Relationship between type of unprovoked venous thromboembolism and cancer location: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be the first manifestation of an underlying cancer. We aimed to assess the period prevalence of occult cancer detection stratified by VTE location (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE] or both) and the anatomical relationship between occult cancer and VTE. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of adults with unprovoked VTE with at least 12 months of follow-up. Cancer types were grouped according to thoracic, abdomino-pelvic, or other locations. RESULTS: A total of 2300 patients were eligible including 1218 with DVT only (53%), 719 with PE only (31%), and 363 with both PE and DVT (16%). The pooled 12-month period prevalence of cancer in DVT only, PE only, and DVT + PE was 5.6% (95% CI, 4.4 to 7.2), 4.3% (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.9), and 5.6% (95% CI, 1.7 to 15.5), respectively. Most occult cancers were located in the abdomen (68.4%). The proportion of patients with an abdomino-pelvic cancer was not different in patients with DVT + PE (81%; 95% CI, 54 to 96) than in those with DVT (68%; 95% CI, 57 to 78) or PE alone (65%; 95% CI, 48 to 79). CONCLUSION: The 12-month prevalence of occult cancer was similar in patients with DVT only, PE only, or both. Most cancers were located in the abdomen, and there was no relationship between VTE type and cancer location.

Age-adjusted D-dimer to rule out deep vein thrombosis: findings from the PALLADIO algorithm.

Essentials The accuracy of the age-adjusted D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism is still debated. We assessed the performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with the PALLADIO algorithm. The age-adjusted threshold can reduce the need for imaging tests compared to the fixed cut-off. The safety of this approach should be confirmed in large management studies. SUMMARY: Background Age-adjusted D-dimer has been proposed to increase specificity for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the accuracy of this threshold has been recently questioned. Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance of age-adjusted D-dimer combined with clinical pretest probability (PTP) in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods PALLADIO (NCT01412242) was a multicenter management study that validated a new diagnostic algorithm, incorporating PTP, D-dimer (using the manufacturer's cut-off) and limited or extended compression ultrasonography (CUS) in outpatients with clinically suspected DVT. Patients with unlikely PTP and negative D-dimer had DVT ruled out without further testing (group 1); patients with likely PTP or positive D-dimer underwent limited CUS (group 2); patients with likely PTP and positive D-dimer underwent extended CUS (group 3). Patients with DVT ruled out at baseline had a 3-month follow-up. In this post-hoc analysis we evaluated age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off (defined as age times 10 µg L-1 , or age times 5 µg L-1 for D-dimers with a lower manufacturer's cut-off, in patients > 50 years). Results In total, 1162 patients were enrolled. At initial visit, DVT was detected in 4.0% of patients in group 2 and 53.0% in group 3. The age-adjusted D-dimer, compared with the fixed cut-off, resulted in 5.1% (95% CI, 4.0-6.5%) reduction of CUS. The incidence of symptomatic VTE during follow-up was: 0.24% (95% CI, 0.04-1.37) in group 1; 1.12% (95% CI, 0.44-2.85) in group 2; and 1.89% (95% CI, 0.64-5.40) in group 3. Conclusions The PALLADIO algorithm using age-adjusted D-dimer slightly decreased the number of required imaging tests, but this approach should be confirmed in large management studies.

