Feasibility of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers and defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The use of stress perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remains limited in patients with implantable devices. The primary goal of the study was to assess the safety, image quality, and the diagnostic value of stress perfusion-CMR in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a transvenous PPM or ICD referred for adenosine stress-CMR were enrolled in this single-center longitudinal study. The CMR protocol was performed using a 1.5 T system according to current guidelines while all devices were put in MR-mode. Quality of cine, late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE), and stress perfusion sequences were assessed. An ischemia burden of ≥ 1.5 segments was considered significant. We assessed the safety, image quality and the occurrence of interference of the magnetic field with the implantable device. In case of ischemia, we also assessed the correlation with the presence of significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography. RESULTS: Among 3743 perfusion-CMR examinations, 66 patients had implantable devices (1.7%). Image quality proved diagnostic in 98% of cases. No device damage or malfunction was reported immediately and at 1 year. Fifty patients were continuously paced during CMR. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure remained unchanged during adenosine stress, while diastolic blood pressure decreased (p = 0.007). Six patients (9%) had an ischemia-positive stress CMR and significant coronary stenoses were confirmed by coronary angiography in all cases. CONCLUSION: Stress perfusion-CMR is safe, allows reliable ischemia detection, and provides good diagnostic value.

Long-term Outcomes of a Telementoring Program for Distant Teaching of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes after a telementoring program for distant teaching of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the degree of EVAR procedure assimilation into routine practice. METHODS: A telementoring protocol using stepwise introduction of EVAR was implemented between a university care center and a remote vascular health care site; from March 1999 to October 2003, 49 EVAR patients (mean age 72 years; 48 men) were treated during telementoring at the remote center. After the telementoring period, 86 patients (mean age 71 years; 77 men) underwent EVAR procedures carried out at the secondary care center from November 2003 to July 2011. The long-term outcomes were compared between the EVAR procedures performed during telementoring with the procedures performed independently thereafter. RESULTS: No significant difference was appreciated between telementored and not telementored procedures either in 30-day mortality (4.1% vs 2.3%, p=0.621) or in the initial technical success (93.9% vs 97.7%, p=0.353). The telementored group showed no significant difference in overall aneurysm-related mortality (6.1% vs 2.3%, p=0.353) or in the overall complication rates (p=0.985). The reintervention rate was significantly lower among the unmentored procedures (11.6% vs 32.7%, p=0.004). In particular, significantly fewer patients underwent late endovascular procedures (1.2% vs 12.2%, p=0.009) and late percutaneous interventions (7.0% vs 20.4%, p=0.027) after telementoring ceased. CONCLUSION: The telementoring program followed here allowed excellent EVAR skill assimilation into the routine practice of a remote health care site. Telementoring is a feasible strategy to support skill introduction in remote medical facilities.