Tips and Tricks for Early Diagnosis of Cervico-Vaginal Involvement from Extramammary Paget's Disease of the Vulva: A Referral Center Experience.

Cervico-vaginal (CV) localization of extra-mammary Paget's disease (EMPD) of the vulva is extremely rare. In order to investigate the incidence risk and the pathognomonic clinical and pathological features of this condition, a retrospective analysis was conducted including 94 women treated for vulvar EMPD at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from October 1997 to May 2020. Overall nine patients developed CV involvement from EMPD, with a cumulative incidence of 2.5% (95% CI: 0.5-8.0%) at 5 years, 6.5% (95% CI: 1.9-15.1%) at 10 years and 14.0% (95% CI: 4.8-27.8%) at 15 years, respectively. All cases except one were firstly detected by abnormal glandular cytology. None reported vaginal bleeding or other suspicious symptoms. The colposcopic findings were heterogeneous and could sometimes be misdiagnosed. Cervical and/or vaginal biopsies were always performed for histopathological diagnosis by identification of Paget cells in the epithelium or stroma. Most patients developed invasive EMPD (5/9) of the cervix and/or vagina and underwent hysterectomy with partial or total colpectomy. CV involvement from EMPD should not be underestimated in women with a long-standing history of vulvar Paget's disease. Liquid-based cytology with immunocytochemistry represents a valuable tool for early diagnosis and should be routinely performed during the required lifelong follow-up.

SIIV position paper: clinical approach to vulval diseases. Need for quality standards.

This paper summarizes the position of the Italian Society of Vulvology on the clinical approach to vulval disease. A thorough history (general medical, gynaecological, and vulval history) is essential for a successful and fruitful vulvological examination. Characteristics of pruritus (itch) and pain, that are the two main vulval symptoms, should be collected and reported with precision, according to duration, temporal course, location, provocation, and intensity. Physical examination must consider both the general condition of the patient and the specific vulval region, that must be examined following a standardized methodology. The physical examination of the vulva is carried out with naked eye and adequate natural or halogen lighting. The subsequent use of instrumental magnification can be considered on particular parts of skin/mucosa, already highlighted with the first inspection. Also, palpation is essential, allowing to appreciate physical features of vulval lesions: consistency, surface, soreness, adherence to underlying plans. Finally, the five-step approach of the International Society for the Study of Vulvo-vaginal Disease about Terminology and Classification of Vulvar Dermatological Disorders (2012) is summarized. A vulval biopsy may be useful in the following situations: when clinical diagnosis is uncertain, lesion not responding to treatment; histologic confirmation for a clinical diagnosis and exclusion or confirmation of a suspected neoplastic intraepithelial or invasive pathology.

Diagnostic Criteria for Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Vulvar Aberrant Maturation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe the features required for diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and vulvar aberrant maturation (VAM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases tasked the difficult pathologic diagnoses committee to develop consensus recommendations for clinicopathologic diagnosis of vulvar lichen planus, lichen sclerosus, and dVIN. The dVIN subgroup reviewed the literature and formulated diagnostic criteria that were reviewed by the committee and then approved by the International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases membership. RESULTS: Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia is the immediate precursor of human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and shows a spectrum of clinical and microscopic appearances, some overlapping with HPV-related neoplasia. The histopathologic definition of dVIN is basal atypia combined with negative or nonblock-positive p16 and basal overexpressed, aberrant negative, or wild-type p53. The most common pattern of dVIN is keratinizing with acanthosis, aberrant rete ridge pattern, and premature maturation. The morphologic spectrum of keratinizing dVIN includes hypertrophic, atrophic, acantholytic, and subtle forms. A few dVIN cases are nonkeratinizing, with basaloid cells replacing more than 60% of epithelium. Vulvar aberrant maturation is an umbrella term for lesions with aberrant maturation that arise out of lichenoid dermatitis and lack the basal atypia required for dVIN. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of women at risk for dVIN and VAM requires a collaborative approach by clinicians and pathologists experienced in vulvar disorders. Close surveillance of women with lichen sclerosus and use of these recommendations may assist in prevention of HPV-independent squamous cell carcinoma through detection and treatment of dVIN and VAM.

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus and Neoplastic Transformation: A Retrospective Study of 976 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the neoplastic potential of vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 976 women with VLS. We recorded age at diagnosis of VLS, length of follow-up, and type of neoplasia, categorized as the following: (1) vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), further subdivided in differentiated VIN (dVIN) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; (2) superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma; and (3) frankly invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia incidence risk, neoplasia incidence rate, and cumulative probability of progression to neoplasia according to the Kaplan-Meier method were estimated. Log-rank test was used to compare the progression-free survival curves by age at diagnosis of VLS. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis of VLS was 60 (median = 60; range = 8-91) years. The mean length of follow-up was 52 (median = 21; range = 1-331) months. The following 34 patients developed a neoplasia: 8 VIN (4 dVIN, 4 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), 6 keratinizing superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma (5 with adjacent dVIN), and 20 keratinizing invasive squamous cell carcinoma (1 with adjacent dVIN). The neoplasia incidence risk was 3.5%. The neoplasia incidence rate was 8.1 per 1,000 person-years. The cumulative probability of progression to neoplasia increased from 1.2% at 24 months to 36.8% at 300 months. The median progression-free survival was significantly shorter in older women (≥70 years) when compared with that in younger women (p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Vulvar lichen sclerosus has a nonnegligible risk of neoplastic transformation and requires a careful and lifelong follow-up in all patients, particularly in elderly women. Early clinical and histological detection of preinvasive lesions is essential to reduce the risk of vulvar cancer.

VIN usual type-from the past to the future.

Usual vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN) is the most common VIN type, generally related to a human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, predominantly type 16. The incidence of uVIN has been increasing over the last decades, and a bimodal peak is observed at the age of 40-44 and over 55 years. Almost 40% of patients with uVIN have a past, concomitant or future HPV-associated lesion of the lower genital tract. HPV-related malignancies are associated with a persistent HPV infection. The host immune response is of crucial importance in determining clearance or persistence of both HPV infections and HPV-related VIN. About 60% of the patients present with symptoms. Clinical features of uVIN vary in site, number, size, shape, colour, and thickness of lesions. Multicentric disease is often present. Most uVIN lesions are positive at immunohistochemistry to p16(ink4a) and p14(arf), but negative to p53. Irrespective of surgical treatment used, uVIN recurrence rates are high. Positive margins do not predict the development of invasive disease and the need to re-excide the tissue around the scare remains to be demonstrated. Therefore, considering the low progression rate of uVIN and psycosexual sequelae, treatments should be as conservative as possible. Medical treatments available are mainly based on immunotherapy to induce normalisation of immune cell count in uVIN. None are approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) for the treatment of uVIN. If medical treatment is performed, adequate biopsies are required to reduce the risk of unrecognised invasive disease. Some studies suggest that failure to respond to immunotherapy might be related to a local immunosuppressive microenvironment, but knowledge of the uVIN microenvironment is limited. Moreover, our knowledge of the potential mechanisms involved in the escape of HPV-induced lesions from the immune system has many gaps. HPV vaccines have been demonstrated to be effective in preventing uVIN, with 94.9% efficacy in the HPV-naive population, while studies on therapeutic vaccines are limited. The low incidence of VIN requires large multicentre studies to determine the best way to manage affected patients and to investigate the immunological characteristics of the 'vulvar microenviroment' which leads to the persistence of HPV.