[The quality of patient information brochures can be improved: a discussion using radium-223 therapy as an example]. / De kwaliteit van patiëntenfolders kan beter: een beschouwing aan de hand van radium-223-therapie.

Patients and their peers need to be adequately informed to ensure proper treatment selection, and to facilitate optimal realisation and outcome of treatment. Written patient information can contribute, but only when brochures are of sufficient quality. An evaluation of patient brochures for radium-223 therapy in the Netherlands revealed significant differences in the information provided, as well as discrepancies between the brochures and national guidelines and product documentation. This potentially leads to confusion, false expectations, wrong treatment decisions, suboptimal realisation and outcome of treatment, and unnecessary toxicity and in radiation hygiene risks. Here we discuss the option of national patient information brochures that can be used by all centres in order to circumvent such issues. This would require collaboration between all medical professions, patient organisations and other groups involved, and responsibilities for medical information, distribution and updates must be properly defined. A national patient information brochure of this kind is currently under development for radium-223 therapy.

F-18 FDG PET/CT for detecting bone and bone marrow involvement in sarcoidosis patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of bone involvement in sarcoidosis has been estimated to be 3% to 5%, mostly affecting the phalanges. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution pattern of bone and bone marrow involvement as detected by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: Between June 2006 and September 2010, 122 patients suffering from severe sarcoidosis who underwent a PET/CT and met the inclusion criteria were studied. In 94 (77%) patients, the PET/CT demonstrated positive findings associated with sarcoidosis. The 94 PET/CTs were screened for the presence of bone/bone marrow localizations. Additionally, low-dose CT scans were screened for other causes of increased bone uptake. Relevant clinical data were gathered retrospectively. RESULTS: Evidence for bone/bone marrow localizations was found in 34% of the 94 patients with PET/CT-positive findings. Of these patients, 60% showed obvious focal bone lesions at various localizations: axial skeleton (47%), pelvis (40%), extremities (34%), and skull (2%). In 40% of patients, diffuse increased uptake in both axial and peripheral bone marrow, without focal lesions, was found. Both diffuse and focal uptake were seen in 34%, whereas only focal lesions were observed in 25%. In all but 2 (6%) patients, no bone abnormalities on low-dose CT were found. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of PET/CT-positive sarcoidosis patients had osseous abnormalities on PET/CT. The majority of these lesions (94%) could not be detected on low-dose CT. No single localization of preference was found. These preliminary results stress the value of PET/CT imaging in the assessment of bone/bone marrow involvement in sarcoidosis patients.

Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: current evidence in oncology and potential role in colorectal cancer staging.

Tumour staging in cancer patients generally entails a multimodality imaging approach. Whole-body (WB) imaging techniques may, however, be more time- and cost-effective than a multimodality approach. 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET), computed tomography (CT) and hybrid positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) are the most established WB modalities, although new techniques, amongst which diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI), are emerging. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence for WB-DWI in oncology, to discuss its potential for the WB staging of (colo)rectal cancer and to relate it to the established WB techniques.