Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infection ; 51(5): 1249-1271, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37420083
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 17(7): e0011465, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) is a neglected disease of the genital tract due to the inflammatory response to the presence of Schistosoma haematobium eggs in the genital tract. The WHO has prioritized the improvement of diagnostics for FGS and previous studies have explored the PCR-based detection of Schistosoma DNA on genital specimens, with encouraging results. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FGS among women living in an endemic district in North-western Tanzania, using PCR on samples collected though cervical-vaginal swabs, and to compare the performance of self-collected and healthcare worker-collected (operator-collected) samples, and the acceptability of the different sampling methods. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 211 women living in 2 villages in the Maswa district of North-western Tanzania. Urine, self-collected and operator-collected cervical-vaginal swabs were obtained from participants. A questionnaire was administered, focusing on the comfortability in undergoing different diagnostic procedures. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, as assessed by eggs in urine, was 8.5% (95%CI 5.1-13.1). DNA was pre-isolated from genital swabs and transported at room temperature to Italy for molecular analysis. Prevalence of active schistosomiasis, urinary schistosomiasis, and FGS were 10.0% (95% CI 6.3-14.8), 8.5% (95%CI 5.1-13.1), and 4.7% (95%CI 2.3-8.5), respectively. When real-time PCR was performed after a pre-amplification step, the prevalence of active schistosomiasis increased to 10.4% (95%CI 6.7-15.4), and FGS to 5.2% (95%CI 2.6-9.1). Of note, more cases were detected by self-collected than operator-collected swabs. The vast majority of participants (95.3%) declared that they were comfortable/very comfortable about genital self-sampling, which was indicated as the preferred sampling method by 40.3% of participants. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study show that genital self-sampling followed by pre-amplified PCR on room temperature-stored DNA is a useful method from both technical and acceptability point of views. This encourages further studies to optimize samples processing, and identify the best operational flow to allow integration of FGS screening into women health programmes, such as HPV screening.


Assuntos
Genitália Feminina , Esquistossomose Urinária , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Esquistossomose Urinária/diagnóstico , Esquistossomose Urinária/epidemiologia , Esquistossomose Urinária/urina , Schistosoma haematobium/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real
3.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(2)2021 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33503986

RESUMO

The differential diagnosis of hepatic cystic echinococcosis (CE) may be challenging. When imaging is insufficient, serology can be applied, but no consensus diagnostic algorithm exists. We evaluated the performances of nine serological tests commercialized in Europe for the diagnosis of "echinococcosis". We performed a diagnostic accuracy study using a panel of sera from patients with hepatic CE (n = 45 "liquid" content stages, n = 25 "solid" content stages) and non-CE focal liver lesions (n = 54 with "liquid" content, n = 11 with "solid" content). The diagnosis and staging of CE were based on ultrasound (gold standard). Nine commercial seroassays (5 ELISA, 2 WB, 1 Chemiluminescence Immunoassay [CLIA] and 1 Immunochromatographic test [ICT]) were the index tests. Sensitivity (Se) ranged from 43 to 94% and from 31 to 87%, and specificity (Sp) from 68 to 100% and from 94 to 100%, when borderline results were considered positive or negative, respectively. Three seroassays (2 ELISA, 1 WB) were excluded from further analyses due to poor performances. When tests were combined, Sp was 98-100%. The best results were obtained using the WB-LDBIO alone (Se 83%) or as a third test after two non-WB tests (Se 67-86%). A validated WB or two non-WB tests, read with stringent criteria (borderline = negative and considered positive only if concordant positive), possibly confirmed by the WB, appear sensible approaches.

4.
Malar J ; 18(1): 17, 2019 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30670018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transfusion with Plasmodium-infected blood represents a risk for malaria transmission, a rare but severe event. Several non-endemic countries implement a strategy for the screening of candidate blood donors including questionnaire for the identification of at-risk subjects and laboratory testing of blood samples, often serology-based, with temporary deferral from donation for individuals with a positive result. In Italy, the most recent legislation, issued in November 2015, introduced the use of serological tests for the detection of anti-Plasmodium antibodies. METHODS: In the absence of a gold standard for malaria serology, the aim of this work was to evaluate five commercial ELISA kits, and to determine their accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in comparison to immuno-fluorescence antibody test (IFAT), and their agreement (concordance of results). Serum samples from malaria patients or from subjects with malaria history (N = 64), malaria naïve patients with other parasitic infections (N = 15), malaria naïve blood donors (N = 8) and malaria exposed candidate blood donors (N = 36) were tested. RESULTS: The specificity of all ELISA kits was 100%, while sensitivity ranged between 53 and 64% when compared to IFAT on malaria patients samples. When tested on candidate blood donors' samples, ELISA kits showed highly variable agreement (42-94%) raising the possibility that the same individual could be included or excluded from donation depending on the test in use by the transfusion centre. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate how the lack of a gold standard for malaria serology must be taken into account in the application and future revision of current legislation. There is need of developing more sensitive serological assays. Moreover, the adoption of a unique serological test at national level is recommended, as well as the development of screening algorithms based on multiple laboratory tests, including molecular assays.


Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Malária/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Plasmodium/isolamento & purificação , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/instrumentação , Itália , Malária/parasitologia , Malária/transmissão , Programas de Rastreamento/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 53(1): 1-6, 2012 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22110073

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Differential diagnosis between acute optic disc edema (ODE) and optic disc pseudoedema (PODE) may be a clinical challenge even for well-trained ophthalmologists. Funduscopy remains the first-line investigation. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of funduscopy in differentiating ODE from PODE. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, two-center study of subjects referred for presumed acute ODE. During funduscopy, each observer completed a form concerning the presence/absence of the 10 conventional signs of ODE. Seventy-four patients with ODE and 48 subjects with PODE were included in the analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity from all possible combinations of signs were calculated by support vector machine (SVM) analysis. RESULTS: As a single sign, the swelling of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer had the highest accuracy (0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.97). Little variation was observed when more than fours signs were present. The best four-sign combinations were SWELLING, HEMORRHAGES, papilla ELEVATION, and CONGESTION of peripapillary vessels (accuracy, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.89). The presence of retinal or choroidal folds appeared to be a pathognomonic sign of true ODE (100% sensitivity) but had a low rate of presentation (23%). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of at least four ophthalmoscopic signs (with the sign "swelling" included) gives the highest accuracy. Furthermore, peripapillary retinal folds seem to be related exclusively to ODE because they were never observed in our PODE group. These data may be useful for clinicians when evaluating patients referred for presumed optic disc edema in the acute phase.


Assuntos
Oftalmoscopia , Disco Óptico/patologia , Papiledema/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão Intracraniana/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurite Óptica/diagnóstico , Neuropatia Óptica Isquêmica/diagnóstico , Pseudotumor Cerebral/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA