Costal Cartilage Considerations: Novel Use of Handheld Ultrasound Device in Rhinoplasty.

Handheld ultrasound devices can be used in revision rhinoplasty to evaluate the calcification of costal rib cartilage that is to be harvested for grafting. This article provides instructions on how to perform this technique. Laryngoscope, 134:651-653, 2024.

Prognostic Utility of Tumor Stage versus American Thyroid Association Risk Class in Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic strengths of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification in well-differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and their implications in guiding medical decision-making and epidemiological study designs. METHODS: The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for DTC patients. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and Kaplan-Meier analyses modeled patient mortality and overall survival, respectively. Each CPH model was evaluated by its concordance index, measure of explained randomness (MER), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Overall, 134,226 patients were analyzed, with an average age of 48.1 ± 15.1 years (76.9% female). Univariate CPH models using AJCC staging demonstrated higher concordance indices, MERs, and AUCs than those using ATA risk classification (all p < 0.001). Multivariable CPH models using AJCC staging demonstrated higher concordance indices (p = 0.049), MERs (p = 0.046), and AUCs (p = 0.002) than those using ATA risk classification. The AICs of multivariable AJCC staging and ATA risk models were 7.564 × 104 and 7.603 × 104 , respectively. AJCC stage I tumors were associated with greater overall survival than those classified as ATA low risk, whereas AJCC stages II-III and stage IV tumors demonstrated worse survival than ATA intermediate- and high-risk tumors, respectively (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AJCC staging may be a more predictive system for patient survival than ATA risk. The prognostic utility of these two systems converges when additional demographic and clinical factors are considered. AJCC staging was found to classify patients across a wider range of survival patterns than the ATA risk stratification system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:205-211, 2023.

Outcomes of Concurrent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Rhinoplasty: A Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and functional nasal airway obstruction are common but distinct medical problems which affect quality of life. In certain instances, patients often benefit from concomitant functional septorhinoplasty, or elect for cosmetic rhinoplasty, in addition to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and prefer combining procedures. Determining outcomes of combined surgery is important when discussing risks and benefits with patients. METHODS: A thorough literature search of articles published in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Patients were categorized as either having FESS or rhinoplasty alone or combined. Binary random-effects models were applied to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for outcomes including complications, recurrence, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 55 screened articles, 6 were included in the analysis, and of these, 6 (405 patients), 2 (90 patients), 4 (290 patients), and 3 (190 patients) provided data for postoperative complications, recurrence of CRS symptoms, revision rates, and patient satisfaction, respectively. Major complications were observed in 11 (5.8%) total combined cases, 0 (0%) FESS cases, and 6 (3.5%) rhinoplasty cases with no statistical difference between combined cases and rhinoplasties (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.45-4.16, p = 0.58). Recurrence of CRS symptoms was noted in 35.6% combined cases and 28.9% FESS cases (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.55-3.64, p = 0.47). There was no observed difference in revision rates between combined and isolated rhinoplasties (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43-2.32, p = 1). Lastly, 91.6% of patients were satisfied with results of combined cases compared to 87.4% of patients in standalone cases (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.61-4.03, p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Aggregate evidence demonstrates similar risk in complication rates in combined surgical cases compared to stand-alone rhinoplasty. There appears to be no significant difference in recurrence of symptoms, revision rates or patient satisfaction.

Video Standards for Rhinoplasty Education: A Review and Recommended Guidelines.

Importance: Intraoperative videography is widely used to record rhinoplasty procedures, yet little is known about the optimal surgical vantage points at critical procedural steps. Objective: To assess commonly used camera angles in public and proprietary intraoperative rhinoplasty videos and discuss approaches to obtaining these viewing angles. Design: Public and propriety rhinoplasty videos were reviewed and categorized based on procedure type, specific area(s) of focus, and camera angles utilized at a series of critical operative steps. The most commonly used camera angles were recorded and assessed based on surgical field visualization and the authors' personal recording experiences. Results: Of the 114 videos that met inclusion criteria, 49 were full-length open rhinoplasty procedures, 20 full-length endonasal rhinoplasty procedures, 17 tip techniques, 8 opening techniques, 7 fashioning grafts, 7 osteotomies, and 6 cartilage harvests. With respective to footage acquisition, the upward camera angle was most frequently used for recording, and endoscopic view was least frequently used. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings demonstrate that there is extensive variability in camera angles between surgical films. Moreover, many of these camera angles are insufficient due to obstruction by surgical staff, inability to visualize deep structures, and difficulty capturing the three-dimensional nasal framework. A guide indicating the best viewing angles for different aspects of the procedure would be useful to optimize educational videos.