RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The right upper transversal hepatectomy (RUTH) is considered a complex technique of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies. The intraoperative management of the right hepatic vein (RHV) is still controversial because it may cause obstruction of outflow in the remnant hepatic segment. The aim of this study is to present our experience of laparoscopic RUTH and the strategy of RHV resection and reconstruction in different settings. METHODS: Five patients who underwent laparoscopic RUTH for liver tumor were enrolled retrospectively. Clinical and pathological features of the patients, peri-operative treatment, as well as short- and long-term outcomes were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Laparoscopic RUTH was successfully performed in all five patients. Two individuals underwent RUTH while preserving RHV. Among the remaining patients who underwent RUTH with RHV resection, one patient underwent RHV reconstruction but the others did not. Immediate or long-term venous related complications did not occurred in a median follow-up period of nine months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RUTH surgery for tumors in the right upper region of the liver is safe and feasible. The strategic workflow we proposed for the resection and reconstruction of the RHV offers a reliable method for preserving liver parenchyma and reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To investigate the impact of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). METHODS: Patients with GET-NETs who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-center database. The prognostic impact of clinicopathological factors including PNI on post-operative outcomes were evaluated. A novel nomogram was developed and externally validated. RESULTS: A total of 2,099 patients with GEP-NETs were included in the training cohort; 255 patients were in the external validation cohort. Median PNI (n = 973) was 47.4 (IQR 43.1-52.4). At the time of presentation, 1,299 (61.9%) patients presented with some type of clinical symptom. Low-PNI (≤42.2) was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as nodal metastasis and distant metastasis (all p < 0.05). Patients with a low PNI had a higher incidence of severe (≥Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa: low PNI 24.9% vs. high PNI 15.4%, p = 0.001) and multiple (≥3 types of complications: low PNI 14.5% vs. high PNI 9.2%, p = 0.024) complications, as well as a worse overall survival (OS)(5-year OS, low PNI 73.7% vs. high PNI 88.5%, p < 0.001), and RFS (5-year RFS, low PNI 68.5% vs. high PNI 79.8%, p = 0.008) versus patients with high PNI (>42.2). A nomogram based on PNI, tumor grade and metastatic disease demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration to predict OS in both the training (C-index 0.748) and two external validation (C-index 0.827, 0.745) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Low PNI was common and associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes among patients with GEP-NETs.