Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 80, 2024 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is frequent in the intensive care unit (ICU), potentially leading to a heightened risk of nosocomial infections. Enhancing the gut microbiome has been proposed as a strategic approach to mitigate potential adverse outcomes. While prior research on select probiotic supplements has not successfully shown to improve gut microbial diversity, fermented foods offer a promising alternative. In this open-label phase I safety and feasibility study, we examined the safety and feasibility of kefir as an initial step towards utilizing fermented foods to mitigate gut dysbiosis in critically ill patients. METHODS: We administered kefir in escalating doses (60 mL, followed by 120 mL after 12 h, then 240 mL daily) to 54 critically ill patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract. To evaluate kefir's safety, we monitored for gastrointestinal symptoms. Feasibility was determined by whether patients received a minimum of 75% of their assigned kefir doses. To assess changes in the gut microbiome composition following kefir administration, we collected two stool samples from 13 patients: one within 72 h of admission to the ICU and another at least 72 h after the first stool sample. RESULTS: After administering kefir, none of the 54 critically ill patients exhibited signs of kefir-related bacteremia. No side effects like bloating, vomiting, or aspiration were noted, except for diarrhea in two patients concurrently on laxatives. Out of the 393 kefir doses prescribed for all participants, 359 (91%) were successfully administered. We were able to collect an initial stool sample from 29 (54%) patients and a follow-up sample from 13 (24%) patients. Analysis of the 26 paired samples revealed no increase in gut microbial α-diversity between the two timepoints. However, there was a significant improvement in the Gut Microbiome Wellness Index (GMWI) by the second timepoint (P = 0.034, one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test); this finding supports our hypothesis that kefir administration can improve gut health in critically ill patients. Additionally, the known microbial species in kefir were found to exhibit varying levels of engraftment in patients' guts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing kefir to critically ill individuals is safe and feasible. Our findings warrant a larger evaluation of kefir's safety, tolerability, and impact on gut microbiome dysbiosis in patients admitted to the ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05416814; trial registered on June 13, 2022.


Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Kefir , Adulto , Humanos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Disbiose , Estudos de Viabilidade , Kefir/análise
2.
Ochsner J ; 22(4): 349-352, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36561098

RESUMO

Background: Burkholderia gladioli (B gladioli) is a rare, gram-negative rod that was initially regarded as a plant pathogen. However, B gladioli has been reported as the primary pathogen causing pneumonia in organ transplant recipients and in patients with cystic fibrosis. We report a case of bacterial pneumonia caused by B gladioli in a patient hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case Report: A 68-year-old male was admitted for acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. He was treated with dexamethasone and convalescent plasma, resulting in improvement in the hypoxemia. However, during the latter part of his inpatient stay, the patient developed pneumonia caused by B gladioli. The isolate of B gladioli was sensitive to meropenem, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and intermediate to ceftazidime. He was treated with meropenem and levofloxacin. Despite treatment, the patient developed acute respiratory distress syndrome with multiorgan failure, suffered cardiac arrest, and died. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first report of B gladioli coinfection in a patient hospitalized for COVID-19 and provides insight into the possible detrimental outcome of B gladioli and COVID-19 coinfection.

3.
Cureus ; 13(8): e17035, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34522514

RESUMO

Gram-negative bacterial infections of the central nervous system (CNS) have worse clinical outcomes. The most common bacteria include Escherichia Coli, Citrobacter species, Enterobacter species, Serratia species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. There are multiple risk factors for CNS infection after shunt insertion, including younger age, obstructive hydrocephalus, shunt revision surgery, and trauma. The clinical presentation of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt infection includes the signs and symptoms of meningitis to fever with abdominal pain and peritonitis. Apart from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, microbiological cultures and radiological studies are key diagnostic tools. Initial empirical intravenous antimicrobial therapy is preferably broad spectrum with appropriate coverage for resistant Gram-negative pathogens and the duration of treatment depends upon pathogenesis, host factors, and clinical response to the therapy. Considering the importance of this disease and associated clinical outcomes, in this review article, we have summarized the epidemiology, clinical features, management, and prevention of Gram-negative VP shunt infections in adults.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA