Comparison Between the Attune and PFC Sigma in Total Knee Arthroplasty: No Difference in Patellar Clunk and Crepitus or Anterior Knee Pain.

Patellar crepitus and clunk (PCC) is a known complication in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the cause of dissatisfaction. Patellofemoral articulations have reportedly been optimized in newer TKAs. This study compared the incidence of PCC between a historical and modern TKA design. A single-surgeon retrospective review of primary PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) or Attune TKA (DePuy Synthes) was performed. A total of 114 PFC Sigma and 103 Attune implants were analyzed at a mean 3.2 years follow-up for overall PCC, painful PCC, anterior knee pain (regardless of crepitus), and PCC necessitating revision. Similar rates of overall PCC (14.6% vs 20.2%, P=.803), painful PCC (8.7% vs 6.1%, P=.605), and anterior knee pain (15.5% vs 9.7%, P=.219) were observed in the Attune and PFC Sigma groups, respectively. No clinically significant differences in range of motion, pain, or Knee Society Scores were found between groups. Subgroup analyses of mobile vs fixed bearing PFC Sigma implants demonstrated higher rates of overall PCC (32.4% vs 15.0%, P=.043), painful PCC (20.6% vs 5.0%, P=.016), anterior knee pain (17.6% vs 1.3%, P=.003), and crepitus requiring revision surgery (17.6% vs 1.3%, P=.003) for mobile bearing PFC Sigma implants. No difference was found in the rates of anterior knee pain or PCC between the PFC Sigma and Attune implants. Subgroup analysis suggests that a mobile bearing PFC Sigma implant results in higher PCC. The authors believe the true incidence of anterior knee pain and PCC is underreported in the literature because many outcome measures do not capture these complications. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e508-e514.].

Synthetic Mesh Allograft Reconstruction for Extensor Mechanism Insufficiency After Knee Arthroplasty.

Extensor mechanism (EM) insufficiency after knee arthroplasty is a rare but devastating complication resulting in severe disability. To date, primary repair and allograft reconstructive options have produced suboptimal results. A synthetic mesh allograft reconstruction technique has recently been introduced with promising outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who experienced EM failure after total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and subsequently underwent synthetic mesh EM reconstruction using a previously described technique. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative knee range of motion and residual extensor lag, pre- and postoperative pain and functional outcome scores, and complications were extracted during the chart review. Twelve patients met inclusion criteria: 3 with patellar tendon and 9 with quadriceps tendon defects. At mean follow-up of 27.0 months, all patients were ambulatory, with a mean residual extensor lag of 12.9° (range, 0°-30°). Mean visual analog scale pain score decreased significantly after EM reconstruction: 4.6±2.3 (range, 1-8) preoperatively vs 1.8±2.4 (range, 0-7) postoperatively (P=.01). The mean Knee Society knee score improved from 41.5±11.1 (range, 21-57) preoperatively to 79.5±13.8 (range, 54-90) postoperatively (P<.0001). The mean Knee Society function score improved from 14.6±12.3 (range, 0-40) preoperatively to 64.2±27.1 (range, 5-95) postoperatively (P<.0001). One clinical failure occurred as a result of prosthetic joint infection. Synthetic mesh EM reconstruction effectively restores knee function for a variety of EM deficiencies following knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e385-e390.].

Subcutaneous anterior transposition versus decompression and medial epicondylectomy for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

A review of the literature often fails to uncover the best procedure for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. This article compares 2 frequently used methods (subcutaneous anterior transposition vs decompression and medial epicondylectomy) for their effectiveness in relieving both subjective and objective symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome. Between August 1991 and October 1993, nineteen patients underwent surgical decompression by a single surgeon for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Factors evaluated included upper extremity range of motion, elbow valgus stress, grip strength, pinch, 2-point discrimination, and pre- and postoperative nerve conduction. A standardized questionnaire was administered to assess subjective relief of symptoms.In the transposition group, grip strength averaged 71.2% of normal and pinch strength 86.6% of normal, and 2-point discrimination averaged 8.0 mm. The derived subjective assessment score was 23.2 of a possible 40. The average ulnar motor conduction velocity across the elbow was 50.1 m/sec preoperatively and 56.3 m/sec postoperatively. In the medial epicondylectomy group, grip strength averaged 79.5% of normal and pinch strength 81.7% of normal, and 2-point discrimination averaged 8.0 mm. The average ulnar motor conduction velocity across the elbow was 45.7 m/sec preoperatively and 55.7 m/sec postoperatively. No statistically significant difference existed between the 2 groups for the aforementioned indexes. These results do not indicate a difference between the outcomes of the patients undergoing either of the procedures. Because epicondylectomy is less technically demanding, with less soft tissue dissection of the nerve, it may be preferred over ulnar transposition.