = 61). No significant difference in outcome scores among the 3 WB groups was found. Arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia was the most common complication (11%) in the delayed WB group, followed by the immediate WB group (3%) and the progressive WB group (0%; P < .01). Overall complication rates were highest in the delayed WB group (44%), followed by the immediate and progressive WB groups (25% and 3%, respectively; P < .00001). The delayed WB group was permitted to return to sport at a mean of 10.5 months from the index procedure; the progressive WB group, at 6.0 months; and the immediate WB group, at 9.0 months (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This review revealed no significant difference in outcome scores when comparing immediate, progressive, and delayed WB protocols. Time to permitted return to sport was not significantly different among the groups, but there existed a trend toward earlier return in the progressive WB group. Patients in the delayed and immediate WB groups experienced a higher overall complication rate. Progressive WB postoperative protocols may decrease the risk of complications without compromising outcomes; however, more research is needed to identify the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol, given the significant data heterogeneity currently available in the literature.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Benign bone tumors are often treated with extended curettage utilizing an adjuvant therapy to eliminate any remaining tumor cells. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the histologic depth of necrosis created by various adjuvant therapies used in the treatment of benign bone tumors. METHODS: A high-speed burr was utilized to create cortical defects within porcine humeri and femora. Phenol, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), argon beam coagulation (ABC), liquid nitrogen, and the Bipolar Hemostatic Sealer (BHS) were each applied to five defects, with an additional five defects left untreated as a control. The maximal depth of necrosis was determined under microscopic examination. RESULTS: The phenol, PMMA, ABC, liquid nitrogen, and BHS demonstrated an average histologic depth of necrosis of 0.30, 0.78, 2.54, 2.54, and 0.92 mm, respectively, each of which was significantly increased compared to the control group (p = .001, .003, .003, .01, and <.001). Their respective variances, a measure of reproducibility, were 0.01, 0.09, 0.96, 1.93, and 0.03 mm2 . CONCLUSION: This study confirms, through histologic analysis, adjuvant therapies create a rim of cellular necrosis beyond that of burring during extended curettage, supporting their use in the treatment of benign bone tumors. Furthermore, it provides a head-to-head comparison.