ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the results of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measurements using automatic auditory response telemetry (AutoART) with those obtained by ART in adults. The study also aimed to evaluate the predictive value of intraoperative ART and AutoART ECAPs for speech intelligibility (SI) and hearing success (HS), and to determine if cochlear nerve (CN) cross-sectional area (CSA) obtained preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans could predict ART and AutoART ECAPs and SI and HS outcome. METHODS: The study analyzed and correlated ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds at electrodes E2, E6, and E10, as well as averaged ECAP thresholds over electrodes E1-E12, using data from 32 implants. Correlations were also examined for ART and AutoART ECAP slopes. In addition, averaged ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes for each participant were correlated with CN CSA measured from MRI sequences. SI of the monosyllabic Freiburg Speech Test at 65 dB sound pressure level was examined along with averaged ART and AutoART thresholds and slopes over all 12 electrodes. A parallel analysis was performed for HS, derived from the difference between baseline and 6-month SI. Finally, correlations between CN CSA and SI, as well as CN CSA and HS were examined. RESULTS: The results of the study showed a significant positive correlation between ART and AutoART ECAP thresholds and as well as slopes for E2, E6, E10 and averaged thresholds and slopes of E1-E12. However, no significant correlation was observed between ART and AutoART averaged ECAP thresholds and slopes and either SI and HS or CN CSA. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between CN CSA and SI and HS. CONCLUSION: While AutoART is a reliable and safe program for measuring ECAPs in adults, the study found no preoperative prognostic information on intraoperative ECAP results using parameters extracted from current MRI sequences or pre-/intraoperative information on subsequent hearing outcome using ECAP and CN CSA.

Significance of endolymphatic sac surgery with and/or without simultaneous cochlea implant surgery in respect of vertigo control and speech perception in patients with Menière's disease.

PURPOSE: The focus on treating patients with Menière's Disease (MD) lies on the reduction of vertigo attacks and the preservation of sensory function. Endolympathic hydrops is considered as an epiphenomenon in MD, which can potentially be altered by endolymphatic sac surgery (ESS). Purpose of the study was to investigate the influences on vertigo control through manipulation of the perilymphatic system with or without ESS. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 86 consecutive patients with MD according to current diagnostic criteria after endolymphatic sac surgery alone (ESSalone; n = 45), cochlear implantation (CI) alone (CIalone; n = 12), and ESS with CI (ESS + CI; n = 29), treated at a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: vertigo control, speech perception pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Gender, side, and preoperative treatment were similar in all groups. Age was younger in the ESSalone-group with 56.2 ± 13.0 years (CIalone = 64.2 ± 11.4 years; ESS + CI = 63.1 ± 9.7 years). Definitive MD was present in all the CIalone, in 79.3% of the ESS + CI and in 59.6% of the ESSalone-patients. Likewise, vertigo control rate was 100% in the CIalone, 89.7% in the ESS + CI and 66.0% in the ESSalone-group. CONCLUSIONS: Vertigo control was improved in all three groups, however, superior in groups treated with CI, potentially contributed by the manipulation of both the endo- and perilymphatic systems. A more systematic characterization of the patients with larger case numbers and documentation of follow up data would be needed to evaluate a clinical effect more properly.

Age standardization and time-of-day performance for the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA): results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

PURPOSE: The Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) is a German matrix test designed to determine speech recognition thresholds (SRT). It is widely used for hearing-aids and cochlear implant fitting, but an age-adjusted standard is still lacking. In addition, knowing that the ability to concentrate is an important factor in OLSA performance, we hypothesized that OLSA performance would depend on the time of day it was administered. The aim of this study was to propose an age standardization for the OLSA and to determine its diurnal performance. METHODS: The Gutenberg Health Study is an ongoing population-based study and designed as a single-centre observational, prospective cohort study. Participants were interviewed about common otologic symptoms and tested with pure-tone audiometry and OLSA. Two groups-subjects with and without hearing loss-were established. The OLSA was performed in two runs. The SRT was evaluated for each participant. Results were characterized by age in 5-year cohorts, gender and speech recognition threshold (SRT). A time stamp with an hourly interval was also implemented. RESULTS: The mean OLSA SRT was - 6.9 ± 1.0 dB (group 1 male) and - 7.1 ± 0.8 dB (group 1 female) showing an inverse relationship with age in the whole cohort, whereas a linear increase was observed in those without hearing loss. OLSA-SRT values increased more in males than in females with increasing age. No statistical significance was found for the diurnal performance. CONCLUSIONS: A study with 2900 evaluable Oldenburg Sentence Tests is a novelty and representative for the population of Mainz and its surroundings. We postulate an age- and gender-standardized scale for the evaluation of the OLSA. In fact, with an intergroup standard deviation (of about 1.5 dB) compared to the age dependence of 0.7 dB/10 years, this age normalization should be considered as clinically relevant.

[Speech perception as a function of cochlear coverage-comparison in bimodally hearing cochlear implant patients. German version]. / Sprachverstehen in Abhängigkeit von der cochleären Abdeckung ­ Vergleich bei bimodal versorgten Cochleaimplantatpatienten.

BACKGROUND: Hearing success in bimodally hearing patients with a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA) exhibits different results: while some benefit from bimodal CI and HA, others do not. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate hearing success in terms of speech perception in bimodally fitted patients in relation to the cochlear coverage (CC) of the CI electrodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the OTOPLAN software (CAScination AG, Bern, Switzerland), CC was retrospectively measured from CT scans of the temporal bone of 39 patients, who were then categorized into two groups: CC ≤ 65% (CC500) and CC > 65% (CC600). Monaural speech intelligibility for monosyllables at a sound pressure level (SPL) of 65 dB in open field was assessed at various timepoints, preoperatively with HA and postoperatively with CI, and compared between the groups. In addition, speech intelligibility was correlated with CC in the entire cohort before surgery and during follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, no significant differences in speech intelligibility were found between CC500 and CC600 patients at any of the FU timepoints. However, both CC500 and CC600 patients showed a steady improvement in speech intelligibility after implantation. While CC600 patients tended to show an earlier improvement in speech intelligibility, CC500 patients tended to show a slower improvement during the first 3 months and a steeper learning curve thereafter. The two patient groups converged during FU, with no significant differences in speech intelligibility. There was no significant relationship between unimodal/unilateral free-field speech intelligibility and CC. However, patients with a CC of 70-75% achieved maximum speech intelligibility. CONCLUSION: Despite a nonsignificant correlation between CC and speech discrimination, patients seem to reach their maximum in unimodal/unilateral speech understanding mainly at 70-75% coverage. However, there is room for further investigation, as CC500 was associated with a shorter cochlear duct length (CDL), and long and very long electrodes were used in both groups.

The German hearing in noise test with a female talker: development and comparison with German male speech test.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to develop the German Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) with female speaker by fulfilling the recommendations by International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) for using a female speaker to create new multilingual speech tests and to determine norms and to compare these norms with German male speech tests-the male speakers HINT and the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA). METHODS: The HINT with a female speaker consists of the same speech material as the male speaking HINT. After recording the speech material, 10 normal hearing subjects were included to determine the performance-intensity function (PI function). 24 subjects were part of the measurements to determine the norms and compare them with the norms of male HINT and OLSA. Comparably, adaptive, open-set methods under headphones (HINT) and sound field (OLSA) were used. RESULTS: Acoustic phonetic analysis demonstrated significant difference in mean fundamental frequency, its range and mean speaking rate between both HINT speakers. The calculated norms by three of the tested four conditions of the HINT with a female speaker are not significantly different from the norms with a male speaker. No significant effect of the speaker's gender of the first HINT measurement and no significant correlation between the threshold results of the HINT and the OLSA were determined. CONCLUSIONS: The Norms for German HINT with a female speaker are comparable to the norms of the HINT with a male speaker. The speech intelligibility score of the HINT does not depend on the speakers' gender despite significant difference of acoustic-phonetic parameters between the female and male HINT speaker's voice. Instead, the speech intelligibility rating must be seen as a function of the used speech material.

Hearing rehabilitation for unilateral deafness using a cochlear implant: the influence of the subjective duration of deafness on speech intelligibility.

BACKGROUND: For patients with single sided deafness (SSD) or severe asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASHL), cochlear implantation remains the only solution to restore bilateral hearing capacity. Prognostically, the duration of hearing loss in terms of audiological outcome is not yet clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the influence of subjective deafness duration on postoperative speech perception after cochlear implantation for SSD as well as its impact on quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study included a total of 36 adults aged 50.2 ± 15.5 years who underwent CI for SSD/ASHL at our clinic between 2010 and 2015. Patients were audiometrically assessed at 3 and 12-36 months postoperatively. Test results were correlated with self-reported duration of deafness. Quality of life was assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean duration of deafness was 193.9 ± 185.7 months. The side-separated hearing threshold showed an averaged target range between 30 and 40 dB HL. Freiburg monosyllable test increased from 0% pre-operatively to 20% after 3 months (p = 0.001) and to 50% after 12-36 months (p = 0.002). There was a significant correlation between audiometric outcome and subjective deafness duration at 12-36 months postoperatively (r = - 0.564; p = 0.02) with a cutoff for open-set monosyllable recognition at a duration of deafness of greater than 408 months. Quality of life was significantly improved by CI. CONCLUSIONS: CI implantation in unilaterally deafened patients provides objective and subjective benefits. Duration of deafness is unlikely to be an independent negative predictive factor and thus should not generally be considered as contraindication.

Vestibular and audiometric results after endolymphatic mastoid shunt surgery in patients with Menière's disease.

PURPOSE: Treatment of Menière's Disease (MD) comprises an array of both non-destructive and destructive treatment options. In patients who are therapy-refractory to non-destructive medical treatment, endolymphatic mastoid shunt surgery (EMSS) is both recommended and debated controversially. The aim of this study was to investigate safety in terms of hearing, vestibular function, complication rate, and efficacy with regards to vertigo control of EMSS in patients with MD according to the current diagnostic criteria of 2015. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 47 consecutive patients with definite or probable MD with description of demographic parameters, pre- and postoperative MD treatment, pre- and postoperative audiometric (pure tone audiometry) and vestibular (caloric testing) results. The parameters were compared between patients with and without postoperative vertigo control. RESULTS: 31/47 patients (66.0%) had improved vertigo control postoperatively. Postoperative hearing and vestibular preservation were predominantly stable. No significant differences between patients with improved vertigo control and patients with no change or worse vertigo episodes were found. In the treatment refractory group, 4 patients required a revision EMSS and 6 a destructive MD treatment (5 gentamicin intratympanically, 1 labyrinthectomy). No peri- or postsurgical complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: EMSS was found to be beneficial in two thirds of the patients with definite or probable Morbus Menière and a safe procedure regarding hearing and vestibular preservation with no postoperative complications. Therefore, EMSS should be considered before inducing destructive treatment options, such as intratympanic gentamicin application or labyrinthectomy.

Comparison of ABR and ASSR using narrow-band-chirp-stimuli in children with cochlear malformation and/or cochlear nerve hypoplasia suffering from severe/profound hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: In pediatric audiology, objective techniques for hearing threshold estimation in infants and children with profound or severe hearing loss play a key role. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are available for frequency-dependent hearing threshold estimations and both techniques show strong correlations but sometimes with considerable differences. The aim of the study was to compare hearing threshold estimations in children with and without cochlear and cochlear nerve malformations. METHODS: Two groups with profound or severe hearing loss were retrospectively compared. In 20 ears (15 children) with malformation of the inner ear and/or cochlear nerve hypoplasia and a control group of 20 ears (11 children) without malformation, ABR were measured with the Interacoustics Eclipse EP25 ABR system® (Denmark) with narrow-band CE-chirps® at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz and compared to ASSR at the same center frequencies under similar conditions. RESULTS: ABR and ASSR correlated significantly in both groups (r = 0.413 in malformation group, r = 0.82 in control group). The malformation group showed a significantly lower percentage of "equal" hearing threshold estimations than the control group. In detail, patients with isolated cochlear malformation did not differ significantly from the control group, whereas patients with cochlear nerve hypoplasia showed significantly greater differences. CONCLUSION: ABR and ASSR should be used jointly in the diagnostic approach in children with suspected profound or severe hearing loss. A great difference in hearing threshold estimation between these techniques could hint at the involvement of cochlear nerve or cochlear nerve hypoplasia itself.

The use of structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound ensures time-efficiency and report quality during residency.

PURPOSE: Free text reports (FTR) of head and neck ultrasound studies are currently deployed in most departments. Because of a lack of composition and language, these reports vary greatly in terms of quality and reliability. This may impair the learning process during residency. The purpose of the study was to analyze the longitudinal effects of using structured reports (SR) of head and neck ultrasound studies during residency. METHODS: Attending residents (n = 24) of a tripartite course on head and neck ultrasound, accredited by the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM), were randomly allocated to pictures of common diseases. Both SRs and FTRs were compiled. All reports were analyzed concerning completeness, acquired time and legibility. Overall user contentment was evaluated by a questionnaire. RESULTS: SRs achieved significantly higher ratings regarding completeness (95.6% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001), description of pathologies (72.2% vs. 58.9%, p < 0.001) and legibility (100% vs. 52.4%, p < 0.001) with a very high inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' kappa 0.9). Reports were finalized significantly faster (99.1 s vs. 115.0 s, p < 0.001) and user contentment was significantly better when using SRs (8.3 vs. 6.3, p < 0.001). In particular, only SRs showed a longitudinally increasing time efficiency (- 20.1 s, p = 0.036) while maintaining consistent completeness ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SRs of head and neck ultrasound studies results in an increased longitudinal time-efficiency while upholding the report quality at the same time. This may indicate an additive learning effect of structured reporting. Superior outcomes in terms of comprehensiveness, legibility and time-efficiency can be observed immediately after implementation.

Clinical benefit of wideband-tympanometry: a pediatric audiology clinical study.

PURPOSE: Wideband-tympanometry (WBT) could give more informative data about the tympanic condition than the conventional tympanometry. In the actual literature, the clinical profit of wideband-tympanometry in pediatric audiological settings is not well evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyze the additional clinical benefit. METHODS: 150 children (281 ears) with normal hearing, at the age from 11 days up to 14;10 years, checked with pure tone audiometry or auditory brainstem responses (ABR) participated in this retrospective study. We divided in four age ranges (≤ 6 month; > 6 month ≤ 3 years; > 3 years ≤ 11 years; > 11 years). All children were evaluated with ENT examination including ear microscopy, conventional 226-Hz or 1000-Hz tympanometry and WBT. Ear canal volumes were determined. RESULTS: Compared with literature data, our patients aged ≤ 3 years showed smaller mean ear canal volumes (≤ 4 ml). We found a good statistical correlation between the WBT-results and 1000-Hz tympanometry but a rare correlation between WBT-results and ear microscopic findings. In the patients with pathologic ear microscopic results in all groups of age, a significant reduction of WBT-absorbance in 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that WBT collects additive data to detect the correct middle ear status. In pediatric audiology, WBT is an additional useful method to value middle ear problems and to analyze the character of infantile hearing loss. Standard guidelines for the interpretation of the pediatric population are needed. Hence, it will be necessary to determine these findings in a larger number of infantile ears.

