Ceftazidime is a potential drug to inhibit cell proliferation by increasing cellular p27.

The development of new therapeutic uses for existing drugs is important for the treatment of some diseases. Cephalosporin antibiotics stand as the most extensively utilized antibiotics in clinical practice, effectively combating bacterial infections. Here, we found that the antimicrobial drug ceftazidime strongly upregulates p27 protein levels by inhibiting p27 ubiquitination. The p27 protein is a classic negative regulator of the cell cycle. Next, we demonstrated that ceftazidime can impede the cell cycle from G1 to S phase, thus inhibiting cell proliferation. Furthermore, we found that ceftazidime promotes p27 expression and inhibits cell proliferation by reducing Skp2, which is a substrate recognition component of the Skp2-Cullin-F-box (SCF) ubiquitin ligase. Moreover, ceftazidime downregulates transcriptional expression of Skp2. Importantly, we demonstrated that ceftazidime inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells in vivo. These findings reveal ceftazidime-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation through the Skp2-p27 axis, and could provide a potential strategy for anti-tumor therapy.

Ceftazidime reduces cellular Skp2 to promote type-I interferon activity.

Skp2 plays multiple roles in malignant tumours. Here, we revealed that Skp2 negatively regulates type-I interferon (IFN-I)-mediated antiviral activity. We first noticed that Skp2 can promote virus infection in cells. Further studies demonstrated that Skp2 interacts with IFN-I receptor 2 (IFNAR2) and promotes K48-linked polyubiquitination of IFNAR2, which accelerates the degradation of IFNAR2 proteins. Skp2-mediated downregulation of IFNAR2 levels inhibits IFN-I signalling and IFN-I-induced antiviral activity. In addition, we uncovered for the first time that the antibiotic ceftazidime can act as a repressor of Skp2. Ceftazidime reduces cellular Skp2 levels, thus enhancing IFNAR2 stability and IFN-I antiviral activity. This study reveals a new role of Skp2 in regulating IFN-I signalling and IFN-I antiviral activity and reports the antibiotic ceftazidime as a potential repressor of Skp2.

Necroptosis-related signatures identify two distinct hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes: Implications for predicting drug sensitivity and prognosis.

Background: Necroptosis is associated with oncogenesis, tumor immunity and progression. This research aims to investigate the association of necroptosis-related genes with drug sensitivity and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Based on necroptosis-related signatures, HCC patients retrieved from the TCGA database were categorized. Survival outcomes, mutation profile, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity between HCC subtypes were further compared. Then, LASSO analysis was performed to construct a necroptosis-related prognostic signature, which was further evaluated using another independent cohort. Results: A total of 371 patients with HCC could be categorized into two necroptosis-related subtypes. About 36% of patients were allocated to subtype A, with worse survival, more mutant TP53, and a lower likelihood of immunotherapy response. In contrast, patients in subtype B had a favorable prognosis, with lower expression of immunosuppressive signatures but a lower abundance of B and CD8+ T-cell infiltration. The prognostic risk score calculated using the expression levels of nine genes involved in the necroptosis pathway (MLKL, FADD, XIAP, USP22, UHRF1, CASP8, RIPK3, ZBP1, and FAS) showed a significant association with tumor stage, histologic grade, and Child‒Pugh score. Additionally, the risk score model was proven to be accurate in both the training and independent external validation cohorts and performed better than the TNM staging system and three well-recognized risk score models. Conclusions: Based on necroptosis-related signatures, we identified two HCC subtypes with distinctive immune microenvironments, mutation profiles, drug sensitivities, and survival outcomes. A novel well-performing prognostic model was further constructed.

Methotrexate and Triptolide regulate Notch signaling pathway by targeting the Nedd4-Numb axis.

Methotrexate (MTX) is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, acute leukemia, and psoriasis. MTX can cause certain side effects, such as myelosuppression, while the exact mechanism of myelosuppression caused by MTX is unknown. Notch signaling pathway has been considered to be essential to regulate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) regeneration and homeostasis, thus contributing to bone marrow hematopoiesis. However, whether MTX affects Notch signaling remains unexplored. Here, our study provides evidence that MTX strongly suppresses the Notch signaling pathway. We found that MTX inhibited the interaction between Nedd4 with Numb, thus restricting K48-linked polyubiquitination of Numb and stabilizing Numb proteins. This in turn inhibited the Notch signaling pathway by reducing Notch1 protein levels. Interestingly, we found that a monomeric drug, Triptolide, is capable of alleviating the inhibitory effect of MTX on Notch signaling pathway. This study promotes our understanding of MTX-mediated regulation of Notch signaling and could provide ideas to alleviate MTX-induced myelosuppression.

Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Retrospective real-world data.

BACKGROUND: S-1 has been recognized as one of the standard adjuvant chemotherapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in East Asia, but the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) with S-1 monotherapy for PDAC. METHODS: Patients with resected PDAC who received adjuvant GS or S-1 chemotherapy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between May 2014 and May 2022 were reviewed. Data retrieved from medical records were used to evaluate efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were included, with 167 receiving GS and 74 receiving S-1. The patients who received GS were generally younger (median [range] age: 62 [36-78] versus 64 [44-87] years, p = 0.004), but chemotherapy began later (median [range] interval between chemotherapy and surgery: 49 [17-125] versus 40 [16-100] days, p < 0.001). The median disease-free survival (DFS, 15.1 versus 15.9 months, p = 0.52) and overall survival (OS, 34.8 versus 27.1 months, p = 0.34) did not differ significantly between the GS and S-1 groups, even after adjustment for the biases. However, the chemotherapy completion rate was higher in the patients treated with S-1 (52.4% versus 75.7%, p = 0.006), while grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred more frequently in the GS group (49.5% versus 18.2%, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy demonstrated noninferiority to the GS regimen in DFS and OS with better tolerability for PDAC following surgery.

Characteristics and Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Lung Lepidic Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Lepidic adenocarcinoma (LPA) is an infrequent subtype of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of LPA have not been elucidated. Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of 4191 LPA patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with non-LPA pulmonary ADC to explore the clinicopathological and prognosis features of LPA. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to identify independent survival predictors for further nomogram development. The nomograms were validated using the concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots, as well as decision curve analysis, in both the training and validation cohorts. Results: Compared with non-LPA pulmonary ADC patients, those with LPA exhibited unique clinicopathological features, including more elderly and female patients, smaller tumor size, less pleural invasion, and lower histological grade and stage. Multivariate analyses showed that age, sex, race, tumor location, primary tumor size, pleural invasion, histological grade, stage, primary tumor surgery, and chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with LPA. The nomograms showed good accuracy compared with the actual observed results and demonstrated improved prognostic capacity compared with the TNM stage. Conclusions: LPA is more frequently diagnosed in older people and women. LPA was inclined to be smaller in tumor size and lower in tumor grade and staging, which may indicate a favorable prognosis. The constructed nomograms accurately predict the long-term survival of LPA patients.