Revisiting flow augmentation bypass for cerebrovascular atherosclerotic vaso-occlusive disease: Single-surgeon series and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in the nonsurgical management of cerebrovascular atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease, approximately 15-20% of patients remain at high risk for recurrent ischemia. The benefit of revascularization with flow augmentation bypass has been demonstrated in studies of Moyamoya vasculopathy. Unfortunately, there are mixed results for the use of flow augmentation in atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease. We conducted a study to examine the efficacy and long term outcomes of superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass in patients with recurrent ischemia despite optimal medical management. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of patients receiving flow augmentation bypass from 2013-2021 was conducted. Patients with non-Moyamoya vaso-occlusive disease (VOD) who had continued ischemic symptoms or strokes despite best medical management were included. The primary outcome was time to post-operative stroke. Time from cerebrovascular accident to surgery, complications, imaging results, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were aggregated. RESULTS: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. The median time from cerebrovascular accident to surgery was 87 (28-105.0) days. Only one patient (5%) had a stroke at 66 days post-op. One (5%) patient had a post-operative scalp infection, while 3 (15%) developed post-operative seizures. All 20 (100%) bypasses remained patent at follow-up. The median mRS score at follow up was significantly improved from presentation from 2.5 (1-3) to 1 (0-2), P = .013. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with high-risk non-Moyamoya VOD who have failed optimal medical therapy, contemporary approaches to flow augmentation with STA-MCA bypass may prevent future ischemic events with a low complication rate.

Accuracy and Interrater Reliability of CISS Versus Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted VIBE for the Presence of Optic Canal Invasion in Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: The magnetic resonance imaging sequence used to assess optic canal invasion by tuberculum sella meningiomas (TSMs) has not been standardized. Both constructive interference in steady state (CISS) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences are frequently used. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy and interrater reliability of these sequences in predicting optic canal invasion by TSMs. METHODS: In the present retrospective study of 27 patients (54 optic canals) who had undergone endoscopic transtuberculum transplanum resection of TSMs, images from preoperative CISS and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE sequences were assessed by 5 neuroradiologists who were unaware of the operative findings. The readers evaluated the optic canal in 4 quadrants at 2 locations (the posterior tip of the anterior clinoid process and the optic strut). A quadrant was considered positive for tumor invasion if invasion was present at either of these 2 locations. The reference standard was intraoperative observation of gross optic canal invasion. RESULTS: The interrater agreement was good for the presence or absence of tumor involvement in a particular quadrant (CISS, 0.635; VIBE, 0.643; 95% confidence interval for the difference, -0.086 to 0.010). The mean sensitivity and specificity for optic nerve invasion were 0.643 and 0.438 with CISS and 0.643 and 0.454 with VIBE, respectively. No significant differences were seen between the sequences in terms of reader accuracy when the intraoperative findings were used as the reference standard. CONCLUSION: CISS and VIBE sequences both have good accuracy in predicting for optic canal tumor invasion by TMEs.

Peritumoral Brain Edema and Surgical Outcome in Secretory Meningiomas: A Matched-Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Secretory meningioma (SM) is a rare subtype of benign meningioma reported to cause significant peritumoral brain edema (PTBE). Therefore, patients with SM may have more severe presenting symptoms and possibly increased postoperative complications. Our aim was to perform a statistically rigorous comparison of patients with SM with other nonsecretory World Health Organization grade I meningiomas and examine PTBE, postsurgical outcomes, and recurrence in a large series of cases. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at our institution with pathologically confirmed SM between 2000 and 2017 was performed. A control group of nonsecretory grade I meningiomas was matched 1:1 according to tumor location and size. Study groups were compared on clinical characteristics and outcomes using logistic, cumulative logit, and normal linear generalized estimating equations regression models. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with SM met inclusion criteria and were matched with 55 control patients. After adjusting for size and location, the odds of a patient with SM having a more severe T2 edema grade were 8.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.8-21.1; P < 0.001) times higher, and the odds of any T2 edema were 6.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-17.6; P < 0.001) times higher. Significance remained even when adjusting for age. Postoperative complications, Simpson grade resection, neurologic outcome, and recurrence were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SM have significantly greater odds of having PTBE compared with patients with nonsecretory World Health Organization grade I meningiomas of a similar size and location. Despite this situation, surgical outcome and recurrence rates are similar.

Back to the future: surgical rehearsal platform technology as a means to improve surgeon-patient alliance, patient satisfaction, and resident experience.

OBJECTIVE: Informed consent, when performed appropriately, serves many roles beyond simply obtaining the prerequisite medicolegal paperwork to perform a surgery. Prior studies have suggested that patient understanding is poor when verbal communication is the sole means of education. Virtual reality platforms have proven effective in enhancing medical education. No studies exist that have demonstrated the utility of virtual reality-facilitated informed consent (VR-IC) in improving the physician-patient alliance. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of VR-IC among patients providing consent for surgery and the impact of this educational and information technology-based strategy on enhancing the physician-patient alliance, patient satisfaction, and resident-physician perception of the consent process. METHODS: Prospective, single-site, pre- and postconsent surveys were administered to assess patient and resident perception of informed consent performed with the aid of VR-IC at a large tertiary academic medical center in the US. Participants were adult patients (n = 50) undergoing elective surgery for tumor resection and neurosurgical residents (n = 19) who obtained patient informed consent for these surgical procedures. Outcome measures included scores on the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9), the modified Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Patient pre- and postconsent data were recorded in real time using a secure online research data platform (REDCap). RESULTS: A total of 48 patients and 2 family members provided consent using VR-IC and completed the surveys pre- and postconsent; 47.9% of patients were women. The mean patient age was 57.5 years. There was a statistically significant improvement from pre- to post-VR-IC consent in patient satisfaction scores. Measures of patient-physician alliance, trust, and understanding of their illness all increased. Among the 19 trainees, perceived comfort and preparedness with the informed consent process significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: VR-IC led to improved patient satisfaction, patient-physician alliance, and patient understanding of their illness as measured by the PDRQ-9. Using VR-IC contributed to residents' increased comfort in the consent-gathering process and handling patient questions. In an era in which satisfaction scores are directly linked with hospital and service-line outcomes and reimbursement, positive results from VR-IC may augment physician and hospital satisfaction scores in addition to increasing measures of trust between physicians and patients.

A Liquid Biopsy to Assess Brain Tumor Recurrence: Presence of Circulating Mo-MDSC and CD14+ VNN2+ Myeloid Cells as Biomarkers That Distinguish Brain Metastasis From Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common type of brain tumor malignancy in the US. They are also the most common indication for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, the incidence of both local recurrence and radiation necrosis (RN) is increasing as treatments improve. MRI imagery often fails to differentiate BM from RN; thus, patients must often undergo surgical biopsy or resection to obtain a definitive diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To hypothesize that a marker of immunosuppression might serve as a surrogate marker to differentiate patients with active vs inactive cancer-including RN. METHODS: We thus purified and quantified Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (Mo-MDSC) by flow cytometry in patients proven by biopsy to represent BM or RN. RESULTS: We report the utility of the previously reported HLA-Dr-Vnn2 Index or DVI to discriminate recurrent BM from RN using peripheral blood. The presence of CD14+ HLA-DRneg/low Mo-MDSC is significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patients with brain metastasis recurrence compared to RN (Average 61.5% vs 7%, n = 10 and n = 12, respectively, P < .0001). In contrast, expression of VNN2 on circulating CD14+ monocytes is decreased in BM patients compared to patients with RN (5.5% vs 26.5%, n = 10 and n = 12, respectively, P = .0008). In patients with biopsy confirmed recurrence of brain metastasis, the average DVI was 11.65, whereas the average DVI for RN patients was consistently <1 (Avg. of 0.17). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DVI could be a useful diagnostic tool to differentiate recurrent BM from RN using a minimally invasive blood sample.

Outcomes and Clinical Characteristics of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Many clinical and demographic factors can influence survival of patients with hematologic malignancies who have intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs). Understanding the influence of these factors on patient survival can guide treatment decisions and may inform prognostic discussions. We conducted a systematic literature review to determine survival of patients with intracranial hemorrhages and concomitant hematologic malignancy. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid, SCOPUS, and Embase databases were queried with the following terms: ("intracranial hemorrhages" OR "brain hemorrhage" OR "cerebral hemorrhage" OR "subdural hematoma" OR "epidural hematoma" OR "intraparenchymal hemorrhage") AND ("Hematologic Neoplasms" OR "Myeloproliferative Disorders" OR "Myelofibrosis" OR "Essential thrombocythemia" OR "Leukemia"). Abstracts and articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria that were determined a priori. RESULTS: Literature review yielded 975 abstracts from which a total of 68 full-text articles were reviewed. Twelve articles capturing 634 unique patients were included in the final qualitative analysis. Median overall survival for all patients ranged from 20 days to 1.5 months while median overall survival for the subset of patients having ICH within 10 days of diagnosis of hematologic malignancy was 5 days. Intraparenchymal hemorrhages, multiple foci of hemorrhage, transfusion-resistant low platelet counts, leukocytosis, low Glasgow Coma Scale scores at presentation, and ICH early in treatment course were associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Survival for patients with hematologic malignancies and concomitant ICHs remains poor. Early detection, recognition of poor prognostic factors, and correction of hematologic abnormalities essential to prevention and treatment of ICHs in this patient population.

Association of Race with Survival in Intracranial World Health Organization Grade II and III Meningioma in the United States: Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has shown significant differences in meningioma incidence among different races, but minimal conclusive data exist on the role of race and ethnicity in overall survival for patients with high-grade intracranial meningioma. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the impact of race and ethnicity on survival in patients with high-grade intracranial meningioma. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted for studies using Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases. Databases were queried for the following: Meningioma AND [Ethnic OR Demography, OR African American OR Arab OR Hispanic OR Asian, OR White OR race OR racial] AND [survival OR survival analysis OR survival rate OR treatment outcome OR Survivor OR Outcome]. RESULTS: A literature search yielded a total of 412 abstracts, which were screened according to criteria that were determined a priori, and a total of 129 full-text articles were reviewed. Four articles were included in the final analysis, reporting on a total of 13,424 patients. Three studies saw an overall survival benefit in White non-Hispanics compared with Black non-Hispanics, and 1 reported a survival benefit in White non-Hispanics and Black non-Hispanics among patients who received gross total resection. One study additionally reported an increased likelihood of White patients receiving gross total resection when compared with non-White patients. CONCLUSIONS: The limited data available suggest that White patients have improved measures of survival compared with nonw-White patients, for reasons that are likely complex and multifactorial. Further studies are needed to explore these survival differences seen.

Anatomical Variations in the Location of Veins Draining Into the Anterior Superior Sagittal Sinus: Implications for the Transbasal Approach.

BACKGROUND: Many approaches are used for midline anterior cranial fossa meningioma resection. In the subfrontal approach, the anterior superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is commonly ligated to release the anterior falx. The transbasal approach allows access to the origin of the anterior SSS, allowing for maximum venous preservation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate variations in the first and second veins draining into the SSS. METHODS: We performed stepwise dissections for a transbasal level 1 approach on 8 anatomic specimens. We visualized the first and second veins draining into the sinus and measured the distance from the foramen cecum to these veins. We also measured the orbital bar height to determine the length of sagittal sinus that could be preserved with orbital bar removal. RESULTS: The distance between the foramen cecum and the first vein ranged from 4 to 36 mm while the distance to the second vein ranged from 6 to 48 mm. The mean orbital bar height was 26.4 mm. Based on these measurements, with a traditional bicoronal craniotomy without orbital bar removal, 81% of first veins and 58% of second veins would be sacrificed. CONCLUSION: A supraorbital bar or nasofrontal osteotomy, part of the transbasal skull base approach, is helpful to preserve the first and second veins when ligating the anterior SSS. Based on this study, it may be difficult to preserve these veins without orbital bar removal. Preservation of these veins may be of clinical importance when approaching midline anterior fossa pathologies.

Morbidity and Mortality After Burr Hole Craniostomy Versus Craniotomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Evacuation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are common neurosurgical pathological entities and typically occur after trauma in elderly patients. The 2 most commonly used strategies for treatment have included burr hole drainage and craniotomy with decompression. However, the choice of these procedures has remained controversial and has been primarily determined by surgeon preference. We designed a matched-cohort analysis to compare these 2 procedures and identify the risk factors associated with the postoperative outcomes. Thus, we compared the rates of reoperation and mortality for patients who had undergone craniotomy versus burr hole evacuation for cSDH. METHODS: A retrospective review examining the data from 299 consecutive patients with cSHDs from 2002 to 2015 was performed. We compared the following endpoints between the 2 procedures: 30-day mortality, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, and the need for reoperation. We also compared the potential risk factors in the patients with different primary outcomes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing craniotomy had a decreased need for reoperation compared with patients treated with burr hole evacuation (7.5% vs. 15.7%; P = 0.044). Older age was associated with both increased disposition to a nursing facility and increased 30-day mortality in both groups. Increased 30-day mortality was associated with aspirin usage in patients who had undergone craniotomy and with warfarin (Coumadin) in patients who had undergone burr hole evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified an increased need for reoperation for patients treated with burr hole evacuation compared with those undergoing craniotomy. Older age and low Glasgow coma scale scores were associated with worse outcomes in both groups. Certain methods of anticoagulation were also associated with worse outcomes, which varied between the 2 groups. We recommend that surgeons individualize the choice of procedure according to the specific patient characteristics with consideration of these findings.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage During Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Treatment Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a known complication of aortic aneurysm repair. Previous reports indicate that cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) may reduce incidence of SCI during open aortic aneurysm repair but its utility in endovascular repair remains poorly understood. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the protocols and outcomes of CSFD in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were utilized to conduct a systematic literature review. PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Cochrane, and EMBASE were queried for articles published since 2016 using search terms "(cerebrospinal fluid diversion OR CSF diversion OR lumbar drain OR subarachnoid drain OR spinal) AND (aortic aneurysm AND thoracic AND endovascular OR TEVAR)." Ninety-two articles were identified and screened by 2 independent reviewers, and 23 studies met criteria for full-text review after initial screening. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies met full inclusion criteria for final analysis. Six studies reported incidence of SCI in patients with CSFD and 2 compared SCI incidence between patients with and without CSFD. Protocols for drainage most commonly included draining to a target pressure intra- and postoperatively, between 8 and 12 mm Hg. Incidence of SCI ranged from 0% to 17% in patients with CSFD, and from 0% to 50% in those without CSFD. Rates of CSFD-related complications ranged from <1% to 28%. CONCLUSION: There may be a protective benefit of CSFD in preventing SCI, but there remains significant variation in drain placement protocols. Significant potential bias exists in the reviewed data. Higher quality studies on the role of CSFD in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair are needed.

Diagnosis, treatment, and survival in spinal dissemination of primary intracranial glioblastoma: systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal metastases from primary intracranial glioblastoma (GBM) are infrequently reported, and the disease has yet to be well characterized. A more accurate description of its clinical presentation and patient survival may improve understanding of this pathology, guide patient care, and advocate for increased inclusion in GBM research. The authors sought to describe the clinical presentation, treatment patterns, and survival in patients with drop metastases secondary to primary intracranial GBM. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were queried for abstracts that included patients with primary intracranial GBM and metastases to the spinal axis. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate characteristics of the primary brain lesion, timing of spinal metastases, clinical symptoms, anatomical location of the metastases, and survival and treatment parameters. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank analysis of the survival curves were performed for selected subgroups. RESULTS: Of 1225 abstracts that resulted from the search, 51 articles were selected, yielding 86 subjects. The patients' mean age was 46.78 years and 59.74% were male. The most common symptom was lumbago or cervicalgia (90.24%), and this was followed by paraparesis (86.00%). The actuarial median survival after the detection of spinal metastases was 2.8 months and the mean survival was 2.72 months (95% CI 2.59-4.85), with a 1-year cumulative survival probability of 2.7% (95% CI 0.51%-8.33%). A diagnosis of leptomeningeal disease, present in 53.54% of the patients, was correlated, and significantly worse survival was on log-rank analysis in patients with leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.0046; median survival 2.5 months [95% CI 2-3] vs 4.0 months [95% CI 2-6]). CONCLUSIONS: This study established baseline characteristics of GBMs metastatic to the spinal axis. The prognosis is poor, though these results will provide patients and clinicians with more accurate survival estimates. The quality of studies reporting on this disease pathology is still limited. There is significant need for improved reporting methods for spinal metastases, either through enrollment of these patients in clinical trials or through increased granularity of coding for metastatic central nervous system diseases in cancer databases.

Concordance of angiography and cerebral biopsy results for suspected primary central nervous system vasculitis: A multi-center retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: Primary CNS Vasculitis (PCNSV) is a rare disease that is often challenging to diagnose. Cerebral angiography and biopsy have been utilized in the diagnostic workup for several decades but limited literature reports on the concordance of findings of angiography and biopsy. The primary objective of this work was to examine how cerebral angiography corresponded with biopsy findings in patients with suspected PCNSV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 128 patients who underwent workup for PCNSV between years 2005-2016 were identified by query of existing neurological surgery and angiography databases at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC) and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF). The primary outcome was to examine the concordance of results between angiography and cerebral biopsy. Secondary outcomes included examining concordance between results of biopsy and other commonly performed tests for diagnosis of PCNSV including Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell count (CSF WBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: 128 patients underwent cerebral biopsy for diagnosis of suspected PCNSV. 93 (73%) of these patients also underwent angiography. Of the 34 patients with positive biopsy findings, only 5 also had positive angiography. Positive angiography was not found to be correlated with positive biopsy in our analysis. The only test that was significantly associated with biopsy proven vasculitis was increased CSF WBC count (P = 0.0114). CONCLUSIONS: PCNSV is a rare disease and often requires multiple tests or procedures to obtain definitive diagnosis. These results suggest that cerebral angiography findings are not associated with biopsy findings and should be used cautiously in the diagnostic work-up of PCNSV.

Subdural Hematoma in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: An Outcome Analysis and Examination of Risk Factors of Operative and Nonoperative Management.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic disorders who present with subdural hematomas (SDH) present a surgical decision-making challenge. Because of intrinsic coagulopathy, platelet dysfunction, and immunosuppression, surgical intervention poses a unique set of risks. OBJECTIVE: To describe a clinical sample of patients with hematologic disorders and concurrent SDH, to compare baseline and outcome variables, including complication rates and survival, in surgical versus nonsurgical management, and to identify clinical variables that may predict outcomes. METHODS: A 12-year retrospective case-control study was carried out of 50 adult patients with hematologic malignancies and SDH. Patients underwent surgical evacuation for SDH. Controls did not. Outcomes included discharge disposition, Glasgow Outcome Scale score, 30-day mortality, and overall survival. Complications included seizure, reoperation, and readmission. A Fisher exact test or χ2 analysis compared categorical variables; continuous outcomes were compared with a Student t test. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and multivariable Cox logistic regression evaluated variables associated with overall mortality. RESULTS: Surgical and nonsurgical groups differed only by Glasgow Coma Scale score, with slightly lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the surgical group. Complication rates did not differ; however, the 30-day reoperation rate was 35% for the surgical cohort. Overall, seizure incidence was 18%, readmission was 30%, 30-day mortality was 38%, median survival was 140.5 days, and 75% had a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1-3 at censorship. Increased age, low hemoglobin levels, and low platelet levels were associated with increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Low platelet and hemoglobin levels are consistent markers of poor prognosis and surgical intervention, either as a proxy of or as a cause for clinical deterioration, is associated with increased mortality risk.

Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: a single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been successfully used for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas given its steep dose gradients and high-dose conformality. However, treatment of skull base meningiomas (SBMs) may pose significant risk to adjacent radiation-sensitive structures such as the cranial nerves. Fractionated GKRS (fGKRS) may decrease this risk, but until recently it has not been practical with traditional pin-based systems. This study reports the authors' experience in treating SBMs with fGKRS, using a relocatable, noninvasive immobilization system.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent fGKRS for SBMs between 2013 and 2018 delivered using the Extend relocatable frame system or the Icon system. Patient demographics, pre- and post-GKRS tumor characteristics, perilesional edema, prior treatment details, and clinical symptoms were evaluated. Volumetric analysis of pre-GKRS, post-GKRS, and subsequent follow-up visits was performed.RESULTSTwenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Nineteen patients were treated with the Icon system, and 6 patients were treated with the Extend system. The mean pre-fGKRS tumor volume was 7.62 cm3 (range 4.57-13.07 cm3). The median margin dose was 25 Gy delivered in 4 (8%) or 5 (92%) fractions. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range 4.7-17.4 months). Two patients (9%) experienced new-onset cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. The mean postoperative tumor volume reduction was 15.9% with 6 patients (27%) experiencing improvement of cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. Median first follow-up scans were obtained at 3.4 months (range 2.8-4.3 months). Three patients (12%) developed asymptomatic, mild perilesional edema by the first follow-up, which remained stable subsequently.CONCLUSIONSfGKRS with relocatable, noninvasive immobilization systems is well tolerated in patients with SBMs and demonstrated satisfactory tumor control as well as limited radiation toxicity. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up and comparison to single-session GKRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are necessary to validate these findings and determine the efficacy of this approach in the management of SBMs.

