Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rhinology ; 62(2): 236-249, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38085113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D (VD) possesses immunomodulatory properties, but its role in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remains poorly studied. Herein, we aim to explore the regulation and function of VD3 in CRSwNP. METHODS: 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25VD3) levels in serum and tissue lysates were detected by ELISA. The expression of VD receptor (VDR) and cytochrome P450 family 27 subfamily B member 1 (CYP27B1), the enzyme that converts 25VD3 to the active 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25VD3), and their expression regulation in human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) were studied by RT-PCR, western blotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry. RNA sequencing was performed to identify genes regulated by 1,25VD3 in HNECs. HNECs and polyp tissue explants were treated with 1,25VD3, 25VD3, and dexamethasone. RESULTS: 25VD3 levels in serum and nasal tissue lysates were decreased in patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic CRSwNP than control subjects. The expression of VDR and CYP27B1 were reduced in eosinophilic and noneosinophilic CRSwNP, particularly in nasal epithelial cells. VDR and CYP27B1 expression in HNECs were downregulated by interferon y and poly (I:C). Polyp-derived epithelial cells demonstrated an impaired ability to convert 25VD3 to 1,25VD3 than control tissues. 1,25VD3 and 25VD3 suppressed IL-36y production in HNECs and polyp tissues, and the effect of 25VD3 was abolished by siCYP27B1 treatment. Tissue 25VD3 levels negatively correlated with IL-36y expression and neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP. CONCLUSION: Reduced systemic 25VD3 level, local 1,25VD3 generation and VDR expression result in impaired VD3 signaling activation in nasal epithelial cells, thereby exaggerating IL-36y production and neutrophilic inflammation in CRSwNP.


Assuntos
Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Rinossinusite , Sinusite , Humanos , Sinusite/metabolismo , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/metabolismo , Rinite/metabolismo , Calcifediol/metabolismo , Calcifediol/farmacologia , 25-Hidroxivitamina D3 1-alfa-Hidroxilase/metabolismo , 25-Hidroxivitamina D3 1-alfa-Hidroxilase/farmacologia , Inflamação , Células Epiteliais/metabolismo , Doença Crônica
2.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 103(28): 2168-2174, 2023 Jul 25.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482729

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the effects of arteriovenous argatroban and heparin flushes on platelet count and assess the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and other complications in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgeries. Methods: A single-center, prospective randomized control study was conducted. Patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March to December 2019 were randomly divided into the argatroban group (250 ml normal saline plus 2.5 mg of argatroban) and the heparin group (250 ml normal saline plus 10 mg of heparin). Platelet count, hemorrhage, and thrombosis were assessed. The 4T scores of HIT, the incidences of HIT and other complications were also evaluated. Results: A total of 491 patients (307 males and 184 females) were included in the study, with a mean age of (52.3±13.7) years. There were 245 cases in the argatroban group and 246 cases in the heparin group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the preoperative platelet count between the argatroban and heparin groups [198.0 (161.0, 248.0)×109/L vs 194.0 (157.2, 243.8)×109/L, P=0.498]. Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in the platelet count between the argatroban and heparin groups at 12 h, 1 day, and 5 days after operation [127.0 (100.0, 154.0)×109/L vs 121.5 (90.2, 149.0)×109/L, 126.0 (97.0, 162.0)×109/L vs 123.5 (88.0, 151.0)×109/L, 168.0 (130.0, 215.0) ×109/L vs 161.0 (101.0, 210.5)×109/L] (repeated measures ANOVA between groups: F=3.327, P=0.069; time comparison: F=532.523, P<0.001; time interaction between groups: F=0.675, P=0.512). The proportion of 4T scores of medium and high scores (≥4)[9.8% (24/245) vs 10.6% (26/246), P=0.777] and incidence of HIT antibody positive [1.63% (4/245) vs 1.63% (4/246), P=0.726] were similar between argatroban group and the heparin group. Mechanical ventilation time was shorter in the argatroban group than that in the heparin group [13.0 (11.0, 21.0) vs 15.5 (12.0, 21.0) h, P=0.020]. Conclusion: Compared with heparin, routine management with argatroban for arteriovenous flush in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery does not affect the HIT incidence.


Assuntos
Heparina , Trombocitopenia , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes , Estudos Prospectivos , Solução Salina/efeitos adversos , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos
3.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 132(5): 310-22, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25846813

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation may have prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was to determine whether EGFR gene amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation are predictors of survival in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until July 31, 2014. Studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis if they included patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and/or glioblastoma, EGFR and/or EGFRvIII mutation status was reported, and overall survival (OS) data were reported. RESULTS: Of 113 articles initially identified, only eight contained data with respect to the outcome of interest and were included in the meta-analysis. The number of cases ranged from 14 to 268, and the majority of patients were 60 or more years of age. There was no significant difference in OS between EGFR amplification-positive and EGFR amplification-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.845, 1.434, P = 0.475) or anaplastic astrocytoma patients (pooled HR = 1.455, 95% CI 0.852, 2.482, P = 0.169). There was no significant difference in OS between EGFRvIII-positive and EGFRvIII-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled HR = 1.321, 95% CI: 0.881-1.981, P = 0.178). Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies, and the significance changed when the analysis was performed with studies removed in turn. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence that either EGFR amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation has prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma.


Assuntos
Astrocitoma/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Glioblastoma/genética , Astrocitoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Mutação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA