A comprehensive history of injection therapy for erectile dysfunction, 1982-2023.

INTRODUCTION: Although oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors represent a first choice and long-term option for about half of all patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), self-injection therapy with vasoactive drugs remains a viable alternative for all those who are not reacting or cannot tolerate oral drug therapy. This current injection therapy has an interesting history beginning in 1982. OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive history of self-injection therapy from the very beginnings in 1982 by contemporary witnesses and some members of the International Society for Sexual Medicine's History Committee, a complete history of injection therapy is prepared from eyewitness accounts and review of the published literature on the subject, as well as an update of the current status of self-injection therapy. METHODS: Published data on injection therapy, as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for ED, were reviewed thoroughly by PubMed and Medline research from 1982 until June 2023. Early pioneers and witnesses added firsthand details to this historical review. Therapeutic reports of injection therapy were reviewed, and results of side effects and complications were thoroughly reviewed. RESULTS: The pioneers of the first hours were Ronal Virag (1982) for papaverine, Giles Brindley (1983) for cavernosal alpha-blockade (phentolamine and phenoxybenzamine), Adrian Zorgniotti (1985) for papaverine/phentolamine, and Ganesan Adaikan and N. Ishii (1986) for prostaglandin E1. Moxisylyte (thymoxamine) was originally marketed but later withdrawn. The most common side effect is priapism, with the greatest risk of this from papaverine, which has modified its use for therapy. Currently, prostaglandin E1 and trimixes continue to be the agents of choice for diagnostic and therapeutic use in ED. A recent agent is a mixture of a vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (aviptadil) and phentolamine. CONCLUSIONS: After 40 years, self-injection therapy represents the medication with the highest efficacy and reliability rates and remains a viable option for many couples with ED. The history of this therapy is rich.

The Lost Penis Syndrome: A New Clinical Entity in Sexual Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: The "lost penis syndrome" (LPS) is a term often used in non-clinical settings to describe the subjective perception of the loss of cutaneous and proprioceptive feelings of the male organ during vaginal penetration. Although deserving clinical attention, this syndrome did not receive any consideration in the medical literature. Notwithstanding, it represents a relatively unexceptional condition among patients in sexual medicine clinics, and it is often reported together with other sexual dysfunctions, especially delayed ejaculation, anejaculation, male anorgasmia and inability to maintain a full erection. OBJECTIVES: To draft a new conceptual characterization of the LPS, defined as a lack of penile somesthetic sensations during sexual penetration due to various causes and leading to several sexual consequences in both partners. METHODS: Based on an extensive literature review and physiological assumptions, the mechanisms contributing to friction during penovaginal intercourse, and their correlation to LPS, have been explored, as well as other nonanatomical factors possibly contributing to the loss of penile sensations. RESULTS: Efficient penile erection and sensitivity, optimal vaginal lubrication and trophism contribute to penovaginal friction. Whenever one of these processes does not occur, loss of penile sensation defined as LPS can occur. Sociocultural, psychopathological and age-related (ie, couplepause) factors are also implicated in the etiology. Four types of LPS emerged from the literature review: anatomical and/or functional, behavioral, psychopathological and iatrogenic. According to the subtype, a wide variety of treatments can be employed, including PDE5i, testosterone replacement therapy and vaginal cosmetic surgery, as well as targeted therapy for concomitant sexual comorbidity. CONCLUSION: We held up the mirror on LPS as a clinically existing multifactorial entity and provided medical features and hypotheses contributing to or causing the occurrence of LPS. In the light of a sociocultural and scientific perspective, we proposed a description and categorization of this syndrome hypothesizing its usefulness in daily clinical practice. Colonnello E, Limoncin E, Ciocca G, et al. The Lost Penis Syndrome: A New Clinical Entity in Sexual Medicine. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:113-129.

Review of the Current Status of Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in Erectile Dysfunction (ED), Peyronie's Disease (PD), and Sexual Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy With Special Focus on Technical Aspects of the Different Marketed ESWT Devices Including Personal Experiences in 350 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although the literature of the positive effects of penile low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy is meanwhile substantial, there are substantial differences regarding both the sources of energies and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) devices. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview on the energy range and energy differences of the 6 currently marketed ESWT devices along with personal ESWT experiences in 350 patients. METHODS: This review includes all published preclinical and clinical penile ESWT studies with evaluation of the technical differences of the 6 ESWT devices and the personal experiences with these 6 devices in ED and PD. The main outcomes measures were success rates in ED (International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function change, conversion of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors non-responders) and PD (change in deviation and plaque size), differences of used sources of energy, and energy flux densities (EFDs). RESULTS: 3 different sources of energies are used, that is electromagnetic, electrohydraulic, and piezoelectric .The devices markedly distinguish in the available spectrum of the EFD ranging between 0.09 and 0.55 mJ/mm². In terms of the biological effects, the relevant energy parameters are -6 dB and the 5 MPa focus, which differ substantially between the ESWT devices. In addition, a great variability in the treatment protocols and applied energy is obvious. The preliminary own experiences with low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in 160 ED non-responders and 190 patients with PD with success rates of 45% and 47%, respectively, are reported. CONCLUSION: Positive results were published with all 6 ESWT devices in question in patients with organic ED but with huge differences regarding the EFD and the total energies applied. There is growing evidence that concentrated treatment protocols and increasing energies may yield better results. In this context, it may be argued that at least some of the published studies were markedly underpowered .Owing to the paucity of published studies, the literature of the effects of ESWT in PD and for penile rehabilitation after pelvic surgery is currently not conclusive. Porst H. Review of the Current Status of Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in Erectile Dysfunction (ED), Peyronie's Disease (PD), and Sexual Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy With Special Focus on Technical Aspects of the Different Marketed ESWT Devices Including Personal Experiences in 350 Patients. Sex Med 2021;9:93-122.

[Reflexions on 50 Years of Sexual Medicine in Urology Focusing on Male Sexual Dysfunctions]. / Reflexionen über 50 Jahre Sexualmedizin in der Urologie mit Fokus auf männliche Sexualstörungen.

Diagnosis and therapy of male sexual dysfunctions made enormous progress over the last 50 years. Starting with the development of hydraulic penile implants in 1973 meanwhile several effective and well-tolerated conservative treatments such as the PDE-5 inhibitors avanafil, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, transurethral PGE1 (MUSE) and self-injection therapy with a variety of vasoactive drugs like alprostadil, papaverine/phentolamine (bimix), PGE1/papaverine/phentolamine (trimix/triple drug) or VIP (aviptadil)/phentolamine-Invicorp) have been developed for the treatment of ED. More recently Li-ESWT has provided impressive results both in PDE-5i responders and non-responders and partly also in Peyronie's disease. Regarding premature ejaculation (PE) meanwhile with oral dapoxetine and topical lidocaine/prilocaine spray two effective treatment options are officially available which may be combined in men with severe PE and with PDE-5 inhibitors in men with PE and ED. Hormonal disorders such as hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia and thyroid disorders may be linked to male sexual disorders and successfully treated with T-substitution, prolactin inhibitors or thyroid specific medications.Whereas vascular surgery for ED such as deep dorsal vein ligation/resection or arterial revascularization procedures dominated the 80ies and 90ies last century they have been considered outdated and are replaced in severe ED of organic etiology by the modern new three piece inflatable penile implants whose high technical standard meanwhile provide 10 years survival rates of about 70 %.

Current Strategies in the Management of Peyronie's Disease (PD)-Results of a Survey of 401 Sexual Medicine Experts Across Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease (PD) is a progressive and devastating penile disorder that often results in severe penile curvature with penile shrinking, making vaginal insertion difficult or even impossible. Until now, in contrast to other penile disorders such as erectile dysfunction, PD is characterized by a paucity of conservative treatment options. AIM: To investigate the current status quo in the management of PD across European experts in sexual medicine. METHODS: Members of the European Society of Sexual Medicine and of various andrology and urology societies across Europe, with the majority (78%) being urologists, were contacted via e-mail and newsletters and asked to fill in an online questionnaire. The survey comprised 56 items developed by an expert consensus of the educational committee of the European Society of Sexual Medicine. In the end, 401 participants responded to the entire survey, with 277 reporting treating PD patients themselves and knowing this penile entity very well. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures include description of current strategies regarding diagnosis and treatment of PD as reported by specialists in this field. RESULTS: Of the physicians treating PD patients, 94% performed penile palpation, and 74% perform ultrasonography. 45% assessed the degree of penile curvature by means of intravenous drug testing, but only 17% measured it accurately with a goniometer. Penile length, flaccid or in erect state, was measured by only 39% or 25%, respectively. Only 45% assessed testosterone. Primary treatment options were oral (65%), counseling (57%), and topical/local therapy (30%). Among oral drug users, tadalafil 5 mg was the most commonly used (57%), followed by vitamin E (40%). Regarding intralesional therapy, collagenase clostridium histolyticum was the leading drug (34%), followed by calcium channel blockers (17%). Considering surgical procedures, the original Nesbit technique was the preferred procedure (33%). 36% of the specialists expressed their dissatisfaction with the currently available treatment options, and 64% reported the impression that their patients were mostly dissatisfied with the treatment outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Innovative and presumably multi-modal treatment protocols for PD are urgently needed. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: The survey represents 1 of the largest studies on the management of PD. The results are representative for the standard management of PD mostly among European Urologists with specialization in sexual medicine and may therefore not be generalizable to regions outside Europe or to other physicians treating PD. CONCLUSION: Around one-third of experts and, from their perspective, around two-thirds of patients are dissatisfied with the currently available PD treatment options. Porst H, Burri A, the European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) Educational Committee. Current Strategies in the Management of Peyronie's Disease (PD)-Results of a Survey of 401 Sexual Medicine Experts Across Europe. J Sex Med 2019;16:901-908.

