Evaluation of factors associated with complications in amoebic liver abscess in a predominantly toddy-drinking population: A retrospective study of 198 cases.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the mortality rate has declined in recent years, amoebic liver abscesses (ALAs) still carry a substantial risk of morbidity. Studies regarding the indicators of severity, complication, or prognosis of ALA are limited in number and heterogeneous in methodology and results. METHODS: Clinicodemographic profile, therapeutic modalities, and outcomes of indoor ALA patients admitted between January 2016 and October 2017 were analyzed. An analysis of possible prognostic factors associated with complications and interventional therapy in patients with ALA was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Data of 198 patients with ALA (mean age: 45 ± 12.1; M:F ratio: 193:5) were analyzed. The volume of abscess (503.1 ± 391.2: 300.2 ± 305.8 mL), elevated liver enzymes, and duration of hospital stay (11.98 ± 5.75): 10.23 ± 4.1 days) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in alcoholic, compared to nonalcoholic, individuals. On univariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, and a larger volume of abscess were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. On multivariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyponatremia were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. Male gender, hypoalbuminemia, and larger volume of abscess were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with interventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Older age, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, chronic alcoholism, and smoking are independent factors significantly associated with complications in patients with ALA. Hypoalbuminemia, larger volume of abscess, and male gender are independent variables associated with the requirement of interventional therapy.

Comparison of concomitant therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective open-label randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Resistance to commonly used antibiotics against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is increasing rapidly leading to lower success of traditional triple therapy to eradicate H. pylori infection. So, search for a new regimen as the first-line therapy of H. pylori infection is needed. AIM: In this study, we compared the efficacy of 14-day concomitant therapy and 14-day triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection. METHOD: In this open-labeled prospective trial, patients with H. pylori infection were randomized to concomitant therapy (pantoprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and metronidazole 1000 mg daily in divided doses) and triple therapy (pantoprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, and clarithromycin 1000 mg daily in divided doses). Duration of treatment was 14 days. Gastric biopsy was done 10-12 weeks after completion of therapy to confirm H. pylori eradication. RESULT: The eradication rate achieved with the concomitant therapy was significantly greater than that obtained with the triple therapy. Per-protocol eradication rates of concomitant and triple therapy were 77% and 58.3% (p = 0.028), respectively. Intention-to-treat eradication rates of concomitant and triple therapy were 70.1% and 49.3% (p = 0.013), respectively. Both the treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of eradication of H. pylori infection with  concomitant therapy was higher than that with triple therapy, the rate of concomitant therapy was still less than expected.

Polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl: A safe, cheap, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in the South Asian patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data regarding the comparison of colonoscopic preparation regimens are still variable. We aimed to assess the adequacy and tolerability of two bowel preparation regimens for afternoon colonoscopy. METHODS: In a randomized, investigator-blinded trial, two preparation regimens [4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolytes (PEG-ELS) and 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl) were compared in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age (years) of the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS group (N = 147) and the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl (N = 155) were 44.09 (±15.62) (M:F : 2:1) and 44.12 years (±15.61) (M:F : 1.7:1), respectively. Percentage of patients with excellent and good preparation was higher in the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen compared with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen (22.44 vs 17.41 and 44.21% vs 36.12%). Percentage of patients with fair and poor preparation was lower in 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen compared with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen (21.08% vs 27.74% and 12.24% vs 18.70%). In comparison with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl group, the incidences of abdominal pain (11% vs 15%), bloating (9% vs 12.24%), nausea/vomiting (8.38% vs 9.52%), and sleep disturbance (11% vs 12%) were slightly more common in the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two regimens with regard to bowel cleansing efficacy and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl (10 mg) preparation is as efficacious as the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen for afternoon colonoscopy. Optimal preparation for colonoscopy can be achieved with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen with slightly fewer adverse events and lower cost compared to the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen.