Indirect Ventral Brainstem Decompression by Posterior C1-C2 Distraction and Fixation for Basilar Invagination.

OBJECTIVE: Basilar invagination usually shows a decrease of clivus axis angle (CAA), which could give rise to progressive neural compression. Exploring a safe and effective fixation technique to achieve atlantoaxial stability and neural decompression remains necessary. In this study, we introduce a modified posterior C1-C2 distraction and fixation technique by which we obtained indirect ventral neural decompression and atlantoaxial stability in a series of patients with decreased CAA. METHODS: Thirty patients of basilar invagination were enrolled in our series. All patients underwent thin-slice computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, and dynamic plain radiography examinations before surgery, at discharge and during the follow-ups. Posterior C1-C2 facet joint release and intraoperative reduction by fastening rods were performed in all patients. The CAA was measured on midsagittal CT scans. Patients' neurologic status was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. RESULTS: No neurovascular injury and serious postoperative complication occurred in all patients. Complete ventral brainstem decompression was achieved in 20 patients and partial in 10 patients. The mean postoperative CAA significantly improved to 132.6 degrees compared with the preoperative 123.6 degrees (P < 0.01). The bone fusion was confirmed in all patients on the basis of the last follow-up spine CT scans. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect ventral brainstem decompression by posterior C1-C2 distraction and fixation is a safe and effective technique for treatment of basilar invagination.

A novel surgical protocol for safe and accurate placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability: technical details, accuracy assessment and perioperative complications.

PURPOSE: To introduce a novel surgical protocol for safe and accurate placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability, and to categorize the screw accuracy and perioperative complications regarding this technique in a large case series. METHODS: Between January 2015 and January 2020, patients who had atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability, and underwent atlantoaxial fixation using C1 lateral mass screws were reviewed. C1 lateral mass screws were placed with a novel surgical protocol following a series key steps, including posterior para-odontoid ligament release, panoramic exposure of the invaginated lateral mass, and diligent protection of the abnormal VA. Screw accuracy and related complications were specifically evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 434 C1 lateral mass screws were placed. Fifteen screws (3.5%) were classified as unacceptable, 54 screws (12.4%) were classified as acceptable, and 365 screws (84.1%) were classified as ideal. Overall, 96.5% of screws were deemed safe. There were no cases of vascular injury or permanent neurological defects. One patient with an unacceptable screw presented with hypoglossal nerve paralysis and recovered after an immediate revision surgery. Thirty-seven patients complained about occipital neuralgia and were successfully managed with medication. CONCLUSION: Placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability following this surgical protocol is safe and accurate. Thorough para-odontoid ligamental release, wide exposure of the invaginated lateral mass, and diligent protection of the vertebral artery are critical to maximize the chances of successful screw placement.

Feasibility of occipital condyle screw placement in patients with Chiari malformation type I: a computed tomography-based morphometric study.

BACKGROUND: The occipital condyle (OC) screw is an alternative technique for occipitocervical fixation that is especially suitable for revision surgery in patients with Chiari malformation type I (CMI). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of this technique in patients with CMI. METHODS: The CT data of 73 CMI patients and 73 healthy controls were retrospectively analyzed. The dimensions of OCs, including length, width, height, sagittal angle, and screw length, were measured in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes using CT images. The OC available height was measured in the reconstructed oblique parasagittal plane of the trajectory. RESULTS: The mean length, width, and height of OCs in CMI patients were 17.79 ± 2.31 mm, 11.20 ± 1.28 mm, and 5.87 ± 1.29 mm, respectively. All OC dimensions were significantly smaller in CMI patients compared with healthy controls. The mean screw length and sagittal angle were 19.13 ± 1.97 mm and 33.94° ± 5.43°, respectively. The mean OC available height was 6.36 ± 1.59 mm. According to criteria based on OC available height and width, 52.1% (76/146) of OCs in CMI patients could safely accommodate a 3.5-mm-diameter screw. CONCLUSIONS: The OC screw is feasible in approximately half of OCs in CMI patients. Careful morphometric analyses and personalized surgical plans are necessary for the success of this operation in CMI patients.

Posterior atlantoaxial facet joint reduction, fixation and fusion as revision surgery for failed suboccipital decompression in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: Operative nuances, challenges and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report the technical nuances and clinical outcomes of posterior atlantoaxial facet joint reduction, fixation and fusion (AFRF) technique as a revision procedure for BI and AAD patients with failed suboccipital decompression and large occipital bone defect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 32 patients with BI and AAD who were misdiagnosed as a simple Chiari malformation and received a suboccipital decompression surgery before admission. All patients underwent AFRF as a revision surgery. The separating, fusing, opacifying and false-coloring-volume rendering (SFOF-VR) technique was used to identify the course of the VA. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed after revision surgeries. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms improved in all patients. The postoperative atlantodens interval, Wackenheim line and clivus-canal angle significantly improved (all P < 0.01). Intraoperative dural tear and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 3 patients and were managed by suture repair and lumbar drain. Abnormal VA was identified in 7 patients and no VA injury occurred with the aid of SFOF-VR technique. The average follow-up was 19.1 months and atlantoaxial bone fusion was confirmed in 31 patients. CONCLUSION: For BI and AAD patients with failed suboccipital decompression, revision surgery is challenging. Occipitocervical fixation and posterior midline bone grafting are rather difficult due to the large occipital bone defect. The current study demonstrated that the posterior AFRF is a simple, safe and highly effective technique in revision surgery for such cases. For VA variations, the SFOF-VR technique is an effective tool to delineate the course VA.

Usefulness of 3D Printed Models in the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies: Choice of Treatment Strategy, Design of Screw Trajectory, and Protection of Vertebral Artery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of 3-dimensional (3D) printed models as an aid for the treatment of complex CVJ anomalies. METHODS: 3D printed models were fabricated for 21 patients with complex CVJ anomalies, including vertebral artery anomaly, thin C2 pedicle, vertical atlantoaxial facet joint, or rotational dislocation combined with atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination. Preoperative planning, surgical simulation, and intraoperative reference were achieved using the 3D model during the surgical treatment. The usefulness of 3D printed models, and postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Direct posterior reduction and atlantoaxial fixation were achieved in 19 patients. Transoral odontoidectomy followed by posterior fixation was implemented for 2 patients with vertical facet joint and rotational dislocation. All screws were safely inserted with no complication, and 90% patients achieved a >60% reduction of both horizontal and vertical dislocation. Clinical symptoms improved in all patients, with the averaged Japanese Orthopedic Association scores increasing from 11.14 to 14.43 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The patient-specific 3D printed model would be an effective tool for evaluation of the reducibility of the atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination, decision making in choosing the optimal surgical approach and way of fixation, and precise placement of the screw while protecting the vertebral artery and spinal cord. The risk of neurovascular injury was minimized, and encouraging outcomes were achieved with the aid of this technique.

Posterior Reduction of Fixed Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination by Atlantoaxial Facet Joint Release and Fixation: A Modified Technique With 174 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of fixed atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) with basilar invagination (BI) is challenging. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a modified technique to reduce fixed AAD and BI through a posterior approach. METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, 174 patients with fixed AAD and BI underwent surgical reduction by posterior atlantoaxial facet joint release and fixation technique. RESULTS: There was 1 death in the series, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 52 months (mean: 35.2 months) for the remaining 170 patients. Neurological improvement was observed in 168 of 170 patients (98.8%), and was stable in 1 (0.06%) and exacerbated in 1 (0.06%), with the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores increasing from 11.4 preoperatively to 15.8 postoperatively (P < .01). Radiologically, complete or >90% reduction was attained in 107 patients (62.9%), 60% to 90% reduction was attained in 51 patients (30%), and <50% reduction was attained in 12 patients (7.1%), who underwent additional transoral decompression. Complete decompression was demonstrated in all 170 patients. Solid bony fusion was demonstrated in 167 patients at follow-up (98.2%). CONCLUSION: This series showed the safety and efficacy of the posterior C1-2 facet joint release and reduction technique for the treatment of AAD and BI. Most fixed AAD and BI cases are reducible via this method. In most cases, this method avoids transoral odontoidectomy and cervical traction. Compared with the occiput-C2 screw method, this short-segment C1-2 technique exerts less antireduction shearing force, guarantees longer bone purchase, and provides more immediate stabilization.

Posterior C1-C2 screw and rod instrument for reduction and fixation of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation.

PURPOSE: To report the surgical technique and preliminary clinical results for the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) by posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw and rod instrument. METHODS: Between July 2012 and August 2013, 33 patients who had BI with AAD underwent surgery at our institution. Pre and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) scans were performed to assess the degree of dislocation. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to evaluate the compression of the medulla oblongata. For all patients, reduction of the AAD was conducted by two steps: fastening nuts and rods was performed to achieve the horizontal reduction. Distraction between C1 and C2 screws was performed to obtain the vertical reduction. RESULTS: No neurovascular injury occurred during surgery. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 15 months (mean 10.38 months) in 32 patients. Post-operative three-dimensional CT showed that complete horizontal reduction was obtained in 30/33 (90.9%), and complete vertical reduction was obtained in 31/33 (93.9%). The repeated three-dimensional CT and MR image demonstrated that bony fusion and the decompression of the medulla oblongata were obtained in all patients. Clinical symptoms improved significantly 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This C1-C2 pedicle screw and rod instrument is a promising technique for the treatment of BI with AAD.

Posterior realignment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation with C1-C2 screw and rod system: a technique of direct reduction and fixation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Treatment of chronic and irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) with ventral compression is challenging for surgeons. The main procedures are occipitocervical/C1-C2 fusion after transoral odontoidectomy or release of the periodontoid tissues. These surgical procedures, which are performed simultaneously or intermittently, have many disadvantages that may discount their effectiveness. Therefore, a more effective way to achieve surgical reduction and to keep solid stability with only a single procedure is needed. PURPOSE: We describe a technique to reduce chronic and irreducible AAD with C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw and rod system. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Our sample comprised 26 patients (9 men and 17 women) with irreducible AAD who ranged in age from 15 to 54 years (mean, 35 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' neurologic status was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale. METHODS: Twenty-six symptomatic patients underwent posterior realignment and reduction through the C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw and rod system. The proposed mechanism of reduction is that the implanted screws and rods between C1 and C2 acting as a lever system drew C1 backward and pushed C2 downward and forward after removing circumambient obstruction and scars and thoroughly releasing the facet joints. The preoperative and postoperative JOA score, the extent of reduction, and the conditions of C1-C2 bony fusion were examined. RESULTS: No neurovascular injury occurred during surgery. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 40 months (mean 20.7 months). Radiographic evaluation showed that solid bony fusion was achieved in all patients, and that complete reduction was attained in 18 patients and partial reduction (>60% reduction) in 8 patients. The mean postoperative JOA score at last follow-up was 15.7, compared with the preoperative score of 12.1 (p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: This C1-C2 screw and rod system provides reliable stability and sufficient reduction of the anatomic malalignment at the craniovertebral junction and meanwhile retains the mobility of atlanto-occipital joints in the treatment of chronic and irreducible AAD. Sophisticated skills, thorough release of the facet joints, and intraoperative protection of the vertebral artery are key points to accomplish this technique.