Establishing the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State for the Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Score in a Postoperative Non-Shoulder Hand and Upper-Extremity Population.

PURPOSE: The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a threshold score on a patient-reported outcome measurement beyond which patients consider themselves "well." Our purpose was to establish the PASS for the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain in a 1-year postoperative hand surgery population. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients undergoing non-shoulder upper-extremity surgery at a single, tertiary medical center identified over a 9-month period. At 1 year after surgery, NRS pain and responses to a pain-specific anchor question were collected. Patients were dichotomized based on achieving "PASS(+)" or failing to achieve "PASS(-)" an acceptable symptom state based upon their response to a pain-specific anchor question. Threshold values of a PASS(+) state were calculated for the NRS pain score using the following three methods: (1) mean score of PASS(+) patients, (2) Tubach method (75th percentile threshold for PASS(+) patients), and (3) the Youden index (receiver operating curve analysis to maximize sensitivity and specificity). RESULTS: Of 233 included patients, mean age was 54 years (±17), and 58% (n = 136) were women. Mean NRS pain scores differed between PASS(+) and PASS(-) patients (0.7 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 2.7, respectively). PASS(-) patients were more likely to be non-White and have a diagnosed psychiatric comorbidity. Patient-acceptable symptom state estimates ranged from 0.73 to 2.1 for NRS pain, depending on the calculation method (0.73 for the mean score method, 1.0 for the Tubach method, and 2.1 for the Youden index). The area under the curve for the Youden index method was 0.86 consistent with excellent discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the value of 2.1 to represent the PASS threshold for the NRS pain score in this population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This PASS value should be used when interpreting NRS pain score outcomes at a population level. This threshold is expected to yield excellent discrimination for patient satisfaction when applied to a postoperative hand surgery population.

Linking QuickDASH and PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer-Adaptive Test Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study.

PURPOSE: Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for hand and upper-extremity surgery patients using measures such as the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), as well as general measures including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function domain via a Computer-Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE CAT), has become commonplace. The aim of this study was to link, for crosswalking, the qDASH measure to both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT (v1.2 and v2.0). METHODS: We included 18,944 hand and upper-extremity patients who completed both versions of the PROMIS UE CAT and the qDASH at the same clinical encounter. Shoulder pathology was excluded. Score linkage was performed using the R package equate, and multiple equating models (linear regression, identity, mean, linear, equipercentile, and circle-arc models) were used to establish crosswalk tables. RESULTS: Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores were 38.2 (SD = 23.1) and 36.6 (SD = 9.8), respectively. Mean qDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 scores were 37.3 (SD = 21.8) and 38.3 (SD = 10.4), respectively. Pearson correlations had very strong linear relationships between the qDASH and the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 (r = -0.83 [-0.84, -0.92] and r = -0.80 [-0.81, -0.80], respectively). For the equipercentile equating models, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) had very strong positive relationships to linking measures with ICC = 0.85 (0.84, 0.86) for the qDASH-UE CAT v1.2 crosswalk and ICC = 0.83 (0.82, 0.84) for the qDASH-UE CAT v2.0 crosswalk. CONCLUSIONS: The linkages establish crosswalk tables using equipercentile equating models to convert the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and v2.0 scores to the qDASH and vice versa. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides crosswalk tables for commonly collected PROMs in hand surgery, increasing the comparability of results between centers using different PROMs to study the same conditions or treatments.

Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population.

BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hand surgery. As a result, a diverse array of PROM instruments have been utilized across centers over time. Lack of score interchangeability limits the ability to compare or conglomerate scores when new instruments are introduced. Our aim was to develop a linkage for the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT scores and develop crosswalk tables for interconversion between these PROMs. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted to identify adult (≥ 18y) patients seen by orthopaedic hand surgeons at a single academic tertiary care hospital who had completed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT score at the same visit. For those with multiple visits, only one randomly selected visit was included in the analyses. Pearson's correlation was calculated to determine the linear relationship between the scores. Linkage from PF to UE was performed utilizing several commonly utilized equating models (identity, mean, linear, equipercentile and circle-arc methods). The performance of the models was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) between observed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and estimated PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores generated using the model as well as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The model chosen as the 'best' was further assessed for population invariance using root expected mean squared difference (REMSD) where < 0.08 were considered good. RESULTS: Of 10,081 included patients, mean age was 48.3 (SD = 17.0), and 54% were female (5,477/10,081). Mean UE CAT v1.2 and PF CAT scores were 37 (SD = 9.8) and 46 (SD = 10.0), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.70). All methods performed acceptably (ICC ≥ 0.66 and RMSE < = 7.52 for all). The equipercentile method had the highest ICC (ICC = 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71)) while the mean and circle arc methods had the lowest RMSE. The circle arc method is the most reliable with the smallest standard error and has satisfactory population invariance across age group (REMSD 0.065) and sex (REMSD 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Crosswalk tables to be used for bidirectional conversion between scores were created. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The effect of lateralization and distalization after Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between multiple radiographic measures of lateralization and distalization and clinical outcome scores after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all RTSAs performed by the senior author between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2017. We then evaluated the visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and complication and reoperation rates at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We measured preoperative and postoperative (2-week) radiographs for the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA), lateral humeral offset, and the distance from the glenoid to the lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity. A multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the postoperative radiographic measurements on final patient-reported outcomes (ASES scores, SST, and VAS pain). RESULTS: The cohort included 216 shoulders from unique patients who had patient-reported outcome scores available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (average, 4.0 ± 1.9 years) for a total follow-up rate of 70%. In the multivariable models, more lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final ASES scores -0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.88, -0.17; P = .004), and more distalization (DSA) was associated with better final ASES scores 0.40 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.69; P = .007). More lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final SST scores -0.06 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.003; P = .039). Finally, greater distalization (DSA) was associated with lower final VAS pain scores, ratio = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Greater distalization and less lateralization are associated with better function and less pain after a Grammont-style RTSA. When using a Grammont-style implant, remaining consistent with Grammont's principles of implant placement will afford better final clinical outcomes.

Extracardiac Manifestations Fail to Predict the Severity of Cardiac Phenotype in Children and Young Adults with Marfan Syndrome.

We performed a secondary analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network (PHN) Marfan Trial public-use database to evaluate associations between extracardiac features and cardiac and aortic phenotypes in study participants. Aortic aneurysm phenotype was defined as aortic root Z-score ≥4.5, aortic root growth rate ≥75th percentile, aortic dissection, and aortic surgery. Severe cardiac phenotype was defined as aortic dissection, aortic Z-score ≥4.5, aortic valve surgery, at least moderate mitral regurgitation, mitral valve surgery, left ventricular dysfunction, or death. Extracardiac manifestations were characterized by specific organ system involvement and by a novel aggregate extracardiac score (AES) that was created for this study based on the original Ghent nosology. Mixed effects logistic regression analysis compared AES and systems involvement to outcomes. Of 608 participants (60% male), the median age at enrollment was 10.8 years (interquartile range: 6, 15.4). Aortic aneurysm phenotype was observed in 71% of participants and 64% had severe cardiac phenotype. On univariable analysis, skeletal (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.01, 3.72; p = 0.05), skin manifestation (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.34; p = 0.01) and AES (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.34; p = 0.02) were associated with aortic aneurysm phenotype but were not significant in multivariable analysis. There was no association between extracardiac manifestations and severe cardiac phenotype. Thus, the severity of cardiac manifestations in Marfan syndrome (MFS) was independent of extracardiac phenotype and AES. Severity of extracardiac involvement did not appear to be a useful clinical marker for cardiovascular risk-stratification in this cohort of children and young adults with MFS.

