Dedicated Photon-Counting CT for Detection and Classification of Microcalcifications: An Intraindividual Comparison With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical experience regarding the use of dedicated photon-counting breast CT (PC-BCT) for diagnosis of breast microcalcifications is scarce. This study systematically compares the detection and classification of breast microcalcifications using a dedicated breast photon-counting CT, especially designed for examining the breast, in comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective intraindividual study on women with DBT screening-detected BI-RADS-4/-5 microcalcifications who underwent PC-BCT before biopsy. PC-BCT images were reconstructed with a noninterpolated spatial resolution of 0.15 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm (reconstruction mode 1 [RM-1]) and with 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm (reconstruction mode 2 [RM-2]), plus thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions. Two radiologists independently rated the detection of microcalcifications in direct comparison with DBT on a 5-point scale. The distribution and morphology of microcalcifications were then rated according to BI-RADS. The size of the smallest discernible microcalcification particle was measured. For PC-BCT, the average glandular dose was determined by Monte Carlo simulations; for DBT, the information provided by the DBT system was used. RESULTS: Between September 2022 and July 2023, 22 participants (mean age, 61; range, 42-85 years) with microcalcifications (16 malignant; 6 benign) were included. In 2/22 with microcalcifications in the posterior region, microcalcifications were not detectable on PC-BCT, likely because they were not included in the PC-BCT volume. In the remaining 20 participants, microcalcifications were detectable. With high between-reader agreement (κ > 0.8), conspicuity of microcalcifications was rated similar for DBT and MIPs of RM-1 (mean, 4.83 ± 0.38 vs 4.86 ± 0.35) (P = 0.66), but was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for the remaining PC-BCT reconstructions: 2.11 ± 0.92 (RM-2), 2.64 ± 0.80 (MIPs of RM-2), and 3.50 ± 1.23 (RM-1). Identical distribution qualifiers were assigned for PC-BCT and DBT in 18/20 participants, with excellent agreement (κ = 0.91), whereas identical morphologic qualifiers were assigned in only 5/20, with poor agreement (κ = 0.44). The median size of smallest discernible microcalcification particle was 0.2 versus 0.6 versus 1.1 mm in DBT versus RM-1 versus RM-2 (P < 0.001), likely due to blooming effects. Average glandular dose was 7.04 mGy (PC-BCT) versus 6.88 mGy (DBT) (P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: PC-BCT allows reliable detection of in-breast microcalcifications as long as they are not located in the posterior part of the breast and allows assessment of their distribution, but not of their individual morphology.

Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious calcifications at different sites within one breast: Is biopsy of more than one location needed?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how often biopsy of two sites of morphologically similar or equally suspicious calcifications within the same breast yield differing histopathologic results, and how this may affect clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with two or more sites of calcifications categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ≥ 4b within the same breast who underwent digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-guided VAB). We analyzed how often biopsy of two distinct sites yielded the same or differing histopathologic findings. The histopathologic findings were dichotomized into "actionable" and "non-actionable", depending on the respective further management. We then analyzed how often the consecutive management would have been the same or different. RESULTS: Of 206 women undergoing DBT-guided VAB at our institution within 24 months, 21 consecutive patients (54 ± 10.2 years; range: 35-71) underwent DBT-guided VAB of two distinct sites of calcifications. Management of histologic findings was the same (both sites actionable or both sites non-actionable) in 12/21 (57 %), different in the remaining 9/21 patients (43 %). Of the nine patients whose differing histologic findings would have led to different clinical management, 4/9 had a high-risk lesion (atypical ductal hyperplasia n = 3, papilloma with epithelial atypia n = 1) vs benign changes (adenosis n = 4), 2/9 had high-grade DCIS vs benign changes (adenosis n = 1, fat necrosis n = 1), and 3/9 had invasive cancer (luminal A n = 2, luminal B n = 1) with high-grade DCIS vs pure high-grade DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple sites of calcifications within the same breast, even when morphologically similar or equally suspicious, may represent different histopathologic findings with different clinical management implications. Accordingly, in the presence of suspicious calcifications at multiple distinct sites within the same breast, biopsy of more than one site of calcification should be considered.

Background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced MR imaging suggests systemic effects of intrauterine contraceptive devices.

OBJECTIVES: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices (LNG-IUDs) are designed to exhibit only local hormonal effects. There is an ongoing debate on whether LNG-IUDs can have side effects similar to systemic hormonal medication. Benign background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI has been established as a sensitive marker of hormonal stimulation of the breast. We investigated the association between LNG-IUD use and BPE in breast MRI to further explore possible systemic effects of LNG-IUDs. METHODS: Our hospital database was searched to identify premenopausal women without personal history of breast cancer, oophorectomy, and hormone replacement or antihormone therapy, who had undergone standardized DCE breast MRI at least twice, once with and without an LNG-IUD in place. To avoid confounding aging-related effects on BPE, half of included women had their first MRI without, the other half with, LNG-IUD in place. Degree of BPE was analyzed according to the ACR categories. Wilcoxon-matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare the distribution of ACR categories with vs. without LNG-IUD. RESULTS: Forty-eight women (mean age, 46 years) were included. In 24/48 women (50% [95% CI: 35.9-64.1%]), ACR categories did not change with vs. without LNG-IUDs. In 23/48 women (48% [33.9-62.1%]), the ACR category was higher with vs. without LNG-IUDs; in 1/48 (2% [0-6%]), the ACR category was lower with vs. without LNG-IUDs. The change of ACR category depending on the presence or absence of an LNG-IUD proved highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of an LNG-IUD can be associated with increased BPE in breast MRI, providing further evidence that LNG-IUDs do have systemic effects. KEY POINTS: • The use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices is associated with increased background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI. • This suggests that hormonal effects of these devices are not only confined to the uterine cavity, but may be systemic. • Potential systemic effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices should therefore be considered.

MRI-Based Quantitation of Hepatic Steatosis Does Not Predict Hypertrophy Rate after Portal Vein Embolization in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis and Normal to Moderately Elevated Fat Fraction.

The aim of this study was to correlate the pre-procedural magnetic-resonance-imaging-based hepatic fat fraction (hFF) with the degree of hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Between 2011 November and 2020 February, 68 patients with CRCLM underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 1.5 Tesla) of the liver before PVE. Using T1w chemical shift imaging (DUAL FFE), the patients were categorized as having a normal (<5%) or an elevated (>5%) hFF. The correlation of hFF, age, gender, initial tumor mass, history of chemotherapy, degree of liver hypertrophy, and kinetic growth rate after PVE was investigated using multiple regression analysis and Spearman's test. A normal hFF was found in 43/68 patients (63%), whereas 25/68 (37%) patients had an elevated hFF. The mean hypertrophy and kinetic growth rates in patients with normal vs. elevated hFF were 24 ± 31% vs. 28 ± 36% and 9 ± 9 % vs. 8 ± 10% (p > 0.05), respectively. Spearman's test showed no correlation between hFF and the degree of hypertrophy (R = -0.04). Multivariable analysis showed no correlation between hFF, history of chemotherapy, age, baseline tumor burden, or laterality of primary colorectal cancer, and only a poor inverse correlation between age and kinetic growth rate after PVE. An elevated hFF in a pre-procedural MRI does not correlate with the hypertrophy rate after PVE and should therefore not be used as a contraindication to the procedure in patients with CRCLM.