Genetic complexity of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of hepatitis C virus (HCV): influence on the characteristics of the infection and responses to interferon alfa therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

HCV exists within its host as pools of related genetic variants referred to as quasispecies. The hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of the E2 envelope gene is subjected to strong selective pressure from neutralizing antibodies. The genetic complexity of this region is defined as the total number of genetic variants within the quasispecies population. The genetic complexity of the HVR1 region was examined in patients with chronic hepatitis C and its relationship with the epidemiology of HCV infection, and its influence on liver disease and the response to interferon treatment were determined in 114 patients with chronic hepatitis C. The genetic complexity of the HVR1 major variants was measured before treatment by using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique, and was compared with epidemiological, clinical, virological and histological features. The patients were treated with 3 megaunits of interferon (IFN) alfa for 3 to 6 months and the response to treatment was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. The HVR1 could be studied in 101 of the 114 patients (89%). Genetic complexity was significantly higher in patients infected through blood transfusion than intravenous drug use (mean complexity index: 5.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.5, respectively; P = 0.04). This relationship was independent of age and the estimated time since infection. No significant relationship was found with other parameters of infection or liver disease. In univariate analysis, the genetic complexity of HVR1 major variants did not affect the rates of ALT normalization at months 3 and 6 of IFN treatment. HVR1 genetic complexity was lower in patients with a sustained virological response than in non-responders (4.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.4 +/- 2.0, respectively; P = 0.07). In multivariate analysis of pretreatment parameters associated with a sustained virological response to treatment, three parameters appeared to be independent predictors of such a response: a low viral load (P < 0.04), a low anti-HCV core IgM titer (P = 0.03) and a low genetic complexity of HVR1 major variants (P < 0.04). In conclusion, the HVR1 of HCV has a quasispecies distribution in infected individuals. Its genetic complexity is significantly higher in transfusion recipients than in intravenous drug users, suggesting that the size of the initial inoculum affects the later emergence and development of viral quasispecies. The genetic complexity of HVR1, together with viral load and the anti-HCV IgM titer, are independent predictors of a sustained virological response to IFN alfa in patients with chronic hepatitis.

GB virus C (GBV-C) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Influence on liver disease and on hepatitis virus behaviour: effect of interferon alfa therapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, 1) the prevalence and the epidemiological characteristics of GB virus C (GBV-C) infection, 2) the influence of GBV-C on hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, 3) the pathogenicity of GBV-C in the absence of treatment and under interferon therapy, and 4) the effect of interferon alfa on GBV-C and HCV replications. One hundred fifteen patients with chronic hepatitis C were studied. Before treatment, they were tested for GBV-C RNA by PCR and GBV-C genotype was determined for positive samples. Pretreatment information was collected, including age, gender, source of HCV, estimated duration of HCV infection, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, cirrhosis and Knodell's score on liver biopsy, HCV genotype, HCV viral burden and anti-HCV core IgM antibodies. The genetic complexity of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of HCV was studied by PCR-Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism. All patients were treated with 3 to 9 mega units of interferon alfa-2a three times per week for 3 to 6 months. The influence of GBV-C on the evolution of ALT and HCV replication during and after treatment was studied, and GBV-C and HCV RNA were monitored monthly by PCR during this period. Eighteen patients (16%) were GBV-C RNA-positive. Among 11 samples studied, GBV-C genotype 2a was present in 9 cases, 2b in one case and type 3 in one case. GBV-C RNA-positive patients were significantly younger than GBV-C RNA-negative ones (38.4 +/- 11.5 vs. 47.4 +/- 14.0, P = 0.012), a result independent of the route of transmission and the disease duration. No difference between GBV-C RNA-positive and -negative patients was found for other epidemiological parameters (e.g. gender, risk factor for parenteral viral infections, disease duration and HCV genotypes), or for the characteristics of HCV infection and related liver disease (e.g. HCV RNA level, genetic complexity of the HVR1, anti-HCV core IgM, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, cirrhosis and Knodell's score). GBV-C did not influence the rates of ALT normalization at months 3, 6 and 12 and of sustained hepatitis C virological response at month 12 of treatment follow-up. During treatment, GBV-C viremia became undetectable in 12 patients (67%) but relapse occurred after treatment withdrawal in all the nine patients with sufficient follow-up. In the remaining six patients (33%), GBV-C resisted interferon. Whatever the effect of interferon on GBV-C replication, the ALT levels correlated with the presence of HCV RNA. In conclusion, GBV-C infection is frequent in patients with chronic hepatitis C, who are mainly, but not exclusively, infected by GBV-C genotype 2a. GBV-C positive patients are significantly younger than GBV-C negative ones. GBV-C does not seem to affect HCV replication, liver disease and responses of HCV infection and liver disease to interferon therapy. GBV-C is sensitive to 3 mega units of interferon alfa administered three times per week in two-thirds of the patients, but relapse is constant with this dosage after treatment withdrawal.

What technique should be used for routine detection and quantification of HBV DNA in clinical samples?

Detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in serum allows monitoring of HBV replication and assessing responses to antiviral treatment. HBV DNA quantification measures virus replication and can be used as a prognosis indicator of liver disease and an index of response to antiviral drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of three HBV DNA detection and/or quantification techniques for assessing HBV replication. Three hundred unselected sera with a request for HBV DNA detection and quantification were tested with a molecular hybridisation technique without amplification (Digene Hybrid-Capture, Murex Diagnostics Ltd), a signal amplification assay based on branched DNA technology (Quantiplex HBV DNA, Chiron diagnostics), and an 'in-house' qualitative, non quantitative target amplification assay based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers located in the S gene of the HBV genome. Hybrid-capture and branched DNA gave concordant results in 278 cases (93%). In the 128 samples positive by both assays, DNA titres in pg/ml were related significantly (r = 0.70, P < 0.0001). but branched DNA titres increased more rapidly than hybrid-capture titres when the amount of HBV DNA in the sample increased. Twenty-two sera (7%) were negative by hybrid-capture, but positive in branched DNA (detection rate gain: 15%). In these 22 patients, DNA titres were low, HBsAg was present in all instances and alanine aminotransferase activity was elevated in 18 patients (82%); HBeAg was present in seven patients (32%) and anti-HBe antibodies in 18 patients (82%); liver biopsy, undertaken in 18 patients, revealed chronic active hepatitis in all instances, associated with cirrhosis in eight cases. Qualitative, non-quantitative HBV DNA PCR was positive in 75 (50%) of the 150 hybrid-capture-negative, branched DNA-negative samples, including a significant proportion of patients without evidence of ongoing HBV-related liver disease. The results show that in general, the branched DNA assay detects HBV DNA in more patients than hybrid-capture and that this improved detection rate is relevant clinically and genome equivalents/ml are preferred to pg/ml to quantify HBV DNA in clinical specimens and finally qualitative, non-quantitative polymerase chain reaction can detect HBV DNA in patients without evidence of active HBV-related liver disease. This study emphasizes the need for more sensitive, university standardised quantitative HBV DNA assays and for the definition of clinically relevant cutoffs with these assays.

Significance of anti-hepatitis C virus core IgM antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Antihepatitis C virus (HCV) IgM antibodies were found in patients with both acute and chronic hepatitis C. The aims of the study were to determine the significance, in terms of liver disease and virological parameters, of anti-HCV core IgM antibodies in the serum of patients with chronic hepatitis C, and the possible relationship between the presence of these antibodies before treatment and biochemical and virological responses to interferon therapy. Sixty-one patients with chronic hepatitis C were studied. Tests for serum anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were carried out before treatment. The patients received 3 mega units of interferon alpha-2a subcutaneously thrice weekly for at least 3 months (6 months when alanine aminotransferase activity was normal at month 3). A biochemical response to interferon therapy was defined as normal alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (month 6: biochemical response) and 6 months later (month 12: sustained biochemical response). A sustained virological response was defined as serum HCV RNA negativity by a polymerase chain reaction-based detection method (PCR) in patients with normal alanine aminotransferase at month 12. Anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were detected in 28 of the 61 patients (46%). The prevalence of these antibodies was significantly higher in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 (including subtypes 1a and 1b) than in patients infected with other genotypes (including 2a and 3a) (57% vs. 17%; P < 0.01). No significant difference was found between IgM-positive and IgM-negative patients as regards the mean age, sex ratio, serum alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activities, the prevalence of cirrhosis in liver biopsy specimens, detection of HCV RNA by PCR, and quantitation by branched DNA assay. At month 6 of interferon therapy, normal alanine aminotransferase activity was significantly more frequent in IgM-negative than in IgM-positive patients (52% vs. 21%, respectively; P < 0.02). At month 12, normal alanine aminotransferase activity and PCR negativity were significantly more frequent in IgM-negative than in IgM-positive patients (18% vs. 0%, P < 0.04). It is concluded that anti-HCV core IgM antibodies in serum are significantly more frequent in patients infected by HCV type 1 than by other types. This suggests that their overall prevalence in patients with chronic hepatitis C in industrialized countries, where HCV type 1 accounts for the majority of infections, would be of the order of 50%, that anti-HCV core IgM antibodies are not associated with characteristic features of liver disease, and that their presence before treatment is associated with a failure of interferon alpha therapy to clear the virus.

Is the detection of anti-hepatitis C virus core IgM influenced by the presence of serum rheumatoid factor?

Rheumatoid factor (RF) induces false-positive results in the detection of serum antibodies, especially of the IgM type. About 70% of the patients with chronic hepatitis C have abnormal levels of serum RF. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of serum RF could influence the detection of anti-HCV core IgM, using an assay designed not to pick up RFs by the addition of goat antibodies directed against human IgG in the sample diluent. Serum anti-HCV core IgM antibodies and RF were sought in 60 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Serum anti-HCV IgG antibodies and anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were also sought in 101 patients with high levels of RF. Anti-HCV core IgM antibodies were found in 45% and serum RF in 72% of the patients with chronic hepatitis C. Neither the prevalence nor the levels of RF differed significantly between IgM positive and negative patients. Eight percent of the 101 patients with raised RF had anti-HCV antibodies and two of them had anti-HCV core IgM antibodies. No patient without anti-HCV antibodies had anti-HCV core IgM antibodies. These results show that: a) the detection of anti-HCV core IgM in patients with chronic hepatitis C is independent of the presence of serum RF; b) high titers of serum RF are not responsible for false-positive results of anti-HCV IgM tests. The study suggests that the test used could be a confident tool for studies on the significance of anti-HCV core IgM antibodies in chronic hepatitis C.