Postsurgical opioid prescribing among veterans using community care for orthopedic surgery at non-VA hospitals compared to a VA hospital with a transitional pain service: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The USA provides medical services to its military veterans through Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical centers. Passage of recent legislation has increased the number of veterans having VHA-paid orthopedic surgery at non-VHA facilities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among veterans who underwent orthopedic joint surgery paid for by the VHA either at the Salt Lake City VHA Medical Center (VAMC) or at non-VHA hospitals between January 2018 and December 2021. 562 patients were included in the study, of which 323 used a non-VHA hospital and 239 patients the VAMC. The number of opioid tablets prescribed at discharge, the total number prescribed by postdischarge day 90, and the number of patients still filling opioid prescriptions between 90 and 120 days after surgery were compared between groups. RESULTS: Veterans who underwent orthopedic surgery at a non-VHA hospital were prescribed more opioid tablets at discharge (median (IQR)); (40 (30-60) non-VHA vs 30 (20-47.5) VAMC, p<0.001) and in the first 90 days after surgery than patients who had surgery at the Salt Lake City VAMC (60 (40-120) vs 35 (20-60), p<0.001). Patients who had surgery at Salt Lake City VAMC were also significantly less likely to fill opioid prescriptions past 90 days after hospital discharge (OR (95% CI) 0.06 (0.01 to 0.48), p=0.007). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that veterans who have surgery at a veterans affairs hospital with a transitional pain service are at lower risk for larger opioid prescriptions both at discharge and within 90 days after surgery as well as persistent opioid use beyond 90 days after discharge than if they have surgery at a community hospital.

Management of undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) is a rare tumor for which there are few evidence-based guidelines. The aim of this study was to define current management strategies and outcomes for these patients using a multi-institutional dataset curated by the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for patients with UESL treated across 17 children's hospitals in North America from 1989 to 2019. Factors analyzed included patient and tumor characteristics, PRETEXT group, operative details, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant regimens. Event-free and overall survival (EFS, OS) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were identified with a median age of 9.9 years [interquartile range [IQR): 7-12]. Twenty-seven patients underwent resection at diagnosis, and 47 patients underwent delayed resection, including eight liver transplants. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to a median change in maximum tumor diameter of 1.6 cm [IQR: 0.0-4.4] and greater than 90% tumor necrosis in 79% of the patients undergoing delayed resection. R0 resections were accomplished in 63 patients (81%). Univariate analysis found that metastatic disease impacted OS, and completeness of resection impacted both EFS and OS, while multivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection was associated with decreased expected hazards of experiencing an event [hazard ratio (HR): 0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04-0.6]. At a median follow-up of 4 years [IQR: 2-8], the EFS was 70.0% [95% CI: 60%-82%] and OS was 83% [95% CI: 75%-93%]. CONCLUSION: Complete resection is associated with improved survival for patients with UESL. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy causes minimal radiographic response, but significant tumor necrosis.

Evaluation of Costs Associated With Acute Achilles Tendon Repair.

Background: Increasing attention is being paid to the costs associated with various orthopaedic surgeries. Here, we studied the factors that influence costs associated with surgically treated acute Achilles tendon tears. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with surgically repaired acute Achilles tendon tears, excluding insertional ruptures or chronic tendon issues. Using the Value Driven Outcome (VDO) tool from our institution, we assessed total direct costs as well as facility costs. Briefly, the VDO tool includes an item-level database that can capture detailed cost data-costs are then reported as relative mean data. Cost variables were adjusted to 2022 US dollars, and total direct cost was compared with patient characteristics using gamma regressions to report cost ratios with 95% CIs. Results: Our cohort consisted of 224 patients with Achilles tendon tears surgically repaired by one of 4 fellowship-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. There were no differences in demographics, total direct costs, or facility costs based on surgical positioning (prone n = 156, supine n = 68). Open repairs (n = 215), compared with percutaneous techniques (n = 9) that used commercially available instrumentation, had 37% less total direct costs (P < .001, 95% CI 0.55-0.72). Compared with surgery at a main academic hospital (n = 15), procedures at an ambulatory care center (n = 207) had 19% lower total direct costs (P = .040, 95% CI 0.66-0.99) and 41% lower facility costs (P < .001, 95% CI 0.5-0.7). Conclusion: Improving cost-effective orthopaedic care remains an increasingly important goal. Patient positioning for Achilles tendon repair does not appear to have meaningful impacts on cost. When clinically appropriate, considering surgery location at an ambulatory center appears to reduce surgical costs. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Tympanomastoidectomy versus parenteral antibiotic therapy for pediatric otorrhea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tympanomastoidectomy versus parenteral antibiotic therapy for otorrhea as a result of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) without cholesteatoma in the pediatric population. METHODS: A retrospective review of 221 patients treated for otorrhea at a tertiary academic pediatric hospital was performed to evaluate the impact of tympanomastoidectomy versus parenteral antibiotic therapy on resolution of otorrhea. Inclusion criteria were age 0-18 years, prior treatment with otic and/or oral antibiotic, prior history of tympanostomy tube placement for recurrent otitis media, history of otorrhea, treatment with tympanomastoidectomy or parenteral antibiotic therapy, and follow-up of at least 1 month after intervention. Time to resolution was compared between the two modalities adjusting for age, bilateral ear disease status, and comorbidities using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Eighty-three ears from 58 children met the inclusion criteria. Ears that initially underwent tympanomastoidectomy had a significantly shorter time to resolution of symptoms (median time to resolution) 9 months (95 % confidence interval CI: 6.2-14.8) vs. 48.5 months (95 % lower CI 9.4, p = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, however, only bilateral ear disease status was independently associated with time to resolution of symptoms (hazard ratio 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of treatment-related complications when comparing tympanomastoidectomy to parenteral antibiotic therapy (p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: When adjusting for age, bilateral ear disease status, and comorbidities, there does not appear to be a significant difference in time to resolution of symptoms when comparing parenteral antibiotic therapy to tympanomastoidectomy. An informed discussion regarding risks and benefits of each approach should be employed when deciding on the next step in management for patients with CSOM who have failed more conservative therapies.

