Long-term outcomes of glued (sutureless) amniotic membrane transplantation in acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of a glued (sutureless) technique for amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) with a traditional sutured one in the setting of acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all patients diagnosed with SJS/TEN between 2008 and 2020 within our hospital network who received AMT in the acute phase according to our protocol and had at least one ophthalmic follow-up in the chronic phase. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the most recent visit, presence of a severe ocular complication (SOC) via predefined criteria, time to procedure and duration of procedure. Random effects model analysis was used to evaluate the impact of potential covariates on outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (45 eyes) were included: 14 patients (27 eyes) in the AMT suture group and 9 patients (18 eyes) in the AMT glue group. There was no difference between the two groups in BCVA at the most recent visit (p=0.5112) or development of a SOC (p=1.000). The glue method was shorter in duration than the suture method (p<0.001). Random effects model additionally indicated that there was no difference in BCVA at most recent follow-up between patients who had received glued versus sutured AMT (p=0.1460). CONCLUSIONS: Our glued technique for AMT is as effective as our sutured technique in stabilising the ocular surface and mitigating chronic ocular complications in SJS/TEN. The glued technique is also shorter in duration and performed more expediently than the sutured technique.

The Effectiveness of Intraoperative Clip Placement in Improving Radiation Therapy Boost Targeting After Oncoplastic Surgery.

PURPOSE: The role of surgical clips as markers of the tumor bed cavity for radiation therapy boost targeting after oncoplastic surgery is not well understood. Therefore, we sought to evaluate whether the placement of surgical clips can reduce interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumor bed cavities of oncoplastic surgery patients and ultimately determine an optimal number of clips to place. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed records of 39 women with breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy at our institution. Three radiation oncologists contoured tumor bed cavity volumes on planning computed tomography simulation images. Interobserver variability was measured both by a coefficient of variation of radiation oncologists contour volume and a concordance index defined as the quotient of the intersecting and aggregated volume of the contours. Patients were stratified by the number of surgical clips placed and compared by 1-way analysis of variance. Simple linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship of total excised volume and interobserver variability in patients with a sufficient quantity of surgical clips. RESULTS: Interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumor bed cavity as measured by concordance index was significantly reduced in patients who received intraoperative surgical clips (F = 5.755; P = .001). A similar trend was seen in contour volume (F = 2.616; P = .052). Results of 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis showed that 4 clips are effective and sufficient for reproducible delineation of the tumor bed cavity for the radiation therapy boost. Increasing excision volume does not result in an increase in interobserver variability (r2 = 0.00003). CONCLUSIONS: In oncoplastic surgery patients, intraoperative placement of surgical clips is beneficial and effective in improving the delineation of the tumor bed cavity for the radiation therapy boost. Four clips are necessary and sufficient for accurate boost targeting after lumpectomy with oncoplastic reconstruction.

The Impact on Mortality and Societal Costs From Smoking Cessation in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to require patients to stop smoking prior to elective plastic surgery procedures. Scarce research exists describing the impact on mortality and associated societal cost savings with regard to smoking cessation in aesthetic surgery. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to demonstrate that smoking cessation in anticipation for aesthetic surgery significantly reduces mortality and increases societal cost savings. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of 5 common aesthetic procedures (reduction mammaplasty, breast augmentation, facelift, rhinoplasty, and abdominoplasty) to determine patient smoking rates and subsequent recidivism. Sensitivity analyses estimated life years saved using ranges of recidivism from our literature review and assessed total lifetime savings, including direct and productivity costs, while adjusting for inflation (3%) and interest (5%). One life saved was equated to 45 life years saved. RESULTS: Between May 2008 and May 2013, 7867 patients stopped smoking prior to undergoing aesthetic plastic surgery procedures. Assuming a reported recidivism rate of 68%, smoking cessation prior to aesthetic plastic surgery is associated with 429 lives saved and a total lifetime savings of $524.4 million over the five-year period. Total lives saved ranged from 214 (84% recidivism) to 885 (34% recidivism), and total lifetime cost savings ranged from $262.2 million (84% recidivism) to $1.08 billion (34% recidivism). CONCLUSIONS: Presently, smoking cessation before aesthetic surgery significantly saves patient lives with yearly $104.9 million of societal cost savings in the United States. Future reductions in the presently high recidivism rate would lead to additional lives saved and reduced societal costs.

Quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Quality of care is an emerging area of focus in the surgical disciplines. However, much of the emphasis on quality is limited to high-income countries. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC). DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cinahl, Embase and CAB Abstracts using three domains: quality of care, surgery and LMIC. STUDY SELECTION: We limited our review to studies of essential surgeries that pertained to all three search domains. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data on study characteristics, type of surgery and the way in which quality was studied. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: 354 studies were included. 281 (79.4%) were single-center studies and nearly half (n = 169, 46.9%) did not specify the level of facility. 207 studies reported on mortality (58.47%) and 325 reported on a morbidity (91.81%), most commonly surgical site infection (n = 190, 53.67%). Of the Institute of Medicine domains of quality, studies were most commonly of safety (n = 310, 87.57%) and effectiveness (n = 180, 50.85%) and least commonly of equity (n = 21, 5.93%). CONCLUSION: We find that while there are numerous studies that report on some aspects of quality of care, much of the data is single center and observational. Additionally, there is variability on which outcomes are reported both within and across specialties. Finally, we find under-reporting of parameters of equity and timeliness, which may be critical areas for research moving forward.