Role of peritoneal lavage in adhesion formation and survival rate in rats: an experimental study.

Following laparotomy, almost 95% of patients develop adhesions. To prevent adhesion formation, peritoneal lavage has been investigated and many different lavage solutions have been proposed. In this study, different peritoneal lavage solutions were evaluated, testing their ability to prevent adhesion formation. Three consecutive steps were followed: (1) The lethal dose of Eschericia coli injected in the rat peritoneal cavity was determined, (2) the morbidity and mortality rates of different solutions for peritoneal lavage (i.e., saline, twice-distilled water, antiseptics, and antibiotics solutions) was investigated, and (3) the capability of the different lavage solutions to prevent adhesion formation was tested. Two hundred and ninety-eight rats were employed in this study. After intraperitoneal injection of E. coli, infection (clinical signs and animal vitality), adhesion formation (explorative laparoscopy, peritoneumgraphy and Zühlke scale grading), and animal performance status were investigated. All differences were evaluated by chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Saline solution showed a low morbidity rate with no deaths. Twice-distilled water was associated with 100% mortality rate, as opposed to 45-75% for antiseptics, and 0-3% mortality for antibiotics. Antibiotics determined higher adhesion formation by Zühlke score as compared to saline solution (p < .001), while no difference was observed between antiseptics and saline (p = NS). Peritoneal lavage with 37 degrees C saline solution was associated with low adhesion formation and high survival rate as compared to twice-distilled water and antiseptics. Antibiotics solutions had high survival rate and high adhesion formation. Twice-distilled water and antisepsis should be avoided when based on the data obtained in this work.

Thoracoscopic localization techniques for patients with solitary pulmonary nodule and history of malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the best intrathoracoscopic localization technique in patients with single pulmonary nodule and a history of malignancy. METHODS: We divided 50 patients in two groups, well matched for diameter and depth of the pulmonary lesion. In 25 patients we performed intrathoracoscopic ultrasound to locate the pulmonary nodule (group A), whereas in the other 25 patients the radio-guided technique was adopted (group B). In both group A and group B, the localization techniques were compared with finger palpation. In group A, 12 nodules were in the left lung and 13 in the right one; in group B, 11 lesions were in the left and 14 in the right lung. In both groups, the distance of the nodule from the pleural surface was 2.6 +/- 0.5 cm (2 to 2.5 cm in 14 patients, and >2.5 cm for the remaining 11). The diameter of the nodule was 1.26 +/- 0.22 (< or =1 cm in 10 patients, and 1 to 1.5 cm in 15) in both groups. All patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection, and 10 patients with a primary pulmonary lesion underwent posterior-lateral thoracotomy for lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: In group A, ultrasound localized the nodule in 24 of 25 patients (96%) whereas finger palpation localized it in 19 of 25 (76%; not significant). In group B, both the radio-guided and finger palpation techniques localized the nodule in 20 of 25 patients (80%; not significant). No complications were recorded with the ultrasound technique; however, 10 cases of pneumothorax were detected after the radio-guided technique (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both the ultrasound and radio-guided techniques are accurate to detect solitary pulmonary nodules, but the radio-guided method yields complications as compared with the ultrasound.

Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer is associated with a higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rate and a poor long-term outcome compared with elective surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare early and late outcome after elective and emergency surgery for malignant colorectal cancer, looking for the principal determinants of a worse outcome after emergency colorectal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study of 236 patients presenting with colorectal cancer over an 8-year period was undertaken. Of these, 118 presented as emergencies, whereas 118 patients, well matched for age, sex, site of tumor and TNM admitted as elective, were included in the study. Data reviewed included postoperative mortality and morbidity and long-term outcome. RESULTS: The 30-day operative mortality rate was significantly higher in the emergency group than in the electively treated group (11.9% versus 3.4%, P < 0.01). The higher mortality rate was observed in the perforation group. The 30-day operative morbidity was higher in the emergency group (27.1% versus 12.7%, P < 0.05). Anastomotic failure was a serious complication: following primary resection, we observed 4 non-fatal (5.4%) and two fatal (2.7%) anastomotic leaks after 74 primary anastomoses. Among emergency-treated patients, the procedures characterized by the highest percentage of postoperative complications were three-stage resections (63.6%). The 5-year survival rate was greater after elective surgery (59% versus 39%). CONCLUSIONS: The early and long-term outcome following emergency colorectal surgery was significantly lower than that after elective surgery. Although medical complications in patients with end-stage cancer played an important role, surgical failures still had an important impact on outcome.

Primary rectal lymphoma as a cause of bowel obstruction. Report of a case.

BACKGROUND: Malignant lymphoma involving the rectum either as a localized process or as a manifestation of disseminated disease is rare. Several treatments have been proposed and reported, including surgical resection alone or associated with adjuvant chemoradiation, chemotherapy alone, and radiotherapy alone. METHODS: A case of bowel obstruction caused by a primary rectal MALT lymphoma is reported. Following emergency loop sigmoid colostomy the patient was started on multiple specific cycles of chemotherapy according to the MACOP-B protocol. RESULTS: At the end of chemotherapy a remarkable reduction in the size of the tumor was noted. Subsequently the patient underwent an ultralow anterior resection followed by a straight coloanal anastomosis. At 36 months of follow-up the patient is alive with no tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The present report describes the unique case of a patient with primary obstructing rectal lymphoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and sphincter-saving curative surgery.

Thoracoscopic localization techniques for patients with a single pulmonary nodule and positive oncological anamnesis: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to evaluate the best intrathoracoscopic localization technique in patients with a single pulmonary nodule and a history of malignancy. METHOD: We divided 30 patients into two groups, well matched for diameter and depth of the pulmonary lesion. In 15 patients (group A) we performed intrathoracoscopic ultrasound (US) to locate the pulmonary nodule, while in the other 15 patients (group B) intrathoracoscopic radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) was used. In both groups, the localization technique was compared to finger palpation. In group A, 6 nodules were in the left lung and 9 in the right; in group B, 7 lesions were in the left and 8 in the right lung. In each group, the distance of the nodule from the pleural surface was 2-2.5 cm in 8 patients, and > 2.5 cm in the remaining 7. In both groups, the diameter of the nodule was

[Impact of the sentinel lymph node in the staging of colorectal carcinoma]. / Impatto del linfonodo sentinella nella stadiazione del carcinoma colorettale.

In view of the very good results obtained by lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the staging of patients with melanoma or breast cancer, we investigated the feasibility of intraoperative regional lymphatic mapping in patients with primary colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine whether lymphatic mapping and sentinel node assessment can identify aberrant drainage patterns or make for better staging of the neoplasm in those cases with no or only minimal lymphatic neoplastic involvement. Sixteen consecutive patients with primary colorectal cancer (stage T2-T3) but without macroscopic involvement of the lymphatic system underwent intraoperative lymphatic mapping by injecting 1-1.5 ml of isosulfan blue dye. The identified and resected sentinel nodes were examined using conventional haematoxylin-eosin staining and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Sentinel node identification was successful in 15 out of 16 cases (93.8%). In 11 cases (73.3%) sentinel node status correctly predicted the final staging. The false-negative rate was 26.7%. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the presence of micrometastasis in one case (6.7%), which was consequently upstaged. In cases of colorectal cancer lymphatic mapping is an easy, perfectly feasible technique. However, in our experience, it would not appear to significantly improve the accuracy of the histopathological staging of colorectal carcinoma.