The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition.

PURPOSE: Achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on an outcomes instrument and reporting satisfaction with surgical outcomes are not equivalent. We hypothesized that improvement exceeding the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT MCID is associated with a greater likelihood of reporting satisfaction with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) treatment. Our secondary hypothesis was that a subset of patients failing to meet MCID would still be satisfied. METHODS: Patients ≥1 year after LRTI at one academic tertiary institution were included. QuickDASH and UE CAT v1.2 scores were obtained before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction and levels of improvement in pain and function were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients completed the QuickDASH, and of those, 90 also completed the UE CAT. At a mean of 2.6 ± 1.0 years after surgery, QuickDASH and UE CAT score improvement exceeded the previously published MCID estimates of 8.8 and 4.8. Although 90% (84/93) of the patients reported satisfaction, only 85% (72/93) and 72% (59/90) achieved MCID on the QuickDASH and UE CAT, respectively. Using the MCID estimate of 8.8, 96% (72/75) of the patients meeting the MCID were satisfied with their treatment. Those failing to achieve MCID reported significantly less physical function and pain improvement; however, most were satisfied nonetheless (68% [13/19] for QuickDASH, 77% [23/30] for UE CAT). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving published MCID thresholds on the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 was predictive of patients reporting general satisfaction with their LRTI outcome ≥1 year after surgery. Most patients failing to achieve MCID still reported satisfaction with their LRTI. Achieving MCID thresholds alone should not be used as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with their treatment. Patient satisfaction is a complicated construct that is potentially very different from that of high-quality care. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Encounters: Analysis of Factors that Impact the Press Ganey Survey in the Hand Surgery Population.

Purpose: Our purpose was to identify patient characteristics and visit components that affect patient satisfaction with virtual new patient visits in an outpatient hand surgery clinic as measured by the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) total score (primary outcome) and provider subscore (secondary outcome). Methods: Adult patients evaluated through virtual new patient visits at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2020 and October 2020 who completed the PGOMPS for virtual visits were included. Data regarding demographics and visit characteristics were collected via chart review. Factors associated with satisfaction were identified using a Tobit regression model on the continuous score outcomes (Total Score and Provider Subscore) to account for substantial ceiling effects. Results: A total of 95 patients were included: 54% were men and the mean age was 54 ± 16 years. Mean area deprivation index was 32 ± 18, and the mean driving distance to the clinic was 97 ± 188 mi. Common diagnoses include compressive neuropathy (21%), hand arthritis (19%), hand mass (12%), and fracture/dislocation (11%). Treatment recommendations included small joint injection (20%), in-person evaluation (25%), surgery (36%), and splinting (20%). Multivariable Tobit regressions showed notable differences in satisfaction by the provider on the Total Score but not on the Provider Subscore. Other factors known to affect the PGOMPS scores for in-person visits were not notably associated with the Total or Provider Sub-Scores for virtual visits (area deprivation index, age, and offer of surgery or injection) other than the body mass index. Conclusions: Virtual clinic visit satisfaction was affected by the provider. Wait time strongly affects satisfaction with in-person visits but is not accounted for by the PGOMPS scoring system for virtual visits, which is a limitation of their survey. Further work is required to determine how to improve the patient experience with virtual visits. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Evaluating the Performance of an Automated Patient-Reported Outcomes Collection Platform in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population.

