Hip External Rotation Decreases Ischiofemoral Distance: A Positive Correlation Between Cadaveric and Fluoroscopic Studies.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of hip external rotation or extension/adduction on minimizing the ischiofemoral distance (IFD) and assess the correlation between cadaveric and fluoroscopic IFD measurements in different hip positions. METHODS: This cadaveric study involved 33 hip joints from 17 embalmed cadavers. IFD, the distance between the lesser trochanter and lateral ischium, was measured in different hip positions: neutral, external rotation at 30°, and external rotation at 60° with the hip in both neutral extension and adduction as well as 10° hip extension and 10° hip adduction. Differences in IFD related to positions and correlation between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements were analyzed. RESULTS: IFD measurements showed that the greatest reduction occurred at 60° of external hip rotation, with a significant difference observed only between neutral and 60° external rotation in cadaveric groups (7.60 ± 4.68 vs 5.05 ± 3.48, 95% CI, 0.14-4.96; P = .036). No substantial difference was observed between the extension and adduction positions. Positive correlations were observed between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements, especially in the neutral position (r = 0.492, P = .004), external rotation at 30° (r = 0.52, P = .002), external rotation at 60° (r = 0.419, P = .015), and the extension/adduction positions combined with neutral rotation (r = 0.396, P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The IFD significantly decreased with increasing degrees of hip external rotation, particularly at 60°. No significant reduction was observed in the extension/adduction positions. In addition, positive correlations were observed between cadaveric and fluoroscopic measurements for specific hip positions: neutral rotation, external rotation at 30° and 60°, and extension/adduction at 10° with neutral rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons can use this knowledge to improve hip impingement assessment through radiography, focusing on positions in which IFD reduction is most notable. Understanding the relationship between hip positions and IFD can enhance the diagnosis of ischiofemoral impingement syndrome and benefit patient care and outcomes.

Hip Arthroscopy Simulator Training With Immersive Virtual Reality Has Similar Effectiveness to Nonimmersive Virtual Reality.

PURPOSE: To (1) compare the efficacy of immersive virtual reality (iVR) to nonimmersive virtual reality (non-iVR) training in hip arthroscopy on procedural and knowledge-based skills acquisition and (2) evaluate the relative cost of each platform. METHODS: Fourteen orthopaedic surgery residents were randomized to simulation training utilizing an iVR Hip Arthroscopy Simulator (n = 7; PrecisionOS) or non-iVR simulator (n = 7; ArthroS Hip VR; VirtaMed). After training, performance was assessed on a cadaver by 4 expert hip arthroscopists through arthroscopic video review of a diagnostic hip arthroscopy. Performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET) scores. A cost analysis was performed using the transfer effectiveness ratio (TER) and a direct cost comparison of iVR to non-iVR. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics did not differ between treatment arms or by training level, hip arthroscopy experience, or prior simulator use. No significant differences were observed in OSATS and ASSET scores between iVR and non-iVR cohorts (OSATS: iVR 19.6 ± 4.4, non-iVR 21.0 ± 4.1, P = .55; ASSET: iVR 23.7 ± 4.5, non-iVR 25.8 ± 4.8, P = .43). The absolute TER was 0.06 and there was a 132-fold cost difference of iVR to non-iVR. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy simulator training with iVR had similar performance results to non-iVR for technical skill and procedural knowledge acquisition after expert arthroscopic video assessment. The iVR platform had similar effectiveness in transfer of skill compared to non-iVR with a 132 times cost differential. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Due to the accessibility, effectiveness, and relative affordability, iVR training may be beneficial in the future of safe arthroscopic hip training.

A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the orthopaedic surgeon: Part III, focus on registry creation, diagnosis, and data privacy.

Deep learning is a subset of artificial intelligence (AI) with enormous potential to transform orthopaedic surgery. As has already become evident with the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT (OpenAI Inc.), deep learning can rapidly enter clinical and surgical practices. As such, it is imperative that orthopaedic surgeons acquire a deeper understanding of the technical terminology, capabilities and limitations associated with deep learning models. The focus of this series thus far has been providing surgeons with an overview of the steps needed to implement a deep learning-based pipeline, emphasizing some of the important technical details for surgeons to understand as they encounter, evaluate or lead deep learning projects. However, this series would be remiss without providing practical examples of how deep learning models have begun to be deployed and highlighting the areas where the authors feel deep learning may have the most profound potential. While computer vision applications of deep learning were the focus of Parts I and II, due to the enormous impact that natural language processing (NLP) has had in recent months, NLP-based deep learning models are also discussed in this final part of the series. In this review, three applications that the authors believe can be impacted the most by deep learning but with which many surgeons may not be familiar are discussed: (1) registry construction, (2) diagnostic AI and (3) data privacy. Deep learning-based registry construction will be essential for the development of more impactful clinical applications, with diagnostic AI being one of those applications likely to augment clinical decision-making in the near future. As the applications of deep learning continue to grow, the protection of patient information will become increasingly essential; as such, applications of deep learning to enhance data privacy are likely to become more important than ever before. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Measure Twice, Cut Once: The Future of Digitally Planned Knee Osteotomies.

It is important to highlight the use of patient-specific cutting guides for knee joint osteotomies. Rationale, pitfalls, and planning of conventional osteotomy techniques are examined. The benefits of using patient-specific guides focusing on the potential for improved accuracy, efficiency, and safety are reviewed. The versatility of guides to manipulate the slope in both the coronal and sagittal planes, as well as its ability to accommodate concomitant procedures, is discussed. The time and cost differentials between standard cutting guides and three-dimensional-guided templating are also discussed.

Editorial Commentary: Restrictions in Spinal Motion Result in Lower Outcome Scores After Hip Arthroscopy.

The critical consideration in determining the efficacy of hip surgery is patient-reported outcomes, specifically the achievement of the clinical threshold. Several studies examined the achievement of the clinical threshold following hip arthroscopy (HA) in the presence of coexisting lumbar spine disease. The condition related to the spine receiving a lot of focus in recent research is the lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV). However, this condition could be just the tip of the iceberg. To forecast the outcomes of HA, it is far more important to comprehend spinopelvic motion. Since higher-grade LSTV is associated with less lumbar spine flexibility and reduces the ability to antevert acetabulum, it is possible that LSTV severity or grading could be one of the indicators of less effective operation "especially in "hip users"' (hip users are defined as patents who are more dependent on on hip motion than spinal motion). In light of this, lower-grade LSTV ought to have a less significant impact on surgical outcomes than higher-grade LSTV.

Long-term Outcomes After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement for Patients With Borderline Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopic surgery for patients with dysplasia have been unfavorable. Results have included iatrogenic instability and conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a young age. However, patients with borderline dysplasia (BD) have shown more favorable results at short- and medium-term follow-up. PURPOSE: To assess long-term outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement in patients with BD (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] = 18°-25°) compared with a control group of patients without dysplasia (LCEA = 26°-40°). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We identified a group of 33 patients (38 hips) with BD who were treated for FAI between March 2009 and July 2012. An age- and sex-matched control group of 83 patients (96 hips) was also identified. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected preoperatively and subsequently at a mean of 9.6 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean LCEA and Tönnis angle were 22.42°± 2.02° and 6.27°± 3.23° in the BD group, respectively, and 31.71°± 3.52° and 2.42°± 3.02° in the control group, respectively (P < .001). At a mean follow-up of 9.6 years (range, 8.2-11.6 years), there was a significant improvement in all patient-reported outcome scores in both groups (P < .001). There were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative scores or rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference between the BD and control groups. Bilateral surgery was noted to be a risk factor for any revision during the follow-up period (P < .001). There were 2 hips (5.3%) that underwent revision surgery in the BD group and 10 hips (10.4%) in the control group; of these, 1 patient in the BD group underwent total hip arthroplasty, and 1 patient who had undergone bilateral surgery in the control group underwent bilateral hip resurfacing. CONCLUSION: Durable outcomes (>9 years) with low revision rates can be expected after hip arthroscopic surgery with an approach that involves labral preservation where possible and careful attention to capsular closure in patients with BD. The observed outcomes were similar to those of a femoroacetabular impingement group with normal coverage. These results highlight the importance of classifying patients into impingement or instability categories and tailoring treatment appropriately with arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy, respectively.

