Association between Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Glaucoma in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.

PURPOSE: To examine the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and the development of glaucoma in individuals with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Nationwide, nested case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: From a nationwide cohort of 264 708 individuals, we identified 1737 incident glaucoma cases and matched them to 8685 glaucoma-free controls, all aged more than 21 years and treated with metformin and a second-line antihyperglycemic drug formulation, with no history of glaucoma, eye trauma, or eye surgery. METHODS: Cases were incidence-density-matched to 5 controls by birth year, sex, and date of second-line treatment initiation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for glaucoma, defined by first-time diagnosis, first-time use of glaucoma-specific medication, or first-time glaucoma-specific surgical intervention. RESULTS: Compared with the reference group, who received treatments other than GLP-1RA, individuals who were exposed to GLP-1RA treatment exhibited a lower risk of incident glaucoma (HR, 0.81; CI, 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006). Prolonged treatment extending beyond 3 years lowered the risk even further (HR, 0.71; CI, 0.55-0.91; P = 0.007). Treatment with GLP-1RA for 0 to 1 year (HR, 0.89; CI, 0.70-1.14; P = 0.35) and 1 to 3 years (HR, 0.85; CI, 0.67-1.06; P = 0.15) was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of developing glaucoma compared with receiving other second-line antihyperglycemic medication. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Association of vaginal oestradiol and the rate of breast cancer in Denmark: registry based, case-control study, nested in a nationwide cohort.

Objective: To estimate the rate of breast cancer associated with use of vaginal oestradiol tablets according to duration and intensity of their use. Design: Registry based, case-control study, nested in a nationwide cohort. Setting: Based in Denmark using the civil registration system, the national registry of medicinal product statistics, the Danish cancer registry, the Danish birth registry, and statistics Denmark. Participants: Women aged 50-60 years in year 2000 or turning 50 years during the study period of 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018 were included. Exclusions were a history of cancer, mastectomy, use of systemic hormone treatment, use of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system, or use of vaginal oestrogen treatments other than oestradiol tablets. To each woman who developed breast cancer during follow-up (18 997), five women in the control group (94 985) were incidence density matched by birth year. Main outcome measure: The main outcome was pathology confirmed breast cancer diagnosis. Results: 2782 (14.6%) women with breast cancer (cases) and 14 999 (15.8%) women with no breast cancer diagnosis (controls) had been exposed to vaginal oestradiol tablets with 234 cases and 1232 controls having been in treatment for at least four years at a high intensity (>50 micrograms per week). Increasing durations and intensities of use (cumulative dose/cumulative duration) of vaginal oestradiol tablets was not associated with increasing rates of breast cancer. Compared with never-use, cumulative use of vaginal oestradiol for more than nine years was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.11). Results were similar in women who had long term use (≥four years) and with high intensity of use (>50-70 micrograms per week) with an adjusted hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.08). Conclusions: Use of vaginal oestradiol tablets was not associated with increased breast cancer rate compared with never-use. Increasing duration and intensity of use was not associated with increased rates of breast cancer.

Dementia in Women Using Estrogen-Only Therapy.

This study examines the association between use of estrogen-only therapy for perimenopausal and menopausal women and risk of dementia.

Menopausal hormone therapy and central nervous system tumors: Danish nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Use of estrogen-containing menopausal hormone therapy has been shown to influence the risk of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, it is unknown how the progestin-component affects the risk and whether continuous versus cyclic treatment regimens influence the risk differently. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Nested case-control studies within a nationwide cohort of Danish women followed for 19 years from 2000 to 2018. The cohort comprised 789,901 women aged 50 to 60 years during follow-up, without prior CNS tumor diagnosis, cancer, or contraindication for treatment with menopausal hormone therapy. Information on cumulative exposure to female hormonal drugs was based on filled prescriptions. Statistical analysis included educational level, use of antihistamines, and use of anti-asthma drugs as covariates. During follow-up, 1,595 women were diagnosed with meningioma and 1,167 with glioma. The median (first-third quartile) follow-up time of individuals in the full cohort was 10.8 years (5.0 years to 17.5 years). Compared to never-use, exposure to estrogen-progestin or progestin-only were both associated with increased risk of meningioma, hazard ratio (HR) 1.21; (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.06, 1.37] p = 0.005) and HR 1.28; (95% CI [1.05, 1.54] p = 0.012), respectively. Corresponding HRs for glioma were HR 1.00; (95% CI [0.86, 1.16] p = 0.982) and HR 1.20; (95% CI [0.95, 1.51] p = 0.117). Continuous estrogen-progestin exhibited higher HR of meningioma 1.34; (95% CI [1.08, 1.66] p = 0.008) than cyclic treatment 1.13; (95% CI [0.94, 1.34] p = 0.185). Previous use of estrogen-progestin 5 to 10 years prior to diagnosis yielded the strongest association with meningioma, HR 1.26; (95% CI [1.01, 1.57] p = 0.044), whereas current/recent use of progestin-only yielded the highest HRs for both meningioma 1.64; (95% CI [0.90, 2.98] p = 0.104) and glioma 1.83; (95% CI [0.98, 3.41] p = 0.057). Being an observational study, residual confounding could occur. CONCLUSIONS: Use of continuous, but not cyclic estrogen-progestin was associated with increased meningioma risk. There was no evidence of increased glioma risk with estrogen-progestin use. Use of progestin-only was associated with increased risk of meningioma and potentially glioma. Further studies are warranted to evaluate our findings and investigate the influence of long-term progestin-only regimens on CNS tumor risk.

Menopausal hormone therapy and dementia: nationwide, nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between use of menopausal hormone therapy and development of dementia according to type of hormone treatment, duration of use, and age at usage. DESIGN: Nationwide, nested case-control study. SETTING: Denmark through national registries. PARTICIPANTS: 5589 incident cases of dementia and 55 890 age matched controls were identified between 2000 and 2018 from a population of all Danish women aged 50-60 years in 2000 with no history of dementia or contraindications for use of menopausal hormone therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for all cause dementia defined by a first time diagnosis or first time use of dementia specific medication. RESULTS: Compared with people who had never used treatment, people who had received oestrogen-progestogen therapy had an increased rate of all cause dementia (hazard ratio 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.33)). Increasing durations of use yielded higher hazard ratios, ranging from 1.21 (1.09 to 1.35) for one year or less of use to 1.74 (1.45 to 2.10) for more than 12 years of use. Oestrogen-progestogen therapy was positively associated with development of dementia for both continuous (1.31 (1.18 to 1.46)) and cyclic (1.24 (1.13 to 1.35)) regimens. Associations persisted in women who received treatment at the age 55 years or younger (1.24 (1.11 to 1.40)). Findings persisted when restricted to late onset dementia (1.21 (1.12 to 1.30)) and Alzheimer's disease (1.22 (1.07 to 1.39)). CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal hormone therapy was positively associated with development of all cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease, even in women who received treatment at the age of 55 years or younger. The increased rate of dementia was similar between continuous and cyclic treatment. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these findings represent an actual effect of menopausal hormone therapy on dementia risk, or whether they reflect an underlying predisposition in women in need of these treatments.

Central nervous system tumours among users of vaginal oestradiol tablets: A nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is currently unknown whether vaginal oestradiol is associated with development of meningioma and glioma. The aim of this study was to examine associations between cumulative use and treatment intensity of vaginally administered oestradiol tablets and incidence of meningioma and glioma in a nationwide, population-based study. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study within a nationwide cohort of Danish women followed from 2000 to 2018. The cohort consisted of 590,676 women aged 50-60 years at study start, without prior cancer diagnosis or use of systemic hormone therapy. Information on cumulative dose, duration, and intensity of vaginal oestradiol tablet use was assessed from filled prescriptions. Conditional logistic regression provided adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between vaginal oestradiol use and diagnosis of meningioma or glioma. RESULTS: We identified 1108 women with meningioma and 835 with glioma. Of these, 19.8% and 14.0% used vaginal oestradiol tablets, respectively. The HRs in those with ever-use of vaginal oestradiol tablets was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.34) for meningioma and 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-1.11) for glioma. The corresponding HRs for new users exclusively were 1.18 (95% CI 0.99-1.40) for meningioma and 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-1.13) for glioma. Intensity of vaginal oestradiol tablet use according to duration and user status yielded slightly elevated HRs for meningioma without an apparent dose-response pattern, while the HRs for glioma were generally below unity. Among new users, the HR with high intensity of current or recent vaginal oestradiol tablet use for 2+ years was 1.66 (95% CI 1.09-2.55) for meningioma and 0.77 (95% CI 0.41-1.44) for glioma. CONCLUSION: Use of vaginal oestradiol tablets was associated with a slightly increased incidence of meningioma but not of glioma. Owing to the observational nature of the study, residual bias cannot be ruled out.

Vaginal estrogen and association with dementia: A nationwide population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Use of systemic hormone therapy has been positively associated with development of dementia. Little is known about the dose-dependent effect of vaginal estradiol on dementia risk. METHODS: We assessed associations between cumulative dose of vaginal estradiol tablets and dementia in a case-control study nested in a nationwide Danish cohort of women aged 50 to 60 years at study initiation, who did not use systemic hormone therapy. Each case was age-matched to 10 female controls. RESULTS: A total of 4574 dementia cases were matched to 45,740 controls. Cumulative use of vaginal estradiol tablets was not associated with all-cause dementia; adjusted hazard ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.18) for low dose (< 750 mcg), 1.07 (0.94-1.21) for medium dose (750-2000 mcg), and 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for high dose (> 2000 mcg). Similarly, Alzheimer's disease (AD) only was not associated with vaginal estradiol. DISCUSSION: Exposure to vaginal estradiol tablets was not associated with all-cause dementia or AD only.