Two Cases of Pelvic Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as an extranodal site in the pelvis is rare and can mimic a gynecological malignancy. Although management for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is standardized and curative, prognosis depends on timely diagnosis and therapy. Diagnosis can be challenging as patients lack classical symptoms of fever, night sweats, weight loss, and lymphadenopathy associated with lymphoma. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to diagnose and treat judiciously. In this article, we present cases of 2 females who presented with pelvic masses with initial suspicion of a gynecological malignancy but were ultimately diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the pelvis and managed accordingly.

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban vs Enoxaparin for Preventing Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignant Neoplasm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The high cost of this medication and the low adherence rates observed in prior studies provide an opportunity to benefit patients by demonstrating the safety of a more cost-effective, easier to use thromboprophylactic. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of an oral treatment alternative for thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients with gynecologic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a patient-based, multicenter, open-label, blinded, end point, randomized clinical trial conducted May 2015 to March 2019 in outpatient and inpatient gynecologic oncology settings. Women undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecologic cancer were approached for recruitment. The trial compared rates of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events during a 90-day follow-up period in patients taking apixaban or enoxaparin for postoperative thromboprophylaxis using a modified intent-to-treat analysis. Data analysis was performed from October to December 2019. Interventions: Women were randomized to 28 days of apixaban (2.5 mg orally twice daily) or enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously daily). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included incidence of venous thromboembolic events, adverse events, medication adherence, participant quality of life, and medication satisfaction. Results: Of 500 women recruited for the study, 400 were enrolled and randomized (median age, 58.0 years; range, 18.0-89.0 years); 204 received apixaban and 196 received enoxaparin. Treatment groups did not differ in terms of race/ethnicity, cancer stage, or surgery modality (open vs robotic). There were no statistically significant differences between the apixaban and enoxaparin groups in terms of rates of major bleeding events (1 patient [0.5%] vs 1 patient [0.5%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.07-16.76; P > .99), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (12 patients [5.4%] vs 19 patients [9.7%]; OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.87-4.1; P = .11), venous thromboembolic events (2 patients [1.0%] vs 3 patients [1.5%]; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.26-9.50; P = .68), adverse events, medication adherence, or quality of life between the groups. Participant satisfaction was significantly greater in the apixaban group with regard to ease of taking the medication (186 patients [98.9%] vs 110 patients [58.8%]; OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < .001) and pain associated with taking the medication (4 patients [2.1%] vs 92 patients [49.2%]; OR, 9.20; 95% CI, 2.67-31.82; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that oral apixaban is a potentially safe, less painful, and easier-to-take alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The efficacy of apixaban to prevent venous thromboembolic events is hypothesized as being equivalent. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02366871.

Adiponectin receptor agonist AdipoRon induces apoptotic cell death and suppresses proliferation in human ovarian cancer cells.

We tested the hypothesis that stimulation of adiponectin receptors with the synthetic agonist AdipoRon suppresses proliferation and induces apoptotic death in human high grade serous ovarian tumor cell lines and in ex vivo primary tumors, mediated by activation of 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). We determined the effect of AdipoRon on high grade serous ovarian tumor cells lines (OVCAR3, OVCAR4, A2780) and ex vivo primary tumor tissue. Western blotting analysis was performed to examine changes in activation of AMPK and mTOR signaling and flow cytometry was utilized to examine changes in cell cycle progression. Immunofluorescence of cleaved caspase-3 positive cells and flow cytometry of annexin V positive cells were used to determine changes in apoptotic response. The CyQUANT proliferation assay was used to assess cell proliferation. AdipoRon treatment increased AMPK phosphorylation (OVCAR3 P = 0.01; A2780 P = 0.02) but did not significantly alter mTOR activity. AdipoRon induced G1 cell cycle arrest in OVCAR3 (+ 12.1%, P = 0.03) and A2780 (+ 12.0%, P = 0.002) cells. OVCAR3 and OVCAR4 cells treated with AdipoRon underwent apoptosis based on cleaved caspase-3 and annexin V staining. AdipoRon treatment resulted in a dose dependent decrease in cell number versus vehicle treatment in OVCAR3 (-61.2%, P < 0.001), OVCAR4 (-79%, P < 0.001), and A2780 (-56.9%, P < 0.001). Ex vivo culture of primary tumors treated with AdipoRon resulted in an increase in apoptosis measured with cleaved caspase-3 immunohistochemistry. AdipoRon induces activation of AMPK and exhibits an anti-tumor effect in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumor via a mTOR-independent pathway.

The perceptions of gynecologic oncology fellows on readiness for subspecialty training following OB/GYNRESIDENCY.

A recent survey of fellowship program directors (PD) within gynecologic oncology (GO) noted concerns regarding the abilities of incoming fellows. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of current and former fellows in gynecologic oncology of their readiness for fellowship training. A previously used survey was modified and distributed in 2016 to current and former fellows in GO. The survey explored domains of independent practice, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation and scholarship. A standard Likert scale was employed and domains/responses were tailored to the subspecialty. A total of 150 current and recently former fellows responded to the survey, for a response rate of 38.7%. Nearly 70% of respondents reported being able to independently perform a hysterectomy when starting fellowship, and nearly 50% felt they could perform lysis of adhesions either without assistance. Although nearly 95% reported having had the opportunity to develop a plan of action for patients on labor and delivery, only 40.7% felt able to independently manage postoperative complications without assistance. Common themes that emerged in the open-ended responses pertained to self-perception of inadequate surgical skills and knowledge specific to gynecologic oncology. Although the majority of current and former fellows in gynecologic oncology report feeling prepared for fellowship, themes noted in the open-ended responses suggest a lack of confidence in surgical skills and clinical knowledge.

Fellow Perceptions of Residency Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perceptions of current and former fellows in obstetrics and gynecology (OBG) subspecialties of their readiness for fellowship training. METHODS: A previously used survey was modified and distributed in 2016 to current and former fellows in gynecologic oncology, maternal-fetal medicine, reproductive endocrinology-infertility, and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. The survey explored domains of professionalism, independent practice, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation, and scholarship. A standard Likert scale was employed and domains/responses were tailored to each subspecialty. Standard statistical models were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 478 fellows responded to the survey. Nearly 75% of fellows from each specialty reported feeling prepared or very prepared for fellowship. More than 65% of fellows from each specialty reported feeling very prepared to perform core surgical procedures. More than 90% of respondents reported having opportunities during residency to independently develop a plan of action for patients on labor and delivery. Fewer respondents reported opportunities to independently manage postoperative complications-40.7% of gynecologic oncology and 44.7% of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery reported having such opportunities, whereas 91.9% of maternal-fetal medicine respondents reported having had such opportunities. While 46.4% of respondents received education on scientific writing during residency, 80% reported writing a manuscript as a resident. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of current and former fellows in OBG subspecialties report feeling prepared for fellowship in terms of clinical and surgical skills. Their feedback reveals opportunities for improvement of independent practice in gynecologic scenarios, as well as formal education on scientific research, for OBG residencies.

Minority Race Predicts Treatment by Non-gynecologic Oncologists in Women with Gynecologic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of women with gynecologic cancer are superior when treated by gynecologic oncologists. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) began identifying gynecologic surgeon subspecialty in 2014. We sought to identify characteristics and outcomes of women treated by general gynecologists in comparison with women treated by gynecologic oncologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy in 2014 and 2015 were abstracted from the NSQIP database. Patient characteristics, morbidities, surgeon specialty, and operative outcomes were captured. RESULTS: 7271 hysterectomies were performed for malignant disease, and 669 were performed by generalists. In comparison with generalists, gynecologic oncologists operated on patients who were older (P < 0.001), more likely to be White [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, P < 0.001], had disseminated cancer (OR 3.1, P < 0.001), had ascites (OR 2.6, P < 0.001), and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3 (OR 1.7, P < 0.001). Gynecologic oncologists were also more likely to have hospital readmissions (OR 1.7, P = 0.004) and perform lymph node dissections for endometrial cancer (OR 2.2, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.0, P = 0.021], White race (aOR 2.0, P < 0.001), presence of disseminated cancer (aOR 2.5, P < 0.001), presence of ascites (aOR 1.8, P = 0.036), and ASA class ≥ 3 (aOR 1.6, P < 0.001) remained independent predictive factors for having a gynecologic oncology surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of gynecologic cancer cases are performed by gynecologic oncologists. Generalists are more likely to operate on minority patients and patients with fewer comorbidities. Further efforts to ensure access to specialized cancer care for all patients are needed.

Opioid use in gynecologic oncology in the age of the opioid epidemic: Part II - Balancing safety & accessibility.

