Epididymectomy Is an Effective Treatment for Chronic Epididymal Pain.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic scrotal pain is difficult to manage, and epididymectomy is a treatment option for a subset of men with pain localized to the epididymis. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of epididymectomy at our institution. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2020, 225 men underwent epididymectomy at our institution for pain localized to the epididymis and not part of a greater constellation of pelvic pain or urinary symptoms. Our primary outcome measure was change in pain after epididymectomy, categorized as cured/improved or no change/worsened. Multivariable logistic regression compared the impact of pain duration, and surgical and psychiatric histories on postoperative pain. RESULTS: Patients in both outcome categories-cured/improved and no change/worsened-were similar in age and BMI. Overall, 162 patients (72%) reported cured/improved pain at the last documented follow-up visit. Median follow-up time was 12 (IQR 1-364) weeks. About half of the cohort (n = 117, 52%) had a prior vasectomy, and there was no difference in outcome based on vasectomy history on multivariate analysis (OR 0.625, P = .3). Men with pain duration > 1 year (OR 0.46, P = .03), diagnosed psychiatric conditions (OR 0.44, P = .04), or prior scrotal/inguinal/abdominal surgeries other than vasectomy (OR 0.47, P = .03) had decreased odds of pain relief after epididymectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This 20-year analysis is the largest review of postepididymectomy outcomes reported. Among carefully screened men, 72% had resolution or improvement of scrotal pain. Epididymectomy is most effective for men with < 1 year of focal epididymal pain, with no history of psychiatric conditions or scrotal/inguinal/abdominal surgery other than vasectomy.

Artificial urinary sphincter, Part I: Overview.

Urinary incontinence has a tremendous impact on an individual's quality of life and self-esteem. A number of patients will fail both conservative medical as well as conservative surgical treatments in their pursuit to regain urinary control. The surgical implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a definitive surgical option to reestablish continence. However, there are many challenges that may arise as a patient progresses through the rigorous preparation, surgical procedure, and recovery process. Understanding the history, various indications, and risks of AUS surgery will aid in counseling patients considering AUS.

Penile prosthesis: patient teaching and perioperative care.

As more options become available for treating erectile dysfunction (ED), more men are seeking treatment. Despite excellent efficacy of available medical management, a percentage of these patients will be refractory to the less invasive options for treatment, leaving the surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis as their remaining option for definitive treatment of ED. The patient seeking penile prosthesis surgery faces many challenges as he proceeds through the perioperative processes. A thorough understanding of indications, preoperative assessment and teaching, intraoperative procedure, and postoperative care and teaching for the patient receiving a penile prosthesis will enable him to achieve the best possible outcome.