An implantable shock absorber yields an 85% survival-from-arthroplasty rate through 5 years in working-age patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 5-year rate of survival without undergoing arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in subjects with mild-to-moderate medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) who were treated with an implantable shock absorber (ISA) system. METHODS: Three prospective, sequential, multicenter, international, single-arm clinical trials were conducted comprising subjects who received an ISA for symptomatic medial knee OA after failing ≥ 6 months of conservative therapy. Study outcomes were analyzed cumulatively and by enrollment group when all subjects' follow-up data exceeded the 2-year threshold after ISA implantation. Primary outcome was survival rate without conversion to arthroplasty/HTO. Secondary outcomes were changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function scores after ISA implantation. RESULTS: All 171 enrolled subjects (age 51 ± 9 years, body-mass index 28.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2, 38% female; study knee Kellgren-Lawrence score 2.7 ± 0.9 points) were followed for a minimum of 2, and up to 5, years after device implantation. Overall, 90.6% (155/171) of subjects survived without requiring arthroplasty/HTO at last follow-up (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 years). The Kaplan-Meyer median 3- and 5-year survival-without-arthroplasty point estimates were 89.8% (95% CI 86.5‒95.7%) and 84.9% (95% CI 75.1‒91.1%), respectively. The median 3-year estimated survival rate for the most recent study (n = 81) was 97.3%. The mean WOMAC Pain score decreased 71% from baseline to last follow-up after ISA implantation, from 58 ± 13 to 16 ± 17 points (p < 0.0001). The Function score improved 69%, decreasing from 56 ± 18 to 17 ± 17 points (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In younger patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic medial compartment knee OA, implantation of the ISA device resulted in a 5-year survival rate of 85% from undergoing arthroplasty or HTO. The ISA system may be an effective treatment option for working-age patients with medial knee OA who are not candidates for or do not desire more invasive surgical approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Implantable Shock Absorber Provides Superior Pain Relief and Functional Improvement Compared With High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A 2-Year Report.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 10 million Americans below the age of 65 years have symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) and may not yet be candidates for arthroplasty. In response, a subcutaneous implantable shock absorber (ISA) that unloads the knee has been developed. The safety and effectiveness of ISA treatment were compared against a surgical unloading control, high tibial osteotomy (HTO). DESIGN: This was a prospective open-label cohort study with a historical control arm. Subjects underwent ISA placement or HTO. The primary endpoint was a composite variable combining pain, function, specific adverse events, integrity of implant or hardware, and conversion to subsequent surgery. Pain and function outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores) were assessed through 24 months. Adverse events were tracked. RESULTS: The primary endpoint demonstrated superiority of the ISA arm versus the HTO arm, with 85.6% of ISA subjects meeting all criteria compared with 65.5% of HTO subjects. In addition, all 5 secondary endpoints showed superiority of ISA over HTO. At 24 months, the proportions of subjects considered responders were 95.8% (ISA) versus 87.9% (HTO) for pain and 91.7% (ISA) versus 81.3% (HTO) for function. The ISA procedure was well tolerated, with 13.4 days to full weightbearing status versus 58.0 days for the HTO arm. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an ISA demonstrated noninferiority and superiority versus treatment with HTO in subjects aged 25-65 years who had OA of the medial knee. Treatment with ISA has high clinical benefit and is durable through at least 24 months.

Majority of competitive soccer players return to soccer following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: female and older aged players are less likely to return to soccer.

PURPOSE: To determine return to soccer rates and soccer performance in a large cohort of competitive soccer players after hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and to identify possible risk factors associated with not returning to soccer. METHODS: An institutional hip preservation registry was retrospectively reviewed for patients identified as competitive soccer players who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAI performed between 2010 and 2017. Patient demographics and injury characteristics as well as clinical and radiographic findings were recorded. All patients were contacted for return to soccer information using a soccer-specific return to play questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for not returning to soccer. RESULTS: Eighty-seven competitive soccer players (119 hips) were included. 32 players (37%) underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral hip arthroscopy. The mean age at surgery was 21.6 ± 7.0 years. Overall, 65 players (74.7%) returned to soccer, of which 43 players (49% of all included players) returned to pre-injury level of play or better. Most common reasons for not returning to soccer were pain or discomfort (50%) followed by fear of re-injury (31.8%). The mean time to return to soccer was 33.1 ± 26.3 weeks. Among 22 players who did not return to soccer, 14 (63.6%) reported satisfaction from surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed female players (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27; confidence interval [CI] = 0.083 to 0.872; p = 0.029) and older aged players (OR = 0.895; 95% CI = 0.832 to 0.963; p = 0.003) were less likely to return to soccer. Bilateral surgery was not found to be a risk factor. CONCLUSION: Hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI in symptomatic competitive soccer players allowed three-quarters of them to return to soccer. Despite not returning to soccer, two-thirds of players who did not return to soccer were satisfied with their outcome. Female and older aged players were less likely to return to soccer. These data can better guide clinicians and soccer players with realistic expectations related to the arthroscopic management of symptomatic FAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the Orthopedic surgeon: part I.

Deep learning has a profound impact on daily life. As Orthopedics makes use of this rapid escalation in technology, Orthopedic surgeons will need to take leadership roles on deep learning projects. Moreover, surgeons must possess an understanding of what is necessary to design and implement deep learning-based project pipelines. This review provides a practical guide for the Orthopedic surgeon to understand the steps needed to design, develop, and deploy a deep learning pipeline for clinical applications. A detailed description of the processes involved in defining the problem, building the team, acquiring and curating the data, labeling the data, establishing the ground truth, pre-processing and augmenting the data, and selecting the required hardware is provided. In addition, an overview of unique considerations involved in the training and evaluation of deep learning models is provided. This review strives to provide surgeons with the groundwork needed to identify gaps in the clinical landscape that deep learning models may be able to fill and equips them with the knowledge needed to lead an interdisciplinary team through the process of creating novel deep-learning-based solutions to fill those gaps.

Hip Arthroscopy With Bone Marrow Aspirate Injection for Patients With Symptomatic Labral Tears and Early Degenerative Changes Shows Similar Improvement Compared With Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy With Symptomatic Labral Tears Without Arthritis.

PURPOSE: To define the clinical effect of intra-articular injection of iliac crest-derived bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) at the time of hip arthroscopy in patients with symptomatic labral tears and early radiographic degenerative changes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected hip registry database was performed. Patients with symptomatic labral tears and Tönnis grade 1 or 2 degenerative changes who underwent labrum-preserving hip arthroscopy with BMAC injection were included and were matched with patients who underwent hip arthroscopy without BMAC injection. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively included the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sport, and International Hip Outcome Tool 33 score. Clinical relevance was measured with the minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, and substantial clinical benefit for each outcome score. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent labrum-preserving hip arthroscopy with BMAC injection and were matched with 35 control patients. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the groups (P > .05). The BMAC group consisted of 22 patients (62.9%) with Tönnis grade 1 changes and 13 (37.1%) with Tönnis grade 2 changes, whereas all 35 control patients had Tönnis grade 0 hips. All PROs were significantly improved in both groups at 2 years, with no difference in improvement. The rate of failure requiring conversion to total hip arthroplasty was 14.3% (mean, 1.6 years postoperatively) in the BMAC group and 5.7% (mean, 7 years postoperatively) in the control group (P = .09). The difference in the frequency of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, and substantial clinical benefit was not statistically significant between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In a challenging group of patients with symptomatic labral tears and early radiographic degenerative changes, hip arthroscopy with BMAC injection results in statistically and clinically significant improvement in PROs comparable to a group of patients with nonarthritic hips undergoing hip arthroscopy at short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

The Outcome of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Lumbar Spine Disease Is Beneficial, Yet Limited: A Systematic Review of Existing Evidence.

PURPOSE: To compare hip arthroscopy outcomes in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with concurrent symptomatic lumbar spine disease to the outcomes of arthroscopic FAI patients without spine disease. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Studies were valid for inclusion if they had an average follow-up ≥12 months and compared patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip arthroscopy patients with and without concurrent spinal disease. Data collected included study characteristics, patient demographics, follow-up intervals, surgical indications, spinal pathology, PROMs, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. 3,107 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were evaluated: 1,056 with coexisting lumbar spine disease (spine cohort) and 2,051 control subjects without spine disease (control cohort). The average follow-up period was 24 months. Across included studies, there were 35 instances wherein postoperative PROM scores reported by each cohort were compared. In all 35 instances, the spine cohort reported inferior postoperative PROM scores with the difference being significant (P < .05) on 23 PROMs. Collectively, 23 cases were available contrasting the proportion of each cohort to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). In 22 (95.65%) of these cases, the spine cohort achieved the MCID at a lower rate than the control cohort. There were 14 PROMs, wherein intragroup analyses were reported that compared the preoperative and postoperative score reported by the spine cohort. On all 14 PROMs, the spine cohort reported significant (P < .05) improvement after arthroscopic intervention. CONCLUSION: FAI patients with coexisting lumbar spine pathology experience significant improvement from baseline state after arthroscopic intervention. However, the postoperative outcomes reported are inferior, and the improvement from arthroscopy was limited when compared to surgical control subjects with FAI and normal spinal anatomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

External Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Clinically Meaningful Functional Improvement After Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Individualized risk prediction has become possible with machine learning (ML), which may have important implications in enhancing clinical decision making. We previously developed an ML algorithm to predict propensity for clinically meaningful outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. External validity of prognostic models is critical to determine generalizability, although it is rarely performed. PURPOSE: To assess the external validity of an ML algorithm for predicting clinically meaningful improvement after hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: An independent hip preservation registry at a tertiary academic medical center was queried for consecutive patients/athletes who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between 2015 and 2017. By assuming a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) outcome/event proportion of 75% based on the original study, a minimum sample of 132 patients was required. In total, 154 patients were included. Age, body mass index, alpha angle on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, Tönnis grade and angle, and preoperative Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale were used as model inputs to predict the MCID for the Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale 2 years postoperatively. Performance was assessed using identical metrics to the internal validation study and included discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The concordance statistic in the validation cohort was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.87), suggesting good to excellent discrimination. The calibration slope was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.61) and the calibration intercept 0.13 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.53). The Brier score was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.18). The null model Brier score was 0.20. Decision curve analysis revealed favorable net treatment benefit for patients with use of the algorithm as compared with interventional changes made for all and no patients. CONCLUSION: The performance of this algorithm in an independent patient population in the northeast region of the United States demonstrated superior discrimination and comparable calibration to that of the derivation cohort. The external validation of this algorithm suggests that it is a reliable method to predict propensity for clinically meaningful improvement after hip arthroscopy and is an essential step forward toward introducing initial use in clinical practice. Potential uses include integration into electronic medical records for automated prediction, enhanced shared decision making, and more informed allocation of resources to optimize patient outcomes.

Repair of gluteus medius tears with bioinductive collagen patch augmentation: initial evaluation of safety and imaging.

The purpose of this study was to perform an initial, prospective evaluation of imaging findings and outcomes after open surgical repair of gluteus medius tendon tears with bioinductive collagen patch augmentation. A prospective study was performed of patients with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of symptomatic gluteus medius tears who underwent open, double-row suture anchor repair with bioinductive bovine collagen patch augmentation. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative MRIs were reviewed by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist, and outcome scores were recorded preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively [Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sport; HOS Activities of Daily Living (HOS ADL); Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and International Hip Outcomes Tool (iHOT-33)]. Nine patients, four high-grade tears (≥50% tendon thickness) and five low-grade tears (<50% thickness) underwent surgical repair. At 6 months, 7/9 (77.8%) of tendons were qualitatively classified as completely healed on MRI, with no complications. Mean tendon thickness increased significantly: mediolateral dimension by 5.8 mm (P < 0.001), anteroposterior dimension by 4.1 mm (P = 0.02) and cross-sectional area (CSA) by 48.4 mm2 (P = 0.001). Gluteus medius and minimus CSA did not change significantly (P > 0.05). Patients demonstrated improvements in mean scores for HOS ADL, mHHS and iHOT that met defined minimum clinically important differences (P < 0.05). Open surgical repair of gluteus medius tendon tears with bioinductive collagen patch augmentation is safe and associated with increased tendon thickness on postoperative MRI. Early outcome scores are encouraging and should be evaluated after patients have completed postoperative rehabilitation to measure the whole effect of treatment.

The predictive value of self-reported allergies for reoperation after index hip arthroscopy.

