The Metatarsal Cortical Index as an Indicator of Insufficiency Fracture of the Foot.

The diagnosis of metatarsal stress fractures is challenging. Standard imaging often shows false-negative results. The aim of this study was to create reliable radiologic outcome parameters to predict insufficiency fractures of the metatarsals. We performed an age- and sex-matched case-control study of patients with (n = 18) and without insufficiency fracture (n = 18) of the foot. The metatarsal cortical index (MCI) for each metatarsal was developed to predict an insufficiency fracture. The MCI of each metatarsal was significantly decreased in the insufficiency fracture group compared with the control group (p < .01). The MCI of the fourth ray yielded the highest area under the curve among the analyzed MCI values (area under the curve, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.90). A cut-off value of 1.62 for the MCI of the fourth ray yielded a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 78% to predict insufficiency fracture of the foot (odds ratio, 12.25; 95% confidence interval, 2.54-58.97), and enabled accurate allocation to the insufficiency fracture group versus the control group in 74% of cases. In conclusion, a decreased MCI is associated with metatarsal insufficiency fractures and enables an accurate diagnosis in 3 out of 4 cases. The MCI might aid clinicians in identifying insufficiency fracture, and raise the suspicion of the diagnosis without additional imaging studies.

Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is widely used in spine surgery (sIONM). But guidelines are lacking and its use is mainly driven by individual surgeons' preferences and medicolegal advisements. To gain an overview over the current status of sIONM implementation, we conducted a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries. METHODS: We developed a Web interface-based survey assessing prevalence, indication, technical implementation, and general satisfaction regarding sIONM in German, Austrian, and Swiss spine centers. The electronic survey was performed between November 2017 and April 2018, including both neurosurgical and orthopedic spine centers. RESULTS: A total of 463 German, 60 Austrian, and 52 Swiss spine centers were contacted with participation rates of 64.1% (Germany), 68.3% (Austria), and 55.8% (Switzerland). Some 75.9% participating neurosurgical spine centers and only 14.7% of the orthopedic spine centers applied sIONM. Motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials (93.7% and 94.3%, respectively) were the most widely available modalities, followed by direct wave (D wave; 66.5%). Whereas sIONM utilization was low in spine surgeries for degenerative, traumatic, and extradural tumor diseases, it was high for scoliosis and intradural tumor surgeries. Overall, the general satisfaction within the institutional setting regarding technical skills, staff, performance, and reliability of sIONM was rated as "high" by more than three-quarters of the centers. However, shortage of skilled staff was claimed to be a negative factor by 41.1% of the centers and reimbursement was considered to be insufficient by 83.5%. CONCLUSIONS: sIONM availability was high in neurosurgical but low in orthopedic spine centers. Main modalities were motor/somatosensory-evoked potentials and main indications were scoliosis and intradural spinal tumor surgeries. A more frequent sIONM use, however, was mainly limited by the shortage of skilled staff and restricted reimbursement.