Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: thirteen-year disease-free survival of 769 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with permanent implants alone.

OBJECTIVE: To report 13-year biochemical disease-free survival results on 769 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-nine patients with stage T1-T3, low to high Gleason grade prostate cancer underwent transperineal prostate implants with Iodine-125 (I-125) or Palladium-103 (Pd-103) as the sole treatment between January 1, 1987 and January 1, 1997. Median age was 69 years (range 43-92) and median follow-up was 71 months (range 18-156). Study cohort characteristics are summarized in Tables I and II and Figures 4-6. The patients were divided into two risk groups (low and high risk for extra-prostatic disease) based mainly on clinical stage and Gleason score. Group 1 consisted of 542 patients, who were considered at low risk and were treated with I-125. Group 2 comprised 227 patients, who were considered higher risk and were treated with Pd-103. No patient underwent pathological staging and none received androgen ablative therapy. Treatment failure was based on our modification of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology's (ASTRO) recommended failure criteria, defined as 3 consecutive serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) rises (1). A critical component in our modification is that the value of the third PSA rise be above 0.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients were lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients expired of non-cancer causes within 18 months of the implant. This left 619 patients for evaluation, 441 in Group 1 and 178 in Group 2. The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 619 patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 85%, 80%, 77%, and 77%, respectively (Fig. 1). The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 441 "lower risk" I-125 treated patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 84%, 79%, 76%, and 76%, respectively (Fig. 2). The biochemical disease-free survival rates of the 178 "higher risk" Pd-103 treated patients at 3, 5, 10, and 13 years were 87%, 82%, 80%, and 80%, respectively (Fig. 3). CONCLUSION: The excellent long-term results presented here, as well as the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other common treatments, demonstrate that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for clinical organ-confined prostate cancer in the long term.

Modern prostate brachytherapy. Prostate specific antigen results in 219 patients with up to 12 years of observed follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The purported lack of long term modern prostate brachytherapy outcome data continues to lead many physicians to recommend other, more traditional treatments. This concern for long term results has encouraged the authors to supplement their earlier 10-year follow-up of patients receiving brachytherapy; in the process, an additional 77 patients (> 50%) were added to the original cohort, and the follow-up time was increased by 2 years. METHODS: Between January 1987 and September 1989, 229 patients with T1-T3 prostate carcinoma underwent transperineal prostate brachytherapy using iodine-125 (I-125). No patient received adjuvant hormone therapy. The median Gleason sum was 5 (range, 2-10). Of these patients, 147 were determined to have a high probability of organ-confined disease and were treated solely with an I-125 implant. The remaining 82 patients were determined to be at increased risk for extracapsular disease and received pelvic external beam radiation in addition to brachytherapy. All patients were followed continuously. Failure was defined as a positive biopsy, radiographic evidence of metastases, or three consecutive rises in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus article. RESULTS: Excluding deaths from intercurrent disease, the median follow-up was 122 months (range, 18-144 months). Fourteen patients were excluded from analysis due to insufficient follow-up. Adopting the ASTRO definition of failure resulted in minimal change in survival when compared with the authors' previous study, which used a PSA level > 0.5 ng/mL as the failure point. Observed 10-year disease free survival (DFS) for the entire cohort was 70%. In the brachytherapy only group, the observed 10-year DFS was 66%, whereas those patients treated with the addition of external pelvic radiation achieved a DFS of 79%. None of the patients who were followed for the full 12 years failed between Years 10 and 12. Only 25% of the failures observed occurred > 5 years after treatment, thus confirming the durability of brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate brachytherapy provides excellent long term disease control with few late failures reported in the authors' program. The addition of external beam radiation appears to confer survival advantages in selected patients. Using the ASTRO failure criteria for long term follow-up resulted in no significant difference compared with using a PSA failure point of 0.5 ng/mL.

Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Prostate brachytherapy is an effective treatment option for clinically organ-confined prostate carcinoma. Observed 5- and 10-year follow-up have documented prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels that were comparable to published radical prostatectomy series and were better than several published external-beam radiation series. Between January 1987 and June 1988, a total of 152 consecutive patients with Stage T1 to T3 low to high Gleason grade prostate cancer were studied at Northwest Hospital in Seattle, Washington. Patients' median age was 70 years (range, 53 to 92 years). All patients received Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy with or without a 45 Gy dose of external-beam radiation. The average preoperative PSA, clinical stage, and prostate needle biopsy Gleason sum were 11 ng/ml, T2, and (5), respectively, and were known in all but five patients. PSA follow-up, clinical examination, and biopsy results judged disease-free survival at 5 and 10 postoperative years. Elevation of PSA above 0.5 ng/ml or a positive biopsy or a positive bone scan was considered treatment failure. The authors provide an historical review of prostate brachytherapy in conjunction with up-to-date implant techniques and long-term outcome results.

Modern prostate brachytherapy.

Of all the treatment options available for men with organ-confined prostate cancer, brachytherapy--permament implantation of radioactive seeds into the prostate gland--is the least disruptive for the patient, both physiologically and practically. Early brachytherapy represents the oldest technique for delivering radiation to the prostate gland, preceding external beam therapy of the prostate by several decades. Although there have not been, and are not likely to be, any definitive randomized studies comparing radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, treatment decisions will continue to be made on the basis of patient and physician preferences in conjunction with clinical probabilities. Long-term results in this series show that monotherapy with seed implants achieved disease-free survival of 66%; moreover, 79% of patients with higher grade disease who were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiation also experienced long-term disease-free survival. The following article provides a brief historical review of prostate brachytherapy, rationale for treatments, patient selection criteria, up-to-date implant techniques, and long-term (12-year) outcome results.

Follow-up evaluation of a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial, involving infusions of autologous dendritic cells (DC) and two human histocompatibility antigen (HLA-A2)-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides, was recently completed. Thirty percent of the participants, including subjects with hormone-refractory metastastic disease, and those with suspected local recurrence of prostate cancer, were identified as clinical responders. This report describes the follow-up evaluation of 19 responders in the two study groups. METHODS: After conclusion of the study, study participants were subjected to follow-up evaluations at 6-8-week intervals. Each responder was reevaluated for response status, and duration of response was determined. RESULTS: Subjects were observed for an average of 291 days (metastastic group, group A-2) and 557 days (local recurrence group, group B), which included the treatment and follow-up periods. The average duration of response was 149 days for group A-2, and 187 days for group B. A majority of responders (11/19; 58%) were still responsive at the end of the current follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed may be significant and relatively durable. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines in the future may provide an additional therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

GM-CSF as a systemic adjuvant in a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leukine [sargramostim], Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA) was administered to a subgroup of 44 patients in a phase II clinical trial for prostate cancer using DC pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides. Our purpose was to determine if GM-CSF caused any enhancement of patients' immune responses, including enhancement of clinical response to the DC-peptide treatment. This report compares the clinical responses to DC-peptide infusions with and without systemic GM-CSF treatment. METHODS: GM-CSF was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 75 microg/m2/day for 7 days with each of six infusion cycles. Prefilled syringes were supplied to the patients for self-administration. RESULTS: One complete and 8 partial responders were identified among 44 patients who received GM-CSF, as compared to 2 complete and 17 partial responders among 51 patients who did not receive GM-CSF. For patients who received GM-CSF and were tested by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test, 3 cases of improved immune response were identified, compared to 5 cases of improvement in patients who did not receive GM-CSF. The main GM-CSF side effects reported were local reactions at the site of injection, fatigue, pain, and fever. Most reported side effects were of mild severity, with some cases of moderate severity leading to discontinuation of GM-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest GM-CSF as employed in this trial did not detectably enhance clinical response to DC-peptide infusions, or significantly enhance the measured immune response.

Phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial: report of a study involving 37 patients with disease recurrence following primary treatment.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes the evaluation of 37 subjects admitted with presumed local recurrence of prostate cancer after primary treatment failure. METHODS: All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at 6-week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post-phase II study. Data included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as other assays to monitor cellular and humoral immune responses. RESULTS: One complete and 10 partial responders were identified from this group based on National Prostate Cancer Project criteria, or on a 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or on a significant resolution in lesions (biopsy-proven when possible) on ProstaScint scan. CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggests that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose primary treatment failed.

Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a phase II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with hormone-refractory metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: A phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of infusions of dendritic cells (DC) and two HLA-A2-specific PSMA peptides (PSM-P1 and -P2). This report describes thirty three subjects with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer without prior vaccine therapy history who were evaluated and reported as a group. METHODS: All subjects received six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 at six week intervals. Clinical monitoring was conducted pre-, during, and post- phase II study. Data collected include: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, chest x-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Six partial and two complete responders were identified in the phase II study based on NPCP criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or resolution in previously measurable lesions on ProstaScint scan. CONCLUSIONS: Over 30% of study participants in this group showed a positive response at the conclusion of the trial. This study suggested that DC-based cancer vaccines may provide an alternative therapy for prostate cancer patients whose disease no longer responds to hormone therapy.

Reduction of radioactive seed embolization to the lung following prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided interstitial implantation of radioactive seeds is a common treatment for early stage prostate cancer. One of the risks associated with this therapy is seed embolization to the lung. This paper reports on the incidence and possible adverse effects of seed migration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred ninety consecutive patients were treated with permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer between January 1 and December 31, 1995. One hundred fifty-four patients were treated with iodine-125 (I-125), and 136 patients were treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103). All but one patient had a routine post implant chest radiograph (CXR), leaving 289 evaluable patients. RESULTS: Twenty radioactive seed pulmonary emboli were identified in 17 patients; 3 patients had two emboli each. The radioactive seed pulmonary embolism rate for the entire group of patients was 5.9%. Acute pulmonary symptoms were not reported by any patient in this series. One hundred forty-six study patients were implanted with free seeds alone (136 Pd-103 and 11 I-125), and 143 were implanted with linked seed embedded in a vicryl suture for the peripheral portions of their implants. The radioactive seed embolization rate by patient was 11% (16/146) versus 0.7% (1/143) for free seed implants and implants utilizing linked seeds, respectively. The difference was statistically significant, p = 0.0002. No patient had detectable morbidity as a consequence of seed emboli. CONCLUSION: The use of linked seeds embedded in vicryl sutures for the peripheral portion of permanent radioactive seed prostate implants significantly reduced the incidence of pulmonary seed embolization in patients treated with the Seattle technique.

Ten-year disease free survival after transperineal sonography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy with or without 45-gray external beam irradiation in the treatment of patients with clinically localized, low to high Gleason grade prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The authors report observed 10-year brachytherapy results in the treatment of 152 consecutive patients with clinically organ-confined prostate carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients with T1-T3, low to high Gleason grade, prostate carcinoma were treated between January 1987 and June 1988 at Northwest Hospital in Seattle, Washington. Their median age was 70 years (range, 53-92 years). Of these 152 patients, 98 (64%) received an iodine-125 implant alone (Group 1), and the remaining 54 patients (36%), who were judged to have a higher risk of extraprostatic extension, also were treated with 45 gray (Gy) of external beam irradiation to the pelvis (Group 2). No patient underwent lymph node sampling, and none received androgen ablation therapy. Multivariate regression and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Preoperative patient data with associated success or failure outcomes at 10 years after treatment were used for training and validating a back-propagation neural network prediction program. RESULTS: The average preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) value, clinical stage, and Gleason grade were 11.0 ng/mL, T2, and 5, respectively. The median posttreatment follow-up was 119 months (range, 3-134 months). Overall survival 10 years after treatment was 65%. At last follow-up only 3 of the 152 patients (2%) had died of prostate carcinoma. Ninety-seven patients (64%) remained clinically and biochemically free of disease at 10 years of follow-up and had an average PSA value of 0.18 ng/mL (range, 0.01-0.5 ng/mL). In these patients a period of 42 months was required to reach the average PSA (0.5 ng/mL). The median to last PSA follow-up was 95 months (range, 3-134 months). Postoperative needle biopsies were negative in 56% of patients, positive in 15% of patients, and not available in 29% of patients. Only 6% of patients developed bone metastasis. At 10 years there was no statistically significant difference in treatment outcome between patients who received iodine-125 alone, and those who received iodine-125 with 45-Gy external beam irradiation (P = 0.08). Nevertheless, in these two groups preoperative PSA, stage, and Gleason grade were significantly different (P < 0.01). In the artificial neural network analysis, pretreatment serum PSA was the most accurate predictor of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous prostate brachytherapy is a valid and efficient option for treating patients with clinically organ-confined, low to high Gleason grade, prostate carcinoma. Observed 10-year follow-up documents serum PSA levels superior to those reported in several published external beam irradiation series, and comparable to those published in a number of published radical prostatectomy series.

Method for identifying prostate cells in semen using flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cannot differentiate benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), from prostatitis, or prostate cancer in the range of 4.0-10 ng/ml. An accurate cytologic or histologic assessment is necessary to confirm the proper diagnosis. The nature of a biopsy tends to make it a selective test not frequently repeated. We are reporting a technique employing semen as a source for the differential diagnosis of prostate epithelial cells. METHODS: Eleven vasectomized and nonvasectomized prostate cancer patients provided semen samples (stage T1 to T2). Two patients provided repeat samples. In addition, 15 vasectomized or nonvasectomized individuals without evidence of disease provided semen samples. Three million cells fixed with 50% ethanol were stained by an antibody (7E11.C5) to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), Hybritech Antibody (399) to PSA, and cytokeratin 8 and 18. In addition to the antibodies described, a DNA stain To-Pro 3 was used to identify 2n-4n DNA containing cells. A dual laser, Becton Dickinson FACSCaliber cytometer, was used to analyze the samples. RESULTS: All semen specimens contained diploid, cytokeratin 18-positive epithelial cells regardless of disease status. A clear difference between prostate cancer and normal prostate cell samples was observed using staining with 7E11.C5. The ratio of prostatic cells in the total epithelial cell population (PSMA:cytokeratin ratios) was calculated for each specimen. A retrospective study of sixteen semen samples from 11 prostate cancer patients had a mean PSMA:cytokeratin ratio of 0.57, whereas the samples from 15 patients without evidence of cancer had a mean PSMA:cytokeratin ratio of 0.11. This difference was significant. PSA staining was variable and inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates that human semen contains prostate cells that can be characterized and used in the clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Evaluation of phase I/II clinical trials in prostate cancer with dendritic cells and PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: A phase I trial involving patients with advanced prostate cancer was conducted to assess the safe administration of dendritic cells (DC) and HLA-A0201-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides (PSM-P1 or -P2). Thirty-three of the phase I participants were subsequently enrolled in a phase II trial, which involved six infusions of DC pulsed with PSM-P1 and -P2 peptides. METHODS: Clinical monitoring was conducted up to 770 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected included: complete blood count, bone and total alkaline phosphatase, prostate markers, physical examination, performance status, bone scan, ProstaScint scan, and chest X-ray, as well as assays to monitor cellular immune responses. RESULTS: Nine partial responders were identified in the phase II study based on National Prostate Cancer Project (NPCP) criteria, plus 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen. Four of the partial responders were also responders in the phase I study, with an average response duration of 225 days. Their combined average total response period was over 370 days. Five other responders were nonresponders in the phase I study. Their average partial response period was 196 days. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in the phase I and II clinical trials were significant and of long duration. The partial-responder group included patients who continued to respond from phase I, as well as those who started to respond during the phase II trial.

Measurement of serum prostate-specific membrane antigen, a new prognostic marker for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To describe current results with Western blot assay for prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) using 7E11.C5 antibody and the development of an additional antibody measurement for PSMA by a new sandwich immunoassay. METHODS: A population of patients from a screening group, from a difficult diagnostic group, from a pre- and postoperative radical prostatectomy group, and from a group with metastatic disease followed for a serial period, provided the serum values for a prospective assessment of PSMA by Western blot assay. A new monoclonal antibody was sought, reacting to the C-terminal region of PSMA in order to develop a sandwich radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: PSMA values in screened patients correlate with the more advanced stage of the cancers determined. In postprostatectomy patients, the PSMA value corresponds more with preoperative values and with the values of those with a poor clinical course. In difficult diagnostic cases, the PSMA value is increased, specifically in hormone-refractory cases and particularly in those cases judged by other criteria, such as the National Prostatic Cancer Project, to be in clinical progression compared with those judged to be in clinical remission. The level of PSMA value appears to be independent of homogeneous tumor volume and to be more related to that of prior hormone treatment, or to where prostate cancer cells can be documented to be outside the prostate. A new monoclonal antibody, 3F5.4G6, reacts with the extracellular domain of PSMA near the C-terminal region. This is in contrast to the previously measured antibody 7E11.C5, which reacts with an N-terminal epitope. 3F5.4G6 recognizes the same PSMA protein as does 7E11.C5. The epitopes are essentially at opposite ends of the molecule. The 3F5.4G6 antibody reacts with the LNCaP line but not with DU145, or PC3. These two antibodies to PSMA are well suited for use in a new sandwich immunoassay. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA provides a prostatic cancer serum test by using Western blot, which suggests a clinical prognostic value not seen with other markers. New antibodies, such as 3F5.4G6, reacting with the extracellular domain of PSMA combined with 7E11.C5, appear to offer an opportunity for a new sandwich immunoassay.

Report of immune monitoring of prostate cancer patients undergoing T-cell therapy using dendritic cells pulsed with HLA-A2-specific peptides from prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).

BACKGROUND: In this paper we describe our program for the immune monitoring of phase II participants given dendritic cell (DC)/prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based immunotherapy, and we also present some initial findings. METHODS: Phase II subjects received six administrations of autologous dendritic cells exogenously pulsed with two peptides derived from PSMA. Prior to the initial infusion, and following each treatment, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected for the generation of dendritic cells as well as for comprehensive immune monitoring. RESULTS: Thus far, an increase in PSMA-peptide-specific as well as overall cellular reactivity has been observed in several patients receiving DC plus PSM-P1 and -P2, as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). CONCLUSIONS: Our initial observations using an ELISA and DTH test indicate that we are enhancing cellular immunity in prostate cancer patients following infusion with DC plus PSMA-derived peptides. Several methods are underway to comprehensively monitor both cell-mediated and humoral immune responsiveness, including: determining anti-PSMA serum antibody titers, testing immunogen-restricted responder-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, assessing aberrations in signal transduction, antigen processing, and presentation, and measuring soluble factors that may promote tumor outgrowth.

Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy of prostate cancer.

The immunotherapy of cancer, based on eliciting or enhancing the body's own capacity to mount an effective antitumor response, has produced encouraging early results in the areas of melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma. Such treatments utilizing dendritic cells (DC), immune cells that are excellent antigen presenters, are especially promising. We performed a phase I clinical trial assessing the administration of autologous DC pulsed with HLA-A0201-specific prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for the treatment of 51 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Participants were divided into five groups receiving four or five infusions of peptides alone (PSM-P1 or PSM-P2; group 1 and 2, respectively), autologous DC (group 3), or DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or P2 (group 4 and 5, respectively). No significant toxicity was observed. Immune reactivity against PSM-P2 was detected in HLA-A2+ patients infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2 (group 4 and 5). An average decrease in PSA was observed only in group 5. Seven partial responders were identified based on NPCP criteria + PSA. The excellent tolerance of this treatment approach, as well as the enhanced cellular responses, decreased PSA levels, and partial clinical responses in some patients suggests that it holds great potential in prostate cancer therapy.

Comparison of serum PSMA, PSA levels with results of Cytogen-356 ProstaScint scanning in prostatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Stored serum from clinical trial cases undergoing ProstaScint (CYT-356) scanning were available for Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) assay. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels had already been determined. This provided an opportunity to see what correlations existed between the serum markers and the ProstaScint scan. A group of patients had the studies preprostatectomy, whereas another group had the studies postprostatectomy. METHODS: The scan results, serum PSA, serum PSMA, and clinical data were separately analyzed. PSMA serum levels were determined by Western blot. RESULTS: Preoperatively, radical prostatectomy patients showed a correlation between serum PSA or PSMA levels and the ProstaScint scan in the total group (n = 86), or in an untreated group (n = 38). Preoperatively, PSMA correlated with the pathological stage, whereas PSA correlated with the scan. Postoperatively, only PSMA serum levels correlated with the scan in an untreated group (n = 40). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperatively or postoperatively, Western blot PSMA serum levels predict the stage of disease or local, regional, or distant metastases, as shown by ProstaScint scan. Both the scan and the serum tests provide prognostic information and evaluate the extent of disease to a more significant degree than previously possible.

Brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: results at 7- and 8-year follow-up.

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in interstitial radiation as a cost-effective and efficient method of treating organ-confined prostate cancer. We describe our 7- and 8-year results with transperineal Iodine-125 and Palladium-103 implantation. A total of 551 consecutive patients were treated. Of these, 320/551 (58%) received implant alone (Group I), and 231/551 (42%)--considered higher risk patients--were also treated with a modest dose (45 Gy) of external beam irradiation (Group II). The median follow-up for Group I was 55 months, and for Group II, 60 months. At 7 years, the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 1.0 ng/mL) was 80% in Group I patients, and, at 8 years, 65% in Group II patients. Morbidity was minimal if patients had not undergone prior transurethral prostate resections. The results indicate that interstitial radiation is a valid treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Evaluation of PSA, free PSA, PSMA, and total and bone alkaline phosphatase levels compared to bone scans in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer clinical evaluation is difficult. A revaluation of new prostate markers with regard to bone scans was performed. METHODS: Serial markers, including bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), total alkaline phosphatase (TAP), prostate-specific antigen, total (PSA) and free (fPSA), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), were obtained in patients under evaluation and treatment for possible or known metastatic prostate cancer. These were correlated with bone scan results (BSR). RESULTS: Seventy patients were observed from mid-October 1996-January 1997, during which time 171 serum samples were obtained and correlated with semiquantitative bone scan status. PSA and fPSA provided some correlation with BAP and BSR, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml). Receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that BAP and TAP had a significant discriminating ability for positive and negative bone scans (> .78), compared to PSMA, PSA, and fPSA. However, percent BAP and TAP only correlated with BSR at a level above six lesions. As the lesions detected by BSR increased, the correlation increased. CONCLUSIONS: BAP is a valuable marker for clinical response evaluations to use in the serial follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and correlates well with the bone scan as the number of lesions increase to > 6. PSA or fPSA show comparable results, but only at high levels (> 16-50 ng/ml).

Follow-up evaluation of prostate cancer patients infused with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with PSMA peptides.

BACKGROUND: We recently conducted a phase I clinical trial administering autologous dendritic cells pulsed with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) peptides to advanced prostate cancer patients. Participants were divided into 5 groups receiving 4 or 5 infusions of peptides alone (PSM-P1 or -P2; groups 1 and 2, respectively), autologous DC (group 3), or DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2 (groups 4 and 5, respectively). Seven partial responders were observed. Follow-up evaluation of these responders is presented in this report. METHODS: Clinical monitoring for hematological studies and prostate markers was conducted up to 370 days from the start of the phase I study. Data collected include: lymphocyte, hematocrit, alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and PSMA levels. RESULTS: Groups 4 and 5 (patients infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2) represented 5/7 responders. The length of response was between 100 days (1 patient) to 200 days or above (6 patients). Four patients still remained responsive at the end of the period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: The responses observed in this phase I clinical trial are significant and of long duration. Most of the responders were in treatment groups infused with DC pulsed with PSM-P1 or -P2, suggesting the requirement of both components for effective immunotherapy.