CME suggestions for pediatricians, allergists, and dermatologists, directed by an online survey on urticaria knowledge.

BACKGROUND: The Mexican Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria have been published. Just before their launch, physicians' knowledge was explored relating to key issues of the guidelines. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the opinion of medical specialists concerning urticaria management. METHODS: A SurveyMonkey® survey was sent out to board-certified physicians of three medical specialties treating urticaria. Replies were analyzed per specialty against the evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS: Sixty-five allergists (ALLERG), 24 dermatologists (DERM), and 120 pediatricians (PED) sent their replies. As for diagnosis: ALERG 42% and PED 76% believe cutaneous mastocytosis, urticarial vasculitis, and hereditary angioedema are forms of urticaria, versus DERM 29% (P < 0.005). Most of the specialties find that the clinical history and physical examination are enough to diagnose acute urticaria, except DERM 45% (P < 0.01). DERM 45% believe laboratory-tests are necessary, as opposed to <15% ALLERG-PED (P < 0.005). However, PED 69% did not know that the most frequent cause of acute urticaria in children is infections, versus ALLERG-DERM 30% (P < 0.005). Many erroneously do laboratory testing in physical urticaria and ALLERG 51%, DERM 59%, and PED 37% do extensive laboratory testing in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU); many more PED 59% take Immunoglobulin G (IgG) against foods (P < 0.005). More than half of non-allergists do not know about autologous serum testing nor autoimmunity (P < 0.05). As for treatment, there were a few major gaps: when CSU was controlled, >75% prescribed antihistamines pro re nata, and >85% gave first-generation antiH1 for insomnia. Finally, >40% of DERM did not know that cyclosporine A, omalizumab, or other immunosuppressants could be used in recalcitrant cases. CONCLUSION: Specialty-specific continuous medical education might enhance urticaria management.

Enhancing innate immunity against virus in times of COVID-19: Trying to untangle facts from fictions.

INTRODUCTION: In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, during which the world is confronted with a new, highly contagious virus that suppresses innate immunity as one of its initial virulence mechanisms, thus escaping from first-line human defense mechanisms, enhancing innate immunity seems a good preventive strategy. METHODS: Without the intention to write an official systematic review, but more to give an overview of possible strategies, in this review article we discuss several interventions that might stimulate innate immunity and thus our defense against (viral) respiratory tract infections. Some of these interventions can also stimulate the adaptive T- and B-cell responses, but our main focus is on the innate part of immunity. We divide the reviewed interventions into: 1) lifestyle related (exercise, >7 h sleep, forest walking, meditation/mindfulness, vitamin supplementation); 2) Non-specific immune stimulants (letting fever advance, bacterial vaccines, probiotics, dialyzable leukocyte extract, pidotimod), and 3) specific vaccines with heterologous effect (BCG vaccine, mumps-measles-rubeola vaccine, etc). RESULTS: For each of these interventions we briefly comment on their definition, possible mechanisms and evidence of clinical efficacy or lack of it, especially focusing on respiratory tract infections, viral infections, and eventually a reduced mortality in severe respiratory infections in the intensive care unit. At the end, a summary table demonstrates the best trials supporting (or not) clinical evidence. CONCLUSION: Several interventions have some degree of evidence for enhancing the innate immune response and thus conveying possible benefit, but specific trials in COVID-19 should be conducted to support solid recommendations.

Asma en pediatría / Asthma in pediatrics

Resumen El asma es un trastorno inflamatorio crónico de las vías respiratorias, que lleva a episodios recurrentes de sibilancias, disnea, sensación de opresión torácica y tos. Actualmente se considera como un problema de salud pública en diversos países, y en México su prevalencia se estima en un 8%. Se puede dividir en 2 grandes grupos: asma alérgica, mediada por inmunoglobulina E (IgE) y desencadenada principalmente por aeroalérgenos, y asma no alérgica, cuyos factores etiológicos son las infecciones, irritantes, etc. Los principales componentes a identificar antes de iniciar el tratamiento son: la gravedad, el control, la respuesta a medicamentos y la incapacidad provocada. El tratamiento farmacológico se basa en medicamentos rescatadores, que se utilizan en situaciones agudas, y controladores administrados de forma continua y encaminados a disminuir la inflamación y los síntomas a largo plazo. Las decisiones de la terapéutica instalada deben de ser dinámicas, pasando de una etapa a otra, de acuerdo con los síntomas. En el caso de que exista algún alérgeno como desencadenante de los cuadros, se recomienda utilizar la inmunoterapia para reducir la respuesta alérgica, principalmente en los casos en los que el alérgeno no pueda evitarse.

Abstract Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways, which leads to recurrent episodes of wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness and/or cough; now is considered a public health problem in many countries, in Mexico the prevalence is estimated in 8%. Asthma can be divided in two groups: allergic asthma, IgE-mediated and primarily triggered by airborne allergens and no allergic asthma whose etiological factors are infections, irritants, etc. The main components to be identified before starting treatment are: severity, control, response to drugs and disability. Medications to treat asthma can be classified as relievers, drugs used in acute situations or controllers, medications taken daily on a long-term basis to keep asthma under clinical control chiefly through their anti-inflammatory effects. The therapeutic decisions must be installed dynamic, moving from one to another stage, according to the symptoms. In case an allergen is the trigger of the symptoms, the recommended treatment is immunotherapy in order to reduce the allergic response especially in cases where the allergen can not be avoided.

Implicaciones nutricionales de las dietas de eliminación / Nutritional implications of elimination diets

Resumen:Introducción: La piedra angular del tratamiento de alergia alimentaria es la eliminación de los alimentos causantes. Sin embargo, los niños que restringen el consumo de alimentos básicos tienen un mayor riesgo de desnutrición.El objetivo del estudio fue identificar el estado nutricional de pacientes con dieta de eliminación e identificar la proporción de pacientes del grupo con verdadera alergia alimentaria.Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal de enero a octubre de 2014 en el Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. Se incluyeron pacientes de 1 a 11 años con historia de eliminación de, al menos, uno de cinco alimentos (huevo, leche, trigo, maíz, soya) por un mínimo de 6 meses. Se realizó la valoración nutricional completa y se compararon los índices antropométricos con tablas de Z score para la edad. Se analizaron los datos por medio de estadística descriptiva, y posteriormente con prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y correlación de Spearman.Resultados: Los alimentos más frecuentemente eliminados fueron leche, soya, huevo, maíz y trigo. Al comparar el número de alimentos eliminados de la dieta con los distintos índices antropométricos evaluados, se encontró que entre mayor cantidad de alimentos eliminados, el score Z de peso para la edad (PE) y talla para la edad (TE), así como peso para la talla (PT) fueron menores, y el más afectado fue la reserva grasa. Solamente en el 5% de los niños se corroboró alergia alimentaria.Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma la necesidad de una correcta asesoría nutricional en aquellos pacientes que cuenten con dietas de eliminación, así como el sobrediagnóstico que existe de alergia alimentaria.

Abstract:Background: The backbone of food allergy treatment is the restriction of causative foods. These interventions have shown that children who restrict the consumption of basic foods have a higher risk of malnutrition.The aim of the study was to identify the nutritional status of patients with elimination diet, characterizing their anthropometric indexes and identifying the percentage of patients in the group with true food allergies.Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out from January to October 2014 at the Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez. Patients 1 to 11 years of age with a history of elimination of at least one of five foods (eggs, milk, wheat, corn, soybeans) for a minimum of 6 months were included. Full nutritional assessment was performed by comparing the anthropometric indexes to z score for age. Data analysis used descriptive statistics. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman correlation were performed.Results: The most frequent eliminated foods were milk, soy, eggs, corn, and wheat. Comparing the number of foods eliminated with different anthropometric indexes, with a greater amount of eliminated food, the z-score of weight/age (W/A), height/age (H/A) and weight/height (W/H) were lower and the most affected index was fat reserve. Only in 5% of children was food allergy confirmed.Conclusions The study confirms the need for nutrition counseling for patients who have elimination diets and overdiagnosis of food allergy.