RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by insulin resistance (IR) and dysregulated insulin secretion. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide promotes insulin secretion, whereas thiazolidinedione-pioglitazone decreases IR. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacies of increasing insulin secretion vs decreasing IR strategies for improving myocardial perfusion, energetics, and function in T2D via an open-label randomized crossover trial. METHODS: Forty-one patients with T2D (age 63 years [95% CI: 59-68 years], 27 [66%] male, body mass index 27.8 kg/m2) [95% CI: 26.1-29.5 kg/m2)]) without cardiovascular disease were randomized to liraglutide or pioglitazone for a 16-week treatment followed by an 8-week washout and a further 16-week treatment with the second trial drug. Participants underwent rest and dobutamine stress 31phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance for measuring the myocardial energetics index phosphocreatine to adenosine triphosphate ratio, myocardial perfusion (rest, dobutamine stress myocardial blood flow, and myocardial perfusion reserve), left ventricular (LV) volumes, systolic and diastolic function (mitral in-flow E/A ratio), before and after treatment. The 6-minute walk-test was used for functional assessments. RESULTS: Pioglitazone treatment resulted in significant increases in LV mass (96 g [95% CI: 68-105 g] to 105 g [95% CI: 74-115 g]; P = 0.003) and mitral-inflow E/A ratio (1.04 [95% CI: 0.62-1.21] to 1.34 [95% CI: 0.70-1.54]; P = 0.008), and a significant reduction in LV concentricity index (0.79 mg/mL [95% CI: 0.61-0.85 mg/mL] to 0.73 mg/mL [95% CI: 0.56-0.79 mg/mL]; P = 0.04). Liraglutide treatment increased stress myocardial blood flow (1.62 mL/g/min [95% CI: 1.19-1.75 mL/g/min] to 2.08 mL/g/min [95% CI: 1.57-2.24 mL/g/min]; P = 0.01) and myocardial perfusion reserve (2.40 [95% CI: 1.55-2.68] to 2.90 [95% CI: 1.83-3.18]; P = 0.01). Liraglutide treatment also significantly increased the rest (1.47 [95% CI: 1.17-1.58] to 1.94 [95% CI: 1.52-2.08]; P =0.00002) and stress phosphocreatine to adenosine triphosphate ratio (1.32 [95% CI: 1.05-1.42] to 1.58 [95% CI: 1.19-1.71]; P = 0.004) and 6-minute walk distance (488 m [95% CI: 458-518 m] to 521 m [95% CI: 481-561 m]; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide treatment resulted in improved myocardial perfusion, energetics, and 6-minute walk distance in patients with T2D, whereas pioglitazone showed no effect on these parameters (Lean-DM [Targeting Beta-cell Failure in Lean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes]; NCT04657939).
Assuntos
Estudos Cross-Over , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Tolerância ao Exercício , Hipoglicemiantes , Liraglutida , Pioglitazona , Humanos , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Liraglutida/uso terapêutico , Liraglutida/farmacologia , Feminino , Idoso , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Tolerância ao Exercício/efeitos dos fármacos , Tolerância ao Exercício/fisiologia , Pioglitazona/uso terapêutico , Circulação Coronária/efeitos dos fármacos , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Exercise imaging using current modalities can be challenging. This was patient focused study to establish the feasibility and reproducibility of exercise-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (EX-CMR) acquired during continuous in-scanner exercise in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: This was a prospective, feasibility study. Biventricular volumes/function, aortic flow volume, MR volume (MR-Rvol) and regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) were assessed at rest and during low- (Low-EX) and moderate-intensity exercise (Mod-EX) in asymptomatic patients with primary MR. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients completed EX-CMR without complications. Whilst there were no significant changes in the left ventricular (LV) volumes, there was a significant increase in the LVEF (rest 63 ± 5% vs. Mod-EX 68 ± 6%;p = 0.01). There was a significant reduction in the right ventricular (RV) end-systolic volume (rest 68 ml(60-75) vs. Mod-EX 46 ml(39-59);p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the RV ejection fraction (rest 55 ± 5% vs. Mod-EX 65 ± 8%;p < 0.001). Whilst overall, there were no significant group changes in the MR-Rvol and MR-RF, individual responses were variable, with MR-Rvol increasing by ≥ 15 ml in 4(16%) patients and decreasing by ≥ 15 ml in 9(36%) of patients. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of LV volumes and aortic flow measurements were excellent, including at Mod-EX. CONCLUSION: EX-CMR is feasible and reproducible in patients with primary MR. During exercise, there is an increase in the LV and RV ejection fraction, reduction in the RV end-systolic volume and a variable response of MR-Rvol and MR-RF. Understanding the individual variability in MR-Rvol and MR-RF during physiological exercise may be clinically important.
Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Estudos de Viabilidade , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Valva Mitral , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Função Ventricular Direita , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Doenças Assintomáticas , Variações Dependentes do Observador , AdultoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional-flow cardiac MR (4DF-MR) offers advantages in primary mitral regurgitation. The relationship between 4DF-MR-derived mitral regurgitant volume (MR-Rvol) and the post-operative left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling has not yet been established. PURPOSE: To ascertain if the 4DF-MR-derived MR-Rvol correlates with the LV reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, single-center, two arm, interventional vs. nonintervention observational study. POPULATION: Forty-four patients (male N = 30; median age 68 [59-75]) with at least moderate primary mitral regurgitation; either awaiting mitral valve surgery (repair [MVr], replacement [MVR]) or undergoing "watchful waiting" (WW). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5 T/Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence/Phase contrast imaging/Multishot echo-planar imaging pulse sequence (five shots). ASSESSMENT: Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), phase-contrast MR (PMRI), 4DF-MR and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at baseline, and a follow-up PMRI and 6MWT at 6 months. MR-Rvol was quantified by PMRI, 4DF-MR, and TTE by one observer. The pre-operative MR-Rvol was correlated with the post-operative decrease in the LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi). STATISTICAL TESTS: Included Student t-test/Mann-Whitney test/Fisher's exact test, Bland-Altman plots, linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: While Bland-Altman plots demonstrated similar bias between all the modalities, the limits of agreement were narrower between 4DF-MR and PMRI (bias 15; limits of agreement -36 mL to 65 mL), than between 4DF-MR and TTE (bias -8; limits of agreement -106 mL to 90 mL) and PMRI and TTE (bias -23; limits of agreement -105 mL to 59 mL). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between the MR-Rvol and the post-operative decrease in the LVEDVi, when the MR-Rvol was quantified by PMRI and 4DF-MR, but not by TTE (P = 0.73). 4DF-MR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for reduction in the post-operative LVEDVi with the largest area under the curve (4DF-MR 0.83; vs. PMRI 0.78; and TTE 0.51; P = 0.89). DATA CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential clinical utility of 4DF-MR in the assessment of primary mitral regurgitation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Persistent impairments in myocardial energetics and myocardial blood flow (MBF) may underpin this observation. Using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance, this study tested the hypothesis that patients with severe AS and T2D (AS-T2D) would have impaired myocardial energetics as reflected by the phosphocreatine to ATP ratio (PCr/ATP) and vasodilator stress MBF compared with patients with AS without T2D (AS-noT2D), and that these differences would persist after AVR. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with severe AS without coronary artery disease awaiting AVR (30 AS-T2D and 65 AS-noT2D) were recruited (mean, 71 years of age [95% CI, 69, 73]; 34 [37%] women). Thirty demographically matched healthy volunteers (HVs) and 30 patients with T2D without AS (T2D controls) were controls. One month before and 6 months after AVR, cardiac PCr/ATP, adenosine stress MBF, global longitudinal strain, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and 6-minute walk distance were assessed in patients with AS. T2D controls underwent identical assessments at baseline and 6-month follow-up. HVs were assessed once and did not undergo 6-minute walk testing. RESULTS: Compared with HVs, patients with AS (AS-T2D and AS-noT2D combined) showed impairment in PCr/ATP (mean [95% CI]; HVs, 2.15 [1.89, 2.34]; AS, 1.66 [1.56, 1.75]; P<0.0001) and vasodilator stress MBF (HVs, 2.11 mL min g [1.89, 2.34]; AS, 1.54 mL min g [1.41, 1.66]; P<0.0001) before AVR. Before AVR, within the AS group, patients with AS-T2D had worse PCr/ATP (AS-noT2D, 1.74 [1.62, 1.86]; AS-T2D, 1.44 [1.32, 1.56]; P=0.002) and vasodilator stress MBF (AS-noT2D, 1.67 mL min g [1.5, 1.84]; AS-T2D, 1.25 mL min g [1.22, 1.38]; P=0.001) compared with patients with AS-noT2D. Before AVR, patients with AS-T2D also had worse PCr/ATP (AS-T2D, 1.44 [1.30, 1.60]; T2D controls, 1.66 [1.56, 1.75]; P=0.04) and vasodilator stress MBF (AS-T2D, 1.25 mL min g [1.10, 1.41]; T2D controls, 1.54 mL min g [1.41, 1.66]; P=0.001) compared with T2D controls at baseline. After AVR, PCr/ATP normalized in patients with AS-noT2D, whereas patients with AS-T2D showed no improvements (AS-noT2D, 2.11 [1.79, 2.43]; AS-T2D, 1.30 [1.07, 1.53]; P=0.0006). Vasodilator stress MBF improved in both AS groups after AVR, but this remained lower in patients with AS-T2D (AS-noT2D, 1.80 mL min g [1.59, 2.0]; AS-T2D, 1.48 mL min g [1.29, 1.66]; P=0.03). There were no longer differences in PCr/ATP (AS-T2D, 1.44 [1.30, 1.60]; T2D controls, 1.51 [1.34, 1.53]; P=0.12) or vasodilator stress MBF (AS-T2D, 1.48 mL min g [1.29, 1.66]; T2D controls, 1.60 mL min g [1.34, 1.86]; P=0.82) between patients with AS-T2D after AVR and T2D controls at follow-up. Whereas global longitudinal strain, 6-minute walk distance, and NT-proBNP all improved after AVR in patients with AS-noT2D, no improvement in these assessments was observed in patients with AS-T2D. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe AS, those with T2D demonstrate persistent abnormalities in myocardial PCr/ATP, vasodilator stress MBF, and cardiac contractile function after AVR; AVR effectively normalizes myocardial PCr/ATP, vasodilator stress MBF, and cardiac contractile function in patients without T2D.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Vasodilatadores , Trifosfato de Adenosina , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with worsened clinical outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. We sought to investigate whether HCM patients with T2DM comorbidity exhibit adverse cardiac alterations in myocardial energetics, function, perfusion, or tissue characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 55 participants with concomitant HCM and T2DM (HCM-DM) (n = 20) or isolated HCM (n = 20) and healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 15) underwent 31P-MRS and cardiovascular MRI. The HCM groups were matched for HCM phenotype. RESULTS: Mean ± SD European Society of Cardiology sudden cardiac death risk scores were comparable between the HCM groups (HCM 2.2 ± 1.5%, HCM-DM 1.9 ± 1.2%; P = not significant), and sarcomeric mutations were equally common. HCM-DM patients had the highest median NT-proBNP levels (HV 42 ng/L [interquartile range 35-66], HCM 298 ng/L [157-837], HCM-DM 726 ng/L [213-8,695]; P < 0.0001). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, mass, and wall thickness were similar between the HCM groups. HCM-DM patients displayed a greater degree of fibrosis burden with higher scar percentage and lower global longitudinal strain compared with HCM patients. PCr/ATP (the relative concentrations of phosphocreatine and ATP) was significantly lower in the HCM-DM group than in both HCM and HV (HV 2.17 ± 0.49, HCM 1.93 ± 0.38, HCM-DM 1.54 ± 0.27; P = 0.002). In a similar pattern, stress myocardial blood flow was significantly lower in the HCM-DM group than in both HCM and HV (HV 2.06 ± 0.42 mL/min/g, HCM 1.74 ± 0.44 mL/min/g, HCM-DM 1.39 ± 0.42 mL/min/g; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We show for the first time that HCM-DM patients display greater reductions in myocardial energetics, perfusion, and contractile function and higher myocardial scar burden and serum NT-proBNP levels compared with patients with isolated HCM despite similar LV mass and wall thickness and presence of sarcomeric mutations. These adverse phenotypic features may be important components of the adverse clinical manifestation attributable to a combined presence of HCM and T2DM.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Trifosfato de Adenosina , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/complicações , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/genética , Cicatriz , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Humanos , FenótipoRESUMO
AIM: To investigate the relation of body mass index (BMI) with postoperative pain scores and volume of local anaesthetic (LA) administered epidurally in patients undergoing liver resection surgery. METHODS: Retrospective data from 167 patients who had epidural analgesia (EA) for liver resection surgery were analysed: 123 with BMI < 30kgm-2 and 44 with BMI > 30kgm-2. RESULTS: Total volume of intraoperative bolus of epidural analgesia (EA) was not different between the BMI more than 30 kgm-2 and BMI less than 30 kgm-2 groups (p less 0.05). Mean rate of infusion (8.2±2.7 ml/h vs. 7.9±1.9 ml/h, p=0.0018), pain scores immediately after extubation of the trachea (0.91±0.9 vs. 0.55±0.7, p=0.017) and that before removal of epidural catheter (0.7±0.55 vs. 0.7±0.95, p=0.015) were higher in the BMI > 30kgm-2 group when compared with the BMI ≤ 30kgm-2 group. However, there was no significant difference between the numbers of segments blocked. CONCLUSION: The patients with BMI more than 30 kgm-2 undergoing liver resection experienced more postoperative pain on the day of surgery and before epidural catheter removal than patients with BMI less than 30 kgm-2, despite a higher rate of epidural infusion. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in order to determine adequate local anaesthetic dosing for thoracic epidural analgesia in obese patients.