Penile traction therapy with the new device 'Penimaster PRO' is effective and safe in the stable phase of Peyronie's disease: a controlled multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new penile traction device (PTD), 'Penimaster PRO', in a group of patients with stable Peyronie's disease (PD) compared with a non-intervention group in a multicentre study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 93 patients with chronic stable PD (without erectile dysfunction, with no significant pain, and with a unidirectional curvature of at least 45° being stable for > 3 months) were recruited and followed for a 12-week period. Of these patients, 47 were randomly assigned to the Penimaster PRO group (PG) and 46 to the non-intervention group (NIG). Patients were asked to apply the PTD 3-8 h a day for 12 consecutive weeks, with specific instructions regarding the progressive increase of traction force applied to the penis over time. The primary outcome of the study was the change in the degree of curvature measured in the fully erect state after intracavernosal injection of alprostadil at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months. Other variables, such as the type of curvature, stretched penile length (SPL), Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) scores, erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile function (IIEF-EF) score and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed in each visit. RESULTS: Forty-one patients in the PG and 39 in the NIG completed the study. There was an overall reduction in curvature of 31.2° (P < 0.001) at 12 weeks compared to baseline in the PG, representing a 41.1% improvement from baseline, which significantly correlated with the number of daily hours the device was applied in a dose-dependent manner. Those patients using the device < 4 h/day experienced a reduction of 15°-25° (mean 19.7°, 28.8% improvement; P < 0.05), while patients using the device > 6 h/day experienced greater curvature reduction, ranging from 20° to 50° (mean of 38.4°, 51.4% improvement; P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant changes in curvature were observed in the NIG. Furthermore, SPL increased significantly in the PG compared to baseline and compared with the NIG, ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 cm (mean 1.8 cm; P < 0.05). The IIEF-EF score also improved in patients in the PG (by a mean of 5 points). Mild AEs occurred in 43% of patients, such as local discomfort and glans numbness. CONCLUSION: The use of the Penimaster PRO PTD, a non-invasive treatment, should be offered to patients with stable PD for 3 consecutive months before performing any corrective surgery, as this provided a significant reduction in the curvature, an increase in penile length and a significant improvement of the symptoms and bother induced by PD.

The relationship between penile deformity, age, psychological bother, and erectile dysfunction in a sample of men with Peyronie's Disease (PD).

The aim of the present study was to investigate which PD specific factors (e.g., degree of penile curvature, levels of pain) cause most distress and to further explore whether there are specific subgroups of patients that report particularly high levels of psychological distress. Data were available for N = 119 men with a clinical diagnosis of PD presenting at a private Uro-Andrology in Germany. The strongest complaint of men with PD was being bothered by the look of the penis as opposed to being distressed by the pain (3.48 vs. 2.11). 75.4% reported having significantly less intercourse due to PD and for 61.4% this was very bothersome. Plaque size correlated positively with the level of symptom bother (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Furthermore, men with a stronger curvature reported more concerns regarding size and form of the penis (r = 0.18, p < 0.05), more overall sexual dissatisfaction (r = -0.38, p < 0.001), and more PD related psychological and physiological symptoms (r = 0.58, p < 0.001). 44.4% of patients had a concurrent ED. Highest level of symptom bother was reported by men with a a strong curvature and a comorbid ED. Clinicians should pay special attention to patients presenting with extreme penile deformity and impaired sexual functioning, as they show the highest levels of psychological distress. Here, additional psychosexual support might be necessary.