OC-15 - Risk factors for cancer development after idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with the risk of cancer but the risk factors for cancer development in such patients are still uncertain. AIM: To assess risk factors for the development of cancer after a standard course of anticoagulation in patients with first episode of idiopathic VTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were enrolled in the three large prospective multicentre studies: PROLONG (NEJM 2006) PROLONG II (Blood 2010) and DULCIS (Blood 2014). Women whose index event was hormone related were excluded from the analysis. The development of cancer was recorded during a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: 1,805 patients were enrolled (M/F: 510/453), mean age: 62, median: 67; range:18-87 years). Cancer developed in 55 patients (3% ; 1.7% pt-years) of whom 15 (2.0%; 1.1% pt-years) had PE with or without DVT and 40 (3.8%; 2.1% pt-years) had DVT without PE (p=0.03). The development of cancer was associated with DVT without PE (HR:1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and age >65 (HR: 2.5; 95%: 1.3-4.9). Among patients with DVT, with or without PE, the development of cancer was associated with the presence of residual vein obstruction>4mm (RVO) at compression ultrasound (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and age>65 (HR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.3-6.2). CONCLUSIONS: Age>65 years, DVT without PE and the presence of RVO are significantly associated with the risk of developing cancer after a first episode of idiopathic VTE over a two-year follow-up.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Utility of Graduated Compression Stockings in Prevention of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) following their first proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of graduated compression stockings (GCS) in preventing PTS. METHOD: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were electronically searched from inception to January 2015 for studies investigating the effect of GCS in preventing PTS. All randomised control trials were considered for inclusion if they compared the efficacy of GCS (30-40 mmHg at the ankle) with either placebo or no stockings in adults with new proximal lower limb DVT. Methodological assessment, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. The effect of GCS was expressed as the risk difference (RD). RESULTS: A total of 686 articles were screened. Three randomised controlled trials inclusive of 1,177 patients were eligible for inclusion. PTS developed in 49-70% of control patients at 5 years. High statistical heterogeneity was observed between trials (all PTS: I(2) = 0.94; severe PTS: I(2) = 0.79). The risk difference in PTS incidence between control and GCS arms varied from 0% to 39% between trials. In trials with a higher baseline prevalence of PTS, a visual trend towards more benefit with GCS was noted. CONCLUSION: Uncertainty because of sampling variability and heterogeneity was too high to conclude in favour or against an effect of wearing compression stockings in preventing PTS. An effect may be present for higher values of baseline risk. Further evidence is needed. Article history.

New anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

In recent years, the significant limitations associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have encouraged the development of new agents. Based upon the central roles played by the serine proteases thrombin and Factor Xa in the blood coagulation cascade, direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors have been developed. These agents, which include the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and idrabiotaparinux are free from many of the limitations of VKAs. According to the results of available phase III randomized clinical trials, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are effective and safe enough to qualify as ideal oral anticoagulants for the initial and long-term treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban does not require an initial parenteral treatment and can be given in once daily administrations after the first three weeks. Both of them have limitations for the treatment of patients with severe renal failure, and require further investigations in cancer patients and in pregnant patients with VTE. Both of them lack an antidote.

International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines addressing the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients are heterogeneous and their implementation has been suboptimal worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To establish a common international consensus addressing practical, clinically relevant questions in this setting. METHODS: An international consensus working group of experts was set up to develop guidelines according to an evidence-based medicine approach, using the GRADE system. RESULTS: For the initial treatment of established VTE: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended [1B]; fondaparinux and unfractionated heparin (UFH) can be also used [2D]; thrombolysis may only be considered on a case-by-case basis [Best clinical practice (Guidance)]; vena cava filters (VCF) may be considered if contraindication to anticoagulation or pulmonary embolism recurrence under optimal anticoagulation; periodic reassessment of contraindications to anticoagulation is recommended and anticoagulation should be resumed when safe; VCF are not recommended for primary VTE prophylaxis in cancer patients [Guidance]. For the early maintenance (10 days to 3 months) and long-term (beyond 3 months) treatment of established VTE, LMWH for a minimum of 3 months is preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) [1A]; idraparinux is not recommended [2C]; after 3-6 months, LMWH or VKA continuation should be based on individual evaluation of the benefit-risk ratio, tolerability, patient preference and cancer activity [Guidance]. For the treatment of VTE recurrence in cancer patients under anticoagulation, three options can be considered: (i) switch from VKA to LMWH when treated with VKA; (ii) increase in LMWH dose when treated with LMWH, and (iii) VCF insertion [Guidance]. For the prophylaxis of postoperative VTE in surgical cancer patients, use of LMWH o.d. or low dose of UFH t.i.d. is recommended; pharmacological prophylaxis should be started 12-2 h preoperatively and continued for at least 7-10 days; there are no data allowing conclusion that one type of LMWH is superior to another [1A]; there is no evidence to support fondaparinux as an alternative to LMWH [2C]; use of the highest prophylactic dose of LMWH is recommended [1A]; extended prophylaxis (4 weeks) after major laparotomy may be indicated in cancer patients with a high risk of VTE and low risk of bleeding [2B]; the use of LMWH for VTE prevention in cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery may be recommended as for laparotomy [Guidance]; mechanical methods are not recommended as monotherapy except when pharmacological methods are contraindicated [2C]. For the prophylaxis of VTE in hospitalized medical patients with cancer and reduced mobility, we recommend prophylaxis with LMWH, UFH or fondaparinux [1B]; for children and adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia treated with l-asparaginase, depending on local policy and patient characteristics, prophylaxis may be considered in some patients [Guidance]; in patients receiving chemotherapy, prophylaxis is not recommended routinely [1B]; primary pharmacological prophylaxis of VTE may be indicated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic [1B] or lung [2B] cancer treated with chemotherapy and having a low risk of bleeding; in patients treated with thalidomide or lenalidomide combined with steroids and/or chemotherapy, VTE prophylaxis is recommended; in this setting, VKA at low or therapeutic doses, LMWH at prophylactic doses and low-dose aspirin have shown similar effects; however, the efficacy of these regimens remains unclear [2C]. Special situations include brain tumors, severe renal failure (CrCl<30 mL min(-1) ), thrombocytopenia and pregnancy. Guidances are provided in these contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination and implementation of good clinical practice for the management of VTE, the second cause of death in cancer patients, is a major public health priority.

International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although long-term indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) and loss of the CVC, there is lack of consensus on management of CVC-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients and heterogeneity in clinical practices worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To establish common international Good Clinical Practices Guidelines (GCPG) for the management of CRT in cancer patients. METHODS: An international working group of experts was set up to develop GCPG according to an evidence-based medicine approach, using the GRADE system. RESULTS: For the treatment of established CRT in cancer patients, we found no prospective randomized studies, two non-randomized prospective studies and one retrospective study examining the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) plus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). One retrospective study evaluated the benefit of CVC removal and two small retrospective studies were on thrombolytic drugs. For the treatment of symptomatic CRT, anticoagulant treatment (AC) is recommended for a minimum of 3 months; in this setting, LMWHs are suggested. VKAs can also be used, in the absence of direct comparisons of these two types of anticoagulants in this setting [Guidance]. The CVC can be kept in place if it is functional, well-positioned and non-infected and there is good resolution under close surveillance; whether the CVC is kept or removed, no standard approach in terms of AC duration has been established [Guidance]. For the prophylaxis of CRT in cancer patients, we found six randomized studies investigating the efficacy and safety of VKA vs. placebo or no treatment, one on the efficacy and safety of unfractionnated heparin, six on the value of LMWH, one double-blind randomized and one non randomized study on thrombolytic drugs and six meta-analyses of AC and CVC thromboprophylaxis. Type of catheter (open-ended like the Hickman(®) catheter vs. closed-ended catheter with a valve like the Groshong(®) catheter), its position (above, below or at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium) and method of placement may influence the onset of CRT on the basis of six retrospective trials, four prospective non-randomized trials, three randomized trials and one meta-analysis. In light of these data: use of AC for routine prophylaxis of CRT is not recommended [1A]; a CVC should be inserted on the right side, in the jugular vein, and distal extremity of the CVC should be located at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium [1A]. CONCLUSION: Dissemination and implementation of these international GCPG for the prevention and treatment of CRT in cancer patients at each national level is a major public health priority, needing worldwide collaboration.

The optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism: how long is long enough?

