Pre-surgery optimization of patients' expectations to improve outcome in heart surgery: Study protocol of the randomized controlled multi-center PSY-HEART-II trial.

The PSY-HEART-I trial indicated that a brief expectation-focused intervention prior to heart surgery improves disability and quality of life 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, to investigate the clinical utility of such an intervention, a large multi-center trial is needed to generalize the results and their implications for the health care system. The PSY-HEART-II study aims to examine whether a preoperative psychological intervention targeting patients' expectations (EXPECT) can improve outcomes 6 months after CABG (with or without heart valve replacement). EXPECT will be compared to Standard of Care (SOC) and an intervention providing emotional support without targeting expectations (SUPPORT). In a 3-arm multi-center randomized, controlled, prospective trial (RCT), N = 567 patients scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomized to either SOC alone or SOC and EXPECT or SOC and SUPPORT. Patients will be randomized with a fixed unbalanced ratio of 3:3:1 (EXPECT: SUPPORT: SOC) to compare EXPECT to SOC and EXPECT to SUPPORT. Both psychological interventions consist of 2 in-person sessions (à 50 minute), 2 phone consultations (à 20 minute) during the week prior to surgery, and 1 booster phone consultation post-surgery 6 weeks later. Assessment will occur at baseline approx. 3-10 days before surgery, preoperatively the day before surgery, 4-6 days later, and 6 months after surgery. The study's primary end point will be patients' illness-related disability 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be patients' expectations, subjective illness beliefs, quality of life, length of hospital stay and blood sample parameters (eg, inflammatory parameters such as IL-6, IL-8, CRP). This large multi-center trial has the potential to corroborate and generalize the promising results of the PSY-HEART-I trial for routine care of cardiac surgery patients, and to stimulate revisions of treatment guidelines in heart surgery.

Endometrial Cancer Lymphadenectomy Trial (ECLAT) (pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with high risk of recurrence; AGO-OP.6).

BACKGROUND: The impact of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence is not reliably documented. The side effects of this procedure, including lymphedema and lymph cysts, are evident. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the absence of bulky nodes on 5 year overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II) and a high risk of recurrence. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy will increase 5 year overall survival from 75% (no lymphadenectomy) to 83%, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.65. TRIAL DESIGN: Open label, randomized, controlled trial. In arm A, a total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is performed. In arm B, in addition, a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein is performed. For all patients, vaginal brachytherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) are recommended. MAJOR INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer stages pT1b-pT2, all histological subtypes, and pT1a endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcomas can be included when bulky nodes are absent. When hysterectomy has already been performed (eg, for presumed low risk endometrial cancer), study participation is also possible. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with pT1a, G1 or 2 of type 1 histology or uterine sarcomas (except for carcinosarcomas), endometrial cancers of FIGO stage III or IV (except for microscopic lymph node metastases) or visual extrauterine disease. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Overall survival calculated from the date of randomization until death. SAMPLE SIZE: 640 patients will be enrolled in the study. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: At present, 252 patients have been recruited. Based on this, accrual should be completed in 2025. Results should be presented in 2031. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03438474.

Behavioural outcomes of subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications (EARLYSTIM trial): secondary analysis of an open-label randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Although subthalamic stimulation is a recognised treatment for motor complications in Parkinson's disease, reports on behavioural outcomes are controversial, which represents a major challenge when counselling candidates for subthalamic stimulation. We aimed to assess changes in behaviour in patients with Parkinson's disease receiving combined treatment with subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy over a 2-year follow-up period as compared with the behavioural evolution under medical therapy alone. METHODS: We did a parallel, open-label study (EARLYSTIM) at 17 surgical centres in France (n=8) and Germany (n=9). We recruited patients with Parkinson's disease who were disabled by early motor complications. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either medical therapy alone or bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. The primary outcome was mean change in quality of life from baseline to 2 years. A secondary analysis was also done to assess behavioural outcomes. We used the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease to assess changes in behaviour between baseline and 2-year follow-up. Apathy was also measured using the Starkstein Apathy Scale, and depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory. The secondary analysis was done in all patients recruited. We used a generalised estimating equations (GEE) regression model for individual items and mixed model regression for subscores of the Ardouin scale and the apathy and depression scales. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00354133. The primary analysis has been reported elsewhere; this report presents the secondary analysis only. FINDINGS: Between July, 2006, and November, 2009, 251 participants were recruited, of whom 127 were allocated medical therapy alone and 124 were assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. At 2-year follow-up, the levodopa-equivalent dose was reduced by 39% (-363·3 mg/day [SE 41·8]) in individuals allocated bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy and was increased by 21% (245·8 mg/day [40·4]) in those assigned medical therapy alone (p<0·0001). Neuropsychiatric fluctuations decreased with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy during 2-year follow-up (mean change -0·65 points [SE 0·15]) and did not change with medical therapy alone (-0·02 points [0·15]); the between-group difference in change from baseline was significant (p=0·0028). At 2 years, the Ardouin scale subscore for hyperdopaminergic behavioural disorders had decreased with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy (mean change -1·26 points [SE 0·35]) and had increased with medical therapy alone (1·12 points [0·35]); the between-group difference was significant (p<0·0001). Mean change from baseline at 2 years in the Ardouin scale subscore for hypodopaminergic behavioural disorders, the Starkstein Apathy Scale score, and the Beck Depression Inventory score did not differ between treatment groups. Antidepressants were stopped in 12 patients assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy versus four patients allocated medical therapy alone. Neuroleptics were started in nine patients assigned medical therapy alone versus one patient allocated bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy. During the 2-year follow-up, two individuals assigned bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy and one patient allocated medical therapy alone died by suicide. INTERPRETATION: In a large cohort with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications, better overall behavioural outcomes were noted with bilateral subthalamic stimulation plus medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone. The presence of hyperdopaminergic behaviours and neuropsychiatric fluctuations can be judged additional arguments in favour of subthalamic stimulation if surgery is considered for disabling motor complications. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, French Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National, and Medtronic.

Addition of vandetanib to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. A randomized phase I/II study of the AGO Study Group (AGO-OVAR 2.13).

BACKGROUND: PLD is a standard treatment in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Vandetanib is an oral once daily administered inhibitor of VEGFR-, EGFR- and RET-signaling with activity in combination with chemotherapy in some solid tumours. We aimed to establish a feasible combination therapy of PLD and vandetanib in ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with PLD 50 mg/m(2) q28 and vandetanib 100 mg/d po. It was planned to recruit at least 10 patients evaluable for toxicity over 2 treatment cycles. Primary endpoints were tolerability and safety; secondary endpoint was efficacy. RESULTS: Fourteen of 15 registered patients started treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. Three patients (21%) stopped after first cycle (PD, withdrawal of consent, nausea/vomiting). The remaining 11 patients were treated for at least 2 cycles. Dose reductions of PLD and vandetanib were indicated in 4 (29%) and 5 patients (36%), respectively. The following G3/4 toxicities occurred per patient: 2 (14%) elevated liver enzymes G3, 2 (14%) neutropenia G3/4, 5 (36%) PPE G3/4, 2 (14%) mucositis G3. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor attributed side effects like hypertension or bowel perforations were not reported. Toxicity led to cessation of treatment in 4 patients (29%). Ten patients were evaluable for response: PR 1, SD 4. The median PFS was 6.7 months and median OS was 11.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PLD 50 mg/m(2)q28 and vandetanib 100 mg/d is feasible, but may be intolerable due to reported toxicity.

Evaluation of potentially predictive markers for anti-angiogenic therapy with sunitinib in recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: In ovarian cancer, new therapeutic strategies are needed because the vast majority of patients develop a recurrence and resistance to platinum derivates. Attached to the AGO-OVAR2.11 study investigating the multityrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in recurrent platinum refractory ovarian cancers, this translational research project assesses the potential value of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble VEGF receptor-3 (sVEGFR-3), and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) levels for progression-free survival (PFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Longitudinal serum samples were taken while the patient was on study drugs. Serum concentration of VEGF, sVEGFR-3, and Ang-2 was determined by ELISA. The slope of the markers was correlated to the PFS. RESULTS: Patients showing a decrease in VEGF concentration had a median PFS of 10.5 months [confidence interval (CI), 2.89-12.25] compared to 2.9 months (CI, 1.48-5.32) in the case of an increase (P = .17). The stratified log-rank test showed a trend for longer PFS if a decrease of Ang-2 was observed (P = .089). Dichotomized in absolute decrease or increase, the PFS was 8.4 months (CI, 2.89-12.26) versus 2.7 months (CI, 1.05-5.32), respectively. Patients with a reduction of the sVEGFR-3 concentration had a median PFS of 4.76 months (CI 2.86-10.65) versus 8.61 months (CI, 1.05-not estimable) in patients with an increase of sVEGFR-3. This observation was statistically not significant in the log-rank test (P = .81). CONCLUSION: Ang-2 could potentially identify a patient population that might have a better PFS when under anti-angiogenic treatment, like the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib.

Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without lonafarnib in first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer stage IIB-IV.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates whether a molecular targeted therapy with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib added to standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) could improve progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized phase II study to compare standard therapy carboplatin (C; AUC 5) and paclitaxel (T; 175 mg/m(2)) in primary advanced OC with or without lonafarnib (L). Lonafarnib was given in a dose of 100mg orally twice a day during chemotherapy and was increased afterwards to 200mg up to six months as a maintenance therapy. RESULTS: 105 patients were recruited (53 patients were randomized to receive LTC, 52 to TC). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicity, occurred significantly more often with LTC (23% versus 4%, p=0.005) and was associated with a higher dropout rate. PFS and OS were not significantly different among both arms. The LTC arm showed inferiority in the stratum with residual tumor of more than 1cm: median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.2) compared with 16.4 (95% CI: 10.3-40.4) for TC (p=0.0141; HR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.15-0.84)) with median OS 20.6 months (95% CI: 13.1-31.0) and 43.4 months (95% CI: 15.7-) for the TC arm (p=0.012; HR=0.32 (95% CI: 0.13-0.8)). CONCLUSION: The addition of lonafarnib did not improve PFS or OS. Patients with a residual tumor of more than 1cm had significantly shorter PFS and OS. Incorporation of lonafarnib into future studies for primary therapy of OC is not recommended.

[Motivation for exercise of cancer patients--results of randomized-efficacy study]. / Motivation zu sportlicher Aktivität bei onkologischen Patienten nach der Rehabilitationsmassnahme--Ergebnisse einer randomisiert-kontrollierten Wirksamkeitsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training becomes more important in the rehabilitation of cancer patients. Within the framework of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change the motivation for exercise beyond the clinic residence is characterized by the stage of change concept and can build up with motivational interviewing. This randomized-controlled study analyses the effects of a motivational intervention over the time-period of 9 months. METHODS: Different questionnaires (self-efficacy expectations, decisional balance, and cognitive-affective processes and sports activity) were administered to 175 patients with cancer of a rehabilitation clinic. The intervention group participants received 3 telephone calls at intervals of 2 month. Follow-up time was 9 month after first study admission. At the end of the study 118 Patients were enrolled for analysis (dropout-rate: 32.56 %). To evaluate the effects of treatment nonparametric analysis for longitudinal data were used. RESULTS: The analysis shows significant positive time effects in the intervention and the control group for sports activity (U-value: -2.665; p = 0.008) irrespective of group membership. There were not any significant interaction effects of the other dependent variables. Because the results for the domain decisional balance were not congruent with the assumptions of the TTM further studies should evaluate the suitability for patients with cancer.

[Motivation for exercise of cancer patients--a longitudinal study of the Transtheoretical Model (TTM)]. / Motivation zu sportlicher Aktivität bei onkologischen Patienten nach der Rehabilitationsmassnahme--eine Verlaufsstudie zum Transtheoretischen Modell.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training becomes more important in the rehabilitation of cancer patients. Training programs of rehabilitation centers provides different degrees of difficulty for patients with cancer. Within the framework of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change the motivation for exercise beyond the clinic residence is characterized by the stage of change concept. This study analyses the assumptions of the Transtheoretical Model over the time-period of three months. METHODS: Different TTM-questionnaires (a staging algorithm, self-efficacy expectations, decisional balance, and processes of change) were administered two times to a sample of 121 cancer patients of the rehabilitation clinic. Patients were classified into three groups having regarded individual changes of motivational readiness between the two points in time (regression, unchanged, progression). Statistical analyses of variance were used to test the assumptions of differences between the groups in terms of the dependent variables. RESULTS: The analysis shows significant differences between the three groups for self-efficacy expectations and behavioral processes of change. This result supports the theory, while the constructs decisional balance and cognitive-affective processes do not differ significant.