Towards real-time topical detection and characterization of FDG dose infiltration prior to PET imaging.

PURPOSE: To dynamically detect and characterize 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dose infiltrations and evaluate their effects on positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake values (SUV) at the injection site and in control tissue. METHODS: Investigational gamma scintillation sensors were topically applied to patients with locally advanced breast cancer scheduled to undergo limited whole-body FDG-PET as part of an ongoing clinical study. Relative to the affected breast, sensors were placed on the contralateral injection arm and ipsilateral control arm during the resting uptake phase prior to each patient's PET scan. Time-activity curves (TACs) from the sensors were integrated at varying intervals (0-10, 0-20, 0-30, 0-40, and 30-40 min) post-FDG and the resulting areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared to SUVs obtained from PET. RESULTS: In cases of infiltration, observed in three sensor recordings (30 %), the injection arm TAC shape varied depending on the extent and severity of infiltration. In two of these cases, TAC characteristics suggested the infiltration was partially resolving prior to image acquisition, although it was still apparent on subsequent PET. Areas under the TAC 0-10 and 0-20 min post-FDG were significantly different in infiltrated versus non-infiltrated cases (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.05). When normalized to control, all TAC integration intervals from the injection arm were significantly correlated with SUVpeak and SUVmax measured over the infiltration site (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.77, p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, testing the ability of the first 10 min of post-FDG sensor data to predict infiltration visibility on the ensuing PET, yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Topical sensors applied near the injection site provide dynamic information from the time of FDG administration through the uptake period and may be useful in detecting infiltrations regardless of PET image field of view. This dynamic information may also complement the static PET image to better characterize the true extent of infiltrations.

Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated how imaging of the breast with patients lying prone using a supportive positioning device markedly facilitates longitudinal and/or multimodal image registration. In this contribution, the authors' primary objective was to determine if there are differences in the standardized uptake value (SUV) derived from [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in breast tumors imaged in the standard supine position and in the prone position using a specialized positioning device. METHODS: A custom positioning device was constructed to allow for breast scanning in the prone position. Rigid and nonrigid phantom studies evaluated differences in prone and supine PET. Clinical studies comprised 18F-FDG-PET of 34 patients with locally advanced breast cancer imaged in the prone position (with the custom support) followed by imaging in the supine position (without the support). Mean and maximum values (SUVpeak and SUVmax, respectively) were obtained from tumor regions-of-interest for both positions. Prone and supine SUV were linearly corrected to account for the differences in 18F-FDG uptake time. Correlation, Bland-Altman, and nonparametric analyses were performed on uptake time-corrected and uncorrected data. RESULTS: SUV from the rigid PET breast phantom imaged in the prone position with the support device was 1.9% lower than without the support device. In the nonrigid PET breast phantom, prone SUV with the support device was 5.0% lower than supine SUV without the support device. In patients, the median (range) difference in uptake time between prone and supine scans was 16.4 min (13.4-30.9 min), which was significantly-but not completely-reduced by the linear correction method. SUVpeak and SUVmax from prone versus supine scans were highly correlated, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. Prone SUVpeak and SUVmax were significantly lower than supine in both original and uptake time-adjusted data across a range of index times (P < < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Before correcting for uptake time differences, Bland-Altman analyses revealed proportional bias between prone and supine measurements (SUVpeak and SUVmax) that increased with higher levels of FDG uptake. After uptake time correction, this bias was significantly reduced (P < 0.01). Significant prone-supine differences, with regard to the spatial distribution of lesions relative to isocenter, were observed between the two scan positions, but this was poorly correlated with the residual (uptake time-corrected) prone-supine SUVpeak difference (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT of the breast in the prone position is not deleteriously affected by the support device but yields SUV that is consistently lower than those obtained in the standard supine position. SUV differences between scans arising from FDG uptake time differences can be substantially reduced, but not removed entirely, with the current correction method. SUV from the two scan orientations is quantitatively different and should not be assumed equivalent or interchangeable within the same subject. These findings have clinical relevance in that they underscore the importance of patient positioning while scanning as a clinical variable that must be accounted for with longitudinal PET measurement, for example, in the assessment of treatment response.

Kinetic analysis of FDG in rat liver: effect of dietary intervention on arterial and portal vein input.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary conditions may affect liver [(18)F]FDG kinetics due to arterial and portal vein (PV) input. The purpose of this study was to evaluate kinetic models of [(18)F]FDG metabolism under a wide range of dietary interventions taking into account variations in arterial (HA) and portal vein (PV) input. METHODS: The study consisted of three groups of rats maintained under different diet interventions: 12 h fasted, 24 h fasted and those fed with high fructose diet. [(15)O]H2O PET imaging was used to characterize liver flow contribution from HA and PV to the liver's dual input function (DIF). [(18)F]FDG PET imaging was used to characterize liver metabolism. Differences in [(18)F]FDG kinetics in HA, PV and liver under different diet interventions were investigated. An arterial to PV Transfer Function (TF) was optimized in all three dietary states to noninvasively estimate PV activity. Finally, two compartment 3-parameter (2C3P), two compartment 4-parameter (2C4P), two compartment 5-parameter (2C5P), and three compartment 5-parameter (3C5P) models were evaluated and compared to describe the kinetics of [(18)F]FDG in the liver across diet interventions. Sensitivity of the compartmental models to ratios of HA to PV flow fractions was further investigated. RESULTS: Differences were found in HA and PV [(18)F]FDG kinetics across 12h fasted, 24h fasted and high fructose fed diet interventions. A two exponential TF model was able to estimate portal activity in all the three diet interventions. Statistical analysis suggests that a 2C3P model configuration was adequate to describe the kinetics of [(18)F]FDG in the liver under wide ranging dietary interventions. The net influx of [(18)F]FDG was lowest in the 12h fasted group, followed by 24 h fasted group, and high fructose diet. CONCLUSIONS: A TF was optimized to non-invasively estimate PV time activity curve in different dietary states. Several kinetic models were assessed and a 2C3P model was sufficient to describe [(18)F]FDG liver kinetics despite differences in HA and PV kinetics across wide ranging dietary interventions. The observations have broader implications for the quantification of liver metabolism in metabolic disorders and cancer, among others.