The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of reoperation after index hip arthroscopy for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement in patients with, and without, at least one self-reported allergy. Data were collected prospectively in 1468 patients whose records were retrospectively reviewed. After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, two cohorts were formed: (i) a study cohort (n = 261) composed of patients with a self-reported allergy and (ii) a control cohort. (n = 666). The allergy cohort had a significantly larger [P < 0.001] reoperation rate (24.1% [63/261]) compared to the control cohort (9.6% [64/66]). Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were then performed to better understand the implications of allergy status on the arthroscopic outcome. On UVA the presence of an allergy increased the odds of reoperation after index hip arthroscopy by 2.99 [OR (95% CI): 2.99 (2.04, 4.39); P < 0.001] and for each additional allergy a patient reported, their odds of subsequent surgery increased by 1.27 per allergy [OR (95% CI): 1.27 (1.15, 1.39); P < 0.001]. However, on the MVA, allergy status was not an independent risk factor for reoperation. These findings suggest that allergy status is associated with a higher reoperation rate, however, allergy status alone cannot prognosticate the risk of subsequent surgery. Therefore, allergy status and its association with future surgery after hip arthroscopy should be considered in the context of multiple patient-specific factors that influence the surgical outcome. An understanding of this association enables patient-centered care and will strengthen the physician-patient relationship.

Hip-Spine Syndrome in the Nonarthritic Patient.

Hip-spine syndrome refers to concurrent hip and spine pathology with overlapping symptoms. Most of the literature has studied it in relation to total hip arthroplasty literature and has been shown to increase dislocation risk. Lumbar spine and pelvic mobility have been studied less frequently in relation to nonarthritic pathologic hip states. Understanding the biomechanical relationship between the lumbar spine, pelvis, and hip can help elucidate how hip-spine syndrome affects the nonarthritic hip and how it impacts outcomes of hip arthroscopy. Changes in lumbar spine motion may be the reason certain predisposed patients develop symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or ischiofemoral impingement. Some athletes may be "hip users" with a low pelvic incidence, making them more reliant on hip motion due to less-intrinsic lumbopelvic motion. When these patients have FAI morphology, their increased reliance on hip motion makes them prone to experiencing femoroacetabular contact and concurrent symptoms. Other athletes may be "spine users," with larger pelvic incidence and more baseline lumbopelvic motion, making them less reliant on hip motion and therefore less prone to experiencing hip impingement even with hip FAI morphology. Hip-spine syndrome also appears to have an impact on patient selection, role of nonoperative treatment, and hip arthroscopy surgical outcomes. Identifying patients with concurrent pathology may allow surgeons to recommend targeted physical therapy or counsel patients better on their expectations after surgery.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Mobility Computerized Adaptive Testing Maintains High Correlation and Low Test Burden Compared With Legacy Hip-Specific Instruments in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity-specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility (MO) bank in patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery at a large academic musculoskeletal specialty center between November 2019 and November 2020 completed the following baseline and 6-month measures: PROMIS MO, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), PROMIS Physical Function (PF), modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool 33, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Construct validity was evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficients. The number of questions until completion was recorded as a marker of test burden. The percentage of patients scoring at the extreme high (ceiling) or low (floor) for each measure was recorded to measure inclusivity. Responsiveness was tested by comparing differences between baseline and 6-month measures, controlling for age and sex, using generalized estimating equations. Magnitudes of responsiveness were assessed through the effect size (Cohen d). RESULTS: In this study, 660 patients (50% female patients) aged 32 ± 14 years were evaluated. PROMIS MO showed a strong correlation with PROMIS PF (r = 0.84, P < .001), the International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (r = 0.73, P < .001), PROMIS PI (r = -0.76, P < .001), and the modified Harris Hip Score (r = 0.73, P < .001). Neither PROMIS MO, PROMIS PI, nor PROMIS PF met the conventional criteria for floor or ceiling effects (≥15%). The mean number of questions answered (± standard deviation) was 4.7 ± 2.1 for PROMIS MO, 4.1 ± 0.6 for PROMIS PI, and 4.1 ± 0.6 for PROMIS PF. From baseline to 6 months, the PROMIS and legacy measures exhibited significant responsiveness (P < .05), with similar effect sizes between the patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study reveals that in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, PROMIS MO computerized adaptive testing maintains high correlation with legacy hip-specific instruments, significant responsiveness to change, and low test burden compared with legacy measures, with no ceiling or floor effects at 6-month postoperative follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.