Retrospective Analysis of Hearing-Impaired Adult Patients Treated With an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic success and safety of an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (tBCI) in adult patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Five university hospitals in Frankfurt, Hannover, Dresden, Würzburg, and Vienna. PATIENTS: Data were analyzed from 61 patients (31 women, 30 men) with a mean age of 50 years (min. 26, max. 80). Forty patients had mixed, and 21 conductive hearing loss. Typical etiologies were history of otitis media (n = 20) and cholesteatoma (n = 17). INTERVENTIONS: Implantation of the active tBCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were analyzed for the following time points: up to 6 months postoperatively ("short-term"), 6 to 37 months postoperatively ("long-term"), and the last available measurement per patient ("most recent"). Pure-tone audiometry (air and bone conduction, AC and BC) and sound field thresholds with warble tones (WT), word recognition scores with Freiburger monosyllables (WRS), as well as speech reception thresholds (SRT) using the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) in quiet (SRT) and in noise (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) were collected. RESULTS: No significant changes in air- and bone-conduction thresholds were observed after implantation. A mean WRS improvement of 54% using the active tBCI was shown at the short-term assessment, i.e., a mean score of 79% compared with 25% in the unaided condition. Results remained stable, with a mean score of 75% at the long-term assessment. SRT in noise improved by 3.6 dB SNR in the implanted ear at the short-term assessment. Overall six adverse events and four serious adverse events were reported, resulting in a rate of 9.84 and 6.56%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The tBCI clearly improves speech intelligibility in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, showing stable results up to 1 year post-implantation.

Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.

The aim of this study was to examine the functional hearing results regarding speech perception and auditory sound localization in a high-resolution directional hearing setup following implantation with a new bone conduction device (MED-EL Bonebridge, Innsbruck, Austria). In addition, we assessed the patient acceptance of the Bonebridge system using a questionnaire. The study design is retrospective study. The setting is University Hospital Frankfurt. 18 patients implanted with a Bonebridge device from May 2012 to January 2015 were participated in this study. Speech perception in quiet was tested with the Freiburg monosyllable test at a presentation level of 65 dB SPL. Speech perception in noise was tested post-operatively with the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) in best-aided condition. We assessed auditory sound localization with a high-resolution directional hearing setup. To evaluate the acceptance by patients using the Bonebridge in daily life, we used a modified questionnaire. The overall average of functional hearing gain (n = 18) was 29.3 dB (±20.7 dB). Speech perception of monosyllabic words in quiet improved by 20.7% on average, compared with the pre-operative aided condition. Mean speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of the Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA) improved significantly from -3.8 dB SNR (range -5.7 to 5.8 dB SNR) to -5.2 dB SNR (range -6.3 to -0.6 dB SNR) after implantation. Regarding localization abilities, no significant difference was found between the unaided and aided conditions following Bonebridge implantation. A survey of patients' acceptance and handling of the Bonebridge implant in daily life revealed high patient satisfaction. All patients accepted and benefited from the implanted system. No infections or adverse surgical effects occurred. Speech perception significantly improved in quiet and in noise. No significant difference in sound localization was observed. Acceptance of the Bonebridge implant, tested with a modified questionnaire, was high.

Management of Cochlear Implant Electrode Migration.

OBJECTIVE: The present study reviewed a cochlear implant (CI) patient population after surgery, which received a free-fitting electrode carrier designed for hearing preservation. The aim was to determine the rate of electrode migration of the CI electrodes and present clinical and surgical implications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective patient review. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-eight patients implanted uni- or bilaterally with lateral wall electrodes designed for hearing preservation (358 implants). The control group was 323 patients implanted uni- or bilaterally with preformed perimodiolar electrodes (468 implants). INTERVENTIONS: Determination of CI electrode migration was conducted according to a clinical test protocol. Revision surgery was offered in confirmed patients of electrode migration. A bone groove was considered to improve the fixation of the electrode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiological testing including speech audiometry, subjective sound quality rating, and bilateral pitch comparison in bilateral patients, as well as radiological examinations, were conducted. RESULTS: Electrode migration was observed solely in patients implanted with lateral wall electrodes; 10 of 358 patients with free-fitting electrodes (2.8%) had electrode migration, which was successfully confirmed by the proposed clinical test protocol. Nine of the 10 confirmed patients underwent reinsertion surgery. Mean perception score decreased from 75.0% to 62.1% after electrode migration and recovered completely after reinsertion surgery. A flowchart to detect electrode migration was designed for clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Although electrode migration is a rare complication in CI surgery, long-term follow-up diagnostics should include a test protocol to detect electrode shifts of lateral wall electrode arrays. A reinsertion surgery should be conducted in confirmed patients to recover speech perception.

Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed outcomes of hearing preservation (HP) surgery in a cochlear implant patient population, with clinical follow-up results up to 11 years after implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety six patients (103 ears) with partial deafness who underwent HP surgery at the University Hospital Frankfurt since 1999 were included. Electrode carriers were Cochlear Slim Straight, MED-EL Standard, Medium, Flex, and Flex. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation using the HP surgery technique with either the cochleostomy or round window approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure-tone averages for low frequencies (125 Hz, 250 Hz, 500 Hz, PTAlow) and speech perception scores of the Freiburg monosyllable and number tests in quiet. PTAlow shifts were used to evaluate HP as complete for ≤10 dB, partial between 10 and 30 dB, and minimal for ≥30 dB. Time intervals were: preoperative, postoperative, after 12 months, and long-term (>24 months, mean 51.4 months, range 2-11 years). Impacts of electrode design and surgical approach were analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperatively (n = 103), HP was complete in 32 (31.1%), partial in 49 (47.6%), minimal in 14 (13.6%), and loss of hearing occurred in 8 cases (7.8%). After 12 months (n = 81), HP was complete in 22 (27.2%), partial in 33 (40.7%), minimal in 11 (13.6%), and loss of hearing occurred in 7 additional cases. For long-term outcomes (n = 62) HP was complete in 7 (11.3%), partial in 24 (38.7%), minimal in 9 (14.5%), and loss of hearing occurred in 7 additional cases (total 22/103, 21.4%). Cases with residual hearing who could utilize acoustic amplification (i.e., PTAlow < 80 dB HL) were 82/95 (85.3%) postoperatively, 58/66 (87.9%) after 12 months, and 38/40 (95.0%) for long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term HP is feasible in a subset of patients. Patients with sufficient long-term residual hearing had the prerequisite to benefit from additional acoustic stimulation. No correlation of total hearing loss with etiology, electrode design, or surgical approach was evident. Apart from individual effects of structural damage or inflammation, genetic factors are suggested to influence HP. Cases with total hearing loss still demonstrated successful speech perception in long-term monosyllable recognition scores.

Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.

In normal hearing, the pitch of an acoustic tone can theoretically be encoded by either the place of stimulation in the cochlea or the corresponding rate of vibration. Thus spectral attributes and temporal fine structure of an acoustic signal are naturally correlated. Cochlear implants (CIs), neural prosthetic devices that restore hearing in the profoundly hearing impaired, currently disregard this mechanism; electrical stimulation is provided at fixed electrode positions with default place independent stimulation rate assignments. This does not account for individual cochlear encoding depending on electrode array placement, variations in insertion depth, and the proximity to nerve fibers. Encoding pitch in such manner delivers limited tonal information. Consequently, music appraisal in CI users is often rated cacophonic while speech perception in quiet is close to normal in top performers. We hypothesize that this limitation in electric stimulation is at least partially due to the mismatch between frequency and place encoding in CIs. In the present study, we determined individual electrode locations by analysis of cochlear radiographic images obtained after surgery and calculated place dependent stimulation rates according to models of the normal tonotopic function. Pitch matching in CI users with single-sided deafness shows that place dependent stimulation rates allow thus far unparalleled restoration of tonotopic pitch perception. Collapsed data of matched pitch frequencies as a function of calculated electrical stimulation rate were well fitted by linear regression (R(2) = 0.878). Sound processing strategies incorporating place dependent stimulation rates are expected to improve pitch perception in CI users.

Hearing preservation and improved speech perception with a flexible 28-mm electrode.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine the extent of hearing preservation retrospectively after atraumatic cochlear implant (CI) surgery using a specialized surgical technique and specially designed flexible electrode to minimize cochlear trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 34 patients who had some preoperative residual hearing were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent CI surgery with a flexible 28-mm electrode using a round window insertion technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients had at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up including audiometric testing and speech perception determined using the Freiburg monosyllable word test and the Oldenburger Sentence Test in noise. Audiometric testing served as a proxy for the evaluation of cochlear trauma and hearing preservation. RESULTS: Hearing was preserved to within 20 dB of preoperative low-frequency pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in 40.7% of patients. Hearing was preserved to within 20 dB of preoperative high-frequency PTA in 35.7% of patients. Overall, a deterioration in hearing thresholds was observed between preoperative assessment and first fitting. Speech perception improved significantly over time after surgery. CONCLUSION: Using appropriate surgical techniques, and electrodes specially designed to minimize cochlear trauma, hearing preservation can be achieved.

Cochlear reimplantation after surgery for electric-acoustic stimulation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system usually results in better speech understanding than electric stimulation only, assuming low-frequency hearing can be preserved. Treatment options and outcomes for 4 subjects experiencing compromised hearing after EAS surgery are discussed. METHODS: Each subject underwent revision surgery to replace the original 21-mm electrode arrays used in EAS surgery with cochlear implants (CIs) with 31-mm arrays. Our aims were: (1) to investigate whether deeper insertion is possible, and (2) to evaluate the influence of electrode insertion angle by comparing speech perception scores before and after revision surgery. RESULTS: Deeper insertion was feasible in all subjects. Speech understanding scores after reimplantation were comparable to those seen after the first intervention. CONCLUSION: A 360-degree insertion under EAS conditions provides sufficient speech understanding, even in cases of additional hearing loss. Reimplantation with a longer electrode array is feasible in former EAS patients.

Influence of cochlear implantation on sacculus function.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of cochlear implantation (CI) on the sacculus function and to analyze a possible correlation with resulting vertigo symptoms. METHODS: In a prospective study including 25 patients undergoing CI, preoperative and postoperative assessment of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), caloric horizontal semicircular canal (hSCC) response, and subjective vertigo symptoms were assessed. The patients with postoperative vertigo were compared to the patients without postoperative vertigo with regard to the findings of VEMP responses and caloric testing. RESULTS: Nine patients reported postoperative vertigo. Before surgery, eight of 23 patients (35%) had regular VEMP responses. Two months after CI, four patients had a new loss of sacculus function on VEMP testing. The CI represents a significant risk factor for sacculus impairment. In seven of 12 patients with preoperatively preserved caloric response, this decreased after the operation. The impaired vestibular function did not correlate with vertigo symptoms. When comparing the patient group with vertigo and the group without vertigo after CI, there is a significant difference in the patients' age. CONCLUSIONS: Although CI can cause damage to sacculus and hSCC function, this is probably not the only cause for postoperative vertigo. Advanced age is a significant risk factor for vertigo after CI.

The annoyance of snoring.

Is the annoyance of snoring a reliable tool for the measurement of snoring or does it depend more on the sensitivity of the listener? During an automatized hearing experiment, 550 representative snoring sequences, recorded during polysomnography, were randomly presented to ten examiners for the evaluation of their annoyance (0-100). The mean annoyance score for each snoring sound and the covariance parameters for rater and snoring sounds (restricted maximum likelihood method) were calculated. The average annoyance rating of all snoring sequences was 63.9+/-23.0, the most acceptable snoring sequence rating was 49.2+/-28.0, the most annoying rating was 77.7+/-16.4. The covariance parameters were estimated as 28.7% for the rater and 22.3% for the snoring sound. Our results show that the listeners' noise sensitivity is at least equally relevant for the snoring annoyance as the snoring sound itself.

A case of bilateral cochlear implantation in single-sided untreated acoustic neurinoma.

Acoustic neurinoma affects the acousticofacial nerve and therefore in many cases is a contraindication for cochlear implantation and an indication for brainstem implant. Nevertheless benefit in these patients has been shown after tumour removal and cochlear implantation. The first case of bilateral cochlear implantation in a patient with single-sided untreated acoustic neurinoma is described here. In a 49-year-old woman with progressive hearing loss during the last 12 years we preoperatively diagnosed an acoustic neurinoma of the left side. After cochlear implantation of the right side she was sequentially implanted on the affected side as well. Before surgery radiological control of the tumour for signs of growth was performed and the patient was thoroughly informed of the situation and possible therapies and dangers. Speech discrimination scores obtained in the second implanted ear came up to the performance of the first implant after 6 months.