Testosterone treatment is not associated with increased risk of prostate cancer or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms: prostate health outcomes in the Registry of Hypogonadism in Men.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of testosterone-replacement therapy (TRT) on prostate health indicators in hypogonadal men, including rates of prostate cancer diagnoses, changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Registry of Hypogonadism in Men (RHYME) is a multi-national patient registry of treated and untreated, newly-diagnosed hypogonadal men (n = 999). Follow-up assessments were performed at 3-6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Baseline and follow-up data collection included medical history, physical examination, blood sampling, and patient questionnaires. Prostate biopsies underwent blinded independent adjudication for the presence and severity of prostate cancer; PSA and testosterone levels were measured via local and central laboratory assays; and LUTS severity was assessed via the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Incidence rates per 100 000 person-years were calculated. Longitudinal mixed models were used to assess effects of testosterone on PSA levels and IPSS. RESULTS: Of the 999 men with clinically diagnosed hypogonadism (HG), 750 (75%) initiated TRT, contributing 23 900 person-months of exposure. The mean testosterone levels increased from 8.3 to 15.4 nmol/L in treated men, compared to only a slight increase from 9.4 to 11.3 nmol/L in untreated men. In all, 55 biopsies were performed for suspected prostate cancer, and 12 non-cancer related biopsies were performed for other reasons. Overall, the proportion of positive biopsies was nearly identical in men on TRT (37.5%) compared to those not on TRT (37.0%) over the course of the study. There were no differences in PSA levels, total IPSS, or the IPSS obstructive sub-scale score by TRT status. Lower IPSS irritative sub-scale scores were reported in treated compared to untreated men. CONCLUSIONS: Results support prostate safety of TRT in newly diagnosed men with HG.

Physicians' attitude toward female genital plastic surgery: a multinational survey.

INTRODUCTION: The demand for female genital plastic surgery (FGPS) has increased over the last few decades. Yet, to date, there are no objective explicit measurements to define "abnormal" appearance of genital organs. Using the results of this study, we aimed to produce a statement of the European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) on FGPS practice. AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence of demand for FGPS and to explore the attitudes of sexual medicine specialists toward indications for FGPS. METHODS: Attendees of the 2012 Annual Congress of the ESSM in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were asked to participate in a survey during the congress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A 25-item self-report, closed-question questionnaire subdivided into three sections: sociodemographic data, professional background, and personal attitudes toward FGPS. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 360 physicians (mean age 48 years; range 23-72) from different medical disciplines completed the survey. There were diverse responses among participants regarding the definition of abnormal labial appearance and the techniques for labial reduction they perform. Overall, 65% responded that FGPS is frequently or occasionally demanded by the patients they treat. Likewise, most physicians (63%) reported that they never perform FGPS. Conversely, only 14% reported that they either frequently or occasionally perform FGPS. Almost one-third of participants believe that FGPS (labial surgery) improves sexual function. Fifty-two percent of participants answered that they believe that self image is the main reason for women to ask for labial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Self-image was regarded as the main factor in the demand for FGPS. Many practitioners in the field of sexual medicine recommend that women be referred for consultation with a psychiatrist or psychologist before undergoing FGPS.

Tadalafil once daily in men with erectile dysfunction: an integrated analysis of data obtained from 1913 patients from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: This analysis explores tadalafil once-daily treatment for 12 wk in clinical subpopulations of men with erectile dysfunction (ED). OBJECTIVE: Assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily tadalafil 2.5mg and 5mg in patients with different ED characteristics and comorbidities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This analysis integrated data from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that assigned 1913 men with ≥3-mo history of ED either to once-daily placebo (n=596), tadalafil 2.5mg (n=394), or tadalafil 5mg (n=923). Clinical factors examined included: ethnicity, age, obesity, alcohol consumption, smoking, comorbidities, concomitant medication, and ED characteristics (etiology, duration, severity). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were reported for efficacy and safety, including International Index of Erectile Function Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) scores and Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP3) responses. Clinical factors were included in analysis of covariance models using last observation carried forward for SEP3 and IIEF-EF scores. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Both tadalafil doses significantly improved SEP3 responses (least-squares [LS] mean change: 17.8% and 23.6%, respectively) and IIEF-EF scores (LS mean change: 4.2; 5.4) compared with placebo (p<0.01). Treatment with 2.5mg and 5mg tadalafil resulted in IIEF-EF LS mean improvements ≥4 (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) in patients with hypertension (4.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9-5.7]; 4.7 [95% CI, 3.5-5.8]), cardiac disorder (7.0 [95% CI, 4.7-9.3]; 6.3 [95% CI, 4.4-8.2]), or hyperlipidemia (5.3 [95% CI, 3.4-7.1]; 5.8 [95% CI, 4.3-7.4]). Obese patients (4.7 [95% CI, 3.4-6.0]), smokers (4.8 [95% CI, 3.0-6.7]), and psychogenic ED (7.3 [95% CI, 5.0-9.6]) reached MCID only after treatment with 5mg tadalafil. Severity-specific MCID (IIEF-EF change ≥7) was achieved by 44.5% of patients with severe baseline ED treated with tadalafil 5mg, compared with 11.6% of placebo-treated patients. No unexpected safety findings were observed. These analyses were performed on integrated data and can only provide descriptive results to guide further investigations. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tadalafil 2.5mg or 5mg once daily was well tolerated and resulted in clinically important improvements in patients with mild (54.3% and 74.8%, respectively), moderate (51.3% and 63.1%, respectively), or severe (33.7% and 44.5%, respectively) ED.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: subgroup analyses of pooled data from 4 multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor efficacious for erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), in population subgroups, using pooled data from 4 international, randomized, placebo-controlled studies in men with LUTS/BPH. METHODS: The safety database included 1500 men randomized to tadalafil 5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Changes in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life index, and BPH impact index were examined overall, and changes in IPSS or adverse events (AEs) were examined across subgroups of interest. Treatment-group differences were assessed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Results of pooled data confirmed that tadalafil (N = 752) resulted in significant improvements from baseline vs placebo (N = 746) in IPSS (mean difference -2.3; P <.001), and also in BPH impact index and IPSS-quality of life index (both P <.001). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that IPSS improvements were significant regardless of baseline LUTS severity (IPSS <20/≥20), age (≤65/>65 years), recent previous use of α-blockers or PDE5 inhibitors, total testosterone level (<300/≥300 ng/dL), or prostate-specific antigen predicted prostate volume (<40/≥40 mL). [corrected] Rates of treatment emergent AEs were comparable between subgroups of baseline age (≤65/>65 years), previous PDE5 inhibitor use, and the presence or absence of pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease (including hypertension), but somewhat higher for recent previous α-blocker use. CONCLUSION: In these pooled data analyses, tadalafil 5 mg improved LUTS/BPH across subgroups of age, LUTS severity, testosterone levels, and prostate volume. Rates of AEs were similar across the subgroups assessed.

Effects of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and on erectile dysfunction in sexually active men with both conditions: analyses of pooled data from four randomized, placebo-controlled tadalafil clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) are common in aging males and frequently occur together. Tadalafil has demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions. AIM: The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily vs. placebo over 12 weeks in treating both LUTS/BPH and ED in sexually active men. We also assessed relationships of baseline disease severity and prostate specific antigen (PSA) to outcomes. METHODS: Data were pooled from four multinational, randomized studies of men ≥45 years with LUTS/BPH, with analyses restricted to sexually active men with ED. Randomization (baseline) followed a 4-week placebo run-in; changes from baseline were assessed vs. placebo using analysis of covariance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS subscores, Quality-of-Life Index (IPSS-QoL), BPH Impact Index (BII), and International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain score were used in this study. RESULTS: Tadalafil (N = 505) significantly improved total IPSS vs. placebo (N = 521); mean changes from baseline were -6.0 and -3.6, respectively (P < 0.001). Improvements in IIEF-EF Domain score (tadalafil, 6.4; placebo, 1.4) were also significant vs. placebo, as were the IPSS storage and voiding subscores, IPSS-QoL, and BII (all P < 0.001). No significant impact of baseline ED severity or PSA category on IPSS response was observed (interaction P values, 0.463 and 0.149, respectively). Similarly, improvement in IIEF-EF Domain score was not significantly impacted by baseline LUTS/BPH severity or PSA category (interaction P values, 0.926 and 0.230, respectively). Improvements in IPSS and IIEF-EF Domain score during treatment were weakly correlated (r = -0.229). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was efficacious and well tolerated in treating ED and LUTS/BPH in sexually active men with both conditions. Improvements in both conditions were significant regardless of baseline severity. Improvements in the total IPSS and the IIEF-EF Domain score were weakly correlated.

