Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol ; 2022: 3541046, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35186339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of the cervix are rare; they represent about 1% of all cases. There are no available guidelines regarding the safest mode of delivery after treatment and resolution of a cervical lymphoma. Case Report. We report the first case of a successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour in a woman recovered from a primary large B-cell lymphoma of the cervix and a literature review. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with fully treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the cervix with no residual disease, induction of labour via prostaglandins pessary may be a safe option if indicated.

2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 3(6): 100471, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34454160

RESUMO

Pancreatic cancer is rarely diagnosed during pregnancy; it usually manifests with symptoms such as epigastric pain, vomiting, weight loss, and jaundice, rarely mimicking the hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. It has been postulated that there exists a correlation between the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus and the occurrence of pancreatic cancer later in life. We conducted an expert literature review of the 31 available documented pancreatic cancer cases that were diagnosed during pregnancy. We also report pancreatic adenocarcinoma incidentally suspected in an asymptomatic woman affected by gestational diabetes mellitus; the woman was undergoing a fetal growth scan.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Diabetes Gestacional , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Gravidez
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 246: 72-78, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31962259

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) is usually perceived as a simple and safe alternative to natural birth, but in some instances can be technically difficult with consequent health hazards for both the mother and the fetus. We have proposed an evidence-based literature review of the most common difficult CS scenarios, with the aim to provide useful information about their management, possible prevention and resolution of complications. METHODS: We identified articles through a reserch in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE for studies published between 1979 and 2019. We included the best available evidence, such as RCTs, non-randomised controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, cohort studies, and case series. About sixty articles were included in this review, four hundred and thirty-six were excluded after reviewing the title or abstract or because they weren't in English. FINDINGS: The possible causes of "difficult" caesarean sections were divided into four categories: difficult access to the lower uterine segment; complicated fetal extraction, laceration or organ damage and abnormal placentation. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing in advance the potential technical difficulties and resulting risks allows the surgeon to plan appropriate strategies.


Assuntos
Cesárea/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Recesariana , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Intestinos/lesões , Complicações Intraoperatórias/cirurgia , Apresentação no Trabalho de Parto , Leiomioma , Obesidade Materna , Placenta Acreta , Placenta Prévia , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez , Aderências Teciduais , Ureter/lesões , Bexiga Urinária/lesões , Neoplasias Uterinas
5.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 31(6): 375-387, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693566

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The implementation of palliative care at birth has led to a significant rise in the number of couples who choose to continue with pregnancies complicated by life-limiting malformations (LLMs). Prenatal counselling and appropriate antenatal/perinatal management in these cases are poorly studied and may pose significant challenges. The purpose of this review is to outline specific obstetric risks and to suggest management for mothers who choose to continue with pregnancies with the most common LLMs. RECENT FINDINGS: In pregnancies complicated by LLMs where parents opt for expectant management, clinicians should respect parental wishes, whilst openly sharing potential serious maternal medical risks specific for the identified abnormalities. The focus of both antenatal and perinatal care should be maternal wellbeing rather than foetal survival. Follow-up ultrasound examinations and maternal surveillance should be aimed at achieving timely diagnosis and effective management of obstetric complications. A clear perinatal plan, agreed with the couples by a multi-disciplinary team including a foetal medicine specialist, a neonatologist and a geneticist, is crucial to reduce maternal morbidity. SUMMARY: This review provides a useful framework for clinicians who face the challenges of counselling and managing cases complicated by LLMs where parents opt for pregnancy continuation.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas/mortalidade , Anormalidades Congênitas/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Anencefalia/mortalidade , Anormalidades Congênitas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Aconselhamento Genético , Holoprosencefalia/mortalidade , Humanos , Hidropisia Fetal/mortalidade , Neonatologia/organização & administração , Obstetrícia/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Risco , Triploidia , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13/mortalidade , Síndrome da Trissomía do Cromossomo 18/mortalidade , Síndrome de Turner/mortalidade , Ultrassonografia
6.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569431

RESUMO

Background-The first trimester combined test (FTCT) is an effective screening tool to estimate the risk of fetal aneuploidy. It is obtained by the combination of maternal age, ultrasound fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurement, and the maternal serum markers free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). However, conflicting data have been reported about the association of FTCT, ß-hCG, or PAPP-A with the subsequent diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods-2410 consecutive singleton pregnant women were retrospectively enrolled in Calabria, Southern Italy. All participants underwent examinations for FTCT at 11-13 weeks (plus 6 days) of gestation, and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in accordance with current Italian guidelines and the International Association Diabetes Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glycemic cut-offs. Data were examined by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results-1814 (75.3%) pregnant women were normal glucose tolerant, while 596 (24.7%) were diagnosed with GDM. Spearman univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between FTCT values and subsequent GDM diagnosis (ρ = 0.048, p = 0.018). The logistic regression analysis showed that women with a FTCT <1:10000 had a major GDM risk (p = 0.016), similar to women with a PAPP-A <1 multiple of the expected normal median (MoM, p = 0.014). Conversely, women with ß-hCG ≥2.0 MoM had a reduced risk of GDM (p = 0.014). Conclusions-Our findings indicate that GDM susceptibility increases with fetal aneuploidy risk, and that FTCT and its related maternal serum parameters can be used as early predictors of GDM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Gonadotropina Coriônica Humana Subunidade beta/sangue , Diabetes Gestacional/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Idade Materna , Medição da Translucência Nucal , Gravidez , Proteína Plasmática A Associada à Gravidez/análise
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558120

RESUMO

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and the postpartum period is crucial for early treatment in at-risk women. However, despite recommendations, only a fraction of women undergo a postpartum screening for glucose intolerance (ppOGTT). The present study aims to verify the reason(s) for poor adherence in our population. Research design and methods: This retrospective study includes 451 women in which GDM was diagnosed between 2015⁻2016. During 2017, we verified by phone interview how many women underwent ppOGTT at 6⁻12 weeks postpartum, as recommended by the Italian guidelines. The non-compliant women were asked about the reason(s) for failing to screen. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and the 2-tailed Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical features, respectively, among women performing or non-performing ppOGTT. Results: Out of 451 women with GDM diagnosis, we recorded information from 327. Only 97 (29.7%) performed ppOGTT. The remaining 230 women (70.3%) provided the following explanation for non-compliance: (1) newborn care (30.4%); (2) misunderstood importance (28.3%); (3) oversight (13.0%); (4) unavailability of test reservation in the nearest centers (10.4%); (5) normal glycemic values at delivery (8.3%); (6) discouragement by primary care physician (5.6%). Conclusions: In our population, most women with recent GDM failed to perform ppOGTT. Our results indicated that the prominent barriers could potentially be overcome.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Cuidado Pós-Natal/psicologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA