Cost-effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the commonest cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction worldwide, for which surgery is the mainstay of treatment. At present, there is limited literature on the costs associated with the surgical management of DCM, and none from the United Kingdom (UK). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DCM surgery within the National Health Service, UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incidence of DCM was identified from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database for a single year using five ICD-10 diagnostic codes to represent DCM. Health Resource Group (HRG) data was used to estimate the mean incremental surgery (treatment) costs compared to non-surgical care, and the incremental effect (quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain) was based on data from a previous study. A cost per QALY value of <£30,000/QALY (GBP) was considered acceptable and cost-effective, as per the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance. A sensitivity analysis was undertaken (±5%, ±10% and ±20%) to account for variance in both the cost of admission and QALY gain. RESULTS: The total number of admissions for DCM in 2018 was 4,218. Mean age was 62 years, with 54% of admissions being of working age (18-65 years). The overall estimated cost of admissions for DCM was £38,871,534 for the year. The mean incremental (per patient) cost of surgical management of DCM was estimated to be £9,216 (ranged £2,358 to £9,304), with a QALY gain of 0.64, giving an estimated cost per QALY value of £14,399/QALY. Varying the QALY gain by ±20%, resulted in cost/QALY figures between £12,000 (+20%) and £17,999 (-20%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is estimated to be a cost-effective treatment of DCM amongst the UK population.

Hip reduction surgery versus scoliosis correction in non-ambulant neuromuscular patients: which surgery is the first step?

PURPOSE: Children and young adults with neuromuscular disorders have a high incidence of both spine and hip deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of either primary scoliosis or hip surgery in children and young adults with neuromuscular disorders. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all children and young adults with neuromuscular-related synchronous hip subluxation/dislocation and scoliosis undergoing hip or scoliosis surgery in our institution between 2012 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Demographic and operative data were collected; radiological parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at final follow-up. RESULTS: Forty neuromuscular patients with synchronous hip displacement and scoliosis were included. Twenty patients with an average age of10.2 years had hip correction surgery performed primarily, with a mean follow-up of 54.9 (24-96) months. The other 20 patients with an average age of 12.4 years had scoliosis correction first, with a mean follow-up of 40 (24-60) months. In the "Hip first" group, pelvic obliquity, hip MP and Cobb angle were 16.8°, 71%, and 49°, respectively. At final follow-up, the mean pelvic obliquity and Cobb angles significantly progressed to 27.2° (p = 0.003) and 82.2° (p = 0.001), respectively. Eighteen patients (90%) required scoliosis correction after the hip surgery. In the "Scoliosis first" group, the mean pelvic obliquity, hip MP and Cobb angle were 21.2°, 49% and 65.5°, respectively. At final follow-up, both pelvic obliquity and Cobb angle significantly improved to 8.44° (p = 0.002) and 23.4° (p = 0.001), respectively. In 11/20 (55%) patients, the hip MP had significantly increased following the spinal surgery to 62% (p = 0.001), but only 5/20 (25%) patients underwent hip surgery after scoliosis correction. CONCLUSION: In neuromuscular patients presenting with synchronous hip displacement and scoliosis deformity, corrective scoliosis surgery is associated with a significant correction of pelvic obliquity and lower rates of secondary hip surgery. On the other hand, primary hip surgery does not reduce the risk of pelvic obliquity and scoliosis deformity progression.

Vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with more than 2 years of follow-up- systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Whilst spinal fusion remains the gold standard in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is gaining momentum with relatively few studies on its efficacy thus far. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review reporting on the early results of AVBT for patients undergoing surgery for AIS. We aimed to systematically evaluate the relevant literature pertaining to the efficacy of AVBT with respect to degree of correction of the major curve Cobb angle, complications and revision rates. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of a total of 259 articles, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Overall, 196 patients of (mean age 12.08 years) underwent an AVBT procedure for correction of AIS with a mean follow-up of 34 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of Cobb angle correction, complications and revision rates were used as outcome measures. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on AVBT was performed for studies published between Jan 1999-March 2021 applying the PRISMA guidelines. Isolated case reports were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 196 patients of (mean age 12.08 years) underwent an AVBT procedure for correction of AIS with a mean follow-up of 34 months. There was a significant correction of the main thoracic curve of scoliosis (mean preoperative Cobb angle 48.5°, post-operative Cobb angle at final follow-up of 20.1°, P = 0.01). Overcorrection and mechanical complications were seen in 14.3% and 27.5% of cases, respectively. Pulmonary complications including atelectasis and pleural effusion were seen in 9.7% of patients. Tether revision was performed in 7.85%, and revision to a spinal fusion in 7.88%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review incorporated 9 studies of AVBT and 196 patients with AIS. The complication and revision to spinal fusion rates were 27.5% and 7.88%, respectively. The current literature on AVBT is restricted largely to retrospective studies with non-randomised data. We would recommend a prospective, multi-centre trial of AVBT with strict inclusion criteria and standardised outcome measures.

Cluneal nerve release: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite the heterogeneity of chronic lower back pain aetiologies, cluneal nerve entrapment remains underdiagnosed and poorly understood with few studies discussing the efficacy of its surgical release. OBJECTIVE: The current study opts to conduct a systematic review reporting on the efficacy of cluneal nerve surgical decompression in patients with an established diagnosis who fail conservative treatment. We aimed to systematically evaluate the literature regarding the clinical outcomes, recurrence of symptoms and revision rates of surgical intervention. METHODS: A systematic review of the English language literature dating up until May 2022 was undertaken according to the PRISMA guidelines. Isolated case reports were excluded. RESULTS: Of a total of 54 articles, 4 studies met the inclusion criteria (three were level IV evidence and one level III evidence) and were analyzed. Overall, 98 patients of mean age 61 years, (range 17-86) underwent cluneal nerve release with a mean follow-up of 25.5 months (6-58 months). There was significant improvement in symptoms post operatively in the 4 studies. No systemic or local complications were encountered during the surgeries. Four articles reported on revision surgery for recurrent symptoms in 8 patients out of 98 with a rate of 8.2%. Of the reoperated patients, 7/8 had new branches released that were not addressed initially and 1 had neurectomy for an adhered pre-released branch. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated that cluneal nerve decompression has been performed in a total of 98 patients with significant clinical improvement, zero systemic and local complications and revision rates of 8.2% of the cases.

Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of Scheuermann's Kyphosis (SK).

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study with a minimum follow-up of 10 years of patients who underwent surgery for Scheurmann Kyphosis (SK). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcome of patients with SK who either underwent combined anterior-posterior surgery or posterior instrumented fusion alone. There is paucity of literature for long-term outcome studies on SK. The current trend is towards only posterior (PSF) surgical correction for SK. The combined strategy of anterior release, fusion and posterior spinal fusion (AF/PSF) for kyphosis correction has become historic relic. Long-term outcome studies comparing the two procedures are lacking in literature. METHODS: 51 patients (30 M: 21F) who underwent surgery for SK at a single centre were reviewed. Nineteen had posterior instrumentation alone (PSF) (Group 1) and 32 underwent combined anterior release, fusion with posterior instrumentation (AF/PSF) (Group 2). The clinical data included age at surgery, gender, flexibility of spine, instrumented spinal levels, use of cages and morcellised rib grafts (in cases where anterior release was done), posterior osteotomies and instrumentation, complications and indications for revision surgery. Preoperative flexibility was determined by hyperextension radiographs. The radiological indices were evaluated in the pre-operative, 2-year post-operative and final follow-up [Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Lumbar lordosis (LL), Voustinas index (VI), Sacral inclination (SI) and Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)]. The loss of correction and incidence of JK (Junctional Kyphosis) and its relation to fusion levels were assessed. Complications and difference in outcome between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery for 51 patients was 20.6 years who were followed up for a minimum of 10 years (mean: 14 years; range 10-16 years). The mean age was 18.5 ± 2.2 years and 21.9 ± 4.8 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean pre- and 2-year post-operative ODIs were 32.6 ± 12.8 and 8.4 ± 5.4, respectively, in group 1 (p < 0.0001) and 30.7 ± 11.7 and 6.4 ± 5.7, respectively, in group 2 (p < 0.0001). The final SRS-22 scores in group 1 and 2 were 4.1 ± 0.4 and 4.0 ± 0.35, respectively (p = 0.88). The preoperative flexibility index was 49.2 ± 4.2 and 43 ± 5.6 in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean TKs were 81.4° ± 3.8° and 86.1° ± 6.0° for groups 1 and 2, respectively, which corrected to 45.1° ± 2.6° and 47.3° ± 4.8°, respectively, at final follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean pre-operative LL angle was 60.0° ± 5.0° and 62.4° ± 7.6° in groups 1 and 2, respectively, which at final follow-up was 45.1° ± 4.4° and 48.1° ± 4.8°, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre-operative and final follow-up Voustinas index (VI) in group 1 were 22.9 ± 2.9 and 11.2 ± 1.2, respectively, and in group 2 was 25.9 ± 3.5 and 14.0 ± 2.3, respectively. The mean pre-operative and final follow-up SI angle were 43.6° ± 3.3° and 31.2° ± 2.5° in group 1, respectively, and 44.3° ± 3.5° and 32.1° ± 3.5° in group 2, respectively (p < 0.0001). The pre-operative and final follow-up SVA in group 1 were - 3.3 ± 1.0 cms and - 1.3 ± 0.5 cms, respectively, and in group 2 was - 4.0 ± 1.3cms and - 1.9 ± 1.1cms, respectively (p < 0.0001). Though the magnitude of curve correction in the groups 1 and 2 was significant 36° vs 39° (p = 0.05), there was no significant difference in correction between the two groups. Proximal JK was seen in seven and distal JK in five patients were observed in the whole cohort. CONCLUSION: The long-term clinical outcomes for both PSF and AF/PSF are comparable with reproducible results. No difference was noted in loss of correction and outcome scores between the two groups. The correction of thoracic kyphosis (TK) had a good correlation with ODI. AF/PSF had much higher complications than PSF group. The objective of correcting the sagittal profile and balancing the whole spinal segment on the pelvis can be achieved through single posterior approach with fewer complications.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a meta-analysis and systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review reporting on the efficacy of an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing spinal fusion for AIS. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the relevant literature pertaining to the efficacy of ERAS protocols with respect to the length of stay, complication, and readmission rates in patients undergoing posterior spinal corrective surgery for AIS. ERAS is a multidisciplinary approach aimed at improving outcomes of surgery by a specific evidence-based protocol. The rationale of this rapid recovery regimen is to maintain homeostasis so as to reduce the postoperative stress response and pain. No thorough review of available information for its use in AIS has been published. METHODS: A systematic review of the English language literature was undertaken using search criteria (postoperative recovery AND adolescent idiopathic scoliosis) using the PRISMA guidelines (Jan 1999-May 2020). Isolated case reports and case series with < 5 patients were excluded. Length of stay (LOS), complication and readmission rates were used as outcome measures. Statistical analysis was done using the random effects model. RESULTS: Of a total of 24 articles, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 were Level III and 1 of level IV evidence) and were analyzed. Overall, 1040 patients underwent an ERAS-type protocol following posterior correction of scoliosis and were compared to 959 patients following traditional protocols. There was a significant reduction in the length of stay in patients undergoing ERAS when compared to traditional protocols (p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the complication (p = 0.19) or readmission rates (p = 0.30). Each protocol employed a multidisciplinary approach focusing on optimal pain management, nursing care, and physiotherapy. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates advantages with ERAS protocols by significantly reducing the length of stay without increasing the complications or readmission rates as compared to conventional protocols. However, current literature on ERAS in AIS is restricted largely to retrospective studies with non-randomized data, and initial cohort studies lacking formal control groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Rare, post-periodontitis spondylodiscitis caused by Fusobacterium nucleatum in a patient with multiple sclerosis: challenge of diagnosis and treatment.

Fusobacterium nucleatum is part of the commensal flora of the oral cavity, frequently associated with periodontal infections. We describe the case of a 49-year-old woman, on immunsuppressive therapy for multiple sclerosis, who presented with a 3-month history of debilitating back pain. She had a recent episode of periodontitis, and was under regular dental review. Her MRI scan demonstrated findings suggestive of L2-L3 spondylodiscitis. Her CT-guided biopsy yielded negative cultures and the patient failed two courses of empirical antibiotic treatment. With clinical and radiological disease progression, she underwent a percutaneous disc washout and biopsy, which subsequently grew F. nucleatum Treatment with clindamycin and metronidazole was commenced orally for 6 weeks. She improved gradually, and at 1 year follow-up was asymptomatic. The diagnosis of spondylodiscitis caused by F. nucleatum is challenging. The perseverance on identification by surgical biopsy, minimally invasive washout and targeted antibiotics are the mainstay of effective treatment.

Surgical complications and re-operation rates in spinal metastases surgery: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to review the incidence of complications and unplanned re-operations after surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. BACKGROUND: The spinal column is the most common osseous site for metastatic spread. The goals of the treatment of spinal metastases are largely palliative. The surgical aims include establishing a diagnosis, providing stability, relieving neurological compression and deterioration, decreasing pain and increasing patient independence. Patients with spinal metastases who undergo surgery are considered high risk, with higher morbidity and mortality rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken; PubMed and Embase databases were searched between (2010-2020) for relevant publications in English language with the following search items: metastasis OR metastases AND spine AND surgery AND complications OR revision. Using a standard PRISMA template, 2293 articles were identified. Full-text articles of interest were assessed for inclusion criteria of greater than 30 patients. RESULTS: A final number of 19 articles fully met the search criteria. Four were level II evidence, and the remaining were level III/IV. Surgical site infection 6.5% (135/2088) was reported as the main complication following surgery for spinal metastases followed by neurological deterioration 3.3% (53/1595) and instrumentation failure 2.0% (30/1501). Re-operation rate was 8.3% (54/651), with SSI (27.8%) being the most common reason for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with spinal metastases frequently present with complex therapeutic challenges requiring multidisciplinary team assessment. Surgical site infection (6.5%) was the main reason for a re-operation in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.

Surgical approaches to L5 corpectomy: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical approaches to pathologies of the L5 vertebra constitute a significant challenge. Our aim was to review the efficacy and safety of the surgical approaches to L5 corpectomy and reconstruction across the range of presenting pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, and databases were searched from 1970 to January 2020. The search inclusion criteria were L5 Corpectomy AND/OR Spondylectomy AND/OR Vertebrectomy. The outcome measures studied were length of surgery, blood loss, fusion or failure of fusion/instrumentation, complications and mortality. RESULTS: Initial 36 articles were identified, and final 6 studies met our inclusion criteria. The mean reported blood loss was 2265 ml (400-4700 ml) and was higher for the two-stage posterior-anterior surgery group than the posterior-only surgery group (mean 3230 mls vs. 1260 mls) but not the operative time. All surgical approaches shared high fusion rates (94%) and relatively low complication rates (11.7%). However, surgical strategies incorporating an anterior approach were notable for vascular complications (4-7%), as well as perioperative mortality (9%) not seen in the posterior-only surgery group. CONCLUSION: Where there is clinical and circumstantial equipoise regarding the choice of surgical approaches for a L5 corpectomy, this review indicates a reported mean blood loss of 2265 ml (400-4700 ml), high fusion rates (94%) and relatively low complication rates (11.7%). It is difficult to make direct comparisons between approaches due to small case series, the variability in primary pathology, clinical intent and surgeon experience.

A Personalized Medicine Approach for the Management of Spinal Metastases with Cord Compression: Development of a Novel Clinical Prediction Model for Postoperative Survival and Quality of Life.

