Impact of the type of anesthesia on adverse events during transcarotid artery revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The use of local or regional anesthesia (LRA) is encouraged during transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) because the procedure is performed through a small incision. LRA permits neurologic evaluation during the procedure and may reduce periprocedural cardiac morbidity compared with general anesthesia (GA). There is limited and conflicting information regarding the preferred anesthesia to use during TCAR. We compared periprocedural clinical and technical complications, and intraprocedural performance metrics of TCAR performed under GA vs LRA. METHODS: Patient, lesion, physician, and procedural information was collected in a worldwide quality assurance program of consecutive TCAR procedures. A composite clinical adverse event rate (death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction) and a composite technical adverse event rate (aborted procedure, conversion to carotid endarterectomy, bleeding, dissection, cranial-nerve injury, device failure) in the periprocedural period were computed. Four intraprocedural performance measures (flow-reversal time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and skin-to-skin time) were recorded. Deidentified data were analyzed independently at the Center for Vascular Research, University of Maryland. Poisson regressions were used to assess the impact of anesthesia type on adverse event rates. Linear regressions were used to compare performance measures. RESULTS: A total of 27,043 TCARs were performed by 1456 physicians between 2012 and 2021. A majority of patients (83%) received GA, and this proportion increased over time (R2 = 0.74; P < .0001). Some physicians (33.4%) used LRA in some of their procedures; only 2.7% used LRA in all of their procedures. Clinical risk factors were more common in the LRA group (P < .0001) and anatomic risk factors in the GA group (P < .0001); these differences were adjusted for in subsequent analyses. LRA was more likely to be used by vascular surgeons and by physicians with higher prior transfemoral carotid stenting experience (P < .0001). When comparing GA vs LRA, clinical adverse events (1.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.8 vs 1.55%; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0; P = .78), technical adverse events (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.2-6.2 vs 5.3%; 95% CI, 4.5-6.3; P = .47), and intraprocedural performance measures did not differ by type of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of physicians performed TCAR exclusively under GA, and the overall proportion of procedures performed under GA increased over time. A larger fraction of patients with severe medical risk factors received LRA vs GA, whereas a larger fraction of patients with anatomic risk-factors received GA. Periprocedural clinical and technical adverse events did not differ by type of anesthesia. Intraprocedural performance metrics that drive procedural cost were similar between groups; potential differences in procedural cost driven by anesthetic choice require further study.

Changes of the serum properties and its effect on the endothelial cells restoration in patients with chronic venous disease treated with sulodexide.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are important venous changes in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The use of the venoactive drugs remains an important treatment modality for patients with CVD, reducing the severity of the CVD-related symptoms and swelling but also reducing inflammation and protecting endothelial cells. In this research, the effects of the serum obtained from patients with CVD before and after sulodexide treatment were evaluated for in vivo and in vitro inflammatory markers and endothelial cell function. METHODS: Inflammatory markers (IL-6, matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9], vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1], and von Willebrand factor [vWF]) from the incompetent great saphenous veins (GSVs) and from the systemic venous circulation were studied in 10 patients with CVD (C2s) before and after 2 months of sulodexide (2 × 500 lipasemic units/d) therapy. Serum obtained from the vein blood before and after sulodexide treatment was evaluated for in vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell function. RESULTS: The serum collected from lower leg incompetent GSVs had significantly elevated levels of VCAM-1 (+29%, P < .001) compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Endothelial cells exposed to the serum from the incompetent lower leg veins of the untreated CVD patients demonstrated higher stimulated synthesis of MMP-9 (+17%, P < .01), as well as increased markers of senescence (prolongation of population doubling time, ß-galactosidase activity, and expression of p21 and p53 genes). CVD serum-induced senescent endothelial cells had a higher expression of genes regulating IL-6, MMP-9, VCAM-1, and vWF synthesis. The overall proinflammatory effect on endothelial cells by the serum collected from the incompetent GSVs was stronger as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Serum collected from the veins after sulodexide treatment caused lower levels of endothelial cell inflammatory markers as well as respective gene expression than serum obtained at the beginning of the study (before sulodexide treatment). Sulodexide application also reduced the inflammatory secretory activity of the senescent endothelial cells. Sulodexide treatment resulted in the decrease of the majority of the studied inflammatory parameters in both lower limb incompetent vein and systemic blood. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CVD, there are significant differences between circulating inflammatory markers analyzed from the lower leg incompetent GSV segments compared with the systemic circulation, indicating a higher inflammatory condition in CVD. Treatment with sulodexide reduces the proinflammatory and endothelial cell activation properties of the serum from patients with CVD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study documented the significant proinflammatory human vascular endothelial cell activation when exposed to the serum collected from the varicose veins as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The inflammatory marker expression, endothelial dysfunction, and endothelial cell senescence transformation can be successfully controlled and downregulated by patients' exposure to the glycosaminoglycan (sulodexide) treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm if glycosaminoglycan application can prevent further CVD clinical progression due to potential CVD-related pathological processes' modulation and their downregulation.

Predicting wound complications following lower extremity revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to create a simple risk score to identify factors associated with wound complications after infrainguinal revascularization. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program national data set was queried from 2005 to 2021 to identify 22,114 patients undergoing elective open revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (claudication, rest pain, tissue loss) or peripheral aneurysm. Emergency and trauma cases were excluded. The data set was divided into a two-thirds derivation set and one-third validation set to create a risk prediction model. The primary end point was wound complication (wound dehiscence, superficial/deep wound surgical site infection). Eight independent risk factors for wound complications resulted from the model and were assigned whole number integer risk scores. Summary risk scores were collapsed into categories and defined as low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), high (8-11 points), and very high (>12 points). RESULTS: The wound complication rate in the derivation data set was 9.7% (n = 1428). Predictors of wound complication included age ≤73 (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.46), body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.68-2.36), non-Hispanic White (vs others: OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.30-1.69), diabetes (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37), white blood cell count >9900/mm3 (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35), absence of coronary artery disease (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35), operative time >6 hours (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37), and undergoing a femoral endarterectomy in conjunction with bypass (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57). In both the derivation and validation sets, wound complications correlated with risk category. Among the defined categories in the derivation set, wound complication rates were 4.5% for low-risk patients, 8.5% for moderate-risk patients, 13.8% for high-risk patients, and 23.8% for very high-risk patients, with similar results for the internal validation data set. Operative indication did not independently associate with wound complications. Patients with wound complications had higher rates of reoperation and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model uses easily obtainable clinical metrics that allow for informed discussion of wound complication risk for patients undergoing open infrainguinal revascularization.

Venous compression syndromes in females: A descriptive review.

Venous compression syndromes have been described, yet the role of sex is poorly understood. Although iliac vein compression has been discussed more often with the advent of newer technologies, research has fallen short on defining epidemiology, best practices for evaluation and treatment, and differences in responses to treatment between men and females. The authors report on iliac vein compression, nonthrombotic renal vein compression, and other venous compression syndromes in females. Literature searches of PubMed were performed using the following keywords: females/females and May Thurner, venous stenting, venous outcomes, deep venous disease, deep venous compression, venous stenting, renal vein compression, renal vein surgery/stent, popliteal vein entrapment, venous thoracic vein entrapment, and popliteal vein entrapment. The articles prompted the authors to research further as the referenced articles were reviewed. Sex representation has not been addressed adequately in the research of venous compression syndromes, making the discussion of best treatment options and long-term outcomes difficult. More specific understanding of epidemiology and response to interventions will only come from research that addresses these issues directly, understanding that some of these syndromes occur rarely.

Effect of a Decision Aid on Agreement Between Patient Preferences and Repair Type for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can choose open repair or endovascular repair (EVAR). While EVAR is less invasive, it requires lifelong surveillance and more frequent aneurysm-related reinterventions than open repair. A decision aid may help patients receive their preferred type of AAA repair. Objective: To determine the effect of a decision aid on agreement between patient preference for AAA repair type and the repair type they receive. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cluster randomized trial, 235 patients were randomized at 22 VA vascular surgery clinics. All patients had AAAs greater than 5.0 cm in diameter and were candidates for both open repair and EVAR. Data were collected from August 2017 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2020 to June 2021. Interventions: Presurgical consultation using a decision aid vs usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had agreement between their preference and their repair type, measured using χ2 analyses, κ statistics, and adjusted odds ratios. Results: Of 235 included patients, 234 (99.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 73 (5.9) years. A total of 126 patients were enrolled in the decision aid group, and 109 were enrolled in the control group. Within 2 years after enrollment, 192 (81.7%) underwent repair. Patients were similar between the decision aid and control groups by age, sex, aneurysm size, iliac artery involvement, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Patients preferred EVAR over open repair in both groups (96 of 122 [79%] in the decision aid group; 81 of 106 [76%] in the control group; P = .60). Patients in the decision aid group were more likely to receive their preferred repair type than patients in the control group (95% agreement [93 of 98] vs 86% agreement [81 of 94]; P = .03), and κ statistics were higher in the decision aid group (κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) compared with the control group (κ = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74). Adjusted models confirmed this association (odds ratio of agreement in the decision aid group relative to control group, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.10-7.70). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients exposed to a decision aid were more likely to receive their preferred AAA repair type, suggesting that decision aids can help better align patient preferences and treatments in major cardiovascular procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03115346.

Peri-Procedural Management of Hemodynamic Instability in Patients Undergoing Carotid Revascularization.

Acute perioperative changes in arterial pressure occur frequently, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease or those receiving vasoactive medications, or in relation to certain cardiovascular surgical procedures. Hemodynamic Instability (HI) is common in patients undergoing carotid revascularization because of unique patho-physiological and surgical factors. The operation, by necessity, disrupts the afferent pathway of the baroreflex, which can lead to postendarterectomy HI. Poor arterial pressure control is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after carotid revascularization, but good control of arterial pressure is often difficult to achieve in practice. The incidence, implications, and etiology of HI associated with carotid surgery are reviewed, and some recommendations made for its management. Close monitoring and titration of therapy are probably the most important considerations rather than specific choice of agents.

The American Venous Forum, American Vein and Lymphatic Society and the Society for Vascular Medicine expert opinion consensus on lymphedema diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema imposes a significant economic and social burden in modern societies. Controversies about its risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment permeate the literature. The goal of this study was to assess experts' opinions on the available literature on lymphedema while following the Delphi methodology. METHODS: In December of 2019, the American Venous Forum created a working group tasked to develop a consensus statement regarding current practices for the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema. A panel of experts was identified by the working group. The working group then compiled a list of clinical questions, risk factors, diagnosis and evaluation, and treatment of lymphedema. Fifteen questions that met the criteria for consensus were included in the list. Using a modified Delphi methodology, six questions that received between 60% and 80% of the votes were included in the list for the second round of analysis. Consensus was reached whenever >70% agreement was achieved. RESULTS: The panel of experts reached consensus that cancer, infection, chronic venous disease, and surgery are risk factors for secondary lymphedema. Consensus was also reached that clinical examination is adequate for diagnosing lymphedema and that all patients with chronic venous insufficiency (C3-C6) should be treated as lymphedema patients. No consensus was reached regarding routine clinical practice use of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy as a mandatory diagnostic tool. However, the panel came to consensus regarding the importance of quantifying edema in all patients (93.6% in favor). In terms of treatment, consensus was reached favoring the regular use of compression garments to reduce lymphedema progression (89.4% in favor, 10.6% against; mean score of 79), but the use of Velcro devices as the first line of compression therapy did not reach consensus (59.6% in favor vs 40.4% against; total score of 15). There was agreement that sequential pneumatic compression should be considered as adjuvant therapy in the maintenance phase of treatment (91.5% in favor vs. 8.5% against; mean score of 85), but less so in its initial phases (61.7% in favor vs. 38.3% against; mean score of 27). Most of the panel agreed that manual lymphatic drainage should be a mandatory treatment modality (70.2% in favor), but the panel was split in half regarding the proposal that reductive surgery should be considered for patients with failed conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: This consensus process demonstrated that lymphedema experts agree on the majority of the statements related to risk factors for lymphedema, and the diagnostic workup for lymphedema patients. Less agreement was demonstrated on statements related to treatment of lymphedema. This consensus suggests that variability in lymphedema care is high even among the experts. Developers of future practice guidelines for lymphedema should consider this information, especially in cases of low-level evidence that supports practice patterns with which the majority of experts disagree.

Review of the current evidence for topical treatment for venous leg ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: The development of a venous leg ulcer (VLU) represents the most severe clinical manifestation of a chronic venous disease. Despite major progress, our understanding of the VLU pathogenesis and wound healing biology has remained limited. Treatment of VLUs remains a serious challenge for physicians of different specialties. In the present review, we focused on describing the rationale and scientific basis for topical wound care in the management of VLUs. METHODS: A literature review was performed to summarize the methods with proven efficacy in VLU management. A systematic search was also performed to identify new evidence from the randomized controlled trials reported from 2014 to 2021. The scientific challenges, clinical practice concerns, economic obstacles, and possible directions for further research have been discussed. RESULTS: Hundreds of topical products have been advertised for the treatment of VLUs. However, the reported data on the topical treatment of venous ulcers are insufficient, scattered, and weak, with significant methodologic flaws. A total of 43 randomized controlled trials on the topical treatment of VLUs were reported from 2014 to 2021. Thus, the clinical practice guidelines require updating. We identified major gaps in knowledge and have provided suggestions for future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: The American Venous Forum Research Committee would like to bring attention to the use of topical wound care for VLUs as a critical gap in knowledge and to encourage scientists, practitioners, and industry to collaborate to fill this gap.

Why Venous Leg Ulcers Have Difficulty Healing: Overview on Pathophysiology, Clinical Consequences, and Treatment.

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are one of the most common ulcers of the lower extremity. VLU affects many individuals worldwide, could pose a significant socioeconomic burden to the healthcare system, and has major psychological and physical impacts on the affected individual. VLU often occurs in association with post-thrombotic syndrome, advanced chronic venous disease, varicose veins, and venous hypertension. Several demographic, genetic, and environmental factors could trigger chronic venous disease with venous dilation, incompetent valves, venous reflux, and venous hypertension. Endothelial cell injury and changes in the glycocalyx, venous shear-stress, and adhesion molecules could be initiating events in VLU. Increased endothelial cell permeability and leukocyte infiltration, and increases in inflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, iron deposition, and tissue metabolites also contribute to the pathogenesis of VLU. Treatment of VLU includes compression therapy and endovenous ablation to occlude the axial reflux. Other interventional approaches such as subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery and iliac venous stent have shown mixed results. With good wound care and compression therapy, VLU usually heals within 6 months. VLU healing involves orchestrated processes including hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling and the contribution of different cells including leukocytes, platelets, fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes as well as the release of various biomolecules including transforming growth factor-ß, cytokines, chemokines, MMPs, tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), elastase, urokinase plasminogen activator, fibrin, collagen, and albumin. Alterations in any of these physiological wound closure processes could delay VLU healing. Also, these histological and soluble biomarkers can be used for VLU diagnosis and assessment of its progression, responsiveness to healing, and prognosis. If not treated adequately, VLU could progress to non-healed or granulating VLU, causing physical immobility, reduced quality of life, cellulitis, severe infections, osteomyelitis, and neoplastic transformation. Recalcitrant VLU shows prolonged healing time with advanced age, obesity, nutritional deficiencies, colder temperature, preexisting venous disease, deep venous thrombosis, and larger wound area. VLU also has a high, 50-70% recurrence rate, likely due to noncompliance with compression therapy, failure of surgical procedures, incorrect ulcer diagnosis, progression of venous disease, and poorly understood pathophysiology. Understanding the molecular pathways underlying VLU has led to new lines of therapy with significant promise including biologics such as bilayer living skin construct, fibroblast derivatives, and extracellular matrices and non-biologic products such as poly-N-acetyl glucosamine, human placental membranes amnion/chorion allografts, ACT1 peptide inhibitor of connexin 43, sulodexide, growth factors, silver dressings, MMP inhibitors, and modulators of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, the immune response and tissue metabolites. Preventive measures including compression therapy and venotonics could also reduce the risk of progression to chronic venous insufficiency and VLU in susceptible individuals.

Volume control of the lower limb with graduated compression during different muscle pump activation conditions and the relation to limb circumference variation.

BACKGROUND: The literature supports the use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) for leg edema. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on the GCS effect on limb edema related to sitting, standing, and walking. Data of different limb shapes and their impact on GCS-exerted pressure are lacking. This investigation provides evidence-based information on the effect of GCS on edema reduction and the impact of limb circumference gradients on GCS pressure. METHODS: Thirty healthy individuals (15 men and 15 women; mean age, 32 ± 5 years) were included. All the participants underwent lower limb volume (Kuhnke formula) measurement, before and after sitting for 30 minutes, wearing below-ankle noncompressive socks. The same assessment was repeated 7 days later, in the same participants, but with wearing of below-knee 16 to 20 mm Hg GCS. At 7-day intervals, 1 week with below-ankle noncompressive socks and 1 week with below-knee 16 to 20 mm Hg GCS, all the participants repeated the same protocol including standing and walking. Ten participants underwent bioimpedance assessment (Biody Xpert II; eBIODY, La Ciotat, France) before and after sitting, standing, and walking. In the same group, B and B1 interface pressure values were measured. RESULTS: Data collection was completed in all 60 limbs. Sitting or walking without GCS led to no significant volume changes, whereas volume was decreased by the use of GCS (-4.8% [P < .00001] and -4.4% [P < .00001], respectively). Standing up without GCS led to an increase in volume (2.7%; P < .0001), whereas limb volume was decreased (4.6%; P < .0001) by use of GCS. Bioimpedance showed extracellular water reduction only while walking with GCS (from 40.55% ± 1.66% to 40.45% ± 1.71%; P < .017). Mean interface pressure was 19 ± 5 mm Hg (B) and 16 ± 5 mm Hg (B1). The interface pressure variation from B to B1 was not homogeneous among participants (mean percentage variation of -13% ± 25%, ranging from -54% to 16%). A negative linear trend between pressure variation and circumference percentage increase was found; the subanalysis excluding the two outliers showed a strong negative linear correlation (Pearson coefficient r = -0.96). CONCLUSIONS: GCS led to a significant limb volume reduction irrespective of limb position and muscle pump function. However, extracellular fluid is mobilized only during muscle contraction while walking with GCS. Interestingly, different lower limb circumference variations influence the interface pressure gradient, indicating the importance of proper fitting of both B and B1 during prescription. These data provide a foundation to future investigations dealing with GCS effect on fluid mobilization and with limb geometry impact on compression performance.

Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Shared medical decision making is most important when there are competing options for repair such as in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We sought to understand the sources of patients' pre-existing knowledge about AAA to better inform treating physicians about patients' needs for preoperative counseling. METHODS: We performed a multicenter survey of patients facing AAA repair at 20 Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States as part of the Preferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of AAA study. A validated survey instrument was administered to examine the sources of information available and commonly used by patients to learn about their repair options. The survey was administered by study personnel before the patient had any interaction with the vascular surgeon because survey data were collected before the vascular clinic visit. RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of data from 99 patients showed that our cohort was primarily male (99%) and elderly (mean age 73 years). Patients commonly had a history of hypertension (86%), prior myocardial infarction (32%), diabetes (32%), and were overweight (58%). Patients arrived at their surgeon's office appointment with limited information. A majority of patients (52%) reported that they had not talked to their primary care physician at all about their options for AAA repair, and one-half (50%) reported that their view of the different surgical options had not been influenced by anyone. Slightly less than one-half of patients reported that they did not receive any information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (41% and 37%, respectively). Few patients indicated using the internet as their main source of information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (10% and 11%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are commonly referred for AAA repair having little to no information regarding AAA pathology or repair options. Fewer than one in five patients searched the internet or had accessed other sources of information on their own. Most vascular surgeons should assume that patients will present to their first vascular surgery appointment with minimal understanding of the treatment options available to them.

Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial.

For patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), randomized trials have found endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open surgical repair (OSR). However, OSR has fewer long-term aneurysm-related complications, such as endoleak or late rupture. Patients treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival rates within two years after surgery, and OSR does not require intensive surveillance. Few have examined if patient preferences are aligned with the type of treatment they receive for their AAA. Although many assume that patients may universally prefer the less-invasive nature of EVAR, our preliminary work suggests that patients who value the lower risk of late complications may prefer OSR. In this study, called The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial, we describe a cluster-randomized trial to test if a decision aid can better align patients' preferences and their treatment type for AAA. Patients enrolled in the study are candidates for either endovascular or open repair and are followed up at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform both types of repair. In Aim 1, we will determine patients' preferences for endovascular or open repair and identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, we will assess alignment between patients' preferences and the repair type elected and then compare the impact of a decision aid on this alignment between the intervention and control groups. This study will help us to accomplish two goals. First, we will better understand the factors that affect patient preference when choosing between EVAR and OSR. Second, we will better understand if a decision aid can help patients be more likely to receive the treatment strategy they prefer for their AAA. Study enrollment began on June 1, 2017. Between June 1, 2017 and November 1, 2018, we have enrolled 178 of a total goal of 240 veterans from 20 VA medical centers and their vascular surgery teams across the country. We anticipate completing enrollment in PROVE-AAA in June 2019, and study analyses will be performed thereafter.

Risk prediction of 30-day mortality after lower extremity major amputation.

OBJECTIVE: Universal risk calculators may underestimate mortality risk, whereas purely observational administrative data may lack appropriate granularity to individualize risk. The purpose of this study was to create a simple risk prediction model to identify the factors associated with 30-day morality after lower extremity major amputation for ischemic vascular disease. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program national data set was queried from 2005 to 2015 to identify 14,890 patients undergoing elective above-knee or below-knee amputation for rest pain, tissue loss, or gangrene. The data set was divided into a two-thirds derivation set and one-third validation set for the purpose of creating a risk prediction model. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. Eight independent risk factors for mortality resulted from the model and were assigned whole number integer risk scores. Summary risk scores were collapsed into categories and defined as low (0-3 points), moderate (4-7 points), high (8-10), and very high (>10). RESULTS: Mortality in the derivation data set was 4.6% (n = 453). By multivariable backward elimination, predictors of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence limits]) included preoperative do not resuscitate order (3.1 [2.3-4.0]), congestive heart failure (2.8 [2.1-3.6]), age >80 years (1.8 [1.4-2.2]), chronic renal insufficiency (2.1 [1.7-2.5]), above-knee amputation (1.8 [1.4-2.2]), dependent functional status (2.0 [1.6-2.5]), coronary artery disease (1.3 [1.1-1.6]), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.3 [1.0-1.6]); the final model held a C statistic of 0.74. In both the derivation and validation sets, 30-day mortality correlated with risk category. Among the defined categories in the derivation set, 30-day mortality rates were 2.3% for low-risk patients, 4.3% for moderate-risk patients, 7.5% for high-risk patients, and 17.5% for very-high-risk patients, with similar results for the validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: This risk prediction model uses eight easily obtainable clinical metrics that allow early assessment of 30-day mortality risk of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation for ischemic indications. The internal validation of the risk score demonstrates the increased mortality with increasing risk category. Reliable expected mortality prediction is critically important for surgeons to make recommendations in accordance with a patient's or family's goals of care. These data may also be used to set realistic expectations for hospital-based quality initiatives and to provide guidance in preoperative medical optimization.