As the only oncologists that provide both medical and surgical care, gynecologic oncologists encounter an exceptionally broad range of indications for prescribing opioids in clinical situations ranging from management of acute post-operative pain to chronic cancer-related pain to end-of-life care. While opioids are essential to the practice of gynecologic oncology, they can also have significant side effects and can be misused. Due to the explosive growth of opioid prescriptions and opioid-related overdoses and deaths during the first decade of the 21st century, there has been a recent concerted public health effort to prevent and treat opioid misuse through both legislation and education [1]. The first article in this two part series focused on appropriate use of opioids across clinical settings. This article addresses both the clinical and regulatory aspects of balancing opioid safety and accessibility for patients with gynecologic cancer.

Opioid use in gynecologic oncology in the age of the opioid epidemic: Part I - Effective opioid use across clinical settings, a society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review.

As the only oncologists that provide both medical and surgical oncologic care, gynecologic oncologists encounter an exceptionally broad range of indications for prescribing opioids, from management of acute post-operative pain to chronic cancer-related pain to end-of-life care. If we are to balance opioid efficacy, safety and accessibility for our patients, we must be intimately familiar with appropriate clinical use of opioids in a range of settings, and engage in the national conversation around opioid misuse and how associated regulations and legislation may impact us and our patients. This article examines the appropriate use of opioids across the range of clinical settings encountered in gynecologic oncology.

Relative Morbidity and Mortality of Panniculectomy-Combined Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine intraoperative and postoperative complication rates for surgical staging combined with panniculectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: A prospectively collected institutional surgical database was used to identify patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging between December 2008 and August 2014 (n = 551). The cases were grouped into surgical staging with panniculectomy (panniculectomy group, n = 11 [2.0%]), laparotomy without panniculectomy (laparotomy group, n = 208 [37.7%]), and laparoscopy (minimally invasive surgery group, n = 332 [60.3%]). Major complication and surgical wound complication rates within 30 days from surgery were compared. RESULTS: The panniculectomy group had a significantly higher body mass index compared with other approaches (panniculectomy group, laparotomy group, and minimally invasive surgery group: 60.4, 35.7, and 34.1; P < 0.001) and had a high stage I disease rate (90.9%, 61.5%, and 88.3%; P < 0.001). Mean pannus weight was 5733 g (4.4% of body weight). Intraoperative major complication rates were statistically nonsignificant across the groups (0%, 7.2%, and 4.2%; P = 0.23); however, the panniculectomy group had a significantly higher postoperative major complication rate compared with other approaches (36.4%, 16.3%, and 5.1%; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis controlling for age, ethnicity, body habitus, medical comorbidities, and tumor factors, panniculectomy remained an independent predictor for increased risk of postoperative major complications (adjusted odds ratio, 4.37; P = 0.043). Surgical mortality rates were similar across the groups (0%, 0.5%, and 0%; P = 0.44). Among superobese patients (n = 50), intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were statistically similar across the 3 groups (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although panniculectomy-combined surgical staging is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, the majority recovered uneventfully, making this approach a feasible treatment option, especially for superobese patients with endometrial cancer.

Prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with endometrial hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Although a fraction of endometrial hyperplasia cases have concurrent endometrial carcinoma, patient characteristics associated with concurrent malignancy are not well described. The aim of our study was to identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma among patients with endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted to compare endometrial hyperplasia in both preoperative endometrial biopsy and hysterectomy specimens (n=168) and endometrial carcinoma in hysterectomy specimen but endometrial hyperplasia in preoperative endometrial biopsy (n=43). Clinico-pathologic factors were examined to identify independent risk factors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: The most common histologic subtype in preoperative endometrial biopsy was complex hyperplasia with atypia [CAH] (n=129) followed by complex hyperplasia without atypia (n=58) and simple hyperplasia with or without atypia (n=24). The majority of endometrial carcinomas were grade 1 (86.0%) and stage I (83.7%). In multivariate analysis, age 40-59 (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, p=0.021), age≥60 (OR 6.65, p=0.005), BMI≥35kg/m(2) (OR 2.32, p=0.029), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.51, p=0.019), and CAH (OR 9.01, p=0.042) were independent predictors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma. The risk of concurrent endometrial carcinoma rose dramatically with increasing number of risk factors identified in multivariate model (none 0%, 1 risk factor 7.0%, 2 risk factors 17.6%, 3 risk factors 35.8%, and 4 risk factors 45.5%, p<0.001). Hormonal treatment was associated with decreased risk of concurrent endometrial cancer in those with ≥3 risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and CAH are predictive of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in endometrial hyperplasia patients.