Systematic review of combination drug therapy for non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Several drugs are approved for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, but these are mostly used by clinicians as monotherapies. The combination of different compounds, each of which targets a different aspect of LUTS, seems appealing. However, only few clinical trials have evaluated the effects of combination therapies. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male LUTS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and Cochrane databases were used to identify clinical trials and meta-analyses on male LUTS combination therapy. The search was restricted to studies of level of evidence ≥ 1b. A total of 49 papers published between January 1988 and March 2012 were identified. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The α1-adrenoceptor antagonist (α1-blocker)/5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) combination provides the most data. This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables in patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when treatment is maintained for >1 yr; when given for <1 yr, α1-blockers alone are just as effective. The combination of α1-blocker/5-ARI shows a slightly increased rate of adverse events. It remains unknown whether its safety and superiority over either drug as monotherapy are sustained after >6 yr. The α1-blocker/muscarinic receptor antagonist (antimuscarinic) combination was most frequently assessed as an add-on therapy to already existing α1-blocker therapy. Inconsistent data derive from heterogeneous study populations and different study designs. Currently, the α1-blocker/antimuscarinic combination appears to be a second-line add-on for patients with insufficient symptom relief after monotherapy. The combination seems to be safe in men with postvoid residual <200 ml. However, there are no trials >4 mo concerning safety and efficacy of this combination. The α1-blocker/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination is a new treatment option with only preliminary reports. More studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: An α1-blocker/5-ARI combination is beneficial for patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when medical treatment is intended for >1 yr. Based on short-term follow-up studies, add-on of antimuscarinics to α1-blockers is an option when postvoid residual is <200 ml.

SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most frequently treated male sexual dysfunction worldwide. ED is a chronic condition that exerts a negative impact on male self-esteem and nearly all life domains including interpersonal, family, and business relationships. AIM: The aim of this study is to provide an updated overview on currently used and available conservative treatment options for ED with a special focus on their efficacy, tolerability, safety, merits, and limitations including the role of combination therapies for monotherapy failures. METHODS: The methods used were PubMed and MEDLINE searches using the following keywords: ED, phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, oral drug therapy, intracavernosal injection therapy, transurethral therapy, topical therapy, and vacuum-erection therapy/constriction devices. Additionally, expert opinions by the authors of this article are included. RESULTS: Level 1 evidence exists that changes in sedentary lifestyle with weight loss and optimal treatment of concomitant diseases/risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) can either improve ED or add to the efficacy of ED-specific therapies, e.g., PDE5 inhibitors. Level 1 evidence also exists that treatment of hypogonadism with total testosterone < 300 ng/dL (10.4 nmol/L) can either improve ED or add to the efficacy of PDE5 inhibitors. There is level 1 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the following monotherapies in a spectrum-wide range of ED populations: PDE5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injection therapy with prostaglandin E1 (PGE1, synonymous alprostadil) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/phentolamine, and transurethral PGE1 therapy. There is level 2 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the following ED treatments: vacuum-erection therapy in a wide range of ED populations, oral L-arginine (3-5 g), topical PGE1 in special ED populations, intracavernosal injection therapy with papaverine/phentolamine (bimix), or papaverine/phentolamine/PGE1 (trimix) combination mixtures. There is level 3 evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of oral yohimbine in nonorganic ED. There is level 3 evidence that combination therapies of PDE5 inhibitors + either transurethral or intracavernosal injection therapy generate better efficacy rates than either monotherapy alone. There is level 4 evidence showing enhanced efficacy with the combination of vacuum-erection therapy + either PDE5 inhibitor or transurethral PGE1 or intracavernosal injection therapy. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that combination therapy of PDE5 inhibitors + L-arginine or daily dosing of tadalafil + short-acting PDE5 inhibitors pro re nata may rescue PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy failures. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that adding either PDE5 inhibitors or transurethral PGE1 may improve outcome of penile prosthetic surgery regarding soft (cold) glans syndrome. There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that the combination of PDE5 inhibitors and dapoxetine is effective and safe in patients suffering from both ED and premature ejaculation.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is being investigated for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS). OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy, including onset, and safety of tadalafil on BPH-LUTS and the subject's and clinician's perception of changes in urinary symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial enrolled men ≥45 yr of age with BPH-LUTS for >6 mo, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13, and maximum urine flow rate (Q(max)) ≥4 to ≤15 ml/s. INTERVENTION: Tadalafil 5mg (n=161) or placebo (n=164), once daily. MEASUREMENTS: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) modeling evaluated change from baseline in continuous efficacy variables. Categoric efficacy variables were analyzed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and between-group differences in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS AND LIMITATION: Tadalafil significantly improved IPSS results, from baseline to endpoint, compared to placebo (-5.6 vs -3.6; p=0.004). Reduction in IPSS results was apparent after 1 wk and significant after 4 wk (tadalafil -5.3 vs placebo -3.5; p=0.003). The BPH Impact Index (BII) was not assessed at week 1; however, BII improvement was apparent at 4 wk (tadalafil -1.8 vs placebo -1.2; p=0.029) and continued at 12 wk (tadalafil -1.8 vs placebo -1.3; p=0.057). Tadalafil significantly improved the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function score in sexually active men with erectile dysfunction (ED; 6.7 vs 2.0; p<0.001) at 12 wk (not assessed at week 1). Few subjects reported one TEAE or more (p=0.44). For tadalafil, the most common TEAEs were headache (3.7%) and back pain (3.1%). Tadalafil did not significantly improve Q(max) or reduce postvoid residual volume. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 5mg once daily for 12 wk resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in total IPSS results as early as 1 wk and achieved statistical significance at 4 wk in men with BPH-LUTS. The adverse event profile was consistent with that previously reported in men with ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial is registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). The registration number is NCT00827242.

Critical analysis of the relationship between sexual dysfunctions and lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

CONTEXT: This review focuses on the relationship among sexual dysfunction (SD), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and related therapies. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the current literature to provide an overview of current data regarding epidemiology and pathophysiology of SD and LUTS. Moreover, we analysed the impact of currently available therapies of LUTS/BPH on both erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction and the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in patients with ED and LUTS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a Medline search to identify original articles, reviews, editorials, and international scientific congress abstracts by combining the following terms: benign prostatic hyperplasia, lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of more relevant general population-based and BPH/LUTS or SD clinic-based trials and evaluated the common pathophysiologic mechanisms related to both conditions. In a further step, the overall impact of current BPH/LUTS therapies on sexual life, including phytotherapies, novel drugs, and surgical procedures, was scrutinized. Finally, the usefulness of PDE5-Is in LUTS/BPH was critically analysed, including preclinical and clinical research data as well as possible mechanisms of action that may contribute to the efficacy of PDE5-Is with LUTS/BPH. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based and clinical data demonstrate a strong and consistent association between LUTS and ED, suggesting that elderly men with LUTS should be evaluated for SD and vice versa. Pathophysiologic hypotheses regarding common basics of LUTS and SD as discussed in the literature are (1) alteration of the nitric oxide (NO)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway, (2) enhancement of RhoA-Rho-kinase (ROCK) contractile signalling, (3) autonomic adrenergic hyperactivity, and (4) pelvic atherosclerosis. The most important sexual adverse effects of medical therapies are ejaculation disorders after the use of some α-blockers and sexual desire impairment, ED, and ejaculatory disorders after the use of α-reductase inhibitors. Minimally invasive, conventional, and innovative surgical treatments for BPH may induce both retrograde ejaculation and ED. PDE5-Is have demonstrated significant improvements in both LUTS and ED in men with BPH; combination therapy with PDE5-Is and α1-adrenergic blockers seems superior to PDE5-I monotherapy.

Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual health is an integral part of overall health. Sexual dysfunction can have a major impact on quality of life and psychosocial and emotional well-being. AIM: To provide evidence-based, expert-opinion consensus guidelines for clinical management of sexual dysfunction in men. METHODS: An international consultation collaborating with major urologic and sexual medicine societies convened in Paris, July 2009. More than 190 multidisciplinary experts from 33 countries were assembled into 25 consultation committees. Committee members established scope and objectives for each chapter. Following an exhaustive review of available data and publications, committees developed evidence-based guidelines in each area. Main Outcome Measures. New algorithms and guidelines for assessment and treatment of sexual dysfunctions were developed based on work of previous consultations and evidence from scientific literature published from 2003 to 2009. The Oxford system of evidence-based review was systematically applied. Expert opinion was based on systematic grading of medical literature, and cultural and ethical considerations. RESULTS: Algorithms, recommendations, and guidelines for sexual dysfunction in men are presented. These guidelines were developed in an evidence-based, patient-centered, multidisciplinary manner. It was felt that all sexual dysfunctions should be evaluated and managed following a uniform strategy, thus the International Consultation of Sexual Medicine (ICSM-5) developed a stepwise diagnostic and treatment algorithm for sexual dysfunction. The main goal of ICSM-5 is to unmask the underlying etiology and/or indicate appropriate treatment options according to men's and women's individual needs (patient-centered medicine) using the best available data from population-based research (evidence-based medicine). Specific evaluation, treatment guidelines, and algorithms were developed for every sexual dysfunction in men, including erectile dysfunction; disorders of libido, orgasm, and ejaculation; Peyronie's disease; and priapism. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction in men represents a group of common medical conditions that need to be managed from a multidisciplinary perspective.

The future of erectile dysfunction (ED).

About 30-40 % of ED patients are non-responders to PDE 5 inhibitor monotherapy. Lifestyle modifications and physical activity with weight loss enhance PDE 5 inhibitor responsiveness. The same applies for combination therapies such PDE 5 inhibitors + L-Arginine 3.000mg, PDE 5 inhibitors + statins and PDE 5 inhibitors + Yohimbine. Combination of daily dosing with Tadalafil 5 mg and on demand application of sildenafil or vardenafil can improve responsiveness and erection hardness (personal experiences). Guanylate cyclase activators or RhoA-kinase inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination with PDE 5 inhibitors have shown in preclinical settings the potential to improve erectile function and represent targets for new ED drugs in the future. Immunophilin ligands were able to ameliorate erectile function after cavernous nerve injury due to pelvic surgery. Although having shown convincing efficacy both in animals and humans the centrally acting Melanocortin Receptor (MCR) Agonists were given up for ED treatment because of unfavorable side-effects.Promising targets for ED therapy in the future is gene therapy with several targets as well as stem cell therapy with adipose-derived or muscle-derived stem cells.

Standards for clinical trials in male sexual dysfunctions.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials in male sexual dysfunction (MSD) are expanding. Consequently, there is a need for consensus standards in this area. AIM: To develop an evidence-based, state-of-the-art consensus report on standards for clinical trials in MSD. METHODS: A literature review was performed examining clinical trials in erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), delayed/absent ejaculation, libido disorders/loss of desire, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease, focusing on publications published in the last 20 years. This manuscript represents the opinions of eight experts from seven countries developed in a consensus process. This document was presented for peer review and debate in a public forum and revisions were made based on recommendations of chairpersons to the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion was based on the grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation, and debate. RESULTS: According to experience and recent publications in dealing with clinical trials in sexual dysfunction, recommendations have been made for conducting trials in patients with ED, PE, delayed ejaculation, libido disorders, hypogonadism, and Peyronie's disease. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that future clinical trials are conducted using standards upon which investigators can rely when reading manuscripts or conducting new trials in this field.

Effects of once-daily tadalafil on erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction and signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; BPH-LUTS) may be associated with erectile dysfunction (ED). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of once-daily tadalafil on erectile function in men with ED and BPH-LUTS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Post hoc analysis of a phase 2-3, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of men with ED and moderate-to-severe LUTS secondary to BPH who reported being sexually active. In contrast to typical ED trials, no sexual activity threshold was required to participate. INTERVENTIONS: Screening and 4-wk washout period for patients taking BPH and/or ED treatments; 4-wk placebo run-in period; then once-daily placebo or tadalafil 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg for 12 wk. MEASUREMENTS: International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual volume (PVR). Analyses were performed in men who reported being sexually active with a female partner and who expected to remain so throughout the study. IIEF-EF data are presented for the BPH/ED population overall and for subgroups stratified by baseline age group, body mass index, BPH-LUTS severity, prostate-specific antigen, prior alpha-blocker use, and prior ED therapy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 581 men were included (placebo, n=115; tadalafil 2.5 mg, n=113; tadalafil 5 mg, n=117; tadalafil 10 mg, n=120; tadalafil 20 mg, n=116). IIEF-EF domain score improvements from baseline to end point with tadalafil were 5.4 (2.5 mg), 6.8 (5 mg), 7.9 (10 mg), and 8.2 (20 mg) versus 2.0 with placebo (least-squares means; all p values <0.001). IIEF-EF domain score improvements were observed with tadalafil for all subgroup analyses, with no significant differences between subgroup or subgroup-by-treatment interaction terms. IPSS improvements from baseline to end point were significantly greater for all tadalafil doses versus placebo (all p values <0.05). Changes in Q(max) and PVR were small and not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of once-daily tadalafil in men with ED and BPH-LUTS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00384930.