Lower limb volume in healthy individuals after walking with compression stockings.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the modern appeal of wearing compressive garments during physical activities, the literature is lacking in quality data and controversial in the investigations dealing with the pathophysiologic mechanism by which graduated compression stockings (GCS) affect the calf pump activation in healthy individuals. The aim of the investigation was to provide insight into the clinical effects of GCS use during a standardized walking exercise. METHODS: Twenty physically active healthy volunteers (mean age, 34 ± 5 years; body mass index, 22 ± 2 kg/m2) underwent lower limb ultrasound scanning to exclude vascular impairment. All individuals performed continuous aerobic exercise, walking for 30 minutes on a treadmill, under cardiac monitoring, at 70% of individual estimated maximal heart rate according to the Tanaka equation. The study population performed the standardized walk without GCS (baseline) and at 1 week performed the same standardized walk wearing knee-length 20 to 30 mm Hg GCS (compression). All individuals underwent a lower limb volume assessment by truncated cone formula before and after the walk and a perceived exertion assessment by means of the validated Borg scale at the end of the exercise protocol. RESULTS: All individuals had normal venous and arterial ultrasound examination findings. No significant postural defects were reported. Both legs were assessed in all 20 individuals for a total of 40 cases with and 40 cases without GCS. In the baseline group, the median (interquartile range) lower limb volume changed from 2496 (770) mL before exercise to 2512 (805) mL (P = .2597) after exercise. The compression group reported a significant lower limb volume change from 2466 (670) mL before exercise to 2276 (567) mL (P = .0001) after exercise. Mean perceived exertion was 13 (11) and 11 (1) in the baseline and compression groups, respectively (P = .0001). The interface pressure exerted by the GCS was 24 (2) mm Hg. No complaints in terms of discomfort were reported after use of GCS. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy individuals, GCS (24 [2] mm Hg) use during a continuous standardized walk of 30 minutes is associated with a significant decrease in lower limb volume and a decrease in perceived exertion. The mechanism by which GCS impart their effect during physical activity may involve improved muscle pump function and reductions in inflammatory pathways. Further study will need to validate the mechanisms of the function of GCS used during physical exercise.

Recommendations for the medical management of chronic venous disease: The role of Micronized Purified Flavanoid Fraction (MPFF).

Scope A systematic review of the clinical literature concerning medical management of chronic venous disease with the venoactive therapy Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction was conducted in addition to an investigation of the hemodynamics and mechanism of chronic venous disease. Methods The systematic review of the literature focused on the use of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction (diosmin) which has recently become available in the US, in the management of chronic venous disease. The primary goal was to assess the level of evidence of the role of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction in the healing of ulcers, and secondarily on the improvement of the symptoms of chronic venous disease such as edema. An initial search of Medline, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews and Google Scholar databases was conducted. The references of articles obtained in the primary search, including a Cochrane review of phlebotonics for venous insufficiency, were reviewed for additional studies. Studies were included if patients had a diagnosis of chronic venous disease documented with Doppler and Impedance Plethysmography. Studies excluded were those that had patients with arterial insufficiency (Ankle Brachial Index < .6), comorbidity of diabetes, obesity, rheumatological diseases, or if other causes of edema were present (congestive heart failure, renal, hepatic or lymphatic cause), or if the patient population had recent surgery or deep vein thrombosis, or had been using diuretics (in studies of edema). Other elements of the study design were to note specifically the type of compression therapy used in conjunction with Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction. Results The literature review yielded 250 abstracts, 65 of which met criteria for further review and 10 papers were selected for consideration in the systematic review. Conclusion In summary, the general level of evidence supports the recommendation that the use of medical therapy with Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction has beneficial outcomes without serious adverse events. In the United States, diosmiplex is the only available prescription formulation of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction. It is derived from the rinds of oranges and is categorized as a medical food and not as a drug; and may be a particularly attractive therapy for many chronic venous disease patients because of its favorable safety profile. The Working Group for chronic venous disease concurs with previous guidance by the International European Society for Vascular Surgery in 2015 which recommended the use of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction for the healing of venous ulcers, alone and adjunctive to compression therapy, and for the reduction in symptoms of chronic venous disease such as edema.

Rupture of a True Profunda Femoris Artery Aneurysm: Two Case Reports and Review of the English Language Literature.

Profunda femoris artery aneurysms (PFAAs) are very rare and easily overlooked because they are located deeply within thigh muscle. PFAAs have a high rate of rupture in comparison with other peripheral arterial aneurysms, resulting in emergency surgical procedures with significant morbidity. PFAA is diagnosed with color arterial Doppler ultrasound, although computed tomography angiography remains the best imaging method to precisely define the exact site and length of arterial involvement. PFAAs should be treated surgically once diagnosed, even if they are asymptomatic due to the high incidence of complications. Currently, around 28 patients with PFAA rupture, including the 2 cases from this report, have been described in the English language literature. In this report, we describe the diagnosis and treatment of 2 true ruptured aneurysms of the profunda femoris artery with 2 different approaches, and will review the relevant literature.