PURPOSE: Reliable collection of postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is critical to understanding surgical outcomes and the value of care. Automated PROMs collection, triggered by the electronic medical record at the 1-year postoperative anniversary, may provide a simple way to acquire outcomes for patients who have been discharged from clinic. The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate the percentage of responses with an automated PROMs collection platform and (2) identify whether such a system may introduce selection bias by comparing responders with nonresponders. METHODS: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing hand and upper-extremity surgeries between August 2017 and January 2019 were included. Preoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were collected using tablet computer. Postoperative QuickDASH scores were collected using a single electronic survey request 1 year after surgery via an email with a personalized REDCap link. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors that differed between responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: A response rate of 27% (269 of 1010) was observed for the eligible postoperative patients. On multivariable analysis, the following were associated with greater odds of response: older age, Caucasian race (vs unknown), longer surgery duration, attending the first postoperative visit, and responding to the preoperative QuickDASH. CONCLUSIONS: The poor response rate that was observed highlights that an automated single email postoperative contact for PROMs collection is insufficient-active follow-up via reminder emails and/or telephone calls is needed. Outcome researchers and clinicians must be aware of potential selection biases, such as age and race, that may exist with automated PROMs collection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Single email postoperative contact to obtain postoperative PROMs is insufficient.

Prediction Model with External Validation for Early Detection of Postoperative Pediatric Chylothorax.

Earlier diagnosis of chylothorax following pediatric cardiac surgery is associated with decreased duration of chylothorax. Pleural fluid testing is used to diagnosis chylothorax which may delay detection in patients who are not enterally fed at time of chylothorax onset. Our aim was to develop and externally validate a prediction model to detect chylothorax earlier than pleural fluid testing in pediatric patients following cardiac surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to detect chylothorax using a stepwise approach. The model was developed using data from patients < 18 years following cardiac surgery from Primary Children's Hospital, a tertiary-care academic center, between 2017 and 2020. External validation used a contemporary cohort (n = 171) from Lucille Packard Children's Hospital. A total of 763 encounters (735 patients) were analyzed, of which 72 had chylothorax. The final variables selected were chest tube output (CTO) the day after sternal closure (dichotomized at 15.6 mL/kg/day, and as a continuous variable) and delayed sternal closure. The highest odds of chylothorax were associated with CTO on post-sternal closure day 1 > 15.6 mL/kg/day (odds ratio 11.3, 95% CI 6,3, 21.3). The c-statistic for the internal and external validation datasets using the dichotomized CTO variable were 0.78 (95% CI 0.73, 0.82) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.9) and performance improved when using CTO as a continuous variable (OR 0.84, CI: 95% CI 0.80, 0.87). Using the models described, chylothorax after pediatric cardiac surgery may be detected earlier and without reliance on enteral feeds.

Active physical therapy does not improve outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-center, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between a structured home exercise program (HEP) and active, supervised physiotherapy (PT) after primary Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) by performing a multicenter randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary RTSA at 2 centers were randomized to either a HEP group, in which they were given a handout and a rope pulley, or a PT group, in which they were given a standardized prescription. Surgical technique and implants were standardized. At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, we obtained American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores, visual analogue scale for pain scores, and measured ROM via videotape. On video, ROM was then measured by blinded observers. At all study visits, patients were asked how many days per week they were in PT and how many days a week they completed HEP to determine compliance and crossover. An a priori power analysis suggested 29 patients per group, 56 patients total to detect a difference of 30° in active forward elevation with a power of 0.8 at a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: 89 patients were randomized, 43 to PT, and 46 to HEP. We obtained 1-year PRO follow-up on 83 patients (93%) and ROM follow-up on 73 patients (82%). Nine patients (20%) crossed over from HEP to PT and 2 patients (4%) crossed over from PT to HEP. Complications occurred in 13% of HEP and 17% of PT patients (P = .629). Using mixed models that account for baseline values, there were no significant differences between groups in PROs or ROM at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this 2-center, randomized clinical trial, there were no significant differences in patient outcomes or ROM between HEP and PT after RTSA. These findings suggest that it may not be necessary to recommend PT as a protocol for all patients after RTSA.

Greater spatial access to care is associated with lower mortality for emergency general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases are time-sensitive conditions that require urgent surgical evaluation, yet the effect of geographic access to care on outcomes remains unclear. We examined the association of spatial access with outcomes for common EGS conditions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of twelve 2014 State Inpatient Databases, identifying adults admitted with eight EGS conditions, was performed. We assessed spatial access using the spatial access ratio (SPAR)-an advanced spatial model that accounts for travel distance, hospital capacity, and population demand, normalized against the national mean. Multivariable regression models adjusting for patient and hospital factors were used to evaluate the association between SPAR with (a) in-hospital mortality and (b) major morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 877,928 admissions, of which 104,332 (2.4%) were in the lowest-access category (SPAR, 0) and 578,947 (66%) were in the high-access category (SPAR, ≥1), were analyzed. Low-access patients were more likely to be White, male, and treated in nonteaching hospitals. Low-access patients also had higher incidence of complex EGS disease (low access, 31% vs. high access, 12%; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (4.4% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.05). When adjusted for confounding factors, including presence of advanced hospital resources, increasing spatial access was protective against in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.97; p < 0.001). Spatial access was not significantly associated with major morbidity. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that geospatial access to surgical care is associated with incidence of complex EGS disease and that increasing spatial access to care is independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality. These results support the consideration of spatial access in the development of regional health systems for EGS care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.

Evaluation of Preoperative Factors Affecting Midterm Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition: A Prognostic Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative patient-reported outcomes as predictors of functional improvement following ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. We hypothesized that high levels of preoperative pain interference (PI) and upper-extremity disability are associated with lower magnitudes of functional improvement ≥1 year after surgery on the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) (primary outcome) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (UE) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) (UE CAT) v1.2 (secondary outcome). METHODS: Adult patients who underwent ligament reconstruction tendon interposition between February 2014 and April 2018 at an academic tertiary institution were considered for inclusion in this longitudinal cohort study. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and ≥1 year after surgery. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the magnitude of functional improvement on the QuickDASH and UE CAT. RESULTS: Among 93 included participants, the mean age was 61 ± 7 years, and 75 (81%) were women. At 2.5 ± 1.0 years after surgery, the QuickDASH and UE CAT improved by a mean of 24.5 ± 20.9 and 9.9 ± 10.7 points, respectively. In the primary multivariable model, a greater preoperative QuickDASH (indicative of lower function; coefficient, 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 0.9) and lower preoperative Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (eg, less pain interference; coefficient, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2) were associated with greater QuickDASH improvement independent of potential confounders. In the secondary multivariable model, lower preoperative UE CAT (indicative of worse function; coefficient, -0.9; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.7) and lower preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PI CAT (coefficient, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) were associated with greater UE CAT improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient-reported outcomes may be useful in understanding the degree of improvement that certain patient populations can expect from ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. Those with lower baseline (preoperative) upper-extremity function and PI are expected to derive the greatest functional improvement in the midterm. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Postsurgical Opioid Use Among Veterans Discharged to Skilled Care Facilities Compared to Veterans Discharged to Home After Orthopedic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare opioid use patterns among Veterans who were discharged to a skilled care facility vs home after orthopedic surgery at a VA hospital. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans who had orthopedic surgery at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center (VAMC) between January 2018 and December 2021 and were followed by a transitional pain service. The principal outcome of interest was the time to stop opioid use after discharge from the hospital. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Veterans not already on chronic opioid therapy who had orthopedic surgery at the Salt Lake City VAMC and were followed by a transitional pain service. METHODS: 448 patients were included in the study, of which 371 (83%) were discharged to home and 77 (17%) were discharged to a skilled care facility. Median days to opioid cessation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% CIs and compared with discharge disposition using a log-rank test. Time to opioid cessation following hospital discharge was compared to baseline characteristics using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Patients who were discharged to a skilled care facility used opioids for twice as long as those who were discharged home [median days (interquartile range)]: 22 (19, 26) vs 11 (10, 12), P < .001, respectively. When controlling for baseline characteristics in the multivariable analysis, discharge to a skilled care facility was significantly associated with continued opioid use at all time points [hazard ratio 0.63 (95% CI 0.44, 0.89), P = .009]. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Veterans discharged to a skilled care facility after orthopedic surgery used opioids for twice as long as those who were discharged to home. As postsurgical pain management guidelines change to focus on nonopioid pain modalities and opioid reduction, skilled care providers should adapt those strategies for their facilities.

Dorsal Versus Ventral Intrathecal Catheter Tip Location and Effect on Dose Escalation and Opioid Use in Patients With Cancer Pain.

OBJECTIVES: In the practice of intrathecal drug delivery, consensus exists regarding the cephalad to caudad location of the catheter tip relative to dermatomal distribution of pain. However, data are lacking on the importance of dorsal vs ventral tip location relative to the spinal cord. We hypothesize that a dorsally placed catheter tip improves efficacy because of closer proximity to nociceptive pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 298 patients with cancer with intrathecal drug delivery systems implanted at the Huntsman Cancer Institute from May 2014 to June 2020 was performed. Patients were stratified by catheter tip location zones based on available radiographic studies. Patient-controlled intrathecal medication dose requirements and rate of change were compared with catheter zone and other variables, including the presence of adjuncts such as bupivacaine and ziconotide. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients were suitable for analysis demonstrating a dorsal tip in 63.9% (n = 101) and ventral tip in 36.1% (n = 57), with a median follow-up of 17 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-24). There was no difference in daily dose change from implant to discharge between the dorsal group 8.2% (IQR, 0.0-41.5) and ventral group 20.8% (IQR, 0.0-66.7; p = 0.12). Daily dose change from discharge to follow-up was 2.6% (IQR, 0.0-7.1) in the dorsal group and 1.8% (IQR, 0.0-5.7) in the ventral group (p = 0.92). Catheter tip location had no impact on systemic opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find significant associations between dorsal vs ventral catheter tip location and measures of pain relief, including change in intrathecal dose or systemic opioid use.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Tests.

PURPOSE: It is unclear what score thresholds on patient-reported outcomes instruments reflect an acceptable level of upper extremity (UE) function from the perspective of patients undergoing hand surgery. The purpose of this study was to calculate the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) UE Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), version 2.0, in a population who underwent hand surgery. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent hand surgery between February 2019 and December 2019 at a single academic tertiary institution were identified. QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT version 2.0 scores were collected 1 year after surgery, as were separate symptom- and function-specific anchor questions that queried the acceptability of patients' current state. Threshold values predictive of a patient reporting an acceptable symptom state (PASS[+]) were calculated for both instruments using the 75th percentile score for patients in the PASS(+) group and the Youden Index as determined by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were included. QuickDASH and PROMIS UE CAT scores differed significantly between the PASS(+) and PASS(-) groups. The 75th percentile method yielded PASS values of <16 for the QuickDASH and >43 for the PROMIS UE CAT for both anchor questions. The ROC analysis yielded PASS estimates of <15.9 to <20.5 for the QuickDASH and >38.1 to >46.2 for the PROMIS UE CAT, with ranges calculated from differing threshold values for each of the 2 anchor questions. The ROC-based estimates demonstrated high levels of model discrimination (area under the curve ≥ 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: We propose PASS estimates obtained using the 75th percentile and ROC methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Specifically, PASS values in the range of 15.9-20.5 for the QuickDASH and 38.1-46.2 for the PROMIS UE CAT version 2.0 should be used when interpreting outcomes at a population level.