Surgery should be considered for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) with a life expectancy of ≥3 months. Given the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation and outcomes, clinical prognostic models (CPMs) can assist in tailoring a personalized medicine approach to optimize surgical decision-making. We aimed to develop and internally validate the first CPM of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a novel CPM to predict the survival of patients with MESCC treated surgically. Using data from 258 patients (AOSpine North America MESCC study and Nottingham MESCC registry), we created 1-year survival and HRQoL CPMs using a Cox model and logistic regression analysis with manual backward elimination. The outcome measure for HRQoL was the minimal clinical important difference in EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire scores. Internal validation involved 200 bootstrap iterations, and calibration and discrimination were evaluated. Longer survival was associated with a higher SF-36 physical component score (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96). In contrast, primary tumor other than breast, thyroid, or prostate (unfavorable: HR, 2.57; other: HR, 1.20), organ metastasis (HR, 1.51), male sex (HR, 1.58), and preoperative radiotherapy (HR, 1.53) were not (c-statistic, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.73). Karnofsky performance status <70% (odds ratio [OR], 2.50), living in North America (OR, 4.06), SF-36 physical component score (OR, 0.95) and SF-36 mental component score (OR, 0.96) were associated with the likelihood of achieving a minimal clinical important difference improvement in the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire score at 3 months (c-statistic, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.79). The calibration for both CPMs was very good. We developed and internally validated the first CPMs of survival and HRQoL at 3 months postoperatively in patients with MESCC using the TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) guidelines. A web-based calculator is available (available at: http://spine-met.com) to assist with clinical decision-making.

Clinical outcomes of sacroplasty for metastatic sacral tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and safety of sacroplasty for patients with secondary metastatic lesions to the sacrum. METHODS: Several databases, including the Cochrane library, PubMed and EMBASE, were systematically searched to identify potentially eligible articles in English language. All the above databases were searched until December 2019. The search strategy was based on the combination of the following keywords: sacroplasty AND secondary tumours OR metastasis OR metastases. The reference list of the selected literature was also reviewed and a standard PRISMA template utilised. RESULTS: From a total of 102 articles initially identified, a final seven studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A total of 107 patients from these studies were included. The follow-up ranged from immediate post-operatively to 30.5 months. The mean preoperative VAS was 8.38 (range 6.9-9.3), which improved significantly to 3.01 (range 1.12-4.7) post-operatively (p < 0.001). The most frequent complication reported was cement leakage, which occurred in 26 patients (25.4%), but without any neurological or other adverse sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Sacroplasty in the management of secondary sacral tumours is a safe procedure that can achieve a significant reduction in pain, as quantified by VAS scores, and low complication rate.

Impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Three-column osteotomies (3-CO) have gained popularity in the last decade as part of the armamentarium for the surgical correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Three-column osteotomies in the form of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be necessary to achieve adequate correction for severe and rigid spinal deformity. Studies reporting improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with validated outcome measures after PSO surgery are sparse and currently consist of small series. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the improvement in HRQOL measures following PSO for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the English literature between period 1996 and 2019 for articles reporting outcome of PSO in patients with ASD according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies consisting of patient-reported outcome Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society 22 or 24 (SRS) outcomes after PSO surgery for adult spine deformity patients (18 years or older) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: Eight studies with 431 PSOs were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in ODI in PSO (P < 0.0001), and the mean clinically important difference was achieved with both ODI (50.46 (45.5-55.4) preoperatively to 32.78 (29.7-39) postoperatively) and SRS (2.49 (2.38-2.7) preoperatively to 3.26 (2.8-4.1) postoperatively) scores. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis did find improvements in the health-related quality of life in patients undergoing PSO surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Right- Versus Left-sided Exposures of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve and Considerations of Cervical Spinal Surgical Corridor: A Fresh-Cadaveric Surgical Anatomy of RLN Pertinent to Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study on fresh unprocessed, nonpreserved, undyed specimens which have not previously been reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to perform surgically relevant exposures of the anterior cervical spine with particular attention to observing the potential vulnerabilities of the RLN on right and left. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vulnerability of the RLN in the anterior cervical spine approach on the right versus left is the subject of ongoing debate. Although most cadaveric studies focus on course variations, structural relations of RLN, they have been done in preserved (fixed) cadavers without relevance to the needs of spinal exposure. METHODS: Twelve fresh undyed cadavers had extensive layer by layer dissections by 2 surgeons (one with extensive experience as anatomy dissector). Both sides were explored for vulnerability during cervical spinal procedures. Each dissection was carried out in a phased approach and deliberately explored beyond what can be afforded in live surgery to allow the reader to conceptualize a better view of the structures. RESULTS: In all specimens, we consistently demonstrated that the right surgical corridor involved manipulation of the nerve and its branches especially below C5 to achieve optimum midline access: in the right corridor, the RLN is on its oblique course to the tracheoesophageal groove. On the left, RLN is already in the tracheoesophageal groove and out of the surgical field involving minimal direct mobilization of the nerve. CONCLUSION: RLN surgical anatomy photographed here is novel in using fresh unprocessed cadaveric specimens which has previously not been reported.Right surgical corridor, below C5, involves retraction/manipulation of RLN for achieving optimum spinal midline access, highlighting potential surgical vulnerability of right RLN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The appropriate management of persisting pain after spine surgery: a European panel study with recommendations based on the RAND/UCLA method.

PURPOSE: Management of patients with persisting pain after spine surgery (PPSS) shows significant variability, and there is limited evidence from clinical studies to support treatment choice in daily practice. This study aimed to develop patient-specific recommendations on the management of PPSS. METHODS: Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (RUAM), an international panel of 6 neurosurgeons, 6 pain specialists, and 6 orthopaedic surgeons assessed the appropriateness of 4 treatment options (conservative, minimally invasive, neurostimulation, and re-operation) for 210 clinical scenarios. These scenarios were unique combinations of patient characteristics considered relevant to treatment choice. Appropriateness had to be expressed on a 9-point scale (1 = extremely inappropriate, 9 = extremely appropriate). A treatment was considered appropriate if the median score was ≥ 7 in the absence of disagreement (≥ 1/3 of ratings in each of the opposite sections 1-3 and 7-9). RESULTS: Appropriateness outcomes showed clear and specific patterns. In 48% of the scenarios, exclusively one of the 4 treatments was appropriate. Conservative treatment was usually considered appropriate for patients without clear anatomic abnormalities and for those with new pain differing from the original symptoms. Neurostimulation was considered appropriate in the case of (predominant) neuropathic leg pain in the absence of conditions that may require surgical intervention. Re-operation could be considered for patients with recurrent disc, spinal/foraminal stenosis, or spinal instability. CONCLUSIONS: Using the RUAM, an international multidisciplinary panel established criteria for appropriate treatment choice in patients with PPSS. These may be helpful to educate physicians and to improve consistency and quality of care. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Ewing Sarcoma of the Spine: Prognostic Variables for Survival and Local Control in Surgically Treated Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, ambispective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To quantify mortality and local recurrence after surgical treatment of spinal Ewing sarcoma (ES) and to determine whether an Enneking appropriate procedure and surgical margins (en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins) are associated with improved prognosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of primary ES of the spine is complex. Ambiguity remains regarding the role and optimal type of surgery in the treatment of spinal ES. METHODS: The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor developed a multicenter database including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, mortality, and recurrence rate data for spinal ES. Patients were stratified based on surgical margins and Enneking appropriateness. Survival and recurrence were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients diagnosed with primary spinal ES underwent surgery. Enneking appropriateness of surgery was known for 55 patients; 24 (44%) treated Enneking appropriately (EA) and 31 (56%) treated Enneking inappropriately (EI). A statistically significant difference in favor of EA-treated patients was found with regards to survival (P = 0.034). Neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with increased survival (P = 0.008). Local recurrence occurred in 22% (N = 5) of patients with an EA procedure versus 38% (N = 11) of patients with an EI procedure. The timing of chemotherapy treatment was significantly different between the Enneking cohorts (P < 0.001) and all EA-treated patients received chemotherapy treatment. Although, local recurrence was not significantly different between Enneking cohorts (P = 0.140), intralesional surgical margins and patients who received a previous spine tumor operation were associated with increased local recurrence (P = 0.025 and P = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgery should be undertaken when an en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is feasible. An EA surgery correlates with improved survival, but the impact of other prognostic factors needs to be evaluated. En bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is associated with local control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The computed tomography-based fractal analysis of trabecular bone structure may help in detecting decreased quality of bone before urgent spinal procedures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: To date, no reliable method is available to determine the parameters of bone density based on the routine spinal computed tomography (CT) in the emergency setup. We propose the use of fractal analysis to detect patients with poor quality of bone before urgent or semi-urgent spinal procedures. PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate the hypothesis that the CT-based fractal analysis of the trabecular bone structure may help in detecting patients with poor quality of bone before urgent spinal procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Patients in whom the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan and lumbar spine CT were performed at an interval of no more than 3 months were randomly selected from a prospectively collected database. Diagnostic axial CT scans of L2, L3, and L4 vertebrae were processed to determine the fractal dimension (FD) of the trabecular structure of each spinal level. Box-count method and ImageJ 1.49 software were used. The FD was compared with the results of the DEXA scan: bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score by mean of correlation coefficients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was later performed to determine the cutoff value of FD. RESULTS: A total of 102 vertebral levels obtained from 35 patients (mean age 60±18 years; 29 female) were analyzed. The FD was significantly higher in the group of patients with decreased bone density (DBD) (T-score<-1.0) (1.67 vs. 1.43; p<.0001) and negatively correlated with BMD (R Spearman, -0.53; p<.0001) and T-score (-0.49; p<.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of FD>1.53 indicates DBD (p<.0001; area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that fractal analysis of the lumbar spine CT images may be used to determine bone density before spinal instrumentation (eg, metastatic or traumatic cord compression). Further prospective studies comparing results of the fractal analysis of CT scans with quantitative CT (qCT) are warranted.

En Bloc Resection Versus Intralesional Surgery in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, ambispective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify local recurrence (LR) and mortality rates after surgical treatment of spinal giant cell tumor and to determine whether en bloc resection with wide/marginal margins is associated with improved prognosis compared to an intralesional procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the spine is a rare primary bone tumor known for its local aggressiveness. Optimal surgical treatment remains to be determined. METHODS: The AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor developed a comprehensive multicenter database including demographics, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, mortality, and recurrence rate data for GCT of the spine. Patients were analyzed based on surgical margins, including Enneking appropriateness. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2011, 82 patients underwent surgery for spinal GCT. According to the Enneking classification, 59 (74%) tumors were classified as S3-aggressive and 21 (26%) as S2-active. The surgical margins were wide/marginal in 27 (36%) patients and intralesional in 48 (64%) patients. Thirty-nine of 77 (51%) underwent Enneking appropriate (EA) treatment and 38 (49%) underwent Enneking inappropriate (EI) treatment. Eighteen (22%) patients experienced LR. LR occurred in 11 (29%) EI-treated patients and six (15%) EA-treated patients (P = 0.151). There was a significant difference between wide/marginal margins and intralesional margins for LR (P = 0.029). Seven (9%) patients died. LR is strongly associated with death (Relative Risk 8.9, P < 0.001). Six (16%) EI-treated patients and one (3%) EA-treated patients died (P = 0.056). With regards to surgical margins, all patients who died underwent intralesional resection (P = 0.096). CONCLUSION: En bloc resection with wide/marginal margins should be performed when technically feasible because it is associated with decreased LR. Intralesional resection is associated with increased LR, and mortality correlates with LR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Berry's Ligament and the Inferior Thyroid Artery as reliable anatomical landmarks for the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN): a fresh-cadaveric study of the cervical spine. The RLN relevant to spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although most cadaveric studies of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) have focused on course variations, they have usually been done on preserved (fixed and embalmed) cadavers, which renders the RLN immobile and of less surgical landmark value. PURPOSE: Our aim was to perform a thorough exposure in fresh cadavers, with the intention of investigating the Inferior Thyroid Artery (ITA) and Berry's ligament as reliable landmarks for the identification of the RLN in anterior cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Eight fresh cadavers had layer by layer dissections by two surgeons (one with extensive experience as anatomy dissector) from C2 to T2-T3, with particular attention to illustrating the surgical anatomy of the RLN pertinent to spine. METHODS: We exposed, traced, and referenced the position of RLNs along their entire length bilaterally and examined the reliability of using ITA and superficial fascia of Berry's Ligament as landmark. RESULTS: In all specimens, we were able to verify the entire course of RLNs on both the right and left sides in all cadavers dissected in detail from origin to insertion. The RLNs were consistently associated with the ITA and Berry's ligament bilaterally, with the RLNs passing almost perpendicular to these structures. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the most reliable anatomical landmark for the RLN bilaterally was the ITA and Berry's ligament, both of which would be encountered as readily identifiable structures in anterior cervical spinal exposure before the nerve itself. We believe this will help spinal surgeons to refine their surgical technique to identify RLN where necessary, thus preventing iatrogenic injury. Our landmark protocol of FEEL-LOOK-AVOID can serve as an easy aide-mémoire for intraoperative surgical anatomy of the RLN during ACDF regardless of side.