Survival in Patients with High-Grade Spinal Meningioma: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: To report baseline demographics and examine for differences in survival for patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and III spinal meningioma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with WHO grade II or grade III spinal meningioma between 2004 and 2015. Cases with histopathological confirmation were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated and stratified by tumor type. Facility type, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were also examined. Crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate for differences in survival. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients with WHO grade II or grade III spinal meningioma (white, n = 237; black, n = 32; Asian and Pacific Islander, n = 11; unknown race, n = 7) were identified. The mean patient age was 56.4 years, and the majority were female (70%; n = 201). Almost one-half of the patients were treated in an academic/research program (45.3%; n = 130,). Those with WHO grade III lesions received the earliest treatment, at a mean of 10.8 days following diagnosis. The proportion of patients with unplanned 30-day readmission following surgery was 4.2% (n = 12). Two patients died within 90 days of surgery. Multivariable analysis demonstrated no differences in survival for patients with WHO grade II or grade III lesions (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-4.52; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in overall survival was identified between patients with WHO grade II or III spinal meningioma, although a trend was seen toward worse survival for patients with WHO grade III lesions.

Impact of Dual-Layer Duraplasty During Hemicraniectomy on Morbidity and Operative Metrics of Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study Comparing a Single-Layer with a Dual-Layer Technique.

BACKGROUND: Dural substitutes used during hemicraniectomy provide a barrier and dissection plane during subsequent cranioplasty. A recent review by our group showed that use of dural substitutes in hemicraniectomy is associated with reduction in estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time (OT). In our experience, the use of a dual-layer technique facilitates a dissection plane with minimal adhesions. We hypothesized that use of this dual-layer technique would show decreased OT and EBL in patients undergoing cranioplasty. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study comparing use of single-layer versus dual-layer duraplasty on cranioplasty operative outcomes. Data on dual-layer cases were collected from patients who underwent cranioplasty from 2013 to 2017. These data were matched to controls from 2008 to 2012. Patients were identified by query of a neurosurgical database of all procedures performed at our institution. Patients were included if they had complete surgical records for cranioplasty. Cases and controls were compared with a Student t test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 78 controls and 45 cases met inclusion criteria. All baseline characteristics between cohorts were similar except for surgical indication. Mean OT (102.97 minutes vs. 102.18 minutes) and mean EBL were not significantly different (204.66 mL vs. 190 mL) between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we did not detect any significant difference between EBL and OT with use of single-layer versus dual-layer duraplasty. Mean EBL was slightly higher in the controls compared with cases but this difference was not statistically or clinically significant. This concept would benefit from a prospective randomized study.

Effect of Dural Substitute and Technique on Cranioplasty Operative Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy can be associated with significant morbidity. Dural substitutes during the initial decompression could improve outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of online peer-reviewed databases to determine the effect of dural substitutes during decompressive craniectomy on operative metrics and outcomes after subsequent cranioplasty. RESULTS: Nine studies from 2006 to 2018 had reported the results from 922 patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty. Seven types of dural substitute were described, including biologic and synthetic materials. Compared with no graft, the use of dural substitutes was associated with significantly decreased operative times and surgical blood loss during subsequent cranioplasty. One study evaluated dual-layer substitutes and documented superior results compared with single layer. The most commonly reported complications were infection and cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, a significant reduction in complications was seen in only 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dural substitutes was associated with superior operative metrics, complication rates, and long-term outcomes.