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) approaches 40% of all patients after 10 years of follow-up. This risk is higher in patients with permanent risk factors of thrombosis such as active cancer, prolonged immobilization from medical diseases, and antiphospholipid syndrome; in carriers of several thrombophilic abnormalities, including deficiencies of natural anticoagulants; and in patients with unprovoked presentation. Patients with permanent risk factors of thrombosis should receive indefinite anticoagulation, consisting of subtherapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin in cancer patients, and oral anticoagulants in all other conditions. Patients whose VTE is triggered by major surgery or trauma should be offered three months of anticoagulation. Patients with unprovoked VTE, including carriers of thrombophilia, and those whose thrombotic event is associated with minor risk factors (such as hormonal treatment, minor injuries, long travel) should receive at least three months of anticoagulation. The decision as to go on or discontinue anticoagulation after this period should be individually tailored and balanced against the haemorrhagic risk. Post-baseline variables, such as the D-dimer determination and the ultrasound assessment of residual thrombosis can help identify those patients in whom anticoagulation can be safely discontinued. As a few emerging anti-Xa and anti-IIa compounds seem to induce fewer haemorrhagic complications than conventional anticoagulation, while preserving at least the same effectiveness, they have the potential to open new scenarios for decisions regarding the duration of anticoagulation in patients with VTE.

Is incidentally detected pulmonary embolism in cancer patients less severe? A case-control study.

Incidental pulmonary embolism (PE) in cancer patients is usually thought to be of mild degree. We investigated the severity of PE and evaluated the potential of raising the suspicion of PE in such patients. The computed tomography (CT) extent of PE was evaluated in 19 consecutive unsuspected and 19 randomly selected symptomatic patients. A clinical pattern useful for suspecting PE was also searched. On CT, number of embolized vessels, location of emboli, and simple instrumental findings were not different in the two groups. PE is not less severe in unsuspected cancer patients; moreover, PE may be clinically suspected in such patients.

Fatal bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry.

BACKGROUND: Fatal bleeding is a serious consequence of anticoagulant therapy, but factors associated with fatal bleeding during the first 3 months of treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are uncertain. METHODS: Using data from RIETE, an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with acute VTE, we assessed risk factors for fatal bleeding among all patients. We then used this information to derive a clinical model that would stratify a patient's risk of fatal bleeding during the first 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Of 24 395 patients, 546 (2.24%) had a major bleed and 135 (0.55%) had a fatal bleed. The gastrointestinal tract was the most common site (40% of fatal bleeds), followed by intracranial bleeding (25%). Fatal bleeding was independently associated with the following factors at the time of VTE diagnosis: age >75 years (OR, 2.16), metastatic cancer (OR, 3.80), immobility > or = 4 days (OR, 1.99), a major bleed within the past 30 days (OR, 2.64), an abnormal prothrombin time (OR, 2.09), a platelet count < 100 x 10(9) L(-1) (OR, 2.23), creatinine clearance < 30 mL min(-1) (OR, 2.27), anemia (OR, 1.54), and distal deep vein thrombosis (OR, 0.39). INR at the time of bleeding is not known. A clinical prediction rule for risk of fatal bleeding that included nine baseline factors was derived. Fatal bleeding occurred in 0.16% (95% CI, 0.11-0.23) of the low-risk, 1.06% (95% CI, 0.85-1.30) of the moderate-risk, and 4.24% (95% CI, 2.76-6.27) of the high-risk category. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics and laboratory variables can identify patients at high risk for fatal bleeding during treatment of VTE.

The long-term risk of cancer in patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), 15-20% will have prevalent cancer when VTE is diagnosed but little is known about such patients' long-term risk, time course and predictors of new cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied an inception cohort of patients with a first VTE who were not diagnosed with cancer within 3 months after VTE and who had follow-up for up to 120 months. We determined the annual risk for a new cancer [number of events and 95% confidence interval (CI)] per 100 person-years in all patients and in those with unprovoked VTE and identified predictors for new cancer. RESULTS: We studied 1852 patients with VTE who received anticoagulant therapy for 12 months (mean) and were followed for 4.2 years (mean). During follow-up, there were 105 (5.7%) patients diagnosed with new cancer during the period after the initial 3 months from diagnosis, for an annual risk of 1.32 (CI, 1.09-1.60) per 100 person-years. The risk for new cancer appeared uniform over time. The annual risk for new cancer was more than 2-fold higher in patients presenting with unprovoked compared with those with provoked VTE [1.76 (CI, 1.39-2.20) vs. 0.83 (CI, 0.58-1.16) per 100 person-years; P<0.001]. Clinical predictors for new cancer were increasing age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.23; CI, 1.05-1.44] and unprovoked VTE (HR, 1.86; CI, 1.21-2.87). CONCLUSION: In patients with a first VTE and without prevalent cancer, the risk for new cancer is about 1-2% per year, appears to be uniform over time, and is higher in patients with unprovoked VTE and those with advanced age.

Clinical outcome in patients with venous thromboembolism and hidden cancer: findings from the RIETE Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Although extensive screening in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) may result in early identification of hidden cancer, it is unknown whether the prognosis of these patients may be favorably influenced. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RIETE is an ongoing, prospective registry of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed, symptomatic, acute VTE. We compared the 3-month outcome of patients with hidden cancer with that in patients in whom no symptoms of cancer were noted. RESULTS: Of 17,475 patients with acute VTE, 2852 (16%) had cancer diagnosed before VTE or during admission. Hidden cancer was detected in 178 (1.2%) of the remaining 14,623 patients. The most common sites were lung, prostate, colorectum, or hematologic, and 51% had metastases. As compared with patients in whom no symptoms of cancer were noted, those with hidden cancer had an increased incidence of recurrent VTE (11.4% vs. 2.1%; P < 0.001), major bleeding (5.1% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.007), and mortality (20% vs. 5.4%; P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, patients aged 60-75 years [odds ratio 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.7], with idiopathic VTE (odds ratio 3.0; 95% CI 2.2-4.2), with bilateral thrombosis (odds ratio 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1) or with anemia (odds ratio 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.6) were at an increased risk for hidden cancer. CONCLUSIONS: VTE patients with hidden cancer have an increased incidence of recurrences, major bleeding or death during the first 3 months of therapy. With four simple, easily obtainable variables, it is possible to identify a subgroup of VTE patients with a higher risk for hidden cancer.

Venous thromboembolism and atherosclerosis: is there a link?

After the initial demonstration provided 4 years ago by a case-control study in the New England Journal of Medicine, numerous investigations have addressed the association between venous and arterial thrombotic disorders. According to the results of recent studies, the two conditions are likely to share common risk factors, including age, obesity, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, hyperlipemia and metabolic syndrome. The nature of this association is unclear. On the one hand, atherosclerosis has the potential to promote the development of thrombotic disorders in the venous system. On the other hand, the two clinical conditions can be simultaneously triggered by biological stimuli responsible for activating coagulation and inflammatory pathways in both the arterial and the venous system. Based on the results of two population-based studies carried out in the USA, atherosclerosis is unlikely to constitute a risk factor for venous thromboembolic (VTE) disorders. Several recent studies have consistently shown that subjects with VTE of unknown origin are at a higher risk of subsequent arterial cardiovascular events than subjects with secondary VTE and matched control individuals. In conclusion, the separate nature of arterial and venous disorders has been challenged. Future studies are needed to clarify the nature of this association, to assess its extent, and to evaluate its implications for clinical practice.

Upper extremity DVT in oncological patients: analysis of risk factors. Data from the RIETE registry.

AIM: The aim of the study is to up date informations on the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from the Informatised Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE). METHODS: RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with symptomatic, objectively confirmed, acute venous thromboembolism. In this analysis the clinical characteristics and 3-month outcome of all cancer patients with upper-extremity DVT were evaluated. RESULTS: Up to February 2006, a total of 14,391 patients with symptomatic, objectively confirmed acute venous thromboembolism had been enrolled in RIETE. Of the 2,945 patients with active cancer 196 (6.7%) had arm DVT: 104 had catheter-associated DVT. Most cancer patients with arm DVT were males, younger than 65, and had a low incidence of additional risk factors or underlying diseases. Twenty of them (10%) had symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Most patients were treated with low-molecular-weigh heparin, both initially (94%) and after discharge (75%). During the 3-month follow-up period 12 patients (6.1%) developed VTE recurrences (PE 6, DVT 6), 8 (4.1%) had major bleeding (fatal in 3), 43 (22%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from the RIETE registry show that upper limb DVT is a serious complication in patients with cancer, with a high incidence of recurrences and bleeding complications.

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: guidelines of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

Thromboembolic complications represent one of the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Although several data have been published demonstrating the strong association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), there is poor perception, among oncologists, of the level of risk of thrombosis and of relevance of managing VTE in these patients. The Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM) has provided some recommendations to direct clinical practice according to evidence-based data concerning cancer and VTE. In fact, we conducted an extensive literature review (1996-2005) to produce evidence-based recommendations to improve perceptions of the magnitude of this risk among Italian medical and surgical oncologists and alert on the new approaches to prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Levels of evidence are given according to a five-point rating system, and similarly for each key recommendation a five-point rating system suggests if the evidence is strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks and burden.

The metabolic syndrome and the risk of venous thrombosis: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The results of recent studies have suggested that patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE) might be at increased risk of asymptomatic atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors for atherosclerosis. Its impact on VTE is unknown. METHODS: In a case-control study, consecutive patients with objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and control subjects with objectively excluded DVT underwent clinical assessment for the presence of the metabolic syndrome according to the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria. The presence of known risk factors for DVT was documented. Patients with DVT secondary to cancer were excluded. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was compared between patients with idiopathic DVT and controls. RESULTS: We enrolled 93 patients with a first episode of idiopathic DVT and 107 controls. The mean age was 65.1 and 63.7 years, respectively. The metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 50.5% of patients with idiopathic DVT and in 34.6% of controls [odds ratio (OR) 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05, 3.56]. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and smoke, the metabolic syndrome remained independently associated with idiopathic DVT (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.04, 3.63). In patients with secondary DVT, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic syndrome may play a role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic DVT and may act as link between venous thrombosis and atherosclerosis.

Decision analysis for cancer screening in idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The SOMIT trial randomized patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (IVTE) and without signs of cancer at routine medical examination, to extensive screening for cancer plus 2 years of follow-up or to just 2-year follow-up. METHODS: The data of the SOMIT-trial were used to perform a decision analysis. The screening tests were divided in several possible strategies. The number of detected cancer patients and the number of patients investigated further for an eventually benign condition were calculated for each strategy. The total costs for the screening strategy and for each detected cancer patient were determined. Based on the tumor type, stage, age and gender of the individual cancer patient, the difference in live years gained (LYG) was calculated between the two study groups. RESULTS: Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen combined with sputum cytology and mammography detected 12 of the 14 patients with cancer and had one false-positive result. In general, screening strategies including abdominal/pelvic ultrasonography (US) or tumor markers yielded a higher number of patients needed to screen in comparison with those using abdominal/pelvic CT. Furthermore, the strategies which included colonoscopy, tumor markers, and abdominal/pelvic US were significantly more costly, had inferior LYG and higher costs per LYG, when compared with strategies using abdominal/pelvic CT. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of this analysis, the screening for cancer with a strategy including abdominal/pelvic CT with or without mammography and/or sputum cytology appears potentially useful for cancer screening in patients with IVTE. The cost-effectiveness analysis of this strategy needs confirmation in a large trial.

Relation between quality of anticoagulant treatment and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: About 30% of patients with an episode of adequately treated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) develop the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) within 2 years. During treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) patients spend only 60% of time between an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0 and 3.0. We hypothesized that patients who spend a large amount of their time beneath this range will have an increased risk of the PTS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between the quality of anticoagulant therapy with VKA and the risk of the development of the PTS. METHODS: The time spent beneath the therapeutic range was calculated for patients with a first episode of DVT, who were treated with VKA for at least 3 months. At follow-up assessments for a maximum of 5 years, presence and severity of signs and symptoms of PTS were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients, with a median duration of follow-up of 4.9 years were included for analysis. Of these, 81 patients (33%) developed the PTS. The multivariate model showed that patients who spend more than 50% of their time beneath an INR level of 2.0 are at higher risk for PTS [odds ratio (OR): 2.71, 95% CI: 1.44-5.10]. CONCLUSIONS: Low quality treatment with VKA, which is a common condition, is related to the occurrence of the PTS in patients with DVT. Strategies aimed at improving the quality of long-term anticoagulation might have the potential to reduce the incidence of this complication.