Spinal column chordoma: prognostic significance of clinical variables and T (brachyury) gene SNP rs2305089 for local recurrence and overall survival.

Background: Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive bony tumors associated with poor outcomes. Recently, the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2305089 in the T (brachyury) gene was strongly associated with sporadic chordoma development, but its clinical utility is undetermined. Methods: In 333 patients with spinal chordomas, we identified prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival and assessed the prognostic significance of the rs2305089 SNP. Results: The median LRFS was 5.2 years from the time of surgery (95% CI: 3.8-6.0); greater tumor volume (≥100cm3) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.26-3.15, P = .003) and Enneking inappropriate resections (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.37-4.03, P = .002) were independent predictors of LRFS. The median overall survival was 7.0 years (95% CI: 5.8-8.4), and was associated with older age at surgery (HR = 1.11 per 5-year increase, 95% CI: 1.02-1.21, P = .012) and previous surgical resection (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.03-2.89, P = .038). One hundred two of 109 patients (93.6%) with available pathologic specimens harbored the A variant at rs2305089; these patients had significantly improved survival compared with those lacking the variant (P = .001), but there was no association between SNP status and LRFS (P = .876). Conclusions: The ability to achieve a wide en bloc resection at the time of the primary surgery is a critical preoperative consideration, as subtotal resections likely complicate later management. This is the first time the rs2305089 SNP has been implicated in the prognosis of individuals with chordoma, suggesting that screening all patients may be instructive for risk stratification.

A multicenter cohort study of spinal osteoid osteomas: results of surgical treatment and analysis of local recurrence.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal osteoid osteomas are benign primary tumors arising predominantly from the posterior column of the spine. These "osteoblastic" lesions have traditionally been treated with intralesional excision. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to review the treatment and local recurrence rates for symptomatic spinal osteoid osteomas. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Multicenter ambispective cross-sectional observational cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: During the study period, a total of 84 patients (65 males, 19 females) were diagnosed with a spinal osteoid osteoma and received surgical treatment. The mean age at surgery was 21.8 ± 9.0 years (range: 6.7-52.4 years) and the mean follow-up was 2.7 years (13 days-14.5 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Local recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival. METHODS: Using the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor multicenter ambispective database, surgically treated osteoid osteoma cases were identified. Patient demographic, clinical and diagnostic, treatment, local recurrence, perioperative morbidity, and cross-sectional survival data were collected and retrieved. Descriptive statistics were summarized using mean/standard deviation or frequency/percentage. RESULTS: In our study, most of the tumors were localized in the mobile spine (81 of 84 [96%]); all patients reported pain as a symptom. According to the postoperative assessment, 10 (12%) patients received an en bloc resection with marginal or wide margins, whereas two (2%) patients received en bloc resections with intralesional margins, 69 (82%) patients were treated by piecemeal "intralesional" resection, and three (4%) patients were not assessed. A total of six patients (7%) experienced a local recurrence, all of which occurred in patients who had received an intralesional resection. CONCLUSIONS: Benign bone-forming tumors of the spine are uncommon. Most patients in our series underwent a piecemeal resection with intralesional margins. This remains safe with a low local recurrence rate. En bloc excision may provide more chance of complete excision of the nidus but is not mandatory. The importance of complete excision of the nidus cannot be overemphasized.