Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis. / Guía Clínica Española del Acceso Vascular para Hemodiálisis.

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

The search for a new marker of renal function in older patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-4: usefulness of cystatin C-based equations.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cystatin C (Cys C) is an endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) unaffected by body composition. The aim of the present study was to assess the utility of Cys C-based GFR prediction equations (Hoek, Larsson and Stevens) and creatinine (modification of diet in renal disease-isotope dilution mass spectrometry--MDRD-IDMS, and Cockcroft-Gault--CG) compared with 51Cr-EDTA. METHODS: This study was carried out in 40 Caucasian older patients with advanced age (> or = 60) and chronic kidney disease stages 3-4. To assess the utility of prediction equations in relation to body composition, we measured lean mass (LM) with densitometry (DXA). Pearson's, Bland-Altman and Lin's coefficient (Rc) were used to study accuracy and precision. RESULTS: 51Cr-EDTA was 36.9 +/- 9.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (22-60). Cys C levels were 2.2 +/- 0.8 mg/l (r = 0.085; p = 0.662 LM) and creatinine 2.8 +/- 1.1 mg/dl (r = 0.427; p = 0.021 LM). The most accurate equations were the Hoek, Larsson and Stevens formulae, with a bias of -0.2 (Rc 0.48), -2.9 (Rc 0.44) and 2.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Rc 0.58). The biases obtained with MDRD-IDMS and CG were -14.6 (Rc 0.35) and -12.5 (Rc 0.40). All correlations among biases obtained with creatinine-based formulae and LM were negative and statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results show superiority of Cys C-based GFR formulae over the MDRD-IDMS and CG equations. This significant underestimation obtained with conventional prediction equations was directly related to the influence of LM.