Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 19(9)2018 Aug 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149650

RESUMO

The application of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the treatment of bone defects requires two invasive procedures and several weeks of ex vivo cell expansion. To overcome these limitations, the administration of allogeneic MSC may be attractive, because they are anticipated to be immunoprivileged. Because preclinical studies using various animal models are conflicting with respect to the efficacy of allogeneic MSC, we investigated whether autologous and allogeneic human MSC (hMSC) are equally effective in regenerating bone in a humanized mouse model resembling the human immune system. Applying autologous and allogeneic hMSC in critically sized femoral defects, we found that allogeneic hMSC elicited a mild immune response early after implantation, whereas early angiogenic processes were similar in both treatments. At later healing time points, the transplantation of allogeneic hMSC resulted in less bone formation than autologous hMSC, associated with a reduced expression of the osteogenic factor Runx2 and impaired angiogenesis. We found by species-specific staining for collagen-type-1α2 that MSCs of either source did not synthesize new bone matrix, indicating an indirect contribution of transplanted hMSC to bone regeneration. In conclusion, our data suggest that the application of autologous hMSC is superior to that of allogeneic cells for bone defect treatment.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/citologia , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/metabolismo , Animais , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/imunologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Transgênicos , Neovascularização Fisiológica , Osteogênese , Subpopulações de Linfócitos T/imunologia , Subpopulações de Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante Homólogo , Cicatrização
2.
Am J Pathol ; 188(2): 474-490, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29146294

RESUMO

Bone healing is a complex process with closely linked phases of inflammation, regeneration, and remodeling. IL-6 may crucially regulate this process; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. IL-6 signals are transmitted via the transmembrane glycoprotein 130 by two distinct mechanisms: classic signaling using the membrane-anchored IL-6 receptor and trans-signaling using its soluble form. Herein, we investigated the hypothesis that IL-6 classic and trans-signaling have different functions during bone healing. To investigate fracture healing, 12-week-old C57BL/6J mice underwent a femur osteotomy. To study the function of IL-6 during the inflammatory phase, either an anti-IL-6 antibody, which inhibits IL-6 classic and trans-signaling, or soluble glycoprotein 130 fusion protein, which selectively blocks trans-signaling, was injected after 30 minutes and 48 hours. To analyze IL-6 effects in the repair phase, compounds were injected from day 7 onwards. Global IL-6 inhibition in the early phase after fracture reduced systemic inflammation, the recruitment of immune cells, and bone regeneration, resulting in delayed fracture healing. Global IL-6 inhibition during the repair phase disturbed bone formation and remodeling. In contrast, inhibition of IL-6 trans-signaling exerted minor effects on the immune response and did not influence bone repair, suggesting that the classic pathway accounts for most of the effects observed after global IL-6 inhibition. Our results reveal that IL-6 classic signaling, but not IL-6 trans-signaling, is essential for bone repair.


Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura/imunologia , Interleucina-6/imunologia , Animais , Remodelação Óssea/imunologia , Calo Ósseo/imunologia , Quimiocinas/sangue , Citocinas/sangue , Fêmur/fisiologia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Inflamação/imunologia , Mediadores da Inflamação/imunologia , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Osteogênese/imunologia , Osteotomia , Receptores de Interleucina-6/imunologia , Transdução de Sinais/imunologia , Microtomografia por Raio-X
3.
J Orthop Res ; 33(8): 1235-41, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25876530

RESUMO

Abatement of fracture-related pain is important in patient welfare. However, the frequently used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered to impair fracture healing through blockade of cyclooxygenase-2. An alternative for fracture-related pain treatment may be blockade of nerve growth factor (NGF)/neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1 (TrkA) signaling. Because the effect of blocking this signal-pathway on bone healing has not been extensively investigated, we addressed this issue by applying neutralizing antibodies that target NGF and TrkA, respectively, in a mouse fracture model. Mice with a knock-in for human TrkA underwent femur osteotomy and were randomly allocated to phosphate-buffered-saline, anti-NGF-antibody, or anti-TrkA-antibody treatment. The analgesic effect of the antibodies was determined from the activity and the ground reaction force of the operated limb. The effect of antibody administration on fracture healing was assessed by histomorphometry, micro-computed tomography, and biomechanics. NGF/TrkA-signaling blockade had no negative effect on fracture healing as callus formation and maturation were not altered. Mice treated with anti-TrkA antibody displayed significantly greater activity on post-operative day 2 compared to PBS treatment indicating effective analgesia. Our data indicate, that blockade of NGF/TrkA signaling via specific neutralizing antibodies for pain reduction during fracture healing does not influence fracture healing.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fatores de Crescimento Neural/fisiologia , Receptor trkA/fisiologia , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologia , Animais , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Fatores de Crescimento Neural/antagonistas & inibidores , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/fisiopatologia , Receptor trkA/antagonistas & inibidores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA