Association between physician's case volume in prehospital advanced trauma care and 30-day mortality: A registry-based analysis of 4,032 patients.

BACKGROUND: Seriously injured patients may benefit from prehospital interventions provided by a critical care physician. The relationship between case volume and outcome has been established in trauma teams in hospitals, as well as in prehospital advanced airway management. In this study, we aimed to assess if a volume-outcome relationship exists in prehospital advanced trauma care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the national helicopter emergency medical services database, including trauma patients escorted from scene to hospital by a helicopter emergency medical services physician during January 1, 2013, to August 31, 2019. In addition, similar cases during 2012 were used to determine case volumes. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis, with 30-day mortality as the outcome. Age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, shock index, mechanism of injury, time interval from alarm to the patient and duration of transport, level of receiving hospital, and physician's trauma case volume were used as covariates. On-scene times, interventions performed, and status at hospital arrival were assessed in patients who were grouped according to physician's case volume. RESULTS: In total, 4,032 escorted trauma patients were included in the study. The median age was 40.2 (22.9-59.3) years, and 3,032 (75.2%) were male. Within 30 days, 498 (13.2%) of these patients had died. In the highest case volume group, advanced interventions were performed more often, and patients were less often hypotensive at handover. Data for multivariate analysis were available for 3,167 (78.5%) of the patients. Higher case volume was independently associated with lower mortality (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.89). CONCLUSION: When a prehospital physician's case volume is higher in high-risk prehospital trauma, this seems to be associated with more active practice patterns and significantly lower 30-day mortality. The quality of prehospital critical care could be increased by ensuring sufficient case volume for the providers of such care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.

The first seven years of nationally organized helicopter emergency medical services in Finland - the data from quality registry.

BACKGROUND: Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) play an important role in prehospital care of the critically ill. Differences in funding, crew composition, dispatch criteria and mission profile make comparison between systems challenging. Several systems incorporate databases for quality control, performance evaluation and scientific purposes. FinnHEMS database was incorporated for such purposes following the national organization of HEMS in Finland 2012. The aims of this study are to describe information recorded in the database, data collection, and operational characteristics of Finnish HEMS during 2012-2018. METHODS: All dispatches of the six Finnish HEMS units recorded in the national database from 2012 to 2018 were included in this observational registry study. Five of the units are physician staffed, and all are on call 24/7. The database follows a template for uniform reporting in physician staffed pre-hospital services, exceeding the recommended variables of relevant guidelines. RESULTS: The study included 100,482 dispatches, resulting in 33,844 (34%) patient contacts. Variables were recorded with little or no missing data. A total of 16,045 patients (16%) were escorted by HEMS to hospital, of which 2239 (2%) by helicopter. Of encountered patients 4195 (4%) were declared deceased on scene. The number of denied or cancelled dispatches was 66,638 (66%). The majority of patients were male (21,185, 63%), and the median age was 57.7 years. The median American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Scale classification was 2 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance class 0. The most common reason for response was trauma representing 26% (8897) of the patients, followed by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 20% (6900), acute neurological reason excluding stroke 13% (4366) and intoxication and related psychiatric conditions 10% (3318). Blunt trauma (86%, 7653) predominated in the trauma classification. CONCLUSIONS: Gathering detailed and comprehensive data nationally on all HEMS missions is feasible. A national database provides valuable insights into where the operation of HEMS could be improved. We observed a high number of cancelled or denied missions and a low percentage of patients transported by helicopter. The medical problem of encountered patients also differs from comparable systems.