The impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare short- and long-term outcomes in obese versus nonobese patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity is an important public health issue due to the negative effects on quality of life. Some studies have shown an association between obesity and higher rates of complications and unfavorable outcomes after spine surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records for all adult patients undergoing 1- to 3-level posterolateral fusion for degenerative spine disease between 1992 and 2012 at a single institution. Patients were divided into obese (body mass index > 30 kg/m) and nonobese cohorts to compare complications, reoperation rates, and symptom resolution at the last follow-up. A regression model was used to estimate relative risk ratios. RESULTS: During the study period, 732 patients underwent lumbar fusion, with 662 (90.44%) nonobese patients and 70 (9.56%) obese patients in the cohort. Obese patients had significantly higher blood loss intraoperatively (P = 0.002) and a longer average length of stay (P = 0.022). Moreover, obesity was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of developing a postoperative complication (risk ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-4.16) and surgical site infection (risk ratio 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-6.52). At the last follow-up, a higher proportion of obese patients had radiculopathy (P = 0.018), motor deficits (P = 0.006), sensory deficits (P = 0.008), and bowel or bladder dysfunction (P = 0.006) than nonobese patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, obese patients undergoing lumbar fusion had higher blood loss, longer lengths of stay, higher complication rates, and worse functional outcomes at the last follow-up than nonobese patients. These findings suggest that both surgeons and patients should acknowledge the significantly increased morbidity profile of obese patients after lumbar fusion.

A rare case of anti-Hu paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome in association with cervical cancer.

Anti-Hu antibodies, also known as ANNA-1, are well characterized in paraneoplastic neuropathies. We present here the first known case of anti-Hu seropositivity, cerebellar ataxia, and sensory neuropathy in association with cervical cancer.

The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic medication use: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Exposure to natural sunlight has been associated with improvement in mood, reduced mortality among patients with cancer, and reduced length of hospitalization for patients who have experienced myocardial infarction. Our aim was to evaluate whether the amount of sunlight in a hospital room modifies a patient's psychosocial health, the quantity of analgesic medication used, and the pain medication cost. METHODS: A prospective study of pain medication use was conducted in 89 patients undergoing elective cervical and lumbar spinal surgery where they were housed on either the "bright" or "dim" side of the same hospital unit. Analgesic medication was converted to standard morphine equivalents for interpatient comparison. The intensity of sunlight in each hospital room was measured daily and psychologic questionnaires were administered on the day after surgery and at discharge. RESULTS: Patients staying on the bright side of the hospital unit were exposed to 46% higher-intensity sunlight on average (p = .005). Patients exposed to an increased intensity of sunlight experienced less perceived stress (p = .035), marginally less pain (p = .058), took 22% less analgesic medication per hour (p = .047), and had 21% less pain medication costs (p = .047). Age quartile was the only other variable found to be a predictor of analgesic use, with a significant negative correlation (p <.001). However, patients housed on the bright side of the hospital consistently used less analgesic medications in all age quartiles. CONCLUSION: The exposure postoperatively of patients who have undergone spinal surgery to increased amounts of natural sunlight during their hospital recovery period may result in decreased stress, pain, analgesic medication use, and pain medication costs.

Psychological stress and antibody response to influenza vaccination: when is the critical period for stress, and how does it get inside the body?

OBJECTIVES: This study attempted to determine whether stress of moderate intensity could modulate the antibody response to an influenza vaccination in healthy young adults, identify critical periods during which stress could influence antibody response, and delineate behavioral and biological pathways that might explain relations between stress and antibody. METHODS: A cohort of 83 healthy young adults underwent 13 days of ambulatory monitoring before, during, and after vaccination. Four times daily, subjects reported the extent to which they felt stressed and overwhelmed and collected a saliva sample that was later used to measure cortisol. A battery of health practices (cigarette smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, sleep hygiene) was assessed daily. Antibody titers to the vaccine components were measured at baseline and at 1-month and 4-month follow-up assessments. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: To the extent that they reported higher levels of stress across the monitoring period, subjects exhibited poorer antibody responses to the New Caledonia strain of the vaccine. Stress ratings on the 2 days before the vaccine and the day it was given were not associated with antibody response. However, the 10 days afterward appeared to be a window of opportunity during which stress could shape the long-term antibody response to varying degrees. With respect to potential mediating pathways, little evidence emerged in favor of cortisol secretion, alcohol consumption, physical activity, or cigarette smoking. However, analyses were consistent with a pattern in which feelings of stress and loss of sleep become locked into a feed-forward circuit that ultimately diminishes the humoral immune response. These findings may shed light on the mechanisms through which stress increase vulnerability to infectious disease.

Reactivity and vulnerability to stress-associated risk for upper respiratory illness.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that the greater a person's laboratory stress-elicited elevation in cortisol, the greater the life stress-related risk for upper respiratory infection (URI). We also tested the prediction that the greater the laboratory stress-elicited rise in natural killer cell (NK) cytotoxicity, the smaller the life stress-related URI risk. Finally, we explored whether sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and enumerative immune reactivities to laboratory stress moderate the relation between life stress and URI. METHODS: At baseline, 115 healthy subjects were administered a negative stressful life events checklist and were tested to assess their SNS (blood pressure, heart rate, and catecholamines), HPA (cortisol), and immune (NK cell cytotoxicity and lymphocyte subsets) reactivities to laboratory speech tasks administered 2 weeks apart. Responses were averaged across the two laboratory assessments to create reactivity scores. After these assessments were completed, participants were followed weekly for 12 consecutive weeks. At each follow-up they completed a measure of perceived stress experienced over the last week. They were also instructed to contact the study coordinator if they had a cold or flu at any time during follow-up. A health care worker verified reported illnesses. RESULTS: In a traditional prospective analysis, high cortisol reactors with high levels of life events had a greater incidence of verified URI than did high reactors with low levels of life events and low reactors irrespective of their life event scores. Using hierarchical linear modeling, CD8(+) number, Natural Killer (NK) cell number, and NK cell cytotoxicity, each interacted with weekly perceived stress levels in predicting concurrent occurrences of self-reported URIs. For these outcomes, low immune reactors were more likely to experience an URI during high stress than low stress weeks. High immune reactors did not exhibit differences in weekly URIs as a function of weekly stress level. The SNS reactivity markers did not moderate the association of stress and URI incidence in either analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Acute HPA and immune responses to laboratory stressors are markers of how vulnerable people are to the increased risk for URI